A beautiful Geological account in my local paper topped off by a random mention of Young Earth Creationists?
Saturday, December 31st, 2011In the centre spread of my local free paper is a wonderful account of the geological marvels of my local Forest of Dean. Here’s some snippets:
The Soudley Valley today is a peaceful and scenic place, teeming with wildlife and with a little stream winding through its heart.
It makes it almost impossible to imagine the landscape that David Owen describes as as we begin our walk following one of Gloucestershire Geology Trust’s Trails. “400 million years ago Britain was part of the supercontinent known as the Pangaea that had existed for about 100 million years and would last for another 200 million years,” he says.
“This part of the continent was almost completely South of the equator and would have been a hot, arid landscape. Pretty much all of the Forest of Dean, however, formed part of the river estuary four times wider than the Amazon today.” It was totally unlike the Amazon however as at this point in Earth’s history there was little complex life at all on land.
David says: “Although there were fish in the sea, there were no plants as we know them today at all and certainly no large animals on land.”
This fascinating piece continues bursting with interesting facts and cites the oldest rocks in the forest as being some 400 million years old!
David Owen continues:
By now we have reached 350 million years ago. Still well before the dinasours but at the point where plants were beginning to colonise the land in numbers and fish had crawled out of the water and evolved to breath and walk on dry land.
It’s at this point when life began to flourish on land, that much of the mineral wealth of the Forest was formed. In geological terms, humans have been here for very little time at all, but their impact has been huge. People have been closely entwined with the geology of this area ever since they moved here a mere few thousand years ago. They exploited iron, coal and stone which had formed millions of years earlier.
I’ll leave the piece here, but you get the drift; this is an informative and interesting article and comes complete with nice pictures of rocks.
But this article also comes complete with something rather odd.
I abruptly stopped reading half way through, when my eye caught sight of large red rectangle box embedded at the end of the article, emblazoned with this heading:
YOUNG EARTH CREATIONISM.
Here’s what is said within the box:
Scientists are almost unanimous in their agreement that the earth is billions of years old. In fact, it’s probably one of the few areas of science in which there is such complete agreement. There are a few Christians and Jews who disagree however and date our planet, as our predecessors in Biblical times did, at between 5,0000 and 10,000 years old. They believe that the earth was created, as Genesis describes, in a very short period of time. David says: “It is possible to have strong religious beliefs and reconcile that with modern scientific thought. I have a colleague who is working on some of the oldest rocks on the planet, believed to have been formed not long after the Big Bang. He’s also a committed Christian.”
Seriously why did they have to spoil a perfectly good geological piece with this condescending rubbish? What possible motivation could they have had. It certainly adds nothing to the scientific understanding.
What on earth was the point of it? Can anyone tell me?
It’s just plain weird to me.



