Posts Tagged ‘Catholic’

A few good links

Monday, April 9th, 2012

A few links I found interesting for one reason or another:

Outside the Asylum – The Church of Feliks Dzerzhinsky

The Biblical World – Cursing Your Enemies the Bible Way: Still yet another way not to use the Bible.

The Jerusalem Post – Another Orwellian day at the UN

Pravoslavie – Historical Christian Cemetery demolished in Kerman, Iran

Nick’s Catholic Blog – Does the Letter of 3rd John refute Protestantism?

Psychology Today – It’s a Fine Line between Narcissism and Egocentrism

Catholic Church Conservation – The Catholic Church in the Holy Land plans in future to celebrate Easter according to the Orthodox calendar.

A few good links

Friday, April 6th, 2012

A few links I found interesting for one reason or another:

Ugley Vicar – Is the BBC getting ‘revenge’ on Andrew Lansley over abortion investigation?

Turtle Bay and Beyond – Grotesque: EU Fundamental Rights Agency fabricates data on “LGBT discrimination”

A Grain of Sand – Social Conservatives Are Evil

National Catholic Register – Thomas Merton’s Prophetic Warning About Social Media

Rod Dreher – The Perverse Joy of Apocalypse

The Gospel Coalition – The Cross and Christian Blogging

Shameless Popery – Are We to Take the Bible “Literally”?

Catholic Voices – The Pink News smear that debases the debate

A Brief Encounter Blog: A reciprocated plug

Thursday, April 5th, 2012

The excellent A Brief Encounter blog has posted in celebration of my third blogiversary.

Now, if you’re thinking ugh, talk about an exercise in self-mutual appreciation and back slapping, well, you’re dead right. That’s exactly what this is, and believe me us beleaguered Christian bloggers need to indulge in this once in a while.

On a serious note, if you’re not following Gregg’s blog, you jolly well should be. And you can easily hassle him on Twitter, which is convenient.

A word of warning though, Gregg says it as it is, no holds barred, straight from the hip. Consider yourself warned. I will publicly mention Gregg’s terrible weakness however, which is listening to the radio in his car. Nothing is guaranteed to infuriate him more, and get his fingers pounding the keyboard. He has tried to quit the radio unsuccessfully, and between you and I, I think he’s a hopeless addict.

Anyway, Gregg mentions that we have met in ‘real life’ and contrary to malicious rumours that I never leave the house due to lions, I can confirm that it is indeed true that Gregg has been party to this wonderful honour.

Here’s to Gregg!

Simply a top guy and a top Catholic.

A few good links

Friday, March 30th, 2012

A few links I found interesting for one reason or another:

Outside the Asylum – Making a mockery of reason

Entangled States – The new religion of space exploration

Accepting Abundance – Science Came From Catholic Doctrine

PyroManiacs – Spurgeon on Depression

Wittenburgdoor – Noah’s Blog

Lisa Graas – Grasping at Dogma is Not Grasping at Straws

Standpoint Mag – Beware the Fausts of Neuroscience

Ad Populum Diversion

Thursday, March 29th, 2012

Dr. Taylor Marshall has an excellent blog post up identifying 7 popular diversion strategies employed in discussions relating to philosophy and theology.

Diversion number 5 particularly caught my attention:

5. Ad Populum Diversion – ad populum means “to the people”. This diversion appeals to the masses or what everybody does.

“Contraception cannot be sinful. Everybody does it. Even Catholics.”

“How can Catholicism be the true religion? There are billions on earth who aren’t Catholic.”

“Abortion isn’t wrong. The UN sanctions it.” (This is also an ad verecundiam diversion)

I suspect this will resonate with many of us.

This got me to thinking. Very often Christians are belittled for being ‘out of date’ or ‘not with the times’ in issues of morality and ethics and what have you.

However, just because the majority of modern society deems something as acceptable, does this mean it is so?

Well, we could appeal to democracy as our gauge and argue that we have a society based on principles that most folk adhere to. But what of the dead?

I mean by this of course, tradition.

If we live in a democracy that is favourable to undermining traditional values, then do we not at the same time deny our forefathers their democratic say? In undermining our ancestors view on morality and ethics, are we not simply casting them aside as in error?

But were they in error, or are we?

I’ll hand over to Chesterton at this point to clarify my meaning.

This is taken from Orthodoxy which I’ve just finished reading and am now moving on to The Everlasting Man. In Chesterton I can finally say I have met my Catholic Spurgeon.

But there is one thing that I have never from my youth up been able to understand. I have never been able to understand where people got the idea that democracy was in some way opposed to tradition. It is obvious that tradition is only democracy extended through time. It is trusting to a consensus of common human voices rather than to some isolated or arbitrary record.

The man who quotes some German historian against the tradition of the Catholic Church, for instance, is strictly appealing to aristocracy. He is appealing to the superiority of one expert against the awful authority of a mob.

It is quite easy to see why a legend is treated, and ought to be treated, more respectfully than a book of history. The legend is generally made by the majority of people in the village, who are sane. The book is generally written by the one man in the village who is mad. Those who urge against tradition that men in the past were ignorant may go and urge it at the Carlton Club, along with the statement that voters in the slums are ignorant. It will not do for us.

If we attach great importance to the opinion of ordinary men in great unanimity when we are dealing with daily matters, there is no reason why we should disregard it when we are dealing with history or fable.

Tradition may be defined as an extension of the franchise. Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death.

Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our father. I, at any rate, cannot separate the two ideas of democracy and tradition; it seems evident to me that they are the same idea. We will have the dead at our councils. The ancient Greeks voted by stones; these shall vote by tombstones. It is all quite regular and official, for most tombstones, like most ballot papers, are marked with a cross.

I have first to say, therefore, that if I have had a bias, it was always a bias in favour of democracy, and therefore of tradition. Before we come to any theoretic or logical beginnings I am content to allow for that personal equation; I have always been more inclined to believe the ruck of hard-working people than to believe that special and troublesome literary class to which I belong.

I prefer even the fancies and prejudices of the people who see life from the inside to the clearest demonstrations of the people who see life from the outside. I would always trust the old wives’ fables against the old maids’ facts. As long as wit is mother wit it can be as wild as it pleases.

I think we cast aside traditional thinking on morals and ethics at our peril…..

A few good links

Wednesday, March 14th, 2012

A few links I found interesting for one reason or another:

Toronto Sun – Protestants more suicidal than Catholics: Study

SPIKED – The devaluation of disabled people’s lives

TIME – Study: Narcissism and Religion an Unethical Mix

The Anchoress – Ban the Divine Comedy? Really?

Christian Today – Nearly half the world’s migrants are Christians – Pew study

CounterCultural Father – Protesting too much – In which I’m described as indefatigable and always interesting – always gonna get a link ;-)

Sultan Knish – How I Became a Hate Group

Cranmer’s Curate – Pop Idol Generation Not Bothered About Free Speech

#Anonymous vigilante hacking group have now launched attack against Vatican Website

Wednesday, March 7th, 2012

Blast. Just two days after I blog about vigilante hacking group Anonymous‘ unsuccessful endeavour to attack the Vatican website, it looks like they’ve gone and done it.

On Wednesday afternoon, the Vatican’s website stopped working at around 3:00 o clock, after reportedly being hacked. Apparently, a group known as “Anonymous” claimed responsibility for this. On the Vatican’s website, vatican.va, the issue is described as a “technical problem that’s being solved.”

The Vatican website is currently unavailable.

The Italian branch of Anonymous are apparently targeting “the corrupt Catholic Church” and say in a statement:

“Anonymous decided today to besiege your site in response to the doctrine, to the liturgies, to the absurd and anachronistic concepts that your for-profit organisation spreads around the world.

This attack is not against the Christian religion or the faithful around the world but against the corrupt Roman Apostolic Church.”

They also blather on about protesting the execution of heretics and the burning of books during the Inquisition, the selling of indulgences in the 16th century, and more recently, the sexual abuse of children by priests.

They also accuse the Vatican of being “retrograde” in its interfering in Italian domestic affairs “daily”.

Criminal cyber losers….

UPDATE: Just found the entire statement from Anonymous:

hello Vatican.va

Anonymous has now decided to lay siege to your site in response to the doctrines, liturgies and the precepts absurd and anachronistic that your organization is for profit (Roman Apostolic Church) propagates and spreads worldwide.

You have burned books of immense historical and literary value, you barbarously executed your fiercest detractors and critics over the centuries, have denied universally deemed valid or plausible theories, have led the unwary to pay to get access to paradise with the sale of indulgences.

Have you been guilty of riduazione enslavement of entire populations, using as a pretext your mission of evangelization and the spread of Christianity in the world.

In more recent times have played a significant role in helping Nazi war criminals find refuge in foreign countries and to evade international justice.

Let every day many of the units within the clergy may be responsible of molesting children, covering them when the facts become public domain.

Italy must tolerate interference in your daily life, public policy and social damage, and all that entails.

Do you have property and businesses for the value of billions of euros, on which you have strong tax incentives.

You refuse to decree, practices and objects result of progress such as condoms or abortion as a clinical wounds to eradicate.

You retrogadi, one of the last bastions of an era forunatamente past, and destined anon repeated.

We sincerely hope that the Lateran Treaty will finally be revised in the near future and will come … what you are relegated to a relic of times gone by.

This is NOT intended to attack the true Christian religion and the faithful around the world, but to the corrupt Roman Apostolic Church and all its emanations

UPDATE: It’s 7:40 AM – 8th March and Vatican website up and running as normal, so that was shortlived!

A few good links

Wednesday, March 7th, 2012

A few links I found interesting for one reason or another:

Peter Ould – Richard Coles on Gay Marriage

iBenedictines – How to be a Good Sinner

Brendan O’neill (Telegraph) – Gay marriage is now the issue through which the elite advertises its superiority over the redneck masses

The Deacon’s Bench – “The dominant Catholic narrative of our time is not decline, but astronomic growth”

UK Human Rights Blog – Catholic midwives must continue indirect role in abortions, despite human rights protections

Ligonier – Theological Narcissism

Spiked – God save us from atheist whining

Jack of Kent – The Outing of Bloggers

Pastoral letter from Archbishops Nichols and Smith on same-sex marriage

Tuesday, March 6th, 2012

This is the full text of the pastoral letter written by Archbishop Vincent Nichols and Archbishop Peter Smith on ‘gay marriage’ which is to be read out in all Catholic parishes this weekend:

This week the Coalition Government is expected to present its consultation paper on the proposed change in the legal definition of marriage so as to open the institution of marriage to same-sex partnerships.

Today we want to put before you the Catholic vision of marriage and the light it casts on the importance of marriage for our society.

The roots of the institution of marriage lie in our nature. Male and female we have been created, and written into our nature is this pattern of complementarity and fertility. This pattern is, of course, affirmed by many other religious traditions. Christian teaching fills out this pattern and reveals its deepest meaning, but neither the Church nor the State has the power to change this fundamental understanding of marriage itself. Nor is this simply a matter of public opinion.

Understood as a lifelong commitment between a man and a woman, and for the creation and upbringing of children, marriage is an expression of our fundamental humanity. Its status in law is the prudent fruit of experience, for the good of the spouses and the good of the family. In this way society esteems the married couple as the source and guardians of the next generation. As an institution marriage is at the foundation of our society.

There are many reasons why people get married. For most couples, there is an instinctive understanding that the stability of a marriage provides the best context for the flourishing of their relationship and for bringing up their children. Society recognises marriage as an important institution for these same reasons: to enhance stability in society and to respect and support parents in the crucial task of having children and bringing them up as well as possible.

The Church starts from this appreciation that marriage is a natural institution, and indeed the Church recognises civil marriage. The Catholic understanding of marriage, however, raises this to a new level. As the Catechism says: ‘The matrimonial covenant, by which a man and a woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life, by its nature is ordered toward the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring; this covenant between baptised persons has been raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a sacrament.’ (para.1601)

These rather abstract words are reflected however imperfectly in the experience of married couples. We know that at the heart of a good marriage is a relationship of astonishing power and richness, for the couple, their children, their wider circle of friends and relations and society. As a Sacrament, this is a place where divine grace flows. Indeed, marriage is a sharing in the mystery of God’s own life: the unending and perfect flow of love between Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

We know, too, that just as God’s love is creative, so too the love of husband and wife is creative of new life. It is open, in its essence, to welcoming new life, ready to love and nurture that life to its fullness, not only here on earth but also into eternity.

This is a high and noble vision, for marriage is a high and noble vocation. It is not easily followed. But we are sure that Christ is at the heart of marriage, for his presence is a sure gift of the God who is Love, who wants nothing more than for the love of husband and wife to find its fulfilment. So the daily effort that marriage requires, the many ways in which family living breaks and reshapes us, is a sharing in the mission of Christ, that of making visible in the world the creative and forgiving love of God.

In these ways we understand marriage to be a call to holiness for a husband and wife, with children recognised and loved as the gift of God, with fidelity and permanence as the boundaries which create its sacred space. Marriage is also a crucial witness in our society, contributing to its stability, its capacity for compassion and forgiveness and its future, in a way that no other institution can.

In putting before you these thoughts about why marriage is so important, we also want to recognise the experience of those who have suffered the pain of bereavement or relationship breakdown and their contribution to the Church and society. Many provide a remarkable example of courage and fidelity. Many strive to make the best out of difficult and complex situations. We hope that they are always welcomed and helped to feel valued members of our parish communities.

The reasons given by our government for wanting to change the definition of marriage are those of equality and discrimination. But our present law does not discriminate unjustly when it requires both a man and a woman for marriage. It simply recognises and protects the distinctive nature of marriage.

Changing the legal definition of marriage would be a profoundly radical step. Its consequences should be taken seriously now. The law helps to shape and form social and cultural values. A change in the law would gradually and inevitably transform society’s understanding of the purpose of marriage. It would reduce it just to the commitment of the two people involved. There would be no recognition of the complementarity of male and female or that marriage is intended for the procreation and education of children.

We have a duty to married people today, and to those who come after us, to do all we can to ensure that the true meaning of marriage is not lost for future generations.

With every blessing

Most Reverend V. Nichols, Most Reverend P. Smith
11 March 2012

This pastoral letter seems to be eliciting near hysteria in some quarters.

What do you think?

On a related note, I must say that I’m quite surprised at the number of signatories on the ‘Coalition for Marriage’ petition, which currently stands at some 105,984!

A few good links

Monday, February 27th, 2012

A few links I found interesting for one reason or another:

Barna Research – How Pastors Plan to Improve their Churches

Ethics and Foreign Policy – Developing an Understanding of Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

CounterCultural Father – On Being a Bigot

New York Times – Suicide Bomber Kills 3 in Nigeria

PsychCentral – The Addictive Personality: Why Recovery is a Lifetime Thing

The Deacon’s Bench – New call for divorced and remarried Catholics to be able to receive communion

Telegraph – Mark Thompson: BBC director general admits Christianity gets tougher treatment

Switch to our mobile site