Archive for April, 2010

I’m a Horrible Apologist. Is that OK?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

This is a cross-post by Brian LePort over at the Near Emmaus blog, which I found delightfully honest and refreshing:

I’m a Horrible Apologist. Is that OK?

I enjoy a good conversation with someone who does not affirm the Christian religion. Many of my friends and family are atheist or agnostics. On the other hand, I have noticed that I make for a terrible apologist! I have participated in several conversations throughout the blogosphere over the last couple of weeks that have left me mentally exhausted (e.g. see here, here, and here). There are some people who can go back and forth with a skeptic. I am not one of those people!

I think everyone should be a Christian but I am not very good at arguing for this end. I think the Genesis narrative is vague enough for one to affirm current scientific findings, especially in regards to evolution, but I cannot prove this to be true or false. I think the gospel is very, very believable, but I do not have enough training in philosophy to go toe to toe for very long in arguments over epistemology. I think that experiencing the Holy Spirit can be foundational to a confession of faith. I cannot prove that experiencing the Holy Spirit is any better than other paranormal religious experiences. I think the Scriptures are the Word of God inspired by the Holy Spirit. We could spend all day arguing but I probably cannot prove to you that the Qur’an is inferior.

Is this OK? I know we are told to “make a defense to anyone who ask you for a reason for the hope that is in you” (1 Peter 3.15) but I am more than aware that my reasons often prove unsatisfying to most skeptics. I can spend all day studying Christian theology and biblical exegesis, but I cannot prove to you that you should think any more of these subjects than you do of reading Kant or Foucault.

If I had more time I would try to study these subjects more in depth, but I have this sneaking suspicion that it wouldn’t change much. In the end I would still be a Christian and in the end I would still be able to go so far with my argument before I had to agree to disagree. Is my attitude about this all wrong? Should I care about being able to defend my faith with better arguments in the fields of philosophy, history, and science?

I’m exactly the same, I simply can’t debate or argue for toffees.

My questions is how many folks have ever been argued or debated in to the Kingdom anyway?

The Magen League & The Russian Orthodox Church Vs. Messianic Jews

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

I have posted on this blog in the past relating to the move by the Russian Orthodox Church, in collusion with the Russian government, to outlaw non Russian Orthodox Christians from proselytising in Russia.

See here, here and here.

As the Russian Orthodox church ascends in terms of religious and political power, status and influence, their relationship with the Russian authorities has become worryingly symbiotic.

As the outlawing of non-Orthodox Christians from evangelising appears to have come about for reasons of consolidating religio-political hegemony, I was stunned to discover that anti-Messianic groups have hijacked and co-opted this, by joining forces with the Russian Orthodox Church, with the sole purpose of opposing and eradicating Messianic Jews in Russia.

Cross-post by Joseph over at the Rosh Pina Project

The Magen League & The Russian Orthodox Church Vs. Messianic Jews

According to many anti-Messianics, the authenticity of Messianic Jews as true Jews can be called into question as many of them receive financial and ideological support from powerful churches.

Many people in the anti-Messianic group Magen League clearly feel this way, such as director Alexander Lakshin, who thinks:

‘Self-described “Messianic Jews” are essentially evangelical Christian missionaries in Jewish disguise. Their aim, well camoflauged at first by a blitz of Jewish words, symbols, songs and traditions is simple, to convert as many people as they can to Christianity.’

Then again, the Magen League also enjoys Christian support:

Though underfunded and understaffed, the anti-messianics have in Russia a strong ally — the Russian Orthodox Church, which in many places means de facto state support. “We are viewing the so-called messianic Jewish organizations as sects, which means we are definitely against them,” Father Vsevolod Chaplin, a Moscow-based church official, told JTA.

So perhaps the anti-Messianics of Russia aren’t true Jews, as they receive church backing for the Magen League?

In fact, did you know the Magen League was started as a joint project between, amongst others, Chabad in Russia and the Russian Orthodox Church?:

An international conference: The Missionary Threat – How to combat it? was held in Moscow yesterday. It discussed the issue of the activity in Russia of various evangelical sects, which has increased noticeably over the last year. In order to combat sects together, Russian Chief Rabbi Berl Lazar, the chief rabbis of Kaliningrad, Volgograd, Krasnoyarsk, and Armenia, and representatives of the Jewish religious communities of Belarus and other CIS [Commonwealth of Independent States] countries attended the conference. Roman Silantyev attended the conference on behalf of the Moscow patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church. Those who had assembled agreed that the active work of missionaries from the organizations, Jews for Jesus and Shma Israel, constitute a real danger.  The sect propagandists, who come from the United States and Finland, are called representatives of Judaism and call upon all those who consider themselves true Jews to believe in Jesus Christ. The conference participants are of the opinion that this propaganda has two negative consequences – the incorrect interpretation of the main dogma of both Judaism and Orthodoxy and, consequently, the emergence of tension between the two confessions.

If Messianic Jews can be questioned because they receive support from Gentile Christians, then so can anti-Messianic Jews.

In his speech to the conference, Roman Silantyev, an official from the external relations department of the Russian Orthodox Church’s Moscow Patriarchate, also expressed concern about the sects’ activity, although he noted that these missionaries do not represent an especially serious danger to Orthodoxy but that the patriarchate approves and supports Mr Lazar’s initiatives. The first informational steps were made right away yesterday. A seminar to train specialists who will oppose the missionaries, chiefly in Jewish communities in the provinces, was held as part of the conference. A decision was made to set up a “Magen” league that will monitor the activity of the sect groups.

Unbelievable!

Just what are our Jewish Messianic brothers and sisters up against?

Well to get an insight have a look at the following link, because Magen are planning to come to Europe:

Mark Powers: International Man of Mystery

Oh joy….

John Cleese explains the ‘God Gene’

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

H/T

Pipe Down Bullhorn Guy!

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

Love it, love it, love it.

A cross-post by Christian over at the HomeBrewed Theology blog, which really sums it all up for me right now.

Pipe Down Bullhorn Guy!

We’ve all seen them, whether on the news, the street corner, or in the movies.

We’ve all heard them – “The End is Near!”, “God Hates _______!”, “_____ is a _____!”

Typically, we all have the same response.

We cringe.

The bullhorn guy is loud, is obnoxious, and is absolutely, positively, without a doubt convinced that he is right.

The sin of the bullhorn guy, you see, is pride.

He ignores anything that contradicts with his world view.

He shouts down anyone who tries to have a rational discussion.

He approaches the world like this:

Ears plugged.  Mouth open.  Brain disengaged.

That’s not Jesus.

Jesus met people where they were.

In the story of Lazarus, he knew the end of the story, but until he met the mourners in their grief, his message went unheard.

In the story of the adulteress, he met her in her shame and loved her without condemnation.

You see, conviction in our sin is the job of the Holy Spirit.

Judgment of our lives is the job of Jesus and the Father.

Condemnation of our fellow man was the job of the Pharisees.

Is there a time where the bullhorn may be necessary?  Yes.  However, if that is your primary method of communication, you’re doing it wrong.

Meeting and loving people where they are doesn’t mean we agree with them.

It doesn’t mean we condone their actions.

It means we value them as God does.

It means we see them as God sees them.

It means that they, like us, are perfectly and wonderfully made.

Condemnation will never change a person’s heart.

Love will.

Bullhorn guy, we may never agree.  We may never be close friends.

And that’s ok.

You see, pride goes before a fall.

I’m willing to admit that I may have it wrong.

Are you?

West Virginia coal mine explosion – 25 Miners, 25 Men, 25 Families – And Counting

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

An update to this post earlier from my dear friend and brother Polycarp, who had the harrowing and heartrending job of being on the scene of the disaster late last night.

Pray for families and the injured.

And finally, if you have exhausted the above, for me.

I remember sitting in my home in Louisiana, dreaming about moving to West Virginia, reading books, exploring the history. I lighted upon a book detailing heroic men and women of West Virginia’s past. They fought for their freedom against the Company, sacrificing sometimes their own lives to better their children and their community’s future. They were Coal Miners. These people were not superheroes with supernatural powers, cool costumes and technological marvels. No, these were men, and some women, that get up early in the morning, or late at night, dress in coveralls, pack a lunch and head into the earth to work eight or so hours in the damp, dark open grave to dig out America’s industrial fuel. When they came out, whether or not they were white or black going in, they were all the same shade. Covered in black coal dust, they headed to the bathhouse, if they were lucky, or home if not. They did amazing feats, defeating the Kaiser and Hitler and the Reds with the swing of the pick ax, the rumble of the engine, and the powering of a new miner which didn’t need to eat.

These became my heroes, and drove my motivation to move to West Virginia that much more.

I have met many coal miners since I moved to West Virginia – eight years in October – and these men, who sink into the depths daily have become a fixture in my own life. I have been underground a few times, but it is merely an adolescent fantasy that I could even think to participate in what they do.

Early yesterday morning several dozen men got up, dressed, loved their families and went to work. They worked all day buried deep in the earth. They worked, waiting for that mantrip to come and get them, to take them to the bathhouse, to go home. That moment arrived. They headed home. Then, hell broke loose. The mountain shook, the earth bellowed, and the force of the explosion snatched the life out of nearly 30 men and ripped fathers, sons, brothers, nephews, grandsons from the bosom of their loved ones. Not one of them cares that this is the worse mining disaster since 1984. No, nearly 30 families now only see the tragedy before them – that yesterday morning, in the dark, these miners left for work, and will now forever, remain in the dark, their lives traded for the electricity that I use to write this, that you no doubt use to read this. The next time you turn on the light switch, remember the coal miners.

My station in life requires that I participate in investigations, and I have been to the site of an accident once. Normally, I stay at my desk, ask questions, or record answers, compile reports and then bring them to the Board. To be honest, since I have been in position, I have had the pleasant fortune of simply not having that many fatal reports to file. Generally, they are out of distance. Last night, it was different. Last night, it was in a community that I had spent a considerable amount of time in while I was a community organizer. I still remember that feisty Catholic nun who, I swear, would take on the Pope himself if she thought he was standing in her way. I talked with a lot of miners down there, a lot of families. Last night, I had no excuse not to go, and as the dawn breaks today, I hear reports of friends and family of mine who were connected to those forever etched into the history of the mine.

Normally, I joke to people when they ask if I stay busy. I generally offer the response that if I am busy, then someone has had a bad day. Last night, nearly 30 people had a bad day, and this morning, nearly 30 families we suffer.

Last night, as I raced to the scene, I didn’t know what to expect. You have to understand, this mine is stuck at the end of the world, in a dark holler, between what used to be civilization and what is civilization. The roads are narrows, winding, and may or may not have sides, and if they do, it is generally the wall of a mountain on one, sheared off to make that road, or nothing but a drop on the other. Arriving, traffic was backed up, with Mine Rescue trucks trying to enter the property. Then, I saw a haunting sight, as the first of four ambulances carrying the mutilated body of a coal miner, turned the corner of a mountain road, way up, coming out of the mine property.

Four of them rounded the bend and carried their passengers silently to somewhere. Silence. Reverence. Respect. Family members waiting on the side of the road, tears in eyes, a sniffle. No one knowing really what was going on.

On the site, the mine rescue teams, three already underground, sweeping the mine corridors for signs of life or evidences of death. Four more to go in in the first few hours after I arrived on site. I stood around, praying, not able to do anything by watch. The number of deaths – which will be assigned a number for the report – and the number of missing starting their evil adding and subtracting. They would move slowly from the missing column to the confirmed dead column. And hearts would drop. Those men on the mine rescue teams, they stood around, and I don’t know how many believe in God or not, but it seems to me, that with each passing number, I could see prayers starting to form. Hearts grew heavy.

Then the call came that they were pulling the seven mine rescue teams which were already underground out because of high levels of methane – which causes huge explosions. You cannot enter a mine unless it is properly ventilated to get rid of such things as methane. It was time to leave, as nothing else could be done. We left with twenty-five coal miners confirmed dead and four missing. There is one hope left for those four.

Coal miners are often seen as intellectually impoverished, backwards, backwoods, but coal miners are the heart and soul of West Virginia. These men are coal dust covered, colored, knights, soldiers, embattled on every side, and yet, those men who stood in the shop last night, in the rescue team staging area, cared not for sleep or necessary sustenance,  but to be ready, on deck, to head into a generations old mine, taking hours to get to the search area and spending hours – perhaps days – looking for their fallen comrades whom they never met.

I left, nothing more to do – I haven’t done anything – but pray and rest and get ready to investigate – God, I don’t want to go into that mine – perhaps by sitting in on the hearings. It will be the men and women of MSHA and West Virginia’s mining enforcement agency that as to do the real work, God be with them.

My son wanted to be a coal miner. My God forgive me for every encouraging him to be. When I left yesterday evening, he said that he wanted to pray about them. Maybe, dear God, he will be a preacher.

So, my friends, keep those miners who are still missing in your prayers. Keep their families in your prayers, that community and the communities who lost their loved ones last night.

You can keep up on the updates here.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown, calls the UK General Election for 6 May.

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has called the UK General Election for 6 May.

No big surprise there.

Most of the UK blogs and websites I watch, have gone already in to campaigning overdrive.

Frankly I couldn’t care less. I’m aiming to be an election free zone if I can.

I presume I should feel some Christian responsibility to be politically motivated, but I don’t. In fact I have read today that it is my Christian moral duty to be interested in this election, but I’m not.

To be honest there are a plethora of highly proficient folk online to inform the Christian world who they believe we should vote for, and I personally find none of them any more convincing than the other, either on the left or the right.

And so instead, I’m going to try to put my hands on one of these hats for the duration of the election campaign, do my best to ignore the whole carnival, and keep smiling.

West Virginia coal mine explosion

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

Cross-post by Polycarp (based in the US & posted late last night).

Serious Coal Miner Accident

You can find the details here. Part of my day job is to participate in the investigations of these events. This one will require that I head underground. Please pray, as I am going now.

Twitter update from Polycarp a few moments ago.

On the way home. A very sad night. God help us.

Latest from BBC

Twenty-five miners are now known to have died and four are missing after an accident at a West Virginia coal mine.

The accident was caused by an underground explosion at the Upper Big Branch mine some 30 miles (50 km) south of Charleston in the eastern US.

The blast happened around 1500 (1900 GMT), said the mine’s owner Massey Energy Company.

The number of fatalities makes this the worst US mine disaster since 1984. Rescue efforts have been suspended.

Safety officials said rising methane gas levels had heightened the risk of another explosion.

The operation would resume as soon as conditions allowed, Massey Energy said.

“We are sending all of our prayers and thoughts to the brave miners and their families,” said West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller.

“I just spoke with President Obama and he has promised to make every asset available to help us and we will be in contact as the rescue continues,” said West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin.

“We are all working diligently together and I ask that everyone pray for the miners, their families and our rescue teams.”

Trapped teams

The blast happened as a number of workers were in a vehicle transporting them out of the mine.

Miners in a vehicle ahead felt a blast of air and went back to find out what happened, finding several of their co-workers dead and two injured.

Rescuers had been trying to reach trapped miners further into the mine, but some of them also appear to have been found dead.

Officials say four miners are still unaccounted for, but there was not much hope of finding them alive as they did not appear to have reached chambers which could have provided them with extra oxygen.

“It does not appear that any of the individuals made it to a rescue chamber,” Kevin Stricklin, an administrator for the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, said at a news conference.

“The situation is dire.”

Massey Energy says on its website that it has a safety record that is above the national average, with three fatalities in the last 12 years.

But federal inspectors have fined the company more than $382,000 for serious violations at the mine over the past year, the Associated Press reports.

Last year 34 miners were killed in accidents across the US, the lowest on record.

But the Upper Big Branch accident is the biggest since 1984, when 27 people were killed by a fire at Emery Mining Corp’s mine in Orangeville, Utah.

Anti-Zionist Theologians, Churches, Christians and Their Impact.

Monday, April 5th, 2010

Whilst Stephen Sizer continues his obsessive “anti-Zionist” campaign from his own peculiar theological position, he today appears to physically pee himself laughing, for ‘ticking off’ and ‘raising the blood pressure’ of Mark Tooley.

Nice.

As has been noted on this blog previously, anti-Zionist theologians and churches have the potential to create an existential threat to Israel, which to me is no laughing matter.

Calvin L Smith goes further today, and notes the implication of anti-Zionist Christian rhetoric on the plight of Christians dwelling within Islamic lands:

Before church this Easter morning I was reading through the papers and came across this article in the Daily Telegraph about the awful situation in which Iraqi Christians find themselves. It’s a tragic report of several hundred thousand Christian refugees fleeing the violence they encounter in the likes of Bagdad and Mosul and heading for the West or the Kurdish areas, death threats, being stopped in the streets with demands to see identity cards, resulting in being robbed, kidnapped or more recently simply shot out of hand. Murder of clergy and laity is frequent. And it is clear they are being targeted specifically because they are Christians.

The report highlighted several issues for me. First, anti-Zionist Christians do the plight of such Christians in Iraq and across the Middle East few favours by constantly focusing on the situation in the Holy Land at the expense of the terrible trials Christians face across the wider region. The horrors described should have us all up in arms, but voices from some segments of the Church are strangely silent over the persecution of Christians in Muslim lands. Inevitably, these persecuted Christians might be forgiven for feeling their Western counterparts have forgotten them.

Continue Reading

Indeed.

Stephen Sizer is not alone of course in his vehement “anti-Zionism”, as Joseph over at the Rosh Pina Project today picks up on an essay written by the noted theologian NT Wright.

So with all of this negative preoccupation focused on the Holy Land and the Jewish people, from western Christians, churches and theologians, a consequence of this, is that all too often the terrible plight of our Christian brothers and sisters in Islamic controlled lands is ignored, relegated and potentially worsened.

In order to offer some balance, let’s take a little time to remember our Jordanian brethren, courtesy of the Elder of Ziyon blog:

Jordanian Christians visiting Jerusalem for Easter under threat

Remember the absurd Reuters article that implied that Israel was doing everything it could to discourage Arab Christians from visiting Jerusalem, and that Israeli policies were keeping Christians from Arab countries away?

From The Christian Science Monitor:

Many of the Arab Christians flocking to holy sites in Israel this Easter Sunday come from neighboring Jordan.

But they do so at a price.

Those who make the trek – and, as part of a broader rise in religious tourism, more are making it every year – risk their professional reputation and their family’s disapproval.

For a country whose 1994 peace treaty with Israel was never accepted at the popular level, receiving an entry stamp, let alone a visa from Israel, is considered “treason” to the Arab cause.

But despite a growing movement to discredit those involved with the “Zionist enemy,” hundreds of Jordanians risk their careers and reputation to complete a pilgrimage to holy sites in Israel’s occupied territories.

“I cannot help it,” says Daoud Yazeed, a Jordanian Christian who disguises his pilgrimages as business trips. “Jerusalem is calling.”

In 2009, 15,000 Jordanians traveled to Israel, the most of any Arab or Muslim country. While a majority of them were visiting Palestinian relatives, a significant number are part of a growing trend of religious tourism.

According to tour operators, an increasing number of Jordanian Christians and Muslims – Jerusalem is Islam’s third holiest city – are taking part in all-inclusive week-long trips through Nazareth, Hebron, and Jerusalem, priced at $600.

But under the Anti-Normalization movement, spearheaded by Islamists and professional associations opposed to Jordan’s 1994 peace treaty – or “normalization” with Israel – those found to have normalized are disbarred from their union and lose their professional licenses, which are required by Jordanian law.

Families further face the public humiliation of being added to a once-publicized blacklist of individuals and companies that deal with the “Zionist entity.”
‘Anti-normalization’ activists

Anti-Normalization activists are determined to crack down on the practice this holiday to bring to light those who have “normalized with the enemy,” according to Muslim Brotherhood and National Anti- Normalization Committee leader Hamzah Mansour.

“This is supporting Zionist efforts to rid the holy lands and Palestine of its inhabitants, and it is forbidden,” he said.

He compared trips to Jerusalem to the Hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca which is considered the duty of every adult Muslim, pointing out that the journey is not required if a worshiper has poor health or a lack of money.

“Al Aqsa is occupied territory and you are not expected to pilgrimage to Al Aqsa. God understands,” Mr. Mansour said, calling on Jordanian Christians to pray in local holy sites this Easter to “support the local industry.”

According to the professional associations, they have yet to revoke union memberships over normalization. But the threat itself has deterred hundreds, if not thousands, from making the trip, or pushed their travel into secret, tour operators say.

Normalization, however, was the last of the concerns for Ramzi Mustafa, one of 200 Christian pilgrims from Egypt – the only other Arab country that has made peace with Israel – in the holy city this weekend with organized tour groups.He said his participation in processions on Via Dolorosa on Good Friday is a way of showing support for the Palestinians and the need for peace, not support for “Zionism.”

And what do the Arabs of Jerusalem think about all this?

Nor do Muslim pilgrimages suggest support for occupation, says the head of Jerusalem’s holy sites, Sheikh Mohamed Azzam Tamimi.

“Jordanians and Egyptians, all Arabs should come and see the holy city,” he said, noting that due to visa restrictions most of the visitors are from Asia, not the Arab world. “We may be under occupation, but supporting our efforts is not normalization.”

Politics should not prevent Arab Christians and Muslims from traveling to the holy city, according to William Shomali, auxiliary bishop of the Latin Patriarch in Jerusalem, who welcomed all Arabs to take part in Easter services.

“Our dream is for all Arab Christians and Muslims to come and pray in the holy city,” he said, acknowledging the current situation has been “difficult” for Arab Christians across the region.

“They should come regardless of the political situation,” he said. “We should separate politics from religion, even if certain parties want to join them together; all have the right to pray in the holy sites.”

The Islamists in Jordan, Egypt and elsewhere threaten those who want to come to Jerusalem for any reason – religious or to give cultural support for Palestinian Arabs. The PalArabs who they pretend to be supporting are unanimous in their desire for the visitors, even if they get an Israeli visa stamp.

It just goes to show once again that the people who pretend to care about Palestinian Arabs really only care about hating Israel, not supporting their Palestinian brethren.

It also shows that Israel welcomes these Arabs into the country, and it indicates that Israel is much more interested in freedom of religion for the holy sites under its control than Arab nations ever were.

By way of example, some 105,000 visitors were expected in Jerusalem this week, as opposed to the 10,000 or less that would come during Holy Week before the Six Day War. Any implication that Israeli policies have reduced the number of religious visitors to Jerusalem (as the Reuters article implied) is not only a lie, but an egregious lie.

Greenpeace turns nasty: We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.

Monday, April 5th, 2010

The new religion of anthropogenic climate change has taken a hammering over past months, due to ClimateGate and the fact that they have been steadily losing the scientific argument.

As the pressure has mounted on Gaia, it would seem that they have revealed their true colours:

GreenPeace Weblog

The proper channels have failed. It’s time for mass civil disobedience to cut off the financial oxygen from denial and skepticism.

If you’re one of those who believe that this is not just necessary but also possible, speak to us. Let’s talk about what that mass civil disobedience is going to look like.

If you’re one of those who have spent their lives undermining progressive climate legislation, bankrolling junk science, fueling spurious debates around false solutions, and cattle-prodding democratically-elected governments into submission, then hear this:

We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.

And we be many, but you be few.

Nice.

Us “deniers” had better watch our backs for the pitchforks and ploughshares.

With the utter failure of the HopenHagen summit last December, to secure Gaia’s demands of the nations, it appears they have adopted the new tactic of issuing unveiled threats to dissenters.

Verdict on Nicky Campbell’s Easter Sunday BBC documentary: Are Christians Being Persecuted?

Monday, April 5th, 2010

Cross-post by Jonathan Bartley – Ekklesia

Last week I set out 5 tests by which to evaluate Nicky Campbell’s BBC television documentary on alleged Christian ‘persecution’ in the UK, which was broadcast tonight, on Easter Sunday.

Ekklesia has been examining these issues closely since 2004. We produced a book which analysed the reasons for feelings about ‘persecution’ and predicted the growing trend towards confrontation over this, back in 2006. We also did a report in the same year on one set of conflict situations in universities. It suggested an alternative approach which was welcomed by Government and others involved. We have also spoken to many of the actors caught up in similar cases, on all sides, as well as observing what has been going on behind the scenes.

This is quite hard for me to write, as I know Nicky through doing BBC1′s ‘Big Questions’ TV programme. It is right to be honest however, particularly given the work we have done in this area. (I am aware however it could lose me the Big Questions gig, as criticism seemed to lose me Thought for the Day, but here goes anyway….!)

The documentary concludes what most of us already know – that Christians aren’t being ‘persecuted’ in the same way as in many parts of the world, but that some feel marginalised. But the programme’s overly simplistic hypothesis is (implicitly) that this marginalisation is happening, and is down to ‘secularisation’ which has brought about competition around ‘rights’ in the public square between the religious and the non-religious. It further concludes that religious (Christian) liberty is being lost.

The immediate observation is that the selection of those interviewed was almost entirely one sided. There was no religious voice to provide an alternative view to the documentary’s central hypothesis. The only people who came close were Nick Spencer from Theos and Muslim Ziauddin Sardar. But they simply offered their thoughts about how to deal with ethics and morality in a pluralist society. There was no real challenge to the use of the ‘rights’ discourse, nor a hint that things might be a little more complex. Neither was there a challenge to the ‘secularisation’ hypothesis which is challenged by many academics and others not included or mentioned in the programme.

The other side, however, was represented by interviews with about a dozen others. Those interviews included former Bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir Ali, Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, Anglican Bishop of Oxford John Pritchard, Catholic Archbishop Vincent Nichols, Andrea Williams from the Christian Legal Centre (formerly Lawyers Christian Fellowship), and the Rev George Pitcher from the Daily Telegraph. (NB. three establishment Anglicans, a Catholic and a highly conservative Evangelical as far as the Christians go).

The only dissenting voice was journalist and commentator Polly Tonybee, President of the British Humanist Association, a choice which also reinforced the programme’s mistaken paradigm that this was primarily a ‘religion v atheism/secularism’ issue.

The polling data was also represented in a one-sided manner. Campbell cited a ‘special’ BBC poll commissioned through ComRes for the programme. He said it was to determine whether people were becoming more ‘tolerant’ of religion. What it actually asked about was whether people ‘believed’ Britain was becoming less tolerant, which is rather a different matter.

He reported one poll result – that 44 per cent of people believed Britain is becoming less tolerant of religion. He did not mention however that the same BBC poll found 39 per cent believing Britain is in fact becoming more tolerant.

The poll findings were presented as ‘revealing’. But more in depth studies around the same time by the same polling organisation, paint a different picture. When the question was put: “Do you agree or disagree with each of the following statement?” (sic) “‘Religious freedoms have been restricted in Britain over the past 10 years’” this other survey found that most disagreed. Almost double the number (59 per cent) in fact disagreed (as opposed to agreed) with the statement. Amongst Christians the disagreement was even slightly higher (60 per cent). This evidence was not referred to, even though it provides a compelling case against the programme’s central hypothesis.

But what of the five questions that were raised previously by which the programme might be evaluated?

Question 1. Will the claims of ‘persecution’ be properly scrutinised? There has been so much misinformation about what local councils, hospitals, schools and other bodies have been doing/saying. The claims make great headlines, but upon further scrutiny – including talking to the bodies involved – the claims often have little substance. There are certainly disagreements, but they are often of a different nature to the way they are being presented. Will the documentary interview the public bodies involved and get the story from their perspective? (It is sometimes the case that the people involved in the bodies are themselves Christians).

There was next to no scrutiny of the claims whatsoever. Cases cited included that of Duke Amachree, the Wandsworth homelessness prevention officer. Like the others, the account of his story was one-sided. There was no interview with anyone from Wandsworth council, or even an indication that they had asked the council to comment. There was no reporting of what the local papers said about the case, which is public record, and gives a very different picture. It was not reported for example that there is evidence that it was the actions of the Christian Legal Centre in giving confidential information to the Daily Mail, that may have led to Amachrie’s dismissal. An absolutely crucial point.

The cases of both nurse Caroline Petrie and teacher Olive Jones were also cited. There was no acknowledgement that they are friends. There was no mention of the fact that the allegations against Olive Jones in particular came from the family of a girl with leukaemia who she was tutoring, and the distress that they expressed about what had happened. There was no mention that the Christian Legal Centre falsely claimed that Olive Jones had been sacked – a point which was also uncritically repeated by the media and never scrutinised.

2. Will there be a proper account of why some Christians feel marginalised? Specifically, will the context of post-Christendom be taken into account? The churches have had centuries of special privilege, with Christianity being a dominant narrative. Religion is relocating and finding a new place in society. This is making many Christians feel unsettled and making others fearful. This is being fuelled by many of the reports in the press and media.

After a promising start, which seemed to take this into account, the documentary slipped into the ‘secularisation’ thesis. As predicted Campbell fell back on the example of the Russian/ French revolutions. The reports in the press and media were presented uncritically. There was no acknowledgement in a section about the attitudes of teachers to sharing their faith, that one third of primary schools are faith schools, and that there are legal safeguards, as well as special opt outs, for them to teach in accordance with their ethos. A remarkable and glaring omission. Nor was it mentioned that faith schools can legally discriminate in employment against those of other faiths and no faith.

3. Will the documentary scrutinise the work of pressure groups like the Lawyer’s Christian Fellowship, Christian Concern for our Nation and the Christian Institute, who have been feeding the Daily Mail and Daily Telegraph with stories, sometimes with dire consequences? Will there be examination of their ideology and what is driving their efforts, which we have suggested involves a radicalisation as a response to post-Christendom? Will the links to what is going on in the US also be made?

There was no scrutiny of these groups at all. The Christian Legal Centre was featured several times, and again without any critical analysis, or even a question that they could be fuelling the problem, despite evidence that they are (cited above). There was also an interview with George Pitcher from the Daily Telegraph. No questions of this nature were put to him either. There was no examination of the radicalisation hypothesis or mention of the links to the US.

4. Will the documentary look at mediation efforts to sort out the disputes? What has often been happening is that positions quickly become entrenched and there is little chance of amicable resolution following misunderstandings or mistakes. This is often because pressure groups get involved and raise the stakes, giving stories to the media. I know for a fact that the documentary makers spoke to a top QC who is not just an evangelical Christian, but one of the most experienced commercial mediators in the country.

There was no mention of mediation whatsoever even though the programme makers had been told about its existence. The QC did not feature at all.

5. Will the documentary primarily frame the debates as a simplistic conflict of rights, or accept that the situation is far more complex? Will it bring in different Christian perspectives which do not see this primarily as about one person trumping another?

The documentary framed the debates primarily in terms of conflicts of rights. Although the Equality Bill featured heavily, there was no mention at all, let alone interviews with, for example gay Christians or Quakers who were lobbying on the other side. The issue was presented as one of religious liberty for only one ‘side’, completely failing to acknowledge the liberties of Christians and other religious groups on the other side. Nor were any religious perspectives represented who did not see this as a competition of “rights”.

Conclusion

This could have been a great documentary which actually brought some light to the debates, and offered a way forward. Instead it uncritically accepted the claims which have been reported consistently in the Daily Mail and Daily Telegraph, and failed to challenge the groups who are actually the cause of many of the problems. In a programme which was supposed to be addressing the marginalisation of Christians, it also did a great deal to marginalise Christians who held dissenting views. It took little or no account of poll data and other evidence which would challenge, or even balance the perspective that the programme was seeking to present.

Switch to our mobile site