Archive for August, 2010

Israeli believers share the Gospel via the Internet

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Israel Today:

The community of Messianic Jews (Jews who believe in Jesus) in Israel is becoming increasingly bold. Whereas past decades had seen the bulk of evangelical work in Israel done by foreign Christians, the breaking down of certain societal barriers in recent years has brought the local Body of Messiah to the forefront.

No longer are Israeli Messianic Jews seen as pariahs by the majority of average Israelis. Opposition to Messianic Jews by radical ultra-Orthodox elements has increased, and even reached violent levels, but that is only further evidence that Israeli believers are really coming into their own, a fact the enemy does not appreciate.

As part of that newfound boldness, a group of Israeli believers in Jesus are turning to the Internet to spread the Good News. The founders of the website One for Israel (who declined to reveal their personal identities for fear of attacks by anti-missionary groups) note that “Israelis spend 57.5 hours a month online, double the amount of time that Americans spend.”

And many of those Israeli online surfers are looking for more than just entertainment. “The phrase ‘messiah’ in Hebrew is searched for 145,000 times a month,” One for Israel explained.

Continue

Andrew Gilligan: Our dangerous dalliance with radical Islam

Friday, August 6th, 2010

I thought this to be an excellent piece on the UK, Islamism and politics:

Telegraph:

Over the past 10 days, like a submarine just below the surface, the outline has become visible of a massive Whitehall row, the outcome of which could be almost as important to our country as fixing the deficit.

The argument is about the influence that Islamism should have in the British state. Islamism should never, by the way, be confused with Islam. Islam is a religion, practised by millions of British citizens who have never sought to overthrow anything in their lives. Islamism is a revolutionary political doctrine, supported by a small minority of Muslims, whose aim is to overthrow secular democratic government and replace it with Islamic government.

Continue

Who Goes to Mass and Who Doesn’t. The Uncertain Tomorrow of Catholic Italy

Friday, August 6th, 2010

chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it

Catholic Italy is an “exception” in the secularized landscape of Western Europe and as a model for the other Churches of the continent has been one of the chief points of reference for the last two popes.

John Paul II talked and wrote about it many times. For example, in the “Great prayer for Italy” of 1994:

“Italy as a nation has so much to offer to all of Europe. [...] To Italy, in keeping with its history, is entrusted in a special way the task of defending on behalf of all of Europe the religious and cultural heritage established in Rome by the apostles Peter and Paul.”

And in his speech to the general leadership of the Italian Church gathered in Verona, on October 19, 2006, Benedict XVI said:

“Italy constitutes a rather favorable terrain for Christian testimony. The Church, in fact, is here a very lively reality, which retains a grassroots presence among people of every age and condition. The Christian traditions are often still rooted here and continue to bear fruit. [...] The Italian Church and Italian Catholics are therefore called to seize this great opportunity. [...] If we are able to do this, the Church in Italy will render a great service not only to this nation, but also to Europe and to the world.”

One of the figures that would seem to prove the tenacity and vitality of Catholicism in Italy is attendance at Sunday Mass. For more than thirty years, all of the findings have shown levels of attendance at Mass that are very high compared with other countries of Western Europe: about 30 percent of the population say that they go every Sunday, another 20 percent from one to three times a month, and another 30 percent on Christmas, Easter, and the other major feast days.

It should be enough to consider, for the sake of comparison, that in France those who say they go to Mass every Sunday are less than 5 percent of the population.

But these figures, properly speaking, register “stated” Mass attendance, meaning what is gathered from responses to surveys.

Much less is known about “real” attendance, made by counting those who actually go to Church.

Continue Reading

Nadim Gemayel a Christian member of Lebanon’s Parliament, has called for Hezbollah to disarm

Friday, August 6th, 2010

A brave guy indeed:

Human Events:

Nadim Gemayel is one man who has seen this script before. A Christian member of Lebanon’s Parliament, Gemayel has called for Hezbollah to disarm and for an immediate end to Iranian and Syrian meddling inside his country.

Such boldness can be deadly: Gemayel saw his father, former Lebanese President Bashir Gemayel, assassinated in 1982, and his cousin, Pierre, murdered in 2006—both men taken out by Syrian operatives. But as Gemayel told me recently in an exclusive interview for my new CBN show, Stakelbeck on Terror, he’s willing to brave any threats in order to preserve the culture, rights and dignity of Lebanon’s besieged Christian community.

Read All

Jewish Roots and non-Jews, Part 4

Friday, August 6th, 2010

Fourth part of Derek Leman’s (Messianic Jewish Musings) superb series and I hope you’re enjoying this as much as I am:

Part 1 here, part 2 here and part 3 here.

Jewish Roots and non-Jews, Part 4 by Derek leman

It is surely a puzzle to most Jewish people than non-Jews would want to embrace a Torah lifestyle. The overwhelming majority of the Jewish community is ambivalent.

I was reminded of this at a recent interfaith wedding. Among the four or five cuisine items at the reception, one was shrimp and another involved prosciutto. Many Jewish people, it seems to me, consider it a badge of honor not to be different. The thinking seems to be: I may be Jewish, but I can assimilate and just be normal like everyone else.

Non-Jews in Messianic Jewish synagogues often approach lifestyle issues like ba’alei teshuvot (recent returnees to Jewish observance, a term for newly religious Jews who are usually more zealous than longtime religious). Meanwhile, Jewish members of Messianic synagogues often are ambivalent about matters of Torah living.

Having established repeatedly here at Messianic Jewish Musings that Torah living is not a requirement for non-Jews, we now consider another question entirely: to what degree is it proper for non-Jews to take hold of a Torah lifestyle by free choice?

Motivations and the Gospel
In considering this question, one place to begin is to clarify a few motivations and to comment on their effect on the question.

(1) Some non-Jews feel inadequate before God without Torah practices (Sabbath, holidays, dietary law, fringes, Jewish prayer, etc.). The extreme of this mindset are those who feel that only Jews/Israelites/Messianics are right with God. God does not accept ordinary people. The additional holiness of Torah practices is required to make someone kosher to God. The Bible calls this a denial of the gospel. Instead of Yeshua, this thinking looks to Torah strictures as a system of merit. The book of Galatians was written against such thinking.

(2) Some non-Jews feel rootless before God without Jewish traditions. There are two types in this category. First are those who have been living in communities with Jewish traditions for some time and cannot imagine giving them up. Second are those newly coming into Messianic Judaism from disappointment with traditionless, flavorless churches. For the first group, I will comment below about the status of those already in relationships with Messianic Jewish communities. As for the second group, see part 3 of this series in which I discuss options for non-Jews who want a more Judeo-Christian approach. Churches need to have more robust traditions. A lot of evangelicalism is as devoid as possible of tradition and ritual. This style of religion leaves many empty. But non-Jews tired of shallow and unintelligent worship need not look to Judaism for a solution.

(3) Many non-Jews are drawn to certain aspects of Torah living because these things are in the Bible. Wanting to be closer to God, to live as God’s people did in the Bible, it is natural for many to keep Shabbat, Passover, Shavuot, and Sukkot as a return to biblical living. As I will clarify below, I don’t think this impulse is harmful if it is followed by an equally thorough education in the theology of Israel’s election and role in God’s plan.

(4) Finally, many non-Jews are drawn to Jewish people, to the history and meaning of Israel past and future. This is my own story. In the early days, for me, it was not Torah that drew me, but Jewish people, history, and culture. Matzah ball soup was as important, if not more important, to me than the holidays. I loved the land and people of Israel (based on one two-week trip which was formative for me). I loved “Fiddler on the Roof.” I read Jewish history and felt a kinship with this people. That is why I converted and became a part of the Jewish people. I did not feel inadequate as a gentile. I simply identified with the present and future destiny of Jewish people. I had a Jewish soul, as they say.

Re-Education for the Confused
Those who suffer from feelings of inadequacy, who somehow think God’s love is only for the Israelite, for the priestly people, for the Jew, need to be re-educated.

How can you study the Torah and think God only loves those who keep the Sabbath or the dietary law? Do you suppose that God loved Noah? He ate unclean meat (see Gen 9:3). Do you suppose Jethro was loved by God? Do you think Abraham was Jewish?

Those who feel they need Torah to be accepted by God should study Torah. They will find that Paul, in the New Testament, knew what he was talking about. And he said God accepts those who keep Sabbath and those who don’t (Rom 14:5-9). He said that no one should judge non-Jews for not keeping the holidays (Col 2:16-17). He reflected the Torah’s view of itself, as a covenant between Israel and God, not the universal way of God for all mankind.

Judeo-Christian Options for the Enthusiast
In our discussion in Part 3 of this series, the label Judeo-Christian emerged as a wonderful option for enthusiasts of Jewish roots who wish to incorporate some aspects of the Sabbath and holidays into their lives without taking on Jewish identity for themselves. Especially in the comments we talked about ways for Judeo-Christian enthusiasts to find community together through the educational materials of FFOZ (ffoz.org) and the Union of Messianic Believers (http://www.umjc.org/umb-mainmenu-105).

We agreed that, in some cases, starting new churches would be helpful. In other cases, membership in a local church could be supplemented by individual or group study. Fellowship could happen through the UMB, through FFOZ and similar events, and, of course, online.

Much discussion is needed about how Judeo-Christian enthusiasts can maintain a distinction between Jewish and gentile identities. Certain practices and prayers should be reserved as expressions of Jewish identity. How can philo-Semitic Christians practice some elements of Torah living without stepping on Jewish toes? This will be a future subject of attention at Messianic Jewish Musings.

Hesed for the Already-Affiliated
I don’t want to rehash old discussions, but we’ve talked many times here about the fact that Messianic Judaism opened its doors to numerous non-Jews over the years. Many are in community in our synagogues. Many are entwined in the lives of Jewish and non-Jewish synagogue members.

I want to be clear that I am not advocating asking gentiles to leave.

I am in favor of clarifying for newcomers to Messianic Judaism that this movement is about Jewish people expressing faith and devotion to Yeshua. Messianic Judaism is definitely a home for Jewish followers of Yeshua and for intermarrieds.

Are there legitimate reasons non-Jews would want to be part of the Jewish segment of Yeshua’s body? If you are neither Jewish nor married to a Jewish person, is there a meaning to belonging to a Jewish movement for Yeshua?

I do think there are and will be people called to be crossovers. These are people who wish to support Jewish redemption. They may not desire to convert, but they feel their place is in the movement of Yeshua’s renewal of the Jewish people. These people do not complain about being “second-class citizens.” They do not exhibit a desire to be de facto Jews. They are comfortable in their own skin and recognize the unique election of Israel at the same time as recognizing God’s redemption of the nations. They know that God’s relationship with Jews and non-Jews is equally one of love and hesed. They have no feeling of inadequacy because they were not born into the priestly, Chosen People.

They are secure in the equal but distinct calling they have as the righteous from among the nations. They harbor no suspicion that God loves the Jews more. And they still want to be part of Jewish renewal. And they will be willing, as Messianic Judaism develops practices for distinguishing Jewish and non-Jewish members in synagogues, to support distinction.

Conversion and Judaism
Finally, there are those who sense a deep kinship with the Jewish people and a calling from God to belong.

Conversion is something people debate from a New Testament perspective. It is not my purpose to go over the case for conversion here.

Conversion is also something rare and hard to get in Messianic Judaism. In mainstream Judaism, it is not difficult to convert. The desire to be Jewish is respected and with education and under observation, those who apply are accepted.

Messianic Judaism has an insecurity problem. Messianic leaders are afraid to welcome too many converts. It could appear to the larger Jewish community as though we do not take Jewish distinction seriously, that we are a conversion shop.

But I do hope we overcome our insecurity. I do hope we will be willing to show faithfulness to those whom the mainstream Jewish community would welcome as converts were it not for faith in Yeshua.

Philosopher Games: Battleground God

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

This is an unusual one.

Play Battleground God

Description:

Can your beliefs about religion make it across our intellectual battleground?

In this activity you’ll be asked a series of 17 questions about God and religion. In each case, apart from Question 1, you need to answer True or False. The aim of the activity is not to judge whether these answers are correct or not. Our battleground is that of rational consistency. This means to get across without taking any hits, you’ll need to answer in a way which is rationally consistent. What this means is you need to avoid choosing answers which contradict each other. If you answer in a way which is rationally consistent but which has strange or unpalatable implications, you’ll be forced to bite a bullet.

Of course, you may go along with thinkers such as Kierkegaard and believe that religious belief does not need to be rationally consistent. But that takes us beyond the scope of this activity, which is about the extent to which your beliefs are rationally consistent, not whether this is a good or a bad thing.

These were my results:

You have reached the end!

Congratulations! You have made it to the end of this activity.

You took 1 direct hit and you bit zero bullets. The average player of this activity to date takes 1.38 hits and bites 1.10 bullets. 487209 people have so far undertaken this activity.

Congratulations!

You have been awarded the TPM medal of distinction! This is our second highest award for outstanding service on the intellectual battleground.

The fact that you progressed through this activity being hit only once and biting no bullets suggests that your beliefs about God are well thought out and almost entirely internally consistent.

The direct hit you suffered occurred because one set of your answers implied a logical contradiction. At the bottom of this page, we have reproduced the analysis of your direct hit. You would have bitten bullets had you responded in ways that required that you held views that most people would have found strange, incredible or unpalatable. However, this did not occur which means that despite the direct hit you qualify for our second highest award. A good achievement!

Direct Hit 1

You answered True to questions 10 and 14.

These answers generated the following response:

You’ve just taken a direct hit! Earlier you agreed that it is rational to believe that the Loch Ness monster does not exist if there is an absence of strong evidence or argument that it does. No strong evidence or argument was required to show that the monster does not exist – absence of evidence or argument was enough. But now you claim that the atheist needs to be able to provide strong arguments or evidence if their belief in the non-existence of God is to be rational rather than a matter of faith.

The contradiction is that on the first ocassion (Loch Ness monster) you agreed that the absence of evidence or argument is enough to rationally justify belief in the non-existence of the Loch Ness monster, but on this occasion (God), you do not.

What are your results?

Charismaniacs

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Every Thursday morning I trot off to my local Anglican church for a swift communion service. This is presided over by a wonderful retired priest who I can only describe as a deeply holy man. This is a “high” Anglican Eucharist (very Catholic) and oozing with reverence and you simply cannot help but get swept up into the awe of God.

Today was different.

One of the congregation bought along her son (in his late twenties) and he has what I can only describe as a very charismatic leaning. During the creed and declaration of our faith he shouted out “Hallelujah” and generally rocked about, waving his arms. Please note this was when he wasn’t playing with his mobile phone.

At the end of the service and whilst a member of the congregation was informing folk of an upcoming funeral, he stood up and declared that he was ready and willing to pray for the sick and for those who were not born again.

I’ve nothing against praying for the sick, but the priest looked a little put out and I suspect this chap had not discussed this with him prior to the service. As for praying for those who were not born again, this is a congregation of mostly elderly folk who have been in the faith for a zillion years and are dedicated enough to turn out for these services come wind or high rain.

The priest was absolutely amazing and literally didn’t flinch or bat an eyelid (he’d make a superb poker player) and swept through the service in his usual wonderfully reverent manner.

I’m going to be blunt, this chaps actions felt inappropriate and far from appreciating and respecting the Eucharist, congregation and priest, I have no doubt that he would suspect most of us were simply “religious” and not truly born again.

I have known a pastor of an independent charismatic “evangelical” church declare with ease and without fear that in his opinion the local Catholic priest and congregation were not saved.

It would seem that for some, if there is a lack of emotionalism, then it’s not real Christianity.

By the way, the mother of the chap seemed ill at ease today and even quite nervous and I suspect her fears were played out, especially when he made another announcement that it was her birthday and we must all sing happy birthday.

She looked shell shocked bless her.

Show me the gospel – Simply Christian by Tom Wright

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Last month I blogged about toying with the idea of changing the “All of Grace” page on this Blog.

This is what I said:

The purpose of this page is to convey the Gospel message, pure and simple, and it is heavily visited every day.

Although I love Spurgeon and this was his seminal work in terms of written evangelism, it perhaps does not fit with today’s audience in terms of length, language and literary style etc.

I’m looking for suggestions for a new article to replace this one……

Or if someone wants to play with the original…..

Or perhaps you feel brave enough to write one……

I posed this challenge on a prominent Christian forum, on one of the largest US based Christian blogs, as well as on Twitter, and I was quite surprised at the lack of suggestions. It would seem that us Christians (myself included) are not entirely sure how best to present the gospel message.

I think I may have found the answer.

Just recently the book entitled ‘Simply Christian‘ by Tom Wright has been popping up everywhere. I’ve had this described to me as Wright’s version of ‘Mere Christianity‘ by C S Lewis, and I’ve received an email mentioning it.

The rave reviews seem to indicate this book might be especially fitting for today’s unbeliever, for example:

An excellent primer to the Christian faith….

This is the product description from Amazon:

Why do we expect justice? Why do we crave spirituality? Why are we attracted to beauty? Why are relationships often so painful? And how will the world be made right? These are not simply perennial questions all generations must struggle with, but, according to N. T. Wright, are the very echoes of a voice we dimly perceive but deeply long to hear. In fact, these questions take us to the heart of who God is and what He wants from us.

For two thousand years, Christianity has claimed to solve these mysteries, and this renowned biblical scholar and Anglican bishop shows that it still can today. Not since C. S. Lewis’s classic summary of the faith, Mere Christianity, has such a wise and thorough scholar taken the time to explain to anyone who wants to know what Christianity really is and how it is practiced. Wright makes the case for Christian faith from the ground up, assuming that the reader has no knowledge of (and perhaps even some aversion to) religion in general and Christianity in particular.

Simply Christian walks the reader through the Christian faith step by step and question by question. With simple yet exciting and accessible prose, Wright challenges skeptics by offering explanations for even the toughest doubt-filled dilemmas, leaving believers with a reason for renewed faith. For anyone who wants to travel beyond the controversies that can obscure what the Christian faith really stands for, this simple book is the perfect vehicle for that journey.

So, given all of this, I’ve got my copy being delivered tomorrow and if it’s half as good as most folk are claiming, then I shall endeavour to put together some kind of mashup based on the book.

Let me know if you’ve read this and what you think.

In the meantime, here’s an excerpt which is nicked from the N.T.Wright Page:

Waking Up to the Good News

What happens when you wake up in the morning?

For some people, waking up is a rude and shocking experience. Off goes the alarm, and they jump in fright, dragged out of a deep sleep to face the cold, cruel light of day.

For others, it’s a quiet, slow process. They can be half-asleep and half-awake, not even sure which is which, until gradually, eventually, without any shock or resentment, they are happy to know that another day has begun.

Most of us know something of both, and a lot in between.

Waking up offers one of the most basic pictures of what can happen when God takes a hand in someone’s life.

There are classic alarm-clock stories. Saul of Tarsus on the road to Damascus, blinded by a sudden light, stunned and speechless, discovered that the God he had worshipped had revealed himself in the crucified and risen Jesus of Nazareth. John Wesley found his heart becoming strangely warm, and he never looked back. They and a few others are the famous ones, but there are millions more.

And there are many stories, though they don’t hit the headlines in the same way, of the half-awake and half-asleep variety. Some people take months, years, maybe even decades, during which they aren’t sure whether they’re on the outside of Christian faith looking in, or on the inside looking around to see if it’s real.

As with ordinary waking up, there are many people who are somewhere in between. But the point is that there’s such a thing as being asleep, and there’s such a thing as being awake. And it’s important to tell the difference, and to be sure you’re awake by the time you have to be up and ready for action, whatever that action may be.

Waking up is, in fact, one of the regular early Christian images for “what happens when the gospel of Jesus—the good news that the creator God has acted decisively to put the world to rights—impinges on someone’s consciousness. There’s a good reason for this. “Sleep” was a regular way of talking about death in the ancient Jewish world. With the resurrection of Jesus, the world was being invited to wake up. “Wake up, sleeper!” writes St. Paul. “Rise from the dead! Christ will give you light!” (Ephesians 5:14).

The earliest Christians believed, in fact, that resurrection was what every human being really needed—not just in the end, in the new world that God will eventually make, but in the present life as well. God intends, in the end, to give us a new life, in comparison with which the present one is a mere thing of shadows. He intends to give us new life within his ultimate new creation. But the new creation has already begun with the resurrection of Jesus, and God wants us to wake up now, in the present time, to the new reality. We are to come through death and out the other side into a new sort of life; to become daytime people, even though the rest of the world isn’t yet awake. We are to live in the present darkness by the light of Christ, so that when the sun comes up at last we will be ready for it. Or, to change the image, we are already to be penciling the sketches for the masterpiece that God will one day call us to help him paint. That’s what it means to respond to the call of the Christian gospel.

It isn’t, in other words, a matter of “having a new religious experience.” It may feel like that, or it may not. For some people, becoming a Christian is a deeply emotional experience; for others, it’s a calm, clear-eyed resolution of matters long pondered. Our personalities are gloriously different, and God treats us all gloriously differently. In any case, some religious experiences are profoundly un- or anti-Christian. The ancient world was full of all kinds of religions, many of them deeply dehumanizing. Though we don’t always recognize it, the modern world is like that, too.

So what is involved in hearing and responding to the Christian gospel? What does it mean to wake up to God’s new world? What does it mean, in other words, to become a member of God’s people, of Jesus’s people—of the church?

The gospel—the “good news” of what the creator God has done in Jesus—is first and foremost news about something that has happened. And the first and most appropriate response to that news is to believe it. God has raised Jesus from the dead, and has thereby declared in a single powerful action that Jesus has launched the long-awaited kingdom of God, and that (by means of Jesus’s death) the evil of all the world has been defeated at last. When the alarm clock goes off, this is what it says: “Here’s the good news. Wake up and believe it!”

This message, though, is so utterly unlikely and extraordinary that you can’t expect people simply to believe it in the same way they might believe you if you said it was raining outside. And yet, as people hear the message, at least some find that they do believe it. It makes sense to them. I don’t mean the kind of “sense” you get within the flatland world of secular imagination. There the only things that matter are what you can put into a test tube or a bank account. I mean the kind of sense that exists within the strange new world which -we glimpse, even if only for a moment, in the way we glimpse a whole new world when we stand in awe in front of a great painting, or are swept off our feet by a song or a symphony. That kind of “making sense” is much more like falling in love than like calculating a bank balance. Ultimately, believing that God raised Jesus from the dead is a matter of believing and trusting in the God who would, and did, do such a thing.

This is where our word “belief” can be inadequate or even misleading.What the early Christians meant by “belief” included both believing that God had done certain things and believing in the God who had done them. This is not belief that God exists, though clearly that is involved, too, but loving, grateful trust.

When things “make sense” in that way, you are left knowing that it isn’t so much a matter of you figuring it all out and deciding to take a step, or a stand. It’s a matter of Someone calling you, calling with a voice you dimly recognize, calling with a message that is simultaneously an invitation of love and a summons to obedience. The call to faith is both of these. It is the call to believe that the true God, the world’s creator, has loved the whole world so much, you and me included, that he has come himself in the person of his Son and has died and risen again to exhaust the power of evil and create a new world in which everything will be put to rights and joy will replace sorrow.

The more conscious we are of our own inability to get it right, perhaps even our own flagrant disloyalty to the call to live as genuine human beings, the more we will hear this call as what it most deeply is. It is the offer of forgiveness. It is the summons to receive God’s gift of a slate wiped clean, a totally new start. Even to glimpse that is to catch your breath with awe and gratitude, and to find an answering, thankful love welling up inside. As we saw earlier, just as you can’t set up a staircase of human logic and climb up it to get to some kind of “proof” of God, so you can’t set up a staircase of human moral or cultural achievement and climb up it to earn God’s favor. From time to time some Christians have imagined that they were supposed to do just that, and in their efforts they’ve made a nonsense of everything.

But the fact that we can’t ever earn God’s favor by our own moral effort shouldn’t blind us to the fact that the call to faith is also a call to obedience. It must be, because it declares that Jesus is the world’s rightful Lord and Master. (The language Paul used of Jesus would have reminded his hearers at once of the language they were accustomed to hearing about Caesar.) That’s why Paul can speak about “the obedience of faith.” Indeed, the word the early Christians used for “faith” can also mean “loyalty” or “allegiance.” It’s what emperors ancient and modern have always demanded of their subjects. The message of the gospel is the good news that Jesus is the one true “emperor,” ruling the world with his own brand of self-giving love. This, of course, cheerfully and deliberately deconstructs the word “emperor” itself. When the early Christians used “imperial” language in relation to Jesus, they were always conscious of irony. Whoever heard of a crucified emperor?

When we see ourselves in the light of Jesus’s type of kingdom, and realize the extent to which we have been living by a different code altogether, we realize, perhaps for the first time, how far we have fallen short of what we were made to be. This realization is what we call “repentance,” a serious turning away from patterns of life which deface and distort our genuine humanness. It isn’t just a matter of feeling sorry for particular failings, though that will often be true as well. It is the recognition that the living God has made us humans to reflect his image into his world, and that we haven’t done so. (The technical term for that is “sin,” whose primary meaning is not “breaking the rules” but “missing the mark,” failing to hit the target of complete, genuine, glorious humanness.) Once again, the gospel itself, the very message which announces that Jesus is Lord and calls us to obedience, contains the remedy: forgiveness, unearned and freely given, because of his cross. All we can say is, “Thank you.”

To believe, to love, to obey (and to repent of our failure to do those things): faith of this kind is the mark of the Christian, the one and only badge we wear. That is why, in most traditional churches, the community declares its faith publicly in the words of one of the ancient creeds. This is the stamp of who we are. When we declare our faith, we are saying yes to this God, and to this project. That is the central mark of our identity, of who and what the church is. This, by the way, is what St. Paul meant when he spoke of “justification by faith.” God declares that those who share this faith are “in the right.” He intends to put the whole world to rights; he has already begun this process in the death and resurrection of Jesus, and in the work of his Spirit in the lives of men and women, bringing them to the faith by which alone we are identified as belonging to Jesus. When people come to Christian faith, they are “put in the right” as an advance sign, and as part of the means, of what God intends to do for his whole creation.

Christian faith isn’t a general religious awareness. Nor is it the ability to believe several unlikely propositions. It is certainly not a kind of gullibility which would put us out of touch with any genuine reality. It is the faith which hears the story of Jesus, including the announcement that he is the world’s true Lord, and responds from the heart with a surge of grateful love that says: “Yes. Jesus is Lord. He died for my sins. God raised him from the dead. This is the center of everything.” Whether you come to this faith in a blinding flash or by a long, slow, winding route, once you get to this point you are (whether you realize it or not) wearing the badge which marks you out as part of the church, on an equal footing with every other Christian who ever lived. You are discovering what it means to wake up and find yourself in God’s new world.

What’s more, you are giving clear evidence that a new life has begun. Somewhere in the depths of your being something has stirred into life that was previously not there. It is because of this that many early Christians reached for the language of birth. Jesus himself, in a famous discussion with a Jewish teacher, spoke of being born “from above”: a new event similar to, though distinguished from, ordinary human birth (John 3). Many early Christians picked up and developed this idea. As a newborn baby breathes and cries, so the signs of life in a newborn Christian are faith and repentance, inhaling the love of God and exhaling an initial cry of distress. And at that point what God provides, exactly as for a newborn infant, is the comfort, protection, and nurturing promise of a mother.

Quote of the Day

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

The Irony is that those American churches that protest most vocally against the teaching of Darwinism in their schools are often, in their public policies, supporting a kind of economic Darwinism, the survival of the fittest in world markets and military power.

Source: N T Wright – Surprised by Hope – Page 231

Two crop circles depicting the face of Jesus Christ have appeared on either side of the M4 near Hungerford in Berkshire.

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

Love it:

The two almost identical circles, both 250ft in diameter,  seem to portray Jesus Christ in an image resembling the world famous Shroud of Turin.

Read All

More here….

Switch to our mobile site