Archive for March, 2011

Dr. Robert Enright: Practicing forgiveness can benefit greatly in terms of mental health.

Saturday, March 5th, 2011

“As a person forgives and they bare the pain of what happened to them, they realize that they are stronger than they ever knew, and they are able to stand up and mercifully face what has happened with compassion and that tends to make people stronger.”

“If we are truly motivated to reduce resentment we will get rid of some of that anger, and our psychological science shows that even if some of the resentment is reduced, people then can benefit greatly in terms of their emotional health.”

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) Apologises to Christians

Friday, March 4th, 2011

Following the recent court case involving the Christian foster carers Eunice and Owen Johns, Derby City Council, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), the EHRC have apologised to Christians and to Mr and Mrs Johns:

Earlier this week the case of Johns v Derby City Council, in which the Commission had intervened, attracted some attention. Unfortunately a mistake within our legal submission led to an inference that we did not intend and which was misconstrued as suggesting that the Commission equates Christian moral views with an infection. This oversight was caused by a drafting error in our submissions to the court.  This should have been picked up in our internal clearance process for the legal documentation and does not represent the position of the Commission in any way.

Furthermore, the Commission entirely rejects any view (as reported in the media) that rights in relation to sexual orientation ‘take precedence’ over religious rights. The Commission fully upholds the rights of looked-after children to be supported in their chosen religion or that of their family, in the context of the paramount importance of the welfare of the child.

The Equality Act provides protection against discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief as well as on the grounds of sexual orientation and the Commission has produced extensive guidance to explain this legislation, which was introduced by Parliament.

The Commission has written to Mr and Mrs Johns to apologise.

Source

Wonders will never cease….

Quote of the Day

Friday, March 4th, 2011

Some days are like that. You win a hat for having a sexy bald head, but your pig comes up short in the big race.

Source

Christianity the reason for West’s success, say the Chinese

Thursday, March 3rd, 2011

In the West we are doing our best to destroy our Christian heritage but in China, Chinese intellectuals are coming around to the view that it is precisely this heritage that has made the West so successful.?

Former editor of the Sunday Telegraph, Dominic Lawson, in a review in the Sunday Times of Niall Ferguson’s new book, ‘Civilisation: The West and the Rest’, carries a quote from a member of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in which he tries to account for the success of the West, to date.

He said: “One of the things we were asked to look into was what accounted for the success, in fact, the pre-eminence of the West all over the world.

“We studied everything we could from the historical, political, economic, and cultural perspective. At first, we thought it was because you had more powerful guns than we had.

“Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system.

“But in the past twenty years, we have realised that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity. That is why the West is so powerful.

“The Christian moral foundation of social and cultural life was what made possible the emergence of capitalism and then the successful transition to democratic politics. We don’t have any doubt about this.”

….continue reading

BBC program: The Beauty of Books: Ancient Bibles – claims church deliberately introduced thousands of changes to New Testament

Thursday, March 3rd, 2011

A recent BBC program “The Beauty of Books: Ancient Bibles” claimed the church deliberately introduced thousands of changes into the New Testament for theological reasons. Were church leaders promoting some nefarious agenda, a secretive plot to deceive the masses?

“Similar statements have been made before in the media and we believe they are highly misleading,” says Dr. David Instone-Brewer, a research fellow at Tyndale House, a Bible study center for scholars adjacent to Cambridge University.

The first half of the program highlighted “Codex Sinaiticus,” the oldest Bible bound in a single volume, made in about AD 350. “Codex Sinaiticus is a marvelous manuscript because it contains the oldest full text of the New Testament on top-quality material,” notes Instone-Brewer. There are approximately 23,000 corrections visible in the original manuscripts, which raises questions in some quarters.

“The 23,000 corrections may seem surprising,” Instone-Brewer notes, “and the program concluded that these had a theological agenda.” The BBC program examined two noteworthy examples, both in the Book of Mark. One verse added “Son of God” as a ‘correction’ to Mark 1:1, and another adds “for they were afraid.” The narrator concluded that although some corrections might be scribal errors, these two ‘corrections’ indicated a theological bias.

Dr. Instone-Brewer takes exception to the interpretation of these corrections.  “Although there are some corrections, where the original is erased or overwritten, this is relatively rare,” he notes. “Most of the 23,000 aren’t ‘corrections’ because they leave the original text fully visible, putting a dot under or over letters instead of deleting them, and writing above letters so you can clearly see the earlier text, as the screenshots from the program show clearly.”

“This demonstrates they didn’t want to expunge bad theology, but they wanted to record that other manuscripts were often subtly different. The vast majority of these changes are very minor — alternate spellings or slight grammatical variations which make no difference to the meaning of the text.”

Thousands of manuscripts that came after Sinaiticus have tiny differences due to inexpert copying in the early church, according to Instone-Brewer. “If a class of students all copied out a short book by hand, they would all make mistakes, but the teacher might still be able to reconstruct the original from all the copies. Textual scholars of the New Testament do this same work today.”

…..continue reading

Christian belief and psychiatric medication – If God loves you, why take medicine?

Thursday, March 3rd, 2011

Tom Rees of Epiphenom has an interesting post looking at the relationship between religious belief and medicine.

Specifically, the study Tom refers to looks at the effect of religious beliefs on medication taking, and it comes as no surprise to me that there may be a propensity for some of those of faith to be less likely to take their medicine.

She found that people who put themselves in God’s hands really were less likely to take their medicine.

Of course, the correlation between faith in God and medicinal compliance is far more sophisticated and nuanced than I have alluded to above.

Tom’s study is concerned with drugs for physical disease – HIV in this case – however, of more interest to me is whether this sort of result could be extrapolated for psychiatric drug taking.

From anecdotal and testimonial experiences, I would posit that there is indeed a correlation between faith in God and avoidance of psychiatric drugs, in fact, far more so than with physical medication.

Why would this be so?

Again, from anecdotal experiences and testimonies, there is a proclivity within some quarters of the Christian world to attribute mental – or personality – abnormalities to a lack of faith, or even – within charismatic circles – demon oppression / possession.

The infiltration of the “wealth & health prosperity gospel” is also to blame, and I have blogged previously on this here.

If you perceive that I exaggerate, then be advised that whilst pondering and writing this post, I noted an article published today over at Everyday Christian, which details a Christian family’s response to Bipolar Disorder:

It begins thusly, with some highlighting by me:

When our daughter’s first case worker appeared at our door we were sceptic. What did he know about the battles of the mind? I was convinced that all she needed was prayer, and God would do the rest. I forgot that God often uses man to accomplish his purpose.

The case worker had more patience with us than I did with him. I’m sure he had dealt with families like ours before, but he was very polite in his dealings with us. Samantha didn’t think she needed him and we agreed.

It wasn’t until she had had several breaks that she got another worker on her case. By then I had learned to accept any help with my daughter as a blessing, but I still wouldn’t have believed that the case worker would be God’s angel (messenger) to answer our prayers.

When Samantha had her first break she thought someone was tampering with her mind and was suspicious of any drugs. Her father and I were also very suspicious of the use of drugs in dealing with the mind, and so, she came home without medication.

Thankfully, Samantha is now taking her medication and the article concludes:

Samantha has gone several years now without a break. She has a good job, working in the mental health field. She is living for God, seeking His will for her life.

To all those who work in the mental health field, I want to say that we appreciate you. Thank you all for your patience. May God bless you.

I want end this post with a fortuitous discovery.

Yesterday – through Twitter – I happened upon Gene Anderson’s Rucksack Revolution blog. Gene is a pastor and also bipolar. His blog is the most ‘normal’, insightful, balanced, and encouraging blog I’ve come across charting faith and mental illness.

And so I will conclude with Gene’s words of wisdom, taken from his blog post entitled: Bipolar? Nail it to the cross…

God does not call us to deny our issues. But he does call us to nail them to the cross, much like the image at the top of this post. We are crucified with Christ. We are a new creation. We are somebody and we matter to the Lord Almighty.

But for God’s sake, don’t buy into quacks, false prophets, “word of faith” healers and such ilk. I’m not saying that divine healing and miracles don’t exist.

They do. I’ve experienced one first hand, related to the birth of my daughter.

But beware. Take your meds. Remember your condition.

And listen for the Word of God.

Amen, and make sure you follow Gene’s blog.

Pope Benedict contends Jews are not wholly – or solely – responsible for death of Jesus

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

I’m pleased to read of the extracts from the Pope’s new book – Jesus of Nazareth-Part II – in which he unequivocally contends that the Jews are not wholly – or solely – responsible for the death of Jesus.

The implication of postulating the Jewish people’s collective guilt in regard to the death of Jesus, has of course historically formed the cornerstone of anti-Semitism in Europe.

The Catholic Church’s relationship with the Jewish people is a little fraught at times – which is understandable given the historical record and some recent developments – and hopefully this may go some way towards healing this.

Here are the relevant excerpts:

Now we must ask: Who exactly were Jesus’ accusers? Who insisted that he be condemned to death? We must take note of the different answers that the Gospels give to this question. According to John it was simply “the Jews”. But John’s use of this expression does not in any way indicate—as the modern reader might suppose—the people of Israel in general, even less is it “racist” in character. After all, John himself was ethnically a Jew, as were Jesus and all his followers. The entire early Christian community was made up of Jews. In John’s Gospel this word has a precise and clearly defined meaning: he is referring to the Temple aristocracy. So the circle of accusers who instigate Jesus’ death is precisely indicated in the Fourth Gospel and clearly limited: it is the Temple aristocracy—and not without certain exceptions, as the reference to Nicodemus (7:50–52) shows.

And:

When in Matthew’s account the “whole people” say: “His blood be on us and on our children” (27:25), the Christian will remember that Jesus’ blood speaks a different language from the blood of Abel (Heb 12:24): it does not cry out for vengeance and punishment; it brings reconciliation. It is not poured out against anyone; it is poured out for many, for all. “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God . . . God put [ Jesus] forward as an expiation by his blood” (Rom 3:23, 25). Just as Caiaphas’ words about the need for Jesus’ death have to be read in an entirely new light from the perspective of faith, the same applies to Matthew’s reference to blood: read in the light of faith, it means that we all stand in need of the purifying power of love which is his blood. These words are not a curse, but rather redemption, salvation. Only when understood in terms of the theology of the Last Supper and the Cross, drawn from the whole of the New Testament, does this verse from Matthew’s Gospel take on its correct meaning.

Catholic Pakistani Minorities Minister Shahbaz Bhatti Assassinated

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

And yet another Pakistani politician seeking reform of the blasphemy law is murdered.

The blasphemy laws carry a death sentence for anyone who insults Islam and is used to subjugate and terrify religious minorities.

Mr Bhatti was Pakistan’s first and only Christian cabinet member.

Pakistan’s leading Catholic politician has been murdered in the capital Islamabad.

Minorities minister Shahbaz Bhatti died this morning after gunmen opened fire on his car while travelling to work through a residential district.

Mr Bhatti, 42, a leader of the ruling Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), had just left his home when at least two gunmen ambushed his car, police official Mohammad Iqbal said. He was rushed to the nearby Shifa hospital, but was dead on arrival.

Mr Bhatti had received numerous death threats after calling for changes to the country’s controversial blasphemy law. The blasphemy law carries a death sentence for anyone who insults Islam, and criticis say it has been used to persecute minority faiths. In January, Punjab Governor Salman Taseer, who had also opposed the law, was murdered by one of his bodyguards.

The first Christian to hold a cabinet post in Pakistan, Mr Bhatti spoke about the threat facing him last month, during a visit to Canada to raise awareness about his country’s blasphemy laws. He said: “I have been told by pro-Taliban religious extremists that if I will continue to speak against the blasphemy law, I will be beheaded.”

However, he said: “As a Christian, I believe Jesus is my strength. He has given me a power and wisdom and motivation to serve suffering humanity. I follow the principles of my conscience, and I am ready to die and sacrifice my life for the principles I believe.”

….continue reading

February 2011 Biblical Studies Carnival

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

The February 2011 Biblical Studies Carnival is out, courtesy of Matthew Crowe over at A Fistful of Farthings:

A Fistful of Farthings – February 2011 Biblical Studies Carnival

Switch to our mobile site