ASA rejects complaints about Coalition for Marriage advert

Sanity Prevails:

The Advertising Standards Authority has rejected complaints that an advert from the campaign group the Coalition for Marriage, which said that most people wanted marriage to remain unchanged, was misleading and offensive.

The group, which lobbies for marriage to remain as the union of two people of the opposite sex, ran adverts that appeared in The Daily Telegraph and the magazine Country Life. The adverts featured pictures of couples on their wedding day and included text that said 70 per cent of people wanted marriage to remain unchanged.

“If you want to keep the true meaning of marriage as it is, and has been for thousands of years, say ‘I do’ – by signing our petition,” the advert said.

Twenty-six people complained to the ASA about the adverts. Complainants said the claim that 70 per cent of people wanted marriage to remain unchanged was misleading and the advert was offensive.

The Coalition for Marriage told the ASA that the 70 per cent claim was based on a survey of more than 2,000 people carried out by the polling company ComRes. It said that images of couples appeared regularly in the media and that the aim of the advert was to defend the definition of marriage.

The group said it believed that those complaining were intolerant of opposing views.

The ASA concluded that the complaints were not offensive and was satisfied that the 70 per cent claim was supported by sufficient evidence.

SOURCE

You can read about the initial Advertising Standards Authority ‘investigation’ which was served on the blogger Cranmer along with dozens of links to those who blogged in support.

Cranmer has today blogged his response to the ruling.

Tags: , ,

4 Responses to “ASA rejects complaints about Coalition for Marriage advert”

  1. Archbishop Cranmer Says:

    Bless you, but you have the wrong link to His Grace’s response:

    http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/asa-adjudication-on-coalition-for.html

  2. slwoolverton Says:

    “those complaining were intolerant of opposing views.”

    Love it. Those groups are always claiming ppl like Coalition for Marriage members are intolerant becasue they express their beliefs with conviction. So, I think it is great to see a little turning of the tables.

  3. Tim Says:

    Achoo!

  4. Simian Says:

    Was there ever any doubt about this? If I was a conspiracy theorist I’d say the whole thing was a C4M plot to drum up mock outrage and support! ;-)

Switch to our mobile site