Archive for January, 2010

John 1:29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!”

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi, miserere nobis.
Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi, miserere nobis.
Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi, dona nobis pacem.

Translated….

Lamb of God, you who take away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us.
Lamb of God, you who take away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us.
Lamb of God, you who take away the sins of the world, grant us peace.

We wish to show our solidarity with Seismic Shock who has been the victim of intimidation for shining a spotlight on the anti-Zionist theology of Reverend Stephen Sizer.

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

These are the words from the CIFWatch blog:-

We wish to show our solidarity with Seismic Shock who, as described in his guest post below, has been the victim of intimidation for shining a spotlight on the anti-Zionist theology of Reverend Stephen Sizer. As Ben Cohen at Z-Word says “We Are All Seismic Shock” and he urges readers to tell Sizer what you think by emailing him here. I similarly urge you to do the same thing. For more on this developing story, visit Harry’s Place, ModernityBlog and Engage. We will not be silenced.

I utterly concur. I also posted about this here and am thrilled to see this on so many other blogs. Here is the story again for those that missed it:-

Anglican Vicar Uses Police To Intimidate Blogger

As some people have noticed, I’ve been rather quiet in blogging about the Reverend Stephen Sizer’s activities of late.

After all, what more can be said of a man who forwards emails from Holocaust deniers, shares platforms with Holocaust deniers, and shamelessly flaunts his anti-Zionist theology before Iran’s apocalyptic Holocaust-denying regime? As Iranian pastors are arrested and house churches closed down, why is the Khomeinist regime translating Sizer’s book on Christian Zionism into Farsi? How many more times can I point all this out?

Yet there’s another reason why I’ve been quiet, and whilst I’ve held my tongue and my pen for a while, now is time to speak.

At 10am on Sunday 29th November 2009, I received a visit from two policemen regarding my activities in running the Seismic Shock blog. (Does exposing a vicar’s associations with extremists make me a criminal?, I wondered initially). A sergeant from the Horsforth Police related to me that he had received complaints via Surrey Police from Rev Sizer and from Dr Anthony McRoy – a lecturer at the Wales Evangelical School of Theology – who both objected to being associated with terrorists and Holocaust deniers.

(Context: Sizer has associated with some very nasty terrorists and Holocaust deniers; McRoy has delivered a paper at a Khomeinist theological conference in Iran comparing Hezbollah’s struggle against Israel via suicide bombing with the Christian’s struggle against sin via the atoning death of Jesus, and describes the world’s most prominent Holocaust denier as an “intelligent, humble, charismatic, and charming” man who “gives quick, extensive and intelligent answers to any question, mixed with genial humour”).

The sergeant made clear that this was merely an informal chat, in which I agreed to delete my original blog (http://seismicshock.blogspot.com) but maintain my current one (http://seismicshock.wordpress.com). The policeman related to me that his police force had been in contact with the ICT department my previous place of study, and had looked through my files, and that the head of ICT at my university would like to remind me that I should not be using university property in order to associate individuals with terrorists and Holocaust deniers (I am sure other people use university property to make political comments, but nevermind).

With my research on Reverend Sizer’s associations with terrorists and Holocaust deniers making its way into a publication of the Society of Biblical Literature, I was quite content to hold my peace. However, now that Reverend Sizer is now misrepresenting what has happened in my case in order to intimidate others, now is the time to speak up.

A Christian blogger – “Vee” of LivingJourney, who is based in Australia – linked to my blog as a resource for Christians to learn about anti-Semitism in the Church, including “lots of info on Stephen Sizer and Sabeel”.

Rev Sizer left her this comment:

Dear Vee,

You must take a little more care who you brand as anti-semitic otherwise you too will be receiving a caution from the police as the young former student of Leeds did recently. One more reference to me and you will be reported.

Blessings
Stephen

Sure, Stephen Sizer managed to somehow arrange a police visit to me from within the UK, but does Sizer genuinely think he can use police on the other side of the world to this effect?

Why is Reverend Sizer claiming that I received a police caution, when the police stressed I did not receive a caution? Is Sizer deliberately misrepresenting the same police force that he originally used to his advantage?

Who is Reverend Sizer reporting to, and why does Reverend Sizer genuinely feel he has the power to close down debate by threatening police action? Why call the cops rather than answer his critics?

Political and theological disagreements should never be accompanied with threats of litigation or police action, but instead with logic and open debate.

I hope that more blogs will pick up this story. Don’t let Stephen Sizer get away with this and create a precedent whereby bloggers who expose the truth can be intimidated through the apparatus of the law. This is what Ben Cohen had to say:-

Ben Cohen writes: Stephen Sizer, the Iranian regime’s dutiful mouthpiece inside the Anglican Church, has been intimidating the author of the excellent blog, Seismic Shock. Both cowardly and odious, Sizer’s action underlines the fanatical determination of the pro-Palestine lobby in the UK to shut down open debate. So it’s time to declare that “We Are All Seismic Shock” – and communicate that same message to Sizer by emailing him here.

If you are a blogger then blog about this.

Here is a list of blogs that have already run the story and let me know if you blog about this, so I can add you to the list.

UPDATE 2: OK couldn’t resist one more link, check out this brilliant and balanced analysis (as usual) from Calvin L Smith.

UPDATE: OK, I think I’m going to call it quits with this list as this story has now reached the Guardian and the JC as well as the BBC. A  job well done I think.

Be sure to keep in touch with my good friend Seismic, who is posting updates and of course the Modernity blog who has been absolutely superb throughout this. Also check out Harry’s Place for a guest post from someone called Seismic Yeze Joseph Weissman :)

BBC – Seismic Shock: When blogging meets policing

Mythusmage Opines – Who Won in ‘45?

Covenant Zone – “Anti-Zionist” clergyman in UK convinces police to visit blogger exposing church man’s associations

We Are All Seismic Modernity Blog – Blogging, The Principle, Rev. Sizer And The Police.

JBlog – Seismic Shock

Xanthippa’s Chamberpot – Seismic Shock: criticizing a clergyman opens a ‘police file’

Virtue Online – UK: Anglican Minister Stephen Sizer uses Police To Intimidate Seismic Shock Blogger

Mike’s Musings – Sizer Shock

Living Journey – Thumbs down for Sizer…

Engage Online  – Anglican Vicar Uses Police To Intimidate Blogger

Anglican Samizdat – Anglican vicar complains to police to shut down blogger

Z-Word – We Are All Seismic Shock

CIFWatch – We Will Not Be Silenced

Harry’s Place – Anglican Vicar Uses Police To Intimidate Blogger

Modernity Blog – Reverend Stephen Sizer Uses British Police Against A Blogger.

Solomonia – Anti-Semitic Anglican Priest Stephen Sizer Uses Police to Silence Blogger

Shiraz Socialist – Holocaust Memorial Day: Primo Levi speaks from the grave

JudeoSphere – A Shock to the System

efrafandays – Have Me Cautioned If You Can, You Anti-Judaic Twunks!

archvillain – Scattershot

Simply Jews – We are all Seismic Shock or Rev. Sizer and Big Brother

feuj – We are all Seismic Shock or Rev. Sizer and Big Brother

Dont get fooled again – Uproar as UK vicar reportedly uses police to intimidate blogger

La FuSion – Anglican Vicar Uses Police To Intimidate Blogger

El Nuevo Pantano – Stephen Sizer Wants To Shut Someone Up

Dead Man Turner – Anglican Vicar Uses Police to Intimidate Blogger

Rosie Bell – Plod and Blogs

Edmund Standing – We Are All Seismic Shock

BobFromBrockley – Blogging, hate and free speech: Seismic Shock vs Stephen Sizer

Israel News – Reverend Stephen Sizer and his anti-Zionist Anglican thought police

Newstin – We Are All Seismic Shock

Francis Sedgemore – Not fit for the cure of souls

The Debate Link – I, Too, am Seismic Shock

Modernity Blog – Stephen Sizer, The Police And The Barbra Streisand Effect  (Seismic has this as a must read post on what may have troubled Rev Sizer about his blog)

The Poor Mouth – Vicar uses police to stifle blogger

efrafandays – Stephen Sizer: Hebrews 8-13

Dolphinarium – That’s not the way to do it

Soccer Dad – Trying intimidation on for sizer

Pub Philosopher – Cleric uses police to censor a blogger

Seismic Shock – Stephen Sizer: “various police authorities” monitor Seismic Shock – Check out the Modernity Blog for some comments on this one (Update 12)

TheJC.com – Support Seismic Shock

Rosh Pina – We are all Seismic Shock

Spectator  Melanie Phillips – The British police forget what country they are in

Flesh is Grass – Anglican vicar uses police to intimidate blogger

Adam Holland – An attack on free speech.

Weggis – I be Blogger

The Texas Scribbler – Anglican Vicar Uses Police To Intimidate Blogger

Atlas Shrugs – Seismic Shock: “Various Police Authorities” Monitor Blogger

Modernity Blog – Ex-National Front Leader And Rev. Stephen Sizer.

Index on Censorship – Why are West Yorkshire police harassing a blogger? (There is an update on this link with a police statement)

Mind Your Ps and Qs – Seismic Shock

The New Centrist – Modernity Blog: Reverend Stephen Sizer Uses British Police Against A Blogger

Al Jahom’s Final Word – A very good question

Martin in the Margins – Re. Stephen Sizer: Enemy of free speech.

Roger Pearse – How soon before I am “interviewed” by the police?

Polycarp – Blogger Faces Intimidation Tactics from Anglican Priest

Blazing Cat Fur – Support SeismicShock! Still think censoring speech is a good idea?

Square Mile Wife – MUST read:Clergyman Uses Police In Attempt To Silence UK Blogger

Ghost of Flea – Menace to society

Derren Brown – Anglican Vicar Uses Police To Intimidate Blogger

New Humanist – Blogger brings in police to silence another blogger

Online Journalism Blog – Police pay Seismic Shock blogger a visit over ‘harassment’

Scary Fundamentalist – Good Thing I Don’t Blog in England

A Blogspotting Anglican Episcopalian – Anglican Seismic Shock blogger

Philosémitisme – Antisémitisme: un vicaire anglican se sert de la police pour intimider un bloggeur

Little Green Footballs – Anglican Vicar Uses Police To Intimidate Blogger

Christian Hate – Solidarity against intimidation

The Social Republic – I too am Seismic Shock….

Skangerland – Seismic Shock

Kenneth Hynek – UK blogger “interviewed” by police…

New Appeal to Reason – We are all Seismic Shock–a shocking case of attempted internet censorhip

The Mad Pagan Skeptic, part 2

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

Cross-post by Mariano over at Atheism is Dead.

Part 1 here

We now continue our tripartite consideration of the mad Pagan skeptic, having already considered Friedrich Nietzsche’s virtual prophecy about what would come about due to the death of God.

We will now consider a biblical statement about humanity’s natural knowledge of God and our purposeful negation of such knowledge.

And lastly, we will consider to what atheism has come as they seek to find meaning in a meaningless universe and seek to prop up their favored ideas upon contradictions of their own making.

This essay will be parsed as follows:

1) An Exposition of The Parable of the Mad Man
2) Neo Pagan Atheism
3) The Modern Skeptic

Neo Pagan Atheism
Gleaning from Romans 1:18-28 we see that the Bible makes the following declaration:

…men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because the thing which may be known of God is clearly revealed within them, for God revealed it to them.

For the unseen things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being realized by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, for them to be without excuse.

Because, knowing God, they did not glorify Him as God, neither were thankful.

But they became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Professing to be wise, they became fools and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.

Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness…

For they changed the truth of God into a lie…

they did not think fit to have God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind.

Let us parse this statement:

men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because the thing which may be known of God is clearly revealed within them, for God revealed it to them. For the unseen things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being realized by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, for them to be without excuse.

I firstly, wanted to note that “the thing which may be known of God is clearly revealed within them” may be understood, at least on one level, is that we humans are not animals; even those who believe that we are animals admit the obvious—that we are very, very different from the animals, or from other animals. Thus, humans have always discerned the imago dei—that humans as being made in the image of God.

More directly, God revealed “the unseen things of Him from the creation of the world” as they are “realized by the things that are made.” We often recognize invisible things by their affects. For example, wind is invisible but we see its affect as trees sway, oxygen is invisible but we see its affect as it burns.

I recall a debate engaged upon by Philip Johnson who stated that the evidence for design is all around us. At this point the audience, predictably, laughed at him at which point he quoted Richard Dawkins and Francis Crick who have written:

Dawkins, “Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose” (The Blind Watchmaker, p. 1).

Crick, “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved” (What Mad Pursuit, p.138).

The evidence is clear to behold but they replace the logical conclusion of design by concocting stories about how thing may have, could have (or, should have?) happened in the form of Victorian Era tall tales. As long as they can tell naturalistic stories about time, chance and matter coming together in unknown and unobserved ways to look like design they are, as Dawkins puts it, “intellectually satisfied atheist[s].”

Furthermore, consider what happens when they are confronted by the scientific evidence of a universe fine tuned for life: they imagine unknown and unobserved oscillations and a multiverse in order to deny the evidence set before them—if they can imagine it, that is good enough.

This is why they are said to “suppress the truth in unrighteousness” and thus, “be without excuse”—they know better but talk themselves out of conclusions which are inconvenient to their particular, and peculiar, worldviews.

Because, knowing God, they did not glorify Him as God, neither were thankful.

Knowing that God is behind creation they ignored Him and, as is typical of humanity, did not thank God but take pride in themselves as they think that they have pulled themselves up by their very own boot-straps. The problem with the self made person is that they worship their creator.

But they became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Acceptance of the recognition of divine design lead to imagining scenarios whereby the universe just pops into existence uncaused by nothing and for nothing, life coming from non-life—all without evidence—etc. “Scientific” literature has become saturated with tall tales which, no matter how nonsensical or absurd, are concocted, accepted and promulgated due to adherence to atheism in the guise of Darwinism or the insistence that “science” is not allowed to come to anything but materialistic conclusions.

Think about it: science only deals with the material, only considers the material, only observes the material and, big surprise, only concludes the material. It is a set up whereby one stares into one little corner of reality, the material aspect, then one sees only the material, then one comes to material conclusions and then one demands that the material is all that there is—yet, this is because the refuse to turn around from that little corner and behold the splendor of creations various facets.

Note the statement of Prof. Richard Lewontin (whose whole statement is very worth reading):

Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.

It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated.

Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door. The eminent Kant scholar Lewis Beck used to say that anyone who could believe in God could believe in anything. To appeal to an omnipotent deity is to allow that at any moment the regularities of nature may be ruptured, that miracles may happen.

Professing to be wise, they became fools and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.

The self profession of being wiser than thou is basically a requirement of atheism. It is, in fact, one of their consoling delusions. The atheist is the most erudite amongst us and has based their atheism upon the very best information to date on every topic upon which issues of atheism vs. theism touch (at least this is the talking point which is not the whole story). This is why, for example, they come to the brilliant conclusions that:

It is ignorant and superstitious to believe that God made everything out of nothing.

It is rational and scientific to believe that nothing made everything out of nothing.

It is ignorant and superstitious to believe that God is eternal.
It is rational and scientific to believe that matter is eternal.

God is an effect and must have had a cause.
Matter is the uncaused first cause.

If God made everything, then who made God?
Matter made everything and nothing made matter.

Makes one wonder.

As for “imaginations”; note the words of Prof. Richard Dawkins as he is asked to provide his “most persuasive” argument for his particular Darwinian/Dawkinsian views:

Um, there’s got to be a series of advantages all the way in the feather. If you can’t think of one then that’s your problem, not natural selection’s problem. Natural selection, um, well, I suppose that is a sort of matter of faith on my, on my part since the theory is so coherent and so powerful.[1]

Thus, “their foolish heart was darkened” as they openly display their vain imaginations which are readily discerned as mere excuses for rejecting God.

Changing “the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things” is surely a reference to literal idolatry. Yet, such a change is just as prevalent in atheism not via the literal carving and worshiping of images of man, animals and insects but via neo-Pagan-atheism as atheists push the concept of replacing awe in God with awe in nature (I evidence this via quotations here also see here and here).

Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness…For they changed the truth of God into a lie…they did not think fit to have God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind

While the texts gets into particular action which followed from the choice to reject God and God allowing them to do so, or respecting their freewill choice, let us focus on the fact that they proceeded to “changed the truth of God into a lie” and “did not think fit to have God in their knowledge” which is why “God gave them over to a reprobate mind.”

This is the mind from which they continue to justify their rejection of God. The more that one wants to reject God the more justification they will find for it as they reach ever closer to what they really want: to be rid of God forever. Succinctly stated; this is, at least part of, the reason that God does not part the universe, appear in the sky and say, “Shalom! I am God and you are not” as this would, essentially, rob us of the freewill to seek and find or reject and feel justified in doing so.

Part 3 here.

[1] The Atheism Tapes, Part 4: Richard Dawkins and Jonathan Miller

This essay is copyrighted by Mariano of the “Atheism is Dead” blog at http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com.

It may be republished in part or in its entirety on websites, blogs, or any print media for whatever purpose—in agreement or in order to criticize it—only as long as the following conditions are met:

1) Give credit to “Mariano of the ‘Atheism is Dead’ blog at http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com”

2) Inform me as to which essay is being reproduced and where it is being reproduced via the comments section at this link

For God’s sake, blog! Pope Benedict told priests on Saturday, saying they must learn to use new forms of communication to spread the gospel message.

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

MSNBC – Hat-tip Polycarp:-

For God’s sake, blog! Pope Benedict told priests on Saturday, saying they must learn to use new forms of communication to spread the gospel message.

In his message for the Roman Catholic Church’s World Day of Communications, the pope, who is 82 and known not to love computers or the Internet, acknowledged priests must make the most of the “rich menu of options” offered by new technology.

“Priests are thus challenged to proclaim the Gospel by employing the latest generation of audiovisual resources — images, videos, animated features, blogs, Web sites — which, alongside traditional means, can open up broad new vistas for dialogue, evangelization and catechesis,” he said.

Read More

Catholic News Agency:-

In his message for the 44th World Day for Social Communications, Pope Benedict calls for priests to “make astute use” of available technology in becoming a presence as community leaders on the web. However, he urges them to remain “less notable for their media savvy than for their priestly heart.”

The 2010 World Day for Social Communications will take place on May 16 under the theme “The Priest and Pastoral Ministry in a Digital World: New Media at the Service of the Word.” The Holy Father’s message was released today.

The aim of this year’s message is to draw attention to the possibilities for priestly ministry offered within the “important and sensitive pastoral area of digital communications.”

For every priest, states the Holy Father in the message, fulfilling the fundamental priority of building up God’s communion “necessarily involves using new communications technologies.”

“Priests stand at the threshold of a new era: as new technologies create deeper forms of relationship across greater distances, they are called to respond pastorally by putting the media ever more effectively at the service of the Word.”

Pope Benedict emphasizes that “broad new vistas for dialogue, evangelization and catechesis” can be opened up in cyberspace with the presence of priests, living out their traditional role as community leaders in the world of digital communication.

With proper formation on how to use these technologies appropriately and competently, “shaped by sound theological insights and reflecting a strong priestly spirituality grounded in constant dialogue with the Lord” priests have the opportunity to “introduce people to the life of the Church and help our contemporaries to discover the face of Christ.”

“Yet,” cautions the Holy Father, “priests present in the world of digital communications should be less notable for their media savvy than for their priestly heart, their closeness to Christ.”

With their wisdom and preparation, he continues, priests’ presence online “will not only enliven their pastoral outreach, but also will give a ‘soul’ to the fabric of communications that makes up the ‘Web’.”

“A pastoral presence in the world of digital communications, precisely because it brings us into contact with the followers of other religions, non-believers and people of every culture, requires sensitivity to those who do not believe, the disheartened and those who have a deep, unarticulated desire for enduring truth and the absolute.”

The Pope reiterates the essential quality of the priest’s spiritual life and solid grounding in faith to his ministry through new technologies at the end of the message, saying that he “must always bear in mind that the ultimate fruitfulness of their ministry comes from Christ himself, encountered and listened to in prayer; proclaimed in preaching and lived witness; and known, loved and celebrated in the sacraments, especially the Holy Eucharist and Reconciliation.”

The message ends with a renewed invitation to the clergy, “to make astute use of the unique possibilities offered by modern communications. May the Lord make all of you enthusiastic heralds of the Gospel in the new “agorà” (gathering place) which the current media are opening up.”

In its latest estimate on the economic impact of abortion, the Movement for a Better America is reporting that the abortion toll is projected to climb to a new high of 52,333,000 as of January 22, 2010, the 37th anniversary of Roe V. Wade.

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

MT. FREEDOM, NJ, January 20, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – In its latest estimate on the economic impact of abortion, the Movement for a Better America is reporting that the abortion toll is projected to climb to a new high of 52,333,000 as of January 22, 2010, the 37th anniversary of Roe V. Wade.

The group also estimated that the economic impact has risen to $38.5 trillion in lost U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) since 1970.

“This year alone, the impact involved another $2.45 trillion, or roughly equal to half the GDP of Germany and France combined,” said the Movement in a press release.

MBA President Dennis Howard, who has been researching the economic impact of abortion since 1992, said, “The number of lives lost to surgical abortion has reached 17% of the total U.S. population of 307,000,000.  So it’s not surprising that this year’s increase is equal to 17% of U.S. GDP.”

The estimates are based on average GDP per year since 1970 after abortion became legal in our largest states and the cumulative number of abortions.

The estimates do not include babies lost to abortifacients and contraception because of the lack of public data. Said Howard: “However, the economic impact of these is similar to abortion. My guess is they would double the impact based on abortion alone.”

Howard has been warning since the mid-1990’s that the US faced a major financial crisis based on ongoing demographic trends.  In 1997, he wrote: “I see little hope that we can avoid an eventual crash on Wall Street that will make the 1930’s looking like cashing in your cards after a bad game of Monopoly.”

He even gave percentages as to when a crash would occur. He wrote then: “I’d give it a 50% chance of happening by the year 2000, an 80% chance by the year 2010, and a 100% chance of happening by 2020.”

Howard cited the collapse of the former Soviet Union as an example of the impact of demographics on economies. “The main reason for their collapse was internal – 300 abortions for every 100 live births for decades … Right now, there are not enough younger women to reverse their population decline. They could lose another 40 million people by 2050.”

“Meanwhile,” he said, “the Muslim world is going in the other direction – with rates of natural increase 5 to 6 times higher than ours. They will own the second half of this Century unless we reverse course.”

Anglican Minister Reverend Stephen Sizer uses Police To Intimidate Seismic Shock Blogger

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

NEW POST HERE

I’m in a state of shock.

The fine Messianic Jewish blogger (Seismic Shock), who highlights and confronts fascism, the BNP, far right extremism, anti-Semitism, and much more, within and outside of the church and does so with boldness and courage, has had a visit from the police.

This from Harry’s Place:-

Anglican Vicar Uses Police To Intimidate Blogger

As some people have noticed, I’ve been rather quiet in blogging about the Reverend Stephen Sizer’s activities of late.

After all, what more can be said of a man who forwards emails from Holocaust deniers,shares platforms with Holocaust deniers, and shamelessly flaunts his anti-Zionist theology before Iran’s apocalyptic Holocaust-denying regime? As Iranian pastors are arrested and house churches closed down, why is the Khomeinist regime translating Sizer’s book on Christian Zionism into Farsi? How many more times can I point all this out?

Yet there’s another reason why I’ve been quiet, and whilst I’ve held my tongue and my pen for a while, now is time to speak.

At 10am on Sunday 29th November 2009, I received a visit from two policemen regarding my activities in running the Seismic Shock blog. (Does exposing a vicar’s associations with extremists make me a criminal?, I wondered initially). A sergeant from the Horsforth Police related to me that he had received complaints via Surrey Police from Rev Sizer and from Dr Anthony McRoy – a lecturer at the Wales Evangelical School of Theology – who both objected to being associated with terrorists and Holocaust deniers.

(Context: Sizer has associated with some very nasty terrorists and Holocaust deniers; McRoy has delivered a paper at a Khomeinist theological conference in Iran comparing Hezbollah’s struggle against Israel via suicide bombing with the Christian’s struggle against sin via the atoning death of Jesus, and describes the world’s most prominent Holocaust denier as an “intelligent, humble, charismatic, and charming” man who “gives quick, extensive and intelligent answers to any question, mixed with genial humour”).

The sergeant made clear that this was merely an informal chat, in which I agreed to delete my original blog (http://seismicshock.blogspot.com) but maintain my current one (http://seismicshock.wordpress.com). The policeman related to me that his police force had been in contact with the ICT department my previous place of study, and had looked through my files, and that the head of ICT at my university would like to remind me that I should not be using university property in order to associate individuals with terrorists and Holocaust deniers (I am sure other people use university property to make political comments, but nevermind).

With my research on Reverend Sizer’s associations with terrorists and Holocaust deniers making its way into a publication of the Society of Biblical Literature, I was quite content to hold my peace. However, now that Reverend Sizer is now misrepresenting what has happened in my case in order to intimidate others, now is the time to speak up.

A Christian blogger – “Vee” of LivingJourney, who is based in Australia – linked to my blog as a resource for Christians to learn about anti-Semitism in the Church, including “lots of info on Stephen Sizer and Sabeel”.

Rev Sizer left her this comment:

Dear Vee,

You must take a little more care who you brand as anti-semitic otherwise you too will be receiving a caution from the police as the young former student of Leeds did recently. One more reference to me and you will be reported.

Blessings
Stephen

Sure, Stephen Sizer managed to somehow arrange a police visit to me from within the UK, but does Sizer genuinely think he can use police on the other side of the world to this effect?

Why is Reverend Sizer claiming that I received a police caution, when the police stressed I did not receive a caution? Is Sizer deliberately misrepresenting the same police force that he originally used to his advantage?

Who is Reverend Sizer reporting to, and why does Reverend Sizer genuinely feel he has the power to close down debate by threatening police action? Why call the cops rather than answer his critics?

Political and theological disagreements should never be accompanied with threats of litigation or police action, but instead with logic and open debate.

Seismic Shock has been a commentator this blog and took the BNP’s Rev Robert West to task, check out his comments here.

Check out the ModernityBlog, for some excellent comments on this.

NEW POST HERE

Eyewitnesses have now confirmed Israeli press reports that irreversible damage has been done to the ancient shrine of the biblical Prophet Ezekiel at al-Kifl south of Baghdad. Workmen have painted over age-old Hebrew inscriptions.

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

Previous posts here.

Cross-posted from the Point of no Return:-

Eyewitnesses have now confirmed Israeli press reports that irreversible damage has been done to the Jewish character of the ancient shrine of the biblical Prophet Ezekiel at al-Kifl south of Baghdad. Workmen have painted over age-old Hebrew inscriptions.

Professor Shmuel Moreh, chairman of the Association of Academics from Iraq in Israel, who raised the alarm, received the following message from a friend:

” The tomb is safe. However, the Hebrew inscriptions were removed not by intention, but as a result of building and reconstruction in the tomb itself. The unskilled workers are unaware of the significance of these inscriptions, so they cover them with paint or build upon them. In such case the damage and our loss is great and irreversible.”

Following articles on Ur News, Point of No Return here and here, in the blogosphere, in The Jerusalem Post and Ynet News, Iraqi TV News showed (old) footage of undamaged upper inscriptions and blamed Saddam’s Ba’ath regime for whitewashing the lower part of the Hebrew inscriptions. However, it seems that the upper inscriptions have also now been covered over.

Professor Shmuel Moreh has sent an urgent appeal to the Iraqi authorities asking them to investigate the damage and urging the reconstruction of the tomb to be entrusted to UNESCO in order to stop further damage: ” The world can’t stay indifferent towards the destruction of one of the oldest and most sacred and important shrines in the world,” he says. To contact the Director General of UNESCO, Mrs Irina Bokova, please email her at i.bokova@unesco.org.

When Iraq still had a Jewish community, the shrine of Ezekiel was one of the most important Jewish sites in Iraq. Some 5,000 Jewish pilgrims used to visit the prophet’s tomb at Passover. They would stay in accommodation adjoining the shrine. thousands of Jews lived and owned land in the town of al-Kifl.

On a visit to the tomb in 1910, David Solomon Sassoon wrote in his diary: “the lovely building over the grave is extremely old, built from very big stones said to be the work of King Jehoachim. Above the doorway was a plaque dated 1809/10, which has inscribed on it – ‘this is the tomb of our master Yehezkel the prophet, the son of Buzi the Kohen, may his merit shield us and all Israel. Amen.”

“The room with the grave is very high and has flowers painted on the walls and the names of important visitors to the grave. It is mentioned that my grandfather David Sassoon repaired the building in 1859. The grave is very large: 12 feet 9 inches long, 5 feet 3 inches wide and 5 feet 1 inch high. It is covered with a decorated Parochet, which was sent by David Sassoon from Bombay. It is also written on the walls of the visit of Menahem Saleh Daniel to the grave in 1897/8 and his donation to redecorate the grave. Nearby, another room has five tombs of Geonim (Sages).”

It is feared that unless action is taken at once, UNESCO may feel that damage to the shrine may become too extensive to declare it a World Heritage site. This happened in Babylon, not far away from al-Kifl, where Saddam erased priceless traces of the ancient site when he built his modern palace.

Why are some saved, and not others?

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

I enjoyed this from the CyberBrethren and found this to be a very sensible approach from the Lutherans:-

The other day, my son asked me, “Dad, why are some people saved, and others are not.” I said, “Aha! You are taking Latin, so tell me what this means. You are asking about the crux theologorum.” He thought for a moment and said, “The cross of theologians?” “Correct you are, sir,” I said, “What you are asking is the old question that has proven the downfall of many theologians through the ages, ‘Why some, not others?’ ” And from there we proceeded into an interesting conversation about a feature of Lutheranism that makes both Calvinists “God predestines some to hell, others to heaven”, on the one hand, and Arminians “I have chosen to follow Jesus!” folks, on the other, frustrated with us. Lutheranism, as does Sacred Scripture, simply does not answer the question why some are saved, and not others. Here’s a great Q/A on this that succinctly states why this is the teaching of the Bible, and, consequently, historic Lutheranism.

Question:

I understand that God chose those for salvation before the very foundation of the world. The Bible does not say that there are those who are chosen and that there are those who are not. So, does that mean then that God chose everyone to be saved before the foundation of the world and therefore it is man’s choice whether he will accept God’s saving grace or not? However, one cannot come into God’s grace by himself, but by the Holy Spirit “leading” him unto salvation. Is that the correct interpretation? I am confused by the fact that we were chosen by God before the foundation of the world, yet the very action of choosing can mean that there were those who were not chosen. I know that God wishes everyone to be saved. Can you help me?

Answer:

The question you are wrestling with is really the question, “Why are some saved and not others?” Theologians throughout history have referred to this question as the “crux theologorum” (“the cross of the theologians”) because of the difficulty (and from the Lutheran perspective, the impossibility) of giving an answer to this question which is satisfactory to our human reason.

Some answer this question by pointing to man’s “free will”–only those are saved who “choose” to be saved. Lutherans reject this answer as unscriptural because according to the Bible even man’s will is “dead” and powerless to “choose” God and his grace in Christ. We are saved not because we “choose” to be saved but because the Holy Spirit works faith in our heart through the Gospel (even faith is a gift!). Others answer this question by pointing to God’s sovereign will: God himself predestines from eternity some to be saved and others to be damned. Lutherans reject this answer as unscriptural because according to the Bible God sincerely desires all to be saved and has predestined no one to damnation.

So how do Lutherans answer this question? The answer is that Lutherans do not try to answer it, because (we believe) the Bible itself does not provide an answer to this question that is comprehensible to human reason. Lutherans affirm, with Scripture, that whoever is saved is saved by God’s grace alone, a grace so sure that it excludes all human “action” and “choice” but rather rests on the foundation of God’s action in Christ and his “choice” (predestination) from before the beginning of time. Lutherans also affirm, with Scripture, that those who are damned are damned not by God’s “choice” but on account of their own human sin and rebellion and unbelief. From a human perspective, there is no “rational” or “logical” way to put these two truths together. Lutherans believe and confess them not because they are “rational” and “logical,” but because this is what we find taught in Scripture.

For a further discussion of this issue, you may want to read Articles II and XI in the Formula of Concord (contained in the Book of Concord, the Lutheran Confessions).

I noted once when reading Spurgeon that he opted not to get too drawn on the ‘crux theologorum’. He stated that there are areas of God’s work, that are simply mysterious and that the human mind, on this side of eternity, simply cannot fully grasp them. He describes predestination and free-will as travelling in parallel and meeting together at the throne of God in eternity.

Imagens de Jesus Cristo com cântico de Taizé: Jesus remember me.

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

CHARLES SPURGEON “WHAT HAVE I DONE?”

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

“What have I done?” Jeremiah 8:6

PERHAPS no figure represents God in a more gracious light than those
figures of speech, which represent him as stooping from his throne, and as
coming down from heaven to attend to the wants and to behold the woes
of mankind. We must have love for that God, who, when Sodom and
Gomorrah were reeking with iniquity, would not destroy those cities,
although he knew their guilt and their wickedness, until he had made an
actual visitation to them and had sojourned for awhile in their streets.
Methinks we cannot help pouring out our heart in affection to that God, of
whom we are told that he inclines his ear from the highest glory, and puts it
to the lip of the faintest that breathes out the true desire. How can we resist
feeling that he is a God whom we must love, when we know that he
regards everything that concerns us, numbers the very hairs of our heads,
bids his angels protect our footsteps lest we dash our feet against stones,
marks our path and ordereth our ways. But especially is this great truth
brought near to man’s heart, when we recollect how attentive God is, not
merely to the temporal interests of his creatures, but to their spiritual
concerns. God is represented in Scripture as waiting to be gracious, or, in
the language of the parable, when his prodigals are yet a great way off he
sees them; he runs and falls upon their neck and kisses them. He is so
attentive to everything that is good, even In the poor sinner’s heart, that to
him there is music in a sigh, and beauty in a tear; and in this verse that I
have just read, he represents himself as looking upon man’s heart and
listening — listening, if possibly he may hear something that is good. “I
hearkened and heard; I listened; I stood still, and I attended to them.” And
how amiable does God appear, when he is represented as turning aside,
and as it were with grief in his heart, exclaiming “I did listen, I did hearken,
but they spake not aright; no man repented of his wickedness, saying,
‘What shall I do?’ “ Ah! my hearer, thou never hast a desire towards God
which does not excite God’s hope; thou dost never breathe a prayer
towards heaven which he does not notice; and though thou hast very often
uttered prayers which have been as the morning cloud and as the early dew
that soon passeth away, yet all these things have moved Jehovah’s bowels;
for he has been hearkening to thy cry and noticing the breathing of thy
soul, and though it all hath passed away, yet it did not pass away
unnoticed, for he remembers it even now. And oh! thou that art this day
seeking a Savior, remember, that Savior’s eyes are on thy seeking soul to
day. Thou art not looking after one who cannot see thee; thou art coming
to thy Father, but thy Father sees thee even in the distance. It was but one
tear that trickled down thy cheek, but thy Father noticed that as a hopeful
sign; it was but one throb that went through thy heart just now during the
singing of the hymn, but God, the Loving, noticed even that, and thought
upon it as at least some omen that thou wast not yet quite hardened by sin
nor yet given up by love and mercy.

The text is “What have I done?” I shall just introduce that by a few words
of affectionate persuasion, urging all now present to ask that question:
secondly, I shall give them a few words of assistance in trying to answer it;
and when I have so done, I shall finish by a few sentences of solemn
admonition to those who have had to answer the question against
themselves.

I. First, then, a few words of EARNEST PERSUASION, requesting everyone
now present, and more especially every unconverted person, to ask this
question of himself, and answer it solemnly: “What have I done?”
Few men like to take the trouble to review their own lives; most men are
so near bankruptcy that they are ashamed to look at their own books. The
great mass of mankind are like the silly ostrich, which, when hard pressed
by the hunters, buries its head in the sand and shuts its eyes and then
thinks, because it does not see its pursuers, that therefore it is safe. The
great mass of mankind, I repeat, are ashamed to review their own
biographies. and if conscience and memory together could turn joint
authors of a history of their lives throughout, they would buy a huge iron
clasp and a padlock to it, and look the volume up, for they dare not read it.
They know it to be a book full of lamentation and woe, which they dare
not read, and still go on in their iniquities. I have therefore a hard task in
endeavoring to persuade you one and all to take down that book, and be its
pages few or many, be they white or be they black, I have some difficulty
in getting you to read them through. But may the Holy Spirit persuade you
now, so that you may answer this question, “What have I done?” For
remember, my dear friend, that searching yourself can do you no hurt. No
tradesman ever gets the poorer by looking to his books. he may find
himself to be poorer than he thought he was, but it is not the looking to the
books that hath hurt him; he hath hurt himself by some ill trading before.
Better, my friend, for you to know the past whilst there is yet time for
repairing it, than that you should go blindfolded, hoping to enter the gates
of Paradise and find out your mistake when alas! it is too late, because the
door is shut. There is nothing to be lost by taking stock; you cannot be any
the worse for a little self examination. This of itself shall be one strong
argument to induce you to do it; but remember you may be a great deal the
better; for suppose your affairs are all right with God, why then you may
make good cheer and comfort yourself, for he that is right with his God has
no cause to be sad. But ah! remember there are many probabilities that you
are wrong. There are so many in this world that are deceived, that there are
many chances that you are deceived too. You may have a name to live and
yet be dead; you may be like John Bunyan’s tree, of which he said “ ‘twas
fair to look upon and green outside, but the inside of it was rotten enough
to be tinder for the devil’s tinder box.” You may this day thus stand before
yourself and fellow creatures well whitewashed, and exceeding fair, but
you may be like that Pharisee of whom Christ said, “Thou art a whited
sepulcher, for inwardly thou art full of rottenness and dead men’s bones.”
Now, man, however thou mayest wish to be self-deceived, for my own part
I feel that I would a thousand times rather know my own state really than
have the most pleasing conceptions about it and find myself deceived.
Many a time have I solemnly prayed that prayer, “Lord, help me to know
the worst of my own case; if I be still an apostate from thee, without God
and without Christ, at least let me be honest to myself and know what I
am.” Remember, my friend, that the time you have for self-examination is,
after all, very short. Soon thou wilt know the great secret. I perhaps may
not say words rough enough to rend off the mask which thou now hast
upon thee, but there is one called Death who will stand no compliment.

You may masquerade it out to-day in the dress of the saint, but death will
soon strip you, and you must stand before the judgment seat after death
has discovered you in all your nakedness, be that naked innocence or naked
guilt. Remember, too, though you may deceive yourself, you will not
deceive your God. You may have light weights, and the beam of the scale
in which you weigh yourself may not be honest, and may not therefore tell
the truth; but when God shall try you he will make no allowances; when
the everlasting Jehovah grasps the balances of justice and puts his law into
one scale, ah, sinner, how wilt thou tremble when he shall put thee into the
other; for unless Christ be thy Christ thou wilt be found light weight —
thou wilt be weighed in the balances and found wanting, and be cast away
for ever.

Oh! what words shall I adopt to induce every one of you now to search
yourselves! I know the various excuses that some of you will make. Some
of you will plead that you are members of churches, and that, therefore, all
is right with you. Perhaps you look across from the gallery, and you say to
me, “Spurgeon, your hands baptized me but this year into the Lord Jesus,
and you have often passed to me the sacramental bread and wine.” Ah, my
hearer, I know that and I have baptized, I fear, many of you that the Lord
hath never baptized, and some of you have been received into the churchfellowship
on earth who were never received by God. If Jesus Christ had
one hypocrite in his twelve, how many hypocrites must I have here in
nearly twelve hundred? Ah! my hearers, in this age it is a very easy thing to
make a profession of religion: many churches receive candidates into their
fellowship without examination at all; I have had such come to me, and I
have told them, “I must treat you just the same as if you came from the
world,” because they said, “I never saw the minister, I wrote a note to the
Church, and they took me in,” Verily, in this age of profession, a man may
make the highest profession in the world, and yet be at last found with
damned apostates. Do not put off the question for that; and do not say, “I
am too busy to attend to my spiritual concerns; there is time enough yet.”
Many have said that, and before their “time enough” has come, they have
found themselves where time shall be no more. Oh! thou that sayest thou
hast time enough, how little dost thou know how near death is to thee.
There are some present that will not see New Year’s Day; there is every
probability that a very large number will never see another year. Oh, may
the Lord our God prepare us each for death and for judgment, and bless
this morning’s exhortation to our preparation, by leading us to ask the
question — “What have I done?”

II. Now, then, I am to help you to answer the question — “What have I
done?”

Christian, true Christian, I have little to say to thee this morning. I will not
multiply words, but leave the enquiry with thine own conscience. What
hast thou done? I hear thee reply, “I have done nothing to save myself, for
that was done for me in the eternal covenant, from before the foundation of
the world. I have done nothing to make a righteousness for myself, for
Christ said, ‘It is finished;’ I have done nothing to procure heaven by my
merits, for all that Jesus did for me before I was born.” But say, brother,
what hast thou done for him who died to save thy wretched soul? What
hast thou done for his church? What hast thou done for the salvation of the
world? What hast thou done to promote thine own spiritual growth in
grace? Ah! I might hit some of you that are true Christians very hard here;
but I will leave you with your God. God will chastise his own children. I
will, however, put a pointed question. Are there not many Christians now
present who cannot recollect that they have been the means of the salvation
of one soul during this year. Come, now; turn back: Have you any reason
to believe that directly or indirectly you have been made the means this
year of the salvation of a soul? I will go further. There are some of you
who are old Christians, and I will ask you this question: Have you any
reason to believe that ever since you were converted you have ever been
the means of the salvation of a soul? It was reckoned in the past, in the
times of the patriarchs, to be a disgrace to a woman that she had no
children; but what disgrace it is to a Christian to have no spiritual children
— to have none born unto God by his instrumentality! And yet there are
some of you here that have been spiritually barren, and have never brought
one convert to Christ; you have not one star in your crown of glory, and
must wear a starless crown in heaven. Oh! I think I see the joy and
gladness with which a good child of God looked upon me last week, when
we had heard some one who had been converted to God by her
instrumentality. I took her by the hand and said, “Well, now, you have
reason to thank God.” “Yes, sir,” she said, “I feel a happy and an honored
woman now. I have never, that I know of before been the means of
bringing a soul to Christ.” And the good woman looked so happy the tears
were in her eyes for gladness. How many have you brought during this
year? Come, Christian, what have you done? Alas! alas! you have not been
barren fig-trees, but still your fruit is such that it cannot be seen. You may
be alive unto God; but how many of you have been very unprofitable, and
exceedingly unfruitful? And do not think that while I thus deal hardly with
you I would escape myself. No, I ask myself the question, “What have I
done?” And when I think of the zeal of Whitfield, and of the earnestness of
many of those great evangelists of former times, I stand here astounded at
myself, and I ask myself the question, “What have I done?” And I can only
answer it with some confusion of face. How often have I preached to you,
my hearers, the Word of God, and yet how seldom have I wept over you as
a pastor should! How often ought I to have warned you of the wrath to
come, when I have forgotten to be so earnest as I might have been. I fear
lest the blood of souls should lie at my door, when I shall come to be
judged of my God at last. I beseech you, pray for your minister in this
thing, that he may be forgiven, if there has ever been a lack of earnestness
and energy, and prayerfulness, and pray that during the next year I may
always preach as though I ne’er might preach again,

“A dying man to dying men.”

I heard the moralist whilst I was questioning the Christian, say, “What have
I done? Sir, I have done all I ought to have done. You may, as a Gospeller,
stand there and talk to me about sins; but I tell you Sir, I have done all that
was my duty; I have always attended my church or chapel regularly every
Sunday as ever a man or woman could; I have always read prayers in the
family, and I always say prayers before I go to bed and when I get up in the
morning. I don’t know that I owe anybody anything, or that I have been
unkind to anybody; I give a fair shave to the poor, and I think if good
works have any merit I certainly have done a great deal.” Quite right, my
friend, very right indeed, if good works have any merit; but then it is very
unfortunate that they have not any; for our good works, if we do them to
save ourselves by them, are no better than our sins. You might as well
hope to go to heaven by cursing and swearing, as by the merits of your
own good works; for although good works are infinitely preferable to
cursing and swearing in a moral point of view, yet there is no more merit in
one than there is in the other, though there is less sin in one than in the
other. Will you please to remember then, that all you have been doing all
these years, is good for nothing ? “Well, but, Sir, I have trusted in Christ.”
Now, stop! Let me ask you a question. Do you mean to say, that you have
trusted partly in Christ and partly in your own good works? “Yes, sir.”
Well, then, let me tell you, the Lord Jesus Christ will never be a makeweight;
you must take Christ wholly, or else no Christ at all, for Christ will
never go shaves with you in the work of salvation. So, I repeat, all you
have ever done is good for nothing. You have been building a card house,
and the tempest will blow it down; you have been building a house upon
the sand, and when the rains descend and the floods come, the last vestige
of it will be swept away for ever. Hear ye the word of the Lord! “By the
works of the law shall no flesh living be justified.” “Cursed is every one
that continueth not in all things that are written in the book of the law to
do them,” and in as much as you have not continued in all things that are
written in the law you are transgressors of the law, and you are under the
curse, and all that the law has to say to you is, “Cursed, cursed, cursed!
Your morality is of no help to you whatever, as to eternal things.”
I turn to another character. He says, “Well, I don’t trust in my morality nor
in anything else; I say,

‘Begone, dull care, I pray thee begone from me.’

I have nothing to do with talking about eternity, as you would have me.
But, sir, I am not a bad fellow after all. It is a very little that I ever do
amiss; now and then a peccadillo, just a little folly, but neither my country,
nor my friends nor my own conscience, can say anything against me. True,
I am none of your saints; I don’t profess to be too strict I may go a little
too far sometimes, but it is only a little, and I dare say we shall be able to
set all matters straight before the end comes.” Well, friend, but I wish you
had asked yourself the question, “What have I done?” — it strikes me that
if each of you would just take off that film, that films your heart and your
life over, you might see a grievous leprosy lurking behind what you have
done. “Well, for the matter of that” says one, “perhaps I may have taken a
glass or two too much sometimes.” Stop a bit! What is the name of that?
Stutter as much as you like! Out with it! What is the name of it? “Why, it is
just a little mirth, sir.” Stop: let us have the right name of it. What do you
call it in any one else? “Drunkeness, I suppose.” Says another, “I have been
a little loose in my talk sometimes.” What is that? “It has been just a merry
spree.” Yes, but please to call it what it ought to be called — lascivious
conversation. Write that down. “Oh! no, sir; things are looking serious.”
Yes, they are indeed; but they do not look any more serious than they
really are. Sometimes you have been out on the Sabbath day, haven’t you?
“Oh! yes; but that has been only now and then — just sometimes.” Yes,
but let us put it down what it is, and we will see what the list comes to.
Sabbath-breaking! “Stop,” you say, “I have gone no further sir, certainly I
have gone no further.” I suppose in your conversation, sometime; during
your life, you have quoted texts of Scripture to make jokes of them haven’t
you? And sometimes you have cried out, when you have been a little
surprised, “Lord have mercy upon me!” and such things. I don’t venture to
say you swear: though there is a Christian way of swearing that some
people get into, and they think it is not quite swearing, but what it is
besides nobody knows, and so we will put it down as swearing — cursing
and swearing. “Oh! sir, it was only when somebody trod on my toes, or I
was angry.” Never mind, put it down by its right name: we shall get a
pretty good list against you by-and-bye. I suppose that in trade you never
adulterate your articles. “Well that is a matter of business in which you
ought not to interfere.” Well, it so happens I am going to interfere — and
if you please, we will call it by its right name — stealing. We will put that
down. I suppose you have never been hard with a debtor, have you? You
have never at any time wished that you were richer, and sometimes half
wished that your opposite neighbor would lose part of his custom, so that
you might have it? Well, we will call it by its right name: that is
“covetousness, which is idolatry.” Now, the list seems to be getting black
indeed. Besides that, how have you spent all this year; and though you
have pretended sometimes to say prayers, have you ever really prayed? No,
you have not. Well, then there is prayerlessness to put down. You have
sometimes read the Bible, you have sometimes listened to the ministry; but
have you not, after all, let all these things pass away? Then I want to know
whether that is not despising God, and whether we must not put it down
under that name. Truly, we need go but very little further; for the list
already when summed up is most fearful, and few of us can escape from
sins so great as these, if our conscience be but a little awake.

But there is one man here who has grown very careless and indifferent to
every point of morality. and he says, “Ah! young man, I could tell you what
I have done during the year.” Stop, sir, I don’t particularly wish to know
just now; you may as well tell it to yourself when you get home. There are
young people here: it would not do them much good to know what you
have done perhaps. You are no better than you should be, some people
say; which means, you are so bad they would not like to say what you are.
Do you suppose in all this congregation we have no debauched men —
none that indulge in the vilest sin and lust? Why, God’s angel seems even
now to be flying through our midst, and touching the conscience of some,
to let them know in what iniquities they have indulged during the year. I
pray God that my just simply alluding to them may be the means of
startling your conscience. Ah! ye may hide your sins; the coverlet of
darkness may be your shelter; you may think they shall never be
discovered; but remember, every sin that you have done shall be read
before the sun, and men and angels shall hear it in the day of final account.
Ah! my hearer, be thou moral or be thou dissolute, I beseech thee, answer
this question solemnly to-day: “What have I done?” It would be as well if
you took a piece of paper when you went home, and just wrote down what
you have done from last January to December; and if some of you do not
get frightened at it I must say you have got pretty strong nerves, and are
not likely to be frightened at much yet.

Now I specially address myself to the unconverted man, and I would help
him to answer this question in another point of view. “What have I done?”
Ah! man, thou that livest in sin thou that art a lover of pleasure more than a
lover of God, what hast thou done? Dost thou not know that one sin is
enough to damn a soul for ever? Hast thou never read in Holy Scripture
that cursed is he that sins but once? How damned then, art thou by the
myriad sins of this one year! Recall, I beseech thee, the sins of thy youth
and thy former transgressions up till now; and if one sin would ruin thee for
ever, how ruined art thou now! Why man, one wave of sin may swamp
thee. What will these oceans of thy guilt do? One witness against thee will
be enough to condemn thee: behold the crowds of follies and of crimes
now gathered round the judgment sea that have gone before thee into
judgment. How wilt thou escape from their testimonies, when God shall
call thee to his bar? What hast thou done? Come, man, answer this
question. There are many consequences involved in thy sin, and in order to
answer this question rightly thou must reply to every consequence, what
hast thou done to thine own soul? Why, thou hast destroyed it; thou hast
done thy best to ruin it for ever, For thine own poor soul thou hast been
digging dungeons; thou hast been piling faggots; thou hast been forging
chains of iron — faggots with which to burn it, and fetters with which to
bind it for ever.

Remember, thy sins are like sowing for a harvest. What a harvest is that
which thou hast sown for thy poor soul! Thou hast sown the wind, thou
shalt reap the whirlwind; thou hast sown iniquity, thou shalt reap
damnation. But what hast thou done against the gospel? Remember, how
many times this year thou hast heard it preached. Why since thy birth there
have been waggon loads of sermons wasted on thee. Thy parents prayed
for thee in thy youth, thy friends instructed thee till thou didst come to
manhood. Since then how many a tear has been wept by the minister for
thee! How many an earnest appeal has been shot into thine heart! But thou
hast rent out the arrow. Ministers have been concerned to save thee, and
thou hast never been concerned about thyself. What hast thou done against
Christ? Remember, Christ has been a good Christ to sinners here; but as
there is nothing that burns so well as that soft substance oil, so there is
nothing that will be so furious as that gentle-hearted Savior, when he
comes to be your Judge. Fiercer than a lion on his prey is rejected love.
Despise Christ on the cross, and it will be a terrible thing to be judged by
Christ on his throne.

But again: what have you done for your children this year? Oh! there be
some here present that have been doing all they could to ruin their
children’s souls. ‘Tis solemn what responsibility rests upon a father; and
what shall be said of a drunken father? — the father that sets his children
an example of drunkenness. Swearer, what have you done for your family?
Haven’t you too been twisting the rope for their eternal destruction? Will
they not be sure to do as you do? Mother you have several children, but
this year you have never prayed for one of them never put your arms round
their necks as they kneeled at their little chair at night and said, “Our
Father;” you have never told them of Jesus that loved children and once
became a child like them. Ah, then, you too have neglected your children. I
remember a mother who was converted to God in her old age, and she said
to me — and I shall never forget the woman’s grief — “God has forgiven
me, but I shall never forgive myself. For, sir,” she said, “I have nourished
and brought up children, but I have done it without any respect to
religion.” And then she burst into tears, and said, “I have been a cruel
mother, sir; I have been a wretch!” “Why,” said I, “my good woman, you
have brought your children up.” “Yes,” said she, “my husband died when
they were young, and left me with six of them, and these hands have
earned their bread and found them clothes, no one,” she said, “can accuse
me of being unkind to them in anything but this; but this is the worst of all,
I have been a cruel mother to them, for while I fed their bodies I neglected
their souls.” But some have gone further than this. Ah, young man, you
have not only done your best this year to damn yourself, but you have done
your best to damn others! Remember, last January when you took that
young man into the tavern for the first time, and laughed at all his boyish
scruples as you called them, and told him to drink away as you did.
Remember, when in the darkness of night you first led astray one young
man whose principles were virtuous, and who had not known lust unless
you had revealed it to him. you said at the time, “Come with me, I’ll show
you London life, I’ll let you see pleasure!” That young man, when he first
came to your shop, used to go to the house of God on Sunday, and seemed
to bid fair for heaven — “Ah,” you say, “I have laughed religion out of
Jackson, he doesn’t go anywhere on a Sunday now except for a spree, and
he is just as merry as any of us.” Ah! sir, and you will have two hells when
you are damned; you will have your own hell and his too, for he will look
through the lurid flames upon you, and say, “Mayhap, I had never been
here if you had not brought me here!” And ah! seducer, what eyes will be
those that will glare at you through hell’s horror? — The eyes of one
whom you led into iniquity! what double hells they will be to you as they
glare on you like two stars, whose light is fury, and wither your blood for
ever! Pause ye that have led others astray, and tremble now. I paused
myself, and prayed to God when first I knew a Savior. that he would help
me to lead those to Christ, that I had ever in any way led astray. And I
remember George Whitfield says when he began to pray, his first prayer
was that God would convert those with whom he used to play at cards and
waste his Sundays. “And blessed be God,” he says, “I got everyone of
them.”

O my God, can I not detect in some face here astonishment and terror.
Doth no man’s knees knock together? Doth no man’s heart quail within
him because of his iniquity? Surely it cannot be so, else were your hearts
turned to steel, and your bowels become as iron in the midst of you.
Surely, if it be so, the words of God are most certainly true, wherein he
saith in the seventh verse of this chapter — “The stork in the heaven
knoweth her appointed times; and the turtle, and the crane, and the
swallow, observe the time of their coming, but my people know not the
judgment of the Lord,” and certainly that prophet was true who said, “The
ox knoweth its owner, and the ass his master’s crib, but my people doth
not know, Israel doth not consider.” Oh, are ye so brutish as to let the
reflections of that guilt pass over you without causing astonishment and
terror? Then, surely we who feel our guilt have need to bend our knees for
you, and pray that God might yet bring you to know yourselves; for, living
and dying as you are, hardened and without hope, your lot must be horrible
in the extreme.

How happy should I be if I might hope that the great mass of you could
accompany me in this humble confession of our faith; may I speak as if I
were speaking for each one of you? It shall be at your option, either to
accept what I say, or to reject it; but, I trust, the great multitude of you will
follow me. “Oh, Lord! I this morning confess that my sins are greater than
I can bear; I have deserved thy hottest wrath, and thine infinite displeasure;
and I hardly dare to hope that thou canst have mercy upon me, but
inasmuch as thou didst give thy Son to die upon the cross for sinners, thou
hast also said, ‘Look unto me and be ye saved all the ends of the earth,’
Lord I look to thee this morning, though I never looked before, yet I look
now; though I have been a slave of sin to this moment, yet Lord accept me
sinner though I be, through the blood and righteousness of thy Son, Jesus
Christ. Oh Father, frown not on me, thou mayest well do so, but I plead
that promise which says, ‘Whosoever cometh unto me, I will in no wise
cast out.’ Lord, I come —

‘Just as I am, without one plea,
But that thy blood was shed for me,
And that thou bid’st me come to thee;
O Lamb of God, I come.’

‘My faith doth lay its hand,
On that dear head of thine,
While like a penitent I stand,
And there confess my sin.’

Lord accept me, Lord pardon me, and take me as I am, from this time forth
and for ever, to be thy servant whilst I live, to be thy redeemed when I
die.” Can you say that? Did not many a heart say it? Did I not hear many a
lip in silence utter it? Be of good cheer, my brother, my sister, if that came
from your heart, you are as safe as the angels of heaven, for you are a child
of God, and you shall never perish.

III. Now I have to address a few words of AFFECTIONATE ADMONITION,
and then I have done. It is a very solemn thing to think how years roll
away. I never spent a shorter year in my life than this one, and the older I
grow the shorter the years get; and you, old men, I dare say, look back on
your sixty and seventy years, and you say, “Ah young man, they will seem
shorter soon.” No doubt they will. “So teach us to number our days, O
God, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom.” But is it not a solemn
thing that there is another year nearly gone; and yet many of you are
unsaved? You are just were you were last year. No, you are not, you are
nearer death, and you are nearer hell, except you repent; and perhaps even
what I have said this morning will have no effect upon you. You are not
altogether hardened, for you have had many serious impressions. Scores of
times you have wept under discourses and yet all has been in vain, for you
are what you were. I beseech you answer this question, “What have I
done?” for remember there will be a time when you will ask this question,
but it will be too late. When is that — say you — on the death bed? No, it
is not too late there.

“While the lamp holds out to burn,
The vilest sinner may return.”

But it will be too late to ask, “What have I done?” when the breath has
gone out of your body. Just suppose the monument as it used to be, before
they caged it round. Suppose a man going up the winding staircase to the
top, with a full determination to destroy himself. He has got on the outside
of the railings. Can you imagine him for a moment saying, “What have I
done?” just after he has taken his leap. Why, methinks some spirit in the air
might whisper, “Done? you have done what you can never undo. You are
lost — lost — lost!” Now, remember that you that have not Christ, are today
going up that spiral staircase; perhaps to-morrow you will be standing
in the article of death upon the pallisading, and when death has gotten you,
and you are just leaping from that monument of life down to the gulf of
despair, that question will be full of horror to you. “What have you done?”
But the answer for it will not be profitable, but full of terror Methinks, I
see a spirit launched upon the sea of eternity I hear it say “What have I
done?” It is plunged in flaming waves, and cries, “What have I done?” It
sees before it a long eternity; but it asks the question again, “What have I
done?” The dread answer comes: “Thou hast earned all this for thyself.
Thou knewest thy duty, but thou didst it not, Thou wast warned, but thou
didst despise the warning.” Ah! hear the doleful soliloquy of such a spirit.
The last great day is come; the flaming throne is set, and the great book is
opened. I hear the leaves as with terrible rustle they are turned over. I see
men motioned to the right or to the left, according to the result of that
great book. And what have I done? I know that to me sin will be
destruction for I have never sought a Savior. What is that? The Judge has
fixed his eye on me. Now it is on me turned. Will he say, “Depart ye
cursed,” unto me? Oh! let me be crushed for ever rather than bear that
sight. There is no noise, but the finger is lifted, and I am dragged out of the
crowd, and singly I stand before the Judge. He turns to my page, and
before he reads it my heart quakes within me. “Be it so,” says he, “it has
never been blotted with my blood. You despised my calls; you laughed at
my people; you would have none of my mercy; you said that you would
take the wages of unrighteousness. You shall have them, the wages of sin
is death.” Ah! me, and is he about to say, “Depart, ye cursed?” Yes, with a
voice louder than a thousand thunders, he says, “Depart, ye cursed into
everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.” Ah! it is all true
now. I laughed at the minister because he preached about hell; and here am
I in hell myself, Ah! I used to wonder why he wanted to frighten us so. Ah!
I would to God he had frightened me more, if he might but have frightened
me out of this place. But now here am I lost, and there is no escape. I am
in darkness so dark, there is not a ray of light can ever reach me. I am shut
up so close, that not one of the bolts and bars can ever be removed. I am
damned for ever. Ah! that is a dreary soliloquy. I cannot tell it to you. Oh!
if you were there yourselves, if you could only know what they feel, and
see what they endure, then would you wonder that I am not more earnest
in preaching the Gospel, and you would marvel, not that I wish to make
you weep, but that I did not weep far more myself and preach more
solemnly. Ah! my hearers as the Lord my God liveth, before whom I stand,
I shall one day stand acknowleged by your conscience as having been a
true witness unto you this morning; for there is not one of you here to-day
but will be without excuse if you perish. You have been warned, I have
warned you as earnestly as I can. I have no more powers to spend, no
more arts to try, no more persuasion that I can use. I can only conclude by
saying, I beseech you, fly to Jesus. I entreat you, as immortal spirits that
are bound for endless weal or woe, fly ye to Christ; seek for mercy at his
hands; trust in him and be saved; and at your peril reject my solemn
warning. Remember ye may reject it, but ye reject not me, but him that sent
me. Ye may despise it, but ye despise not me, but a greater than Moses,
even Jesus Christ the Lord; and when ye come before his bar. piercing will
be his language, and terrible his words, when he condemns you for ever,
for ever, for ever, without hope, for ever, for ever, for ever. May God
deliver us from that, for Jesus’ sake Amen.

Switch to our mobile site