Archive for October, 2010

10/10/10 – October 10th 2010 – Trinumeral Superstition

Saturday, October 9th, 2010

With all of our advancements in technology and knowledge coupled with militant atheists ridiculing religious folk for believing in ‘pink unicorns’,  it still strikes me how inherently superstitious we are.

The BBC is reporting that some register offices are specially opening tomorrow in order that couples can tie the knot on this ‘lucky’ day and it’s not just in Britain:

Couples have also planned to have their babies delivered by Caesarean that day, in the hope that some of the day’s luck rubs off on their newborn.

Many Las Vegas hotels are offering special 10.10.10 wedding packages and in China, the most popular ceremony slots, which fall between 10am and 10.10am, were snapped up months ago.

….continue reading

A cursory Internet search reveals fears of a technological virus:

“There’s been a long history of virus scares related to specific dates, and it’s not that surprising to hear people whispering about the possible risks looming on 10 October 2010.

This has been duly debunked.

I’ve even found an article providing a synopsis of the possible implications of the 10/10/10 date singularity.

It would seem that despite our advancements and the many calls for ‘rational’ belief systems, humans are ‘wired’ for belief not based on deducible evidence.

In fact it appears that folk are enthusiastic to invest meaning in:

Shibboleth – a  belief,  principle,  or  practice  which  is  commonly  adhered  to  but  which  is  thought  by  some  people  to  be  inappropriate  or  out  of  date .

This all rather flies in the face of the militant atheist and undermines some of their criticisms of Christians. I would of course adhere to the notion that humans are ‘hard-wired’ for belief and to see beyond the tenable and that superstition is an attempt to satiate the ‘god shaped hole’.

We are not necessarily supposed to be entirely pragmatic epistemologically methodological naturalistic entities.

Who are you?

Thursday, October 7th, 2010

Hey bloggers you’ve got to check this out:

Who are you?

blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk is probably written by a male somewhere between 66-100 years old. The writing style is academic and upset most of the time.

Well they got the male part right! Cheeky……

Does the Internet strengthen or weaken the church and the message?

Thursday, October 7th, 2010

Actually the title of this post came from the Catholic Herald and should have read Is the Internet weakening the Catholic Church?

As it happens – and as I’ve noted previously – Pope Benedict is particularly media savvy, especially with regard to the digital universe. This doesn’t stop with the Pope however and an example can be found today in the National Catholic Register, lamenting the Catholic Church’s current status in the “search engine wars”:

The good news is that the Catholic Church has the answers they are looking for. The bad news is that search engines, like Google.com, don’t entirely know it yet. That’s our fault.

For instance, if I type “What do Christians believe?” into google.com, there is not one Catholic result returned in the top ten. A few are Catholic friendly (some not), but none explicitly and accurately represent the Catholic perspective.

Now, that is admittedly because we often use “Catholic” instead of “Christian” in our online material. But is that what the average person types in when searching?

The article cites the apparent deficiencies with ‘Catholic’ search engine results and concludes:

Anyway, google results are not the end-all be-all. But they are pretty important these days. We have so much great Catholic content online. We just need to polish it up a bit and get it formatted, presented and shared in a way that those searching for it will easily find it. And especially when there are so many other distractions out there doing a better job of it than us.

Improving this one aspect of our evangelization efforts really could have a much bigger impact than I think we realize.

They are of course correct and I’ve noted in the past the Vatican’s commitment to meet the challenge of a new digital age head on.

Today the Vatican meeting of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications concluded, as reported by the Catholic News Service and here’s some excerpts of the article with a few passing comments from me:

Pope Benedict said that while new media can help spread information, often it is focused on attention-grabbing images and makes little or no attempt to help people understand what is happening or what it means for their lives.

How true, in fact there is a website set up with the single purpose of highlighting and combating poor ‘god beat’ journalism. This article is a prime example analysing journalistic coverage of the notorious Westboro Baptist Church in the US.

The Westboro Baptist Church is a sad example of a fundamentalist extremist group garnering disproportionate media attention. I’ve oft noted the fact the more nuanced, reasonable and intelligent you are, the less attention you receive, but that’s another story and of course another temptation to resist.

[.....]

But the Catholic journalists, mostly laypeople, also tried to drive home to the church officials a need to recognize how communications works in the Internet age. The World Wide Web isn’t simply an electronic slate where a newspaper can be posted instead of being printed.

The Internet, and especially blogs and social media such as Facebook have created a new style of communications that is interactive, something most institutional church efforts — from homilies to the Vatican website — have never encouraged.

The Catholic bloggers, newspaper editors and website operators at the conference said people today — especially those under 35 — expect to be able to pose questions, replies and comments. The Catholic Church clearly wants to draw people into parish life and encourage them to share their faith with others, but opening even a tiny comment box on an “official” church website is still seen as too risky.

It’s not that caution and control aren’t smart, several participants said.

Anna Arco, a blogger and editor at the Catholic Herald in England, described the Catholic blogosphere as “lively, loud and argumentative.” She said some Catholic blogs have been ignorant, hurtful and aggressive, but generally when the bloggers are taken seriously as communicators who have something to say in the church, they tend to grow more responsible in what they publish and in the tone they use.

People have turned to blogs because they have not been heard, because their concerns are not being listened to or even taken seriously,” she said.

Jesus Colina, director of Zenit news, said the “original sin” of Catholic communications efforts is that they are designed to speak to the faithful, but not to listen to them.

In addition, he said, while the church claims a unique expertise in creating community, Catholic media tend to give voice only to the bishop and a few priests.

Not much to add to this except to say I agree. To be brutally honest some Christian forums can degenerate into snake pits and not because of the atheists! Enough said.

The Internet is here to stay and if we have an important message then presumably we need to embrace it and as the Catholic News Service aptly concludes:

“There are risks involved” in opening channels for interactive Internet content, she said, “but the great risk is that we don’t engage” with Catholics who don’t read Catholic newspapers or with the wider public.

I just want to note that there are many marvelous examples of Christians online. There are the hundreds of Church and Christian blogs which I follow and I must mention the Biblioblogs – Jim’s doing rather well in the search engines ;-) – with their focus on all things theological and academic.

Anglicans are not being left behind with blogging Bishops and the fairly new Twurch of England amongst other initiatives.

All in all we’re not doing bad, but I feel there could be improvement in terms of mutual online support, but that’s my own little gripe.

The message of Christ must ring out loud and clear online and it is a marvelous opportunity, however, the Internet can also be an unforgiving and merciless environment when it comes to scandal, opposition, and exposure of in-fighting and disunity.

Anyway, back to the original question, does the Internet strengthen or weaken the church and the message? A related question is does going publicly online with our faith serve to strengthen or weaken us personally?

Healthcare Sunday 17 October 2010: This year’s Healthcare Sunday has a focus on mental health

Thursday, October 7th, 2010

I must confess I’d never heard of Healthcare Sunday until Phil Groom tweeted it.

This year Healthcare Sunday falls on the 17th October and has a particular focus on mental health, which is an issue perpetually close to my own heart.

There is a dedicated website which can be found here:

Healthcare Sunday

Lots of resources and ideas available so do check it out.

Here’s some blurb from the website:

One in three people in our congregations and local communities will at some point in their lives suffer from mental health problems.

People with mental health problems often face stigma, discrimination and isolation, despite the fact that mental illness is relatively common and usually treatable.

This year’s Healthcare Sunday has a focus on mental health, and reminds us that we are “called to share one another’s troubles and problems, and in this way obey the Law of Christ Galatian 6:2

Heathcare Sunday Aims to:

Raise awareness of a Biblical response to health and illness

Encourage prayer

Foster care and support of professional and voluntary carers

Promote community responsibility and action

Church must be the one place where folks suffering from mental illness can come and feel safe from stigma and judgement.

Peter Saunders CEO Christian Medical Fellowship: A new pro-euthanasia doctors group (Healthcare Professionals for Change) will be given a media soapbox

Thursday, October 7th, 2010

Following news of the formation of this new pro-euthanasia medical group:

Leading doctors who endorse assisted dying for the terminally ill will this week launch an unprecedented campaign to change the law on the right to die.

Healthcare Professionals for Change, a group of doctors, nurses and allied health professionals, says it wants to challenge bodies such as the British Medical Association, which opposes any change in the law that would allow others to help terminally ill people to die.

The group is the first professional body of its kind to be set up with the explicit aim of changing the 1961 Suicide Act, which forbids such assistance.

The group will be chaired by Dr Ann McPherson, a GP and fellow of the Royal College of General Practitioners and of Green College, Oxford, who is dying of pancreatic cancer. “By taking a hostile approach to a change in the law on assisted dying, medical bodies such as the BMA and the Royal College of Physicians are failing to adequately reflect the views of all their members,” she said. “Many of us believe dying patients should not have to suffer against their wishes at the end of life. Alongside access to good quality end-of-life care, we believe that terminally ill, mentally competent patients should be able to choose an assisted death, subject to safeguards.”

….continue reading

Peter Saunders – CEO Christian Medical Fellowship – reminds us that this group is in fact a very small and very vocal minority group within the medical profession and concludes:

The answer is very clear. We have an extremely well-funded and resourced pro-euthanasia movement in this country, with plenty of media and celebrity support and public relations machinery which ensures that it is only seldom neither seen nor heard.

So when you see a small group of doctors given a soapbox next week to parade ‘hard cases’ and mouth specious euphemisms in an attempt to soften up public and parliamentary opinion on legalising compassionate killing, remember that they constitute a minority of a profession that remains largely opposed to any change in the law.

Read all

A few good links

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010

Here’s a few links to blog posts today which resonated with me for one reason or another:

Clayboy – Blowing up the kids: when propaganda goes wrong

Storied Theology – Genesis 1 & Biblical Authority

Parchment & Pen – Let Ninty-Five Percent Roll off Your Back

scientia et sapientia – If You Read the Bible in English You Should Thank This Guy. (See also Wycliffe Bible Translators)

Telegraph – Euro-socialists want to shut down hospitals opposed to abortion and euthanasia. It’s time to stop them

Bishop Nick Baines – Bishop of Southwark

Centre For Intelligent Design opens in Glasgow

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010

Gordon of the Ecalpemos blog has done some digging around a new organisation calling itself the “Centre for Intelligent Design” which has opened in Glasgow.

This is not the first time this organisation has caught my eye and I just know we are going to be hearing a lot more about them and I don’t necessarily mean in a positive sense.

Gordon’s post is not encouraging and he is concerned over a lack of transparency and asks:

Maybe their funders are religious organisation?

I think that’s probably a given and I would be interested to know the source of funding especially if it’s US money.

Anyway, you can make your own mind up, but I wanted to bring this to your attention as I suspect this new organisation will cause quite a stir in some quarters.

Faith in God Associated with Improved Survival After Liver Transplantation

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010

I’ve tracked down the original research on this one if you feel so inclined as to read it, which can be found here.

Wiley:

Italian researchers report that liver transplant candidates who have a strong religious connection have better post-transplant survival. This study also finds that religiosity—regardless of cause of death—prolongs the life span of individuals who underwent liver transplantation. Full findings are now available online and in the October issue of Liver Transplantation. a journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD).

Much of the medical profession today is focused on the delivery of services, rather than whole patient care which not only takes into account physical well-being, but psychological, social, and spiritual aspects as well. Although there is a lack of interest in religion by the medical community, the authors point out that 90% of the world’s population today is involved in some form of religion or spiritual pursuit. Prior studies have demonstrated that religiosity allows individuals to better cope with illness, and may even influence disease progression. Furthermore, a report by McCullough et al. that included a meta-analysis of 42 studies (surveying roughly 126,000 people) found active religious involvement increased the odds of being alive at follow-up by 26%.

“Our study tested the hypothesis that religiosity—seeking God’s help, having faith in God, trusting in God, trying to discern God’s will even in the disease—improves survival of patients with end-stage liver disease who underwent liver transplantation,” explains Franco Bonaguidi, D.Psych., and lead author of the study. The study team selected 179 patients who received a liver transplant between January 2004 and December 2007, and who also completed the religiosity questionnaire. Participants (129 males and 50 females) had a media age of 52 years and were followed for 4 years (median = 21 months) post-transplantation. Indications for liver transplant included: viral hepatitis (68%), alcoholic liver disease (17%), and autoimmune hepatitis (7%).

Results indicate that the Search for God factor (hazard ratio = 2.95) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (1.05) were independently associated with survival. Furthermore, it was the personal relationship between the patient and God, regardless of religious creed (Christian, Muslim, or other) rather than formal church attendance that positively affected survival. As one participant described, “I recovered my life by the will of Someone up there…I had great faith in Him. This closeness made me feel strong and calm.”

Dr. Bonaguidi concluded, “We found that an active search for God—the patient’s faith in a higher power rather than a generic destiny—had a positive impact on patient survival.” The authors caution that this study focuses on a severely ill patient population, therefore the conclusions may not be applicable to individuals with different illnesses or degrees of disease severity.

The patriarchate of Moscow is a great admirer of the current pontiff but also the most hesitant to recognize his authority over the Orthodox Churches of the East

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010

chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it – by Sandro Magister

ROME, October 6, 2010 – While the Eastern Churches are slowly approaching the convocation of the pan-Orthodox “Great and Holy Council” that should finally unite them in a single assembly after centuries of incomplete “synodality,” the other journey of reconciliation, which sees the East in dialogue with the Church of Rome, is also taking small steps forward.

The object of this dialogue concerns the only real sticking point dividing Catholicism and Orthodoxy, the primacy of the pope.

The latest evidence came a few days ago, in Vienna, where from September 20 to 27 the joint international commission for theological dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church met as a whole, precisely on the universal role of the bishop of Rome during the first millennium of Christian history.

At the head of the Catholic delegation was the new president of the pontifical council for Christian unity, Swiss archbishop Kurt Koch. While for the Eastern Churches, there was the metropolitan of Pergamon Joannis Zizioulas, a great ecumenist and trusted theologian of the patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew I, as well as an old friend of Joseph Ratzinger as theologian and pope.

The Orthodox were fully represented, with the sole exception of the patriarch of Bulgaria. There was the metropolitan archbishop of Cyprus, Chrysostomos II, another champion of ecumenism, whom Benedict XVI met this year during his trip to the island. The patriarch of Moscow had sent to Vienna his most prominent associate, Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, also fresh from a meeting with the pope, with whom he has a relationship of great respect.

The presence of the patriarchate of Moscow in Vienna was all the more important because in Ravenna, in 2007, when agreement was reached on the document to serve as the basis for discussion on the universal role of the bishop of Rome, the Russian Church was not there, because of a disagreement with the patriarchate of Constantinople.

The disagreement was smoothed over, and the Ravenna document was also approved by the patriarchate of Moscow, which had helped to prepare it.

The document affirms that “primacy and conciliarity are mutually interdependent.” And in paragraph 41, it highlights the points of agreement and disagreement:

“Both sides agree that… that Rome, as the Church that ‘presides in love’ according to the phrase of St Ignatius of Antioch, occupied the first place in the taxis, and that the bishop of Rome was therefore the protos among the patriarchs. They disagree, however, on the interpretation of the historical evidence from this era regarding the prerogatives of the bishop of Rome as protos, a matter that was already understood in different ways in the first millennium.”

“Protos” is the Greek word that means “first.” And “taxis” is the structure of the universal Church.

Since then, the discussion on controversial points has advanced at an accelerated pace. And it has started to examine, above all, how the Churches of East and West interpreted the role of the bishop of Rome during the first millennium, when they were still united.

The outline of the discussion was, until this point, a working document drafted by a joint sub-commission at the beginning of autumn 2008, at a meeting in Crete.

In October of 2009, in Cyprus, the joint international commission for theological dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church, with the Russians present, examined and discussed the first part of this outline, on some historical cases of the universal exercise of the “primacy” of the bishop of Rome, in the first centuries of the Christian era.

The discussion was supposed to continue in Vienna. But there were surprises right from the beginning. The Russian delegation raised objections against the working text provided in Crete, and ultimately succeeded in having it rewritten.

….continue reading

What the Guardian won’t report: Egypt’s Persecuted Christian Converts

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

The following is a cross-post from CIFWatch by Yitzchak Besser:

Five hundred years ago, Dina could have been a Marrano hiding her Jewish identity from Spanish inquisitors. Two hundred years ago, Dina could have been a Jewess cowering in the Russian forests. Seventy years ago, Dina could have been in Poland holed up in an attic hoping that no one would hear the floorboards creaking underneath her. Today, Dina is a fifteen-year-old Christian on the run in Cairo, pleading with world dignitaries to save her and her father from the religious persecution that threatens their life.

Dina el-Gohary and her father Maher have been living on borrowed time in Egypt for years. The two are formerly Muslim converts to Christianity. For this act of perceived religious betrayal, their lives have become forfeit. Several fatwas have been put out against them calling for their deaths. They have been threatened, harassed and attacked on numerous occasions. Every few weeks, Gohary and his daughter flee to a new apartment.

Gohary took his case to the courts, asking them to recognize his conversion and change the denomination from Muslim to Christian on his national identity card. They flatly refused his request and threw out his case. When he presented the papers from his church documenting his conversion, the court rejected them, claiming that they were not legally valid.

Although Egypt ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which explicitly mentions the absolute freedom of religion, it is a signatory with a caveat. In 2008, the Cairo Administrative Court noted the reservation stating that the covenant was binding only so long as it does not conflict with Sharia law.

In essence, Egypt grants the freedom of religious belief, but not the freedom of religious practice. As a result of this intolerance, non-Muslim believers face rising levels of religious persecution. Christians, who are largely from the Coptic Church and represent one tenth of Egypt’s population, bear the brunt of this often violent prejudice. In January 2010, three gunmen attacked a church in Upper Egypt, killing seven people and wounding several other bystanders.

Believers in the Baha’i Faith, a religion which Israel supports and which centers itself around the Israeli city of Acre, are also routinely harassed. Egypt does not recognize their religion and so they too face increasingly frequent acts of discrimination.

Yet, it is not these people who truly upset the delicate balance between mosque and state in Egypt. That unfortunate title belongs to formerly Muslim converts, who are viewed by the community as apostates. In the eyes of the Egyptian legal system, a conversion to Islam can be arranged in a week while a conversion away from Islam presents an open and invasive threat to the public.

Converts, like the Goharys, face the most extreme dangers in Egypt. According to Abdul Aziz Zakareya, a cleric and former professor at Al Azhar University, converts “should be killed by authorities. Public conversions can lead to very dangerous consequences. The spreading of a phenomenon like this in a Muslim society can cause many unwanted results and tensions between Muslims and non-Muslims.”

The US State Department knows full well of Christian converts’ plight in Egypt. The 2009 International Religious Freedom Report specifies the Goharys’ case by name. In addition to their case, the report details converts’ allegations of rape and physical abuse as well as the case of a Coptic priest sentenced to five years of hard labor for presiding over a wedding between a Copt and a convert from Islam. The report also points out the severe economic condition of Egypt’s Coptic Christians, which predominantly “rely on pigs and garbage scavenging for their primary income.”

“The Government continued to detain, harass, and deny civil documents, including national identity cards, birth certificates, and marriage licenses, to citizens who convert from Islam to Christianity,” states the report. Members of non-recognized religions, such as the Baha’i Faith, are also ineligible to receive official documents from the government. The report also explains how the government’s failures to prosecute hate crimes or acts of religious persecution have created “a climate of impunity that encourage[s] further assaults.”

Without this official recognition, Gohary cannot be buried as a Christian nor can he prevent the forced marriage of his daughter by her Muslim mother.  Moreover, his passport has been confiscated and he has been banned from leaving the country.

Since their 2009 legal battle, the Goharys have gone into hiding. After numerous threats and calls for Maher’s assassination, they fear for their life. They have met with officials from the US State Department including US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, asking for refugee status and a chance to leave the dangers they face in Egypt. All have promised to help the Goharys. Dina has even sent a letter to President Obama, pleading for help. Nevertheless, they still find themselves in search of a sanctuary with nothing positive on the horizon.

Perhaps it is time for Israel to get involved. When Jews were persecuted throughout history, we had nowhere to turn. We told ourselves that if we were in their shoes, we would do better to help those in need. Now it is time to put that philosophy into practice. Since the State of Israel’s inception, it has consistently sent aid to impoverished areas and desperate people, most recently in the case of the earthquake in Haiti. Israel does not do these actions for the positive PR; it does them because it believes them to be right.

Throughout its history, Israel has helped Jews flee from dangerous areas, to the point where we have now become experts in extraction. Perhaps we should put those skills to use for Maher and Dina’s sake. After all, we too once were harshly persecuted in Egypt for our religious beliefs.

Switch to our mobile site