Archive for July, 2010

Film ABBA: Mamma Mia! The Movie

Saturday, July 31st, 2010

Just to quell the swirling rumours, I am indeed unashamedly a huge ABBA fan, although, to add to my ongoing identity confusion, it is a day of doom when I’m dragged to IKEA kicking and screaming.

Ikea shops are designed like casinos so you lose track of time. You go there on Saturday to spend £50 and somehow leave on Sunday with £300 worth of goods.

I’m sure they must invoke Swedish magic….

To shop there is akin to following the yellow brick road, and you mustn’t deviate or you’ll be lost forever and you may be in danger of not meeting the wizard at the end of the path.

And whatever you do, don’t go the wrong way down the path….shudder….against the flow….

Anyway, I digress with nonsense as it’s good for me psychologically.

Just watched the Mamma Mia Movie and if you’re like me and have weakness for ABBA, you’ll watch this musical with a big fact smile on your face regardless of your present woes.

So if you want a guaranteed, cheer me up, feel-good-factor, session of escapism, then get your mitts on this film.

The Orthodoxy of Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress

Saturday, July 31st, 2010

I’m not going to say any more than than I thought this to be a marvelous piece:

Onesimus

As a good Evangelical, taught always to make much of one’s ‘conversion’ experience and to equate praying the ‘sinner’s prayer’ with ‘being saved’, I was confused when I first read John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress some thirty five years ago. I kept waiting for the dramatic buildup that would surely precede Christian’s conversion. Instead, there was a series of decisions, choices really, each one crucially significant but none of which mapped on to my understanding of ‘salvation’. There was the choice to set out from the city of destruction, the choice to go in by the narrow way through the wicket gate, the choice to reject Mr. Worldly Wiseman’s advice. Choices to listen to Evangelist and Interpreter. The not-yet-saved-as-I-understood-it Christian had already endured several adventures and misadventures, and was obviously striving as best he could to leave his old ways and embark on the way that would lead to the celestial city. Indeed, he was already well along on his journey, and we hadn’t yet come across familiar and what I thought were necessary landmarks to ‘being saved.’

Continue

Do take the time to hop over and read all of this, as it’s well worth your time.

Reverend Michael Land, Vicar of St Mary the Virgin in Herefordshire: Christians need to start swearing

Saturday, July 31st, 2010

What a load of old bullshit:

Telegraph:

The Norman church, has stood for hundreds of years in the tranquil village of Burghill, in countryside surrounded by apple and pear orchards.

However, its vicar, who used to work in the East End of London, is urging parishoners to move aggresively into the modern age – by swearing more.

Reverend Michael Land, 67, said Christians needed to adopt swearing in their everyday language because it is how Jesus would have spoken.

He said too many people put Jesus “on a pedestal” and failed to realise that he was poor, relatively uneducated and preferred not to mix with the elite of his day.

He added that the Church risked becoming out of touch with ordinary people if its clergy did not become “streetwise” and failed to use earthy language.

Continue

Where ignorance predominates, vulgarity invariably asserts itself.

And as if to prove this adage, please note that the words parishioners and aggressively are spelt incorrectly in this crappy article.

Nayara Goncalves a phone shop manager in Florida stopped a would-be armed robber by preaching to him about Jesus.

Friday, July 30th, 2010

BBC:

A 20-year-old Christian mobile phone shop manager in Florida stopped a would-be armed robber by preaching to him about Jesus.

Nayara Goncalves spent nearly five minutes persuading the man that he was doing the wrong thing.

The man eventually apologised, explained his gun was a replica and left the shop in Broward County.

“She was able to remain calm and keep him calm,” a sheriff’s office spokeswoman said.

During the incident on 23 July, Ms Goncalves told the would-be robber: “I’m just going to talk with you about Jesus.”

The man said he was a Christian and was “embarrassed” to be doing what he was doing but that he needed $300 (£190) to avoid being evicted.

The shop manager told him: “I don’t know what you’re going through, but all of us are going through a hard time right now.”

When she explained that she would have to make up any shortfall, he decided to leave.

Ms Goncalves told the BBC she had been inspired by God and that she hoped the man would turn to the church.

Continue

There are so many things in this life that distract us from understanding what is truly important.

Friday, July 30th, 2010

Clayton McDonald’s unique perspective has forced an understanding of life that most of us cannot comprehend.

Hat-tip

4thought.tv – Giving air to the Christian preoccupation with sexuality

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

4thought.tv is the new Channel 4 program described as:

A series of highly personal short films, broadcast 365 days a year, reflecting on a broad range of religious and ethical issues, and aspects of our spiritual lives. These 90 second films challenge some traditional views, providing a platform for both scepticism and devout religious beliefs.

Sounds interesting, so let’s have a quick look at the upcoming Christians to front the show:

First up on August 2nd, the virulently anti-homosexual director of Christian Voice Stephen Green, who was featured on this blog after Classic FM stopped its promotion of Eric Idle’s show ‘Not the Messiah’ due to complaints received from them.

Unsurprisingly Stephen will be addressing the subject of homosexuality.

Rev Rowland Jide Macaulay is due on the 3rd:

Rev Rowland Jide Macaulay believes that those who use the Bible to condemn homosexuality are hypocritical; surely they should also advocate the stoning of adulterers.

Next up on the 4th August is Rev Peter Ould, who believes that God has helped him to overcome his attraction to men. Peter wrote a piece for the Evangelical Alliance back in 2008 entitled; “Of course no one is really gay“:

……I was, therefore, convinced that there was no firm evidence that my same-sex attraction was hard-wired.

Finally on August 6th, Rev Wale Babatunde, of whom I know nothing about and can’t be bothered to dig. Channel 4 describe his views thusly:

Rev Wale Babatunde believes that the Bible is clear: God does not accept homosexuals in the same way that he does not accept thieves.

Let me make one thing perfectly clear, I haven’t spent time putting this post together to make any particular comment on Biblical, theological, moral or ethical stances surrounding the issue of homosexuality. You can make your own mind up.

What I’m heartily sick of is our faith being perpetually defined solely in  terms of sexuality.

As I scan hundreds of incoming feeds from Christian blogs and websites of all types and denominations, a disproportinate amount of the articles relate explicitly to sexuality, especially denouncement or vindication of differing types of sexuality.

If I knew nothing of Christianity I would presume sex is the most important facet.

It’s pathetic, boring, sad, judgemental and disheartening, and Channel 4 are simply exploiting this phenomenon.

Let’s be brutally honest for once. This preoccupation with all things sexual emanating from some quarters of the Christian community, makes us ALL look sex obsessed at best, and severely repressed at worst.

International Interfaith Investment Group (3iG): Faith institutions find responsible investment difficult

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Interesting report on religious institutions and financial investments.

Coincidentally this report comes as the mining company Vedanta is back in the news today over at the Independent. The Church of England was a major shareholder in Vedanta which was accused of human rights and environmental abuses. This culminated in the Church of England being pressured by campaigners to disinvest last February.

Interestingly in the Independent article (Provocatively entitled; Vedanta Resources: The world’s most hated company – I think BP who have investments in Vedanta may have taken that mantle), Vedanta report a highly successful financial year and vigorously deny accusations against them.

New report: Faith institutions find responsible investment difficult

New research has revealed that religious institutions find it difficult to invest responsibly whilst maintaining a strategy that fits in with their beliefs.

Despite the fact that faith institutions are widely considered to be the pioneers of responsible investment and make up the third largest demographic of investors globally, it appears that the stock market presents difficulties when it comes to aligning the needs of the faith with a responsible investment strategy.

The research was published this month by the International Interfaith Investment Group (3iG) – which ARC helped create – along with ESADE Business School in Spain and Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School in Belgium.

Katinka van Cranenburgh of 3iG, who carried out the research along with Professor Celine Louche from Vlerick and Professor Daniel Arenas of ESADE, says that religious investors are not always looking to the bottom?line when deciding where to put their money.

“We found that faith institutions go beyond the financial aspects of investing. They are more driven by the impact they can have on company behaviour or society than by the financial returns. They tend to have a preference for investing in projects or companies that do good, rather than simply adopting “best in class approaches”.

However, this approach is made more difficult by the fact that banks often cannot provide the services required to be consistent with faith?conscious investing, “Faith institutions cannot implement faith?consistent investing alone; they depend on the offerings of financial institutions. The current investment market is not capable of providing all the tools and services that are required by religious investors” says Louche, “The great majority of religious institutions surveyed said that their religious beliefs are reflected in their investment practices, but 51% say they would invest more if there were reliable tools to do so in accordance with their beliefs.”

The research did conclude a possible solution for this; customised religious investment products.Continue

The full PDF press release may be found here.

Jewish Roots and non-Jews, Part 2

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Here’s part 2 of this excellent series by Derek Leman of Messianic Jewish Musings.

Part 1 can be found here.

Jewish Roots and non-Jews, Part 2 by Derek Leman

The problem a whole host of people face right now is a question of calling. What am I called to do?

Many people are paralyzed, incapable of moving forward defining who they are, or knowing what to do. Non-Jews in Messianic synagogues may periodically wonder, “What am I doing here?” Christians with a love for Jewish roots in churches may periodically wonder, “What am I doing here?” People too uncertain to be in community at either a church or a Messianic synagogue wonder, “Where do I belong?”

Who will play God and answer these questions for other people? Not I.

Each person has a relationship with the Living God. The details of that relationship, the influences and desires mediated by God’s Spirit in persons is a holy thing. Watching from the outside, we should be cautious about speaking into this relationship.

Of course, there are egregious cases of abuse of the idea of divine calling. “God led me to this extra-marital affair,” has a false ring to it to say the least.

In Part 2 of this series, I want to consider the intersection of the individual and the community as well as the intersection between certain principles and subjective senses of divine calling. As for the first, the relationship of individual and corporate identity, we think too much as individuals and realize too little that we are part of families, communities, and people groups. As for the second, between principles and subjectivity, we make discerning God’s will more difficult than it needs to be.

Who Am I: an Individual or Part of the Group?
This question is important for many reasons when considering what non-Jews ought to do about love for Jewish roots. People in different situations are asking their questions from different places:

–”I am a Christian, but I want to keep some Jewish observances, such as holidays, without communicating to others that somehow Christians have replaced Israel and without implying that I doubt the uniqueness of Jewish identity and calling.”

–”I am not Jewish, but have been involved for about five years in Messianic Judaism. I don’t know who I am.”

–”I am Jewish and I don’t know what to think about these non-Jews in our synagogue. I can’t imagine life without them. They are integral to my life, but should non-Jews be here?”

Our decisions about what to do as individuals affect our families, communities, and all circles of relationship. Decisions are never purely about “me and only me.”

If you are married, what effect does the identity of your spouse have on you? I speak with many intermarrieds I have met online and it seems to me that the non-Jewish spouses of intermarriage often fail to realize that their family is connected to the people of Israel. I’ve counseled many a non-Jewish spouse to work toward a more Jewish home or at least a Jewish-friendly home. Should a father of Jewish kids eat babybacks and shrimp? Can a family be divided over important covenantal commitments?

If you are married and both are non-Jewish, is belonging to a Messianic Jewish community the desire of both partners?

Another belonging we have is to congregational communities. When I first began hearing from colleagues that there should be more distinction between Jews and non-Jews, I was angry and upset. People whom I believe with all my heart God has placed in my life should not be pushed away. Our community is strong at my synagogue. And there are non-Jews whom I subjectively believe to be inseparable from the future destiny of our community.

I found that in discussions with other Messianic rabbis, most felt the same way. None were eager to start asking people to leave the synagogue, at least not the kind of people who were one with the community. The talk I have heard from colleagues is more about helping people who come for wrong reasons and who don’t belong in a Messianic Jewish community from making the mistake of false belonging.

We have a mess on our hands of individual and corporate proportions because we have been careless in our notions of identity and purpose. But if I have a point to make here, it is this: those who belong in our communities, who have established a home here in Messianic Judaism, and who believe in and work toward the goals of Jewish renewal in Yeshua — as far as I am concerned — belong to the community.

Clarifying our individual identities and purposes should not be about rupturing communities or asking people to leave. A strategy of vetting people for membership in the future or helping people not to make the mistake of joining a community for the wrong reasons is a good one. But playing God and dividing existing communities is not something I will engage in. It seems my colleagues will not either.

Principles and Subjective Senses of Calling
Another issue in the question, “What are non-Jews to do?” is the balance between principles and the subjective sense of calling.

I remember in Christian clergy circles thinking that a lot of people were confused about the difference between subjective and objective ways of knowing. Applications for ministry positions in various Christian groups would have a question like, “On what date and under what circumstances did you receive the calling?”

The calling. As if our path in life is laid out for us like some prophecy which God reveals in words. I suppose that kind of clarity has happened in some cases in history. But by encouraging an objectifying of something subjective, I noticed that pop-Christian thinking about calling was distorted.

The fact is, deny it if you like, God is largely absent, silent, hidden. Our sense of calling is subjective. There is a lot of room for free choice.

People sometimes tell me God has shown them what to do. They move from failure to failure and eventually blame God. If God told me to do this, why didn’t it produce fruit?

I think the balance between subjective calling and objective principles is not as hard as people make it out to be. Consider first the commandments and wisdom that bear on your decisions. After that, follow your desires which fit with the commandments and wisdom.

Commandments and wisdom are the most objective criteria in decisions. Desires are subjective, but should not be despised as a form of recognizing God’s will. Look up “desire” in a concordance. Wrong desires conflict with commandments and wisdom. Right desires agree with commandments and wisdom. And desire is a primary way God leads us.

Some will sense the danger here. “Derek, are you saying that the desire people have to adopt Jewish customs or to belong to Messianic Jewish communities could be from God?” Am I simply rubber-stamping all forms of desire? Yes, if.

Yes, if these desires are consonant with wisdom and commandments.

The following is a list of principles which I think should inform people as they think about calling and purpose in their lives specifically with regard to Jewish roots or belonging to Messianic Jewish communities:

God does not love Jews more than people from the nations. No one needs to be Jewish to find greater favor, blessing, or role in life. If there was any uncertainty about this before Yeshua came and the apostles carried on his work, that uncertainty has been removed completely.

The Torah covenant is not between non-Jews and God, but between God and the people of Israel. As a non-Jew, you do not need to take on Jewish identity markers. It is not wrong for you to eat pork. It is not wrong for you to work on Shabbat. Any sense of guilt you have over these issues is not from God but from false teaching.

The Church is God’s multi-national institution for non-Jews and being human is as corrupt as anything human will be. Israel is God’s national people set apart for a purpose in history. The people of Israel show the same failings as the Church and vice-versa. There is no room for comparing the Church or Israel unfavorably. Both are a mixture of blessing and curse, hope and failure, light and darkness.

Supersessionism (replacement theology) is wrong, but does not disqualify the Church any more than rampant sin disqualifies Israel or the Church. There is no righteous community you can join. God will not judge you because your corporate community is imperfect. We are called to be a light to those around us, in the Church or amongst the people of Israel.

The people of Israel is not a refuge from “Babylon,” as some people put it, or a righteous place for people to run to get away from the alleged paganism of Christianity. Do not seek out a Messianic synagogue because you see no option between church practices that bother you and becoming Jewish. If you think for a minute, people seeking a community free from uncomfortable practices could and perhaps should start Christian community based on those principles before retreating to Israel and giving up on the Church.

Do not try to change Messianic Judaism into a universal Torah movement so you can have a home. If you cannot see in the Bible that God has a remnant of Yeshua-faith in Israel and that this remnant has a purpose in the plan of God in history, I have doubts about your ability to read the Bible. Any attempt to dilute the remnant of Israel with sloppy theology denies that God has a plan for the remnant of Israel. This point gets me in trouble with my friends in the universal Torah movements. Too often, this is what I think they are doing — redefining Israel to include gentiles with faith in Yeshua. If that is true, then why did God bother to choose Israel at all and why are there continuing statements of Israel’s unique election and calling in the New Testament?

It is not necessary to come to Judaism or Messianic Judaism to practice a faith more in line with the whole Bible. It is possible to have Christian communities which celebrate Passover. Though I am not in favor of Shabbat observance for Christians, if you believe this is God’s will, you can do it in a Christian group. You don’t have to take over a Messianic synagogue to be a Sabbath-keeping Christian.

It is possible to be a member of a church and to have periodic fellowship, such as at holidays, with Jewish and/or Messianic Jewish groups. You don’t have to join Israel to have a relationship with Jewish people.

There certainly are non-Jews who have Jewish souls. Conversion has always been an option through intermarriage and also through other forms of joining the Jewish people. If you look at websites about conversion, you will find that the reasons most Jewish teachers list for conversion are similar to the desires many non-Jews in Messianic Judaism have. Some of my colleagues might criticize me for saying this, but I invite them to dialogue. Why should Messianic Judaism be more dissuasive of potential converts than mainstream Judaism? As long as people have healthy senses of their own identity and worth in God’s eyes, I don’t think we should deny persistent desires to become one with the people of Israel. (NOTE: I do not think “Paul’s rule in all the churches” disagrees with what I am saying here — more on that in the Paul’s rule series of blog posts I will continue here on Messianic Jewish Musings).

Upcoming
So far, we have discussed (in Part 1) the reasons for a wide interest among non-Jews in Jewish roots and Messianic Judaism. We have considered the importance of communal identity as opposed to thoughtless individualism. And we have considered the balance between the subjective and objective in finding God’s will for our calling.

In further installments in this series, we will look at options and issues for non-Jews. We will consider questions like, “How would Christianity have looked if it had not been for supersessionism (replacement theology) and anti-nomianism (a rejection of commandments)?” We will discuss the situations of people in different places, all with a love for Israel, for the Hebrew Bible, and for various parts or the whole of Jewish tradition.

It is feared that the destruction of the Temple Mount by Muslims continues

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Fr Stephen Smuts has the low-down here.

The 20 worst Jesus paraphernalia products of all time

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Marc Cortez highlights a website which features a gallery of the the 20 greatest Jesus products of all time. Marc rightly warns us of the disturbing nature of these products and yet if you’re anything like me, this will only encourage you to rubberneck.

These truly are awful, you have been warned, and if you do view them, do let us know your fav ;-)

The 20 greatest Jesus products of all time

ps the worst one for me was the coat hanger, what is it about coat hangers and Jesus?

Switch to our mobile site