Friday Question: If we have no coherent framework of normative belief how do we define divergence from reality?
Friday, December 16th, 2011Doug Chaplin is one of those bloggers who doesn’t post much, but you really wish he did.
In Doug’s post entitled: Belief and Insanity, he relays his brief interaction with a chap who exhibited ‘deviant thinking’, or probably better described as ‘delusional thinking’. Doug notes that there appeared to be a: “dissociation from what most of us would recognise as reality”.
Now, Psychotic disorders and delusion are often intimately entwined, with the latter being a symptom of the former.
So how exactly do we define delusional psychosis? Perhaps we could define it as:
Holding unusual beliefs, which other people don’t experience or share.
or
Loss of contact with reality.
or
A false belief held with absolute conviction despite superior evidence.
I suspect many Christians will have come across accusations inferring ‘delusion’, ‘madness’ or ‘insanity’ in regard to Christian beliefs. It’s no coincidence that Richard Dawkins’ famous book was entitled: “The God Delusion”.
Sadly, there is no doubt that there are indeed Christians who hold to delusional beliefs. For example, I was Tweeted yesterday:
After the destruction of Vatican this March 2012 any Christian that pay tax will die like Ananias and Saphira on 2018
There is no doubt in my mind that this is an example of delusional thinking; however, I also have no doubt that many would view my beliefs as delusional.
If we stick with the assumption of ‘delusion’ as a symptom of psychosis, we are in reality designating ‘delusion’ to the realm of severe mental illness. It is no secret that Dawkins is sympathetic to Robert Pirsig’s statement: “when one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion”.
In modern times I think it would be fair to say that we have lost an overarching cultural narrative in our society that most would adhere to, and now we have a plethora of plurality of systems of belief and worldview.
In the past, deviation from the overarching narrative held by most of the community, may have incurred the label ‘insane’. The growing tendency in this day and age to label religious belief as ‘insane’ says something for the growth of new, alternative, narratives. In fact, in a plurality of belief systems, will we not witness more and more instances in which folk look upon – and view – those with alternative narratives, as delusional or insane?
If this would be the case and the fragmentation of beliefs and cutural narratives continues apace, could we end up with no coherent framework of normative belief, and if so, how then do we define divergence from reality?
Thinking back to my brief and crude attempt to define delusional psychosis:
Holding unusual beliefs, which other people don’t experience or share
This will no longer be valid with such a plethora of beliefs.
loss of contact with reality
With so many different ‘realities’ believed by so many, how will we define ‘reality’?
A false belief held with absolute conviction despite superior evidence.
How will we decide what evidence is superior?
Doug ends on a thought provoking and slightly ominous note:
I do wonder, however, whether a scientific society with fewer shared and more widely divergent beliefs will either resort more readily to “insanity” an an explanation of unacceptable difference of belief (with its accompanying treatment, perhaps?) or will fail in the care it needs to give those who have a genuine medical problem because deviant belief can no longer serve any indexical value of an inability to cope with reality.
And I think that might be something to worry about.
And so the ‘Friday Question’ becomes:
If we have no coherent framework of normative belief, nor an overarching cultural narrative, how do we define divergence from reality? How will we define delusion?
I’ll pop this in at the end here as it is purely anecdotal, but I have experienced, and know of others that have experienced, Psychiatrists that would most certainly view religious belief in delusional terms.
And just to say that there’s a universe more to say on the subject of psychosis and delusional thinking, but I needed to keep this as simple and short as possible and so forgive any crude oversimplifications.



