<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk/2012/09/14/quote-day-235/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk/2012/09/14/quote-day-235/</link>
	<description>I am not out of my mind, most excellent Festus, but I utter words of sober truth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goy</title>
		<link>http://blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk/2012/09/14/quote-day-235/comment-page-1/#comment-88806</link>
		<dc:creator>Goy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk/?p=26672#comment-88806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;In hoc signo vinces†&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt;&quot; ... denigrated and insulted by that freedom of speech.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

The question is simple what is the author apologising for is it freedom of speech or is it hate-speech?

The premise of this proxy apology is that the freedom of speech was hate-speech and that call makes the proxy apology an apology for the existence of freedom of speech.

Prior condition and the after the fact extortion of (proxy) apology makes a nonsense of equally and freely expressed speech.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In hoc signo vinces†</b></p>
<p><i>&#8221; &#8230; denigrated and insulted by that freedom of speech.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>The question is simple what is the author apologising for is it freedom of speech or is it hate-speech?</p>
<p>The premise of this proxy apology is that the freedom of speech was hate-speech and that call makes the proxy apology an apology for the existence of freedom of speech.</p>
<p>Prior condition and the after the fact extortion of (proxy) apology makes a nonsense of equally and freely expressed speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
