Clearing the Ground Parliamentary enquiry – by Christians in Parliament – into Christian freedom in the UK

The much anticipated Parliamentary inquiry called: Clearing the Ground, has been released. The premise of the report was to examine evidence on whether Christians are poorly treated by the law and if they are being pushed out of society.

It was run by Christians in Parliament, chaired by Conservative MP Gary Streeter, and supported by the Evangelical Alliance.

Here is a link to the Evangelical Alliance website which hosts the report.

And here are some of the key findings from the Executive Summary:

Context

Christians in the UK are not persecuted. To suggest that they are is to minimise the suffering of Christians in many parts of the world who face repression, imprisonment and death if they worship, preach or convert.

The recent wave of Christians in the courts does not in and of itself demonstrate that Christianity is badly treated.

However, the frequency and nature of the cases indicates a narrowing of the space for the articulation, expression and demonstration of Christian belief.

Some of the legal activity, associated campaigning and media coverage has been unwise and possibly counter-productive to the positive role that Christians play in society.

Religious Illiteracy

There is a high level of religious illiteracy which has led to many situations where religious belief is misunderstood and subsequently restricted. This comes from a social and cultural minimisation of Christianity in public life.

Religious illiteracy has led to legal restrictions on the way that faith can be expressed. Recent changes have compelled Christians to provide services that they had never previously offered and which may be contrary to their beliefs.

Accommodation of Religious Belief

It is evident that in some cases considerable effort is made to accommodate religious belief, with employers willing to make arrangements to ensure that employees do not have to participate in activities which would infringe their convictions.

In many cases, there is a failure to achieve sufficient accommodation, and in some cases to even attempt to understand or accommodate belief and its manifestation.

Findings

The experiences of Christians in the UK seeking to live out their beliefs and speak freely illustrate a very real problem in the way religious belief, and in particular Christianity is understood and handled. The problem is a pressing challenge to our idea of a plural society.

The way that the media cover many of the cases and the associated issues is often poor and contributes to perceptions of a polarisation between Christianity and public life.

The inquiry made the following specific findings:

The Equality Act 2010 fails to deal with the tensions between different strands of equality policy.

Court decisions have relegated religious beliefs below other strands and effectively created a hierarchy of rights.

The place of religious belief suffers because companies, institutions and the government do not take sufficient action to accommodate it.

The 1986 Public Order Act, and specifically Section 5, places the bar too low through its prohibition on insulting language.

The policing of the Public Order Act and other legislation demonstrates a lack of understanding of what is a legitimate expression of Christian belief.

Government departments handle religious belief in a complex and confused manner and lack sufficient coordination.

Advice from government departments on how to handle religious belief in the public sector varies and in many cases fails to grasp the nature and implications of belief.

Guidance from professional bodies on religious belief often fails to understand, and therefore safeguard, a role for belief in public life.

Across the UK, local authorities handle their relationships with religious groups in very different ways.

Some authorities demonstrate excellent understanding and cooperation, while some authorities place unnecessary barriers to wider Christian contribution.

These findings form the inquiry’s conclusion that there is a problem with how Christianity is understood and handled in Britain today. This problem is legal and cultural. It plays out on a national, local and personal level through laws, policies and regulations that restrict the freedom of Christians to articulate and live out their beliefs.

Recommendations:

There are specific and necessary steps which the government should take, and national and local bodies should implement to enable Christians and other faiths to have greater confidence in their freedom to express their beliefs.

The committee heard from many witnesses supporting the introduction of statutory guidelines for reasonable accommodation. This would mean that employers and service providers have to make an effort to accommodate religious beliefs in a similar manner as they currently do with disabilities. This sort of approach acknowledges diversity and rather than promote a single universal resolution to a situation accepts that in different cases the response may, and often should, vary.

The Inquiry Recommends:

Reasonable accommodation is a concept that has merit and warrants further consideration. If proved viable it may help prevent legal cases where religious activity is unduly restricted.

Areas of the law that permit the arrest of individuals for insulting behaviour need to be significantly amended or reinforced with guidance that permits freedom for preaching and the public articulation of Christian beliefs.

Guidance for local authorities on how to deal with faith groups needs to be strengthened.

Professional bodies need better guidance relating to religious identity, activity and freedom.

Better guidance for government departments and professional bodies to help accommodate religious belief and the way it works itself out in everyday life.

Clear guidelines should be provided to local authorities to reaffirm that children can be adopted and fostered by people with religious beliefs.

Better coordination is needed of policy relating to religion in and across government, and urgent effort is required to address religious illiteracy.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission should be reviewed and restructured to better include and represent religious beliefs.

The problems that Christians face are far from universal, but they do represent a trend towards a reduction in the space given to belief in public life. As a result this leads to an assumption that religious belief should be a private activity.

Christians in Parliament intends to use the findings and recommendations in this report as a basis for dialogue with other faith groups on the broader question of religion in public life. The report will also be discussed with the government, the Equality and Human Rights Commission and other groups to see how we can find a way to resolve these complex but important issues.

How the Church Should Respond:

Many of the challenges identified are not wholly the responsibility of the government to resolve. There is a growing need for churches and Christian organisations to take responsibility when their actions may have contributed to a perception that the scale of the problem facing Christians is greater than it is.

Christians have, and will always, experience tensions between their beliefs and the shifting values of the societies that they live in. To some extent the present tensions should be seen as an encouragement of faithful witness.

Ahead of bringing cases to court, Christians need to consider the potential impact their actions might have on politics, public opinion and the confidence of other Christians in their mission.

The last century saw a privatisation of faith and the development of a sacred-secular divide through which Christianity lost much of its social and political influence. Now, too often the Church is defined by what it opposes rather than what it stands for. It is essential that Christians once again provide hope and a vision for society that goes beyond defending their own interests and includes the good of all.

For many Christians public life is seen as a way of living out their beliefs, and across all denominations there is a growing awareness of the need to respond to the challenges that face our communities, nation and world. This shift is already transforming many, often deprived, parts of the country, however, there is much more that remains to be done in demonstrating this vital role of faith.

Christians need to take seriously their historical role in leading and serving in public life, and church discipleship needs to account for this role – because the gospel is good news for society.

Cranmer was first out of the blocks to blog on this. I’ll add links here, as and when folk comment.

9 comments on this post.
  1. Tim:

    Have you read the offering from the Daily Telegraph as well?

    “The BBC director general Mark Thompson has claimed that Christianity is treated with less sensitivity than other religions because it is ‘pretty broad shoulders’….‘I complain in the strongest possible terms’, is different from, ‘I complain in the strongest possible terms and I am loading my AK47 as I write’,” he said. “This definitely raises the stakes.””

  2. Gordon:

    This misses one of the main points, that many Christians believe that opposition to their beliefs is evidence that they are correct, no matter how bizarre those beliefs may be. Fundamentalism relies on producing evidence of such “persecution” to prove itself and its why fundamentalists like to make more of these cases than there often is to them.

    As a non Christian working in a Christian organisation I find it at times quite intimidating and uncomfortable, but I am unlikely to be heading to court over it. I knew what I was getting into when I took the job and I think Christians should accept that they will get a bit of aggro for their beliefs.

    As someone once said to me:

    “Expecting the world to treat you fairly because you’re a Christian is like expecting a bull not to charge at you because you are a vegetarian.”

    Its all part of life and people need to get a bit less sensitive.

  3. Gordon:

    Mark Thompson: “He suggested other faiths had “very close identity with ethnic minorities” and as a result were covered in a more careful way by broadcasters.”

    This is something often overlooked by people who compare the treatment of Islam to the treatment of Christianity. Islam is a religion of birth, not choice so its a race issue and in fact the BNP and other fascist groups use the word “muslim” as an alternative to racial words they are now not allowed to use in public. This focuses the issue on religion but its really about race.

    In Scotland catholicism is treated in the same way as islam, presumably for the same reason – it is a religion of birth not choice, and anti catholic prejudice is historically anti Irish prejudice.

  4. Tim:

    Gordon, Islam is not a race issue, and if you believe it is then I have to wonder where you have been living this past few years. It is a belief system, and a fascist one at that. There are Arab Muslims, there are also Arab Christians, Pakistani Muslims and Pakistani Christians, Malaysian Muslims and Malaysian Christians, African Muslims and African Christians and so on. Do you honestly expect anyone of any intelligence to swallow that old cods-wallop about it being a race issue?

  5. Gillan Scott:

    Mark Thompson’s comments should come as no surprise to anyone who watches television. The Clearing the Ground report discusses the media on page 23 and basically draws the same conclusions.

    This is why programmes such as Rev are so refreshing, portraying Christians in a much better light. It’s not all bad from the BBC, just a lot of it…

  6. Gordon:

    Tim: In public life in the UK the word “Islam” is coterminus with the word “Asian”. Sorry if that offends you, but the majority of muslims are from ethnic minorities and mainly from asia. They never chose to be muslims just as they didn’t choose to be asian. This is why it is different from protestant Christianity which is increasingly a religion of choice and not something you are born into. This is why Islam is treated differently to Christianity.

    The example I gave of catholicism is identical in Scotland where irish heritage and being a catholic are the same thing and why catholicism gets special treatment in anti bigotry measures.

  7. Tim:

    No Gordon, it is the mainstream media which conflates the words Asian and Muslim e.g. Asian gangs attack such and such, Asian youths protest such and such, Asian youths in court over drug-dealing, pimping, prostitution etc. It is not Asian, it is one demographic and one demographic alone i.e. Muslim. Clearly a Guardian reader I suggest you go back there and leave the real world to people that can actually face up to it.

  8. Gordon:

    You seem to be quick to judge others and seem to know me inside out without ever having met me!

  9. Tim:

    Yes I’m clever like that.