Archive for December, 2009

I’m not surprised Evangelical Christianity is on the rise

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

I really enjoyed these comments from the mighty Ed West over at the Telegraph Blog and are based on a a fascinating IPPR report on UK immigration and faith trends, which I blogged about here:-

Ed West

Life is full of ironies. Europe’s immigration revolution was caused by two major developments, and both had hugely ironic results. Europe’s Holocaust complex and sense of self-hatred following the Nazi horror led to a reactive obsession with racism as the ultimate evil, which led, ironically, to large-scale immigration from among the most anti-Semitic countries on earth, widespread “anti-Zionism” in Europe, and an increase in hate crimes against Jews across the continent.

The second factor was the sexual revolution, the decline of church attendance, the invention of the Pill, the 1967 Abortion Act and the increase in female employment, which caused the European birth rates to plummet in the early 1970s, leading to a need for foreign labour. Thirty years later burqas and hijabs were common on Britain’s streets.

But the spiritual vacuum caused by the decline of the Anglican, Catholic and Methodist churches in England is being filled by other forces. According to the Mail Evangelical Christianity is on the rise.

Some 4.5million of the UK’s foreign-born population claim to have a religious affiliation. Of these, around a quarter are Muslim while more than half are Christian – with Polish Catholics and African Pentecostals among the fastest-growing groups.

While traditional churchgoing is on the decline in the UK over the past decade, the latest immigrants mean Christianity is becoming more charismatic and fundamentalist.

‘Perhaps the most significant change has been the growth of Pentecostal and charismatic Christianity within migrant populations, particularly those from Africa and Latin America,’ the report found.

‘In Lewisham, there are 65 Pentecostal churches serving the Nigerian community, and others serving the Congolese, Ghanaian and Ivorian communities.’

Professor Mike Kenny of IPPR said: ‘The research shows that recent waves of inward migration have given a boost to some of the UK’s established faith communities at a time when Britain’s society and culture are generally more secular, and smaller numbers of the indigenous population are regularly attending churches.

‘Recent migration trends are altering the faith map of the UK. Their biggest impact is being felt in some of our largest cities: London above all, where a rich mosaic of different faith communities has come into being.’

Evangelical Christianity might be heavily African-influenced but it’s also spreading among the natives as well. Yesterday I attended an Evangelical service for a friend’s baby’s naming ceremony (not a baptism, as we papists call it – this group don’t believe in infant baptisms).

The happy clappy thing is not my scene – I’d need at least four Stellas before I could get up and dance in a church without dying of a cringe-related stroke – but it’s easy to see why Evangelical Christianity is rapidly spreading in the UK. The median age of this church was about 20; in most Catholic parishes in London you’re considered an energetic young go-getter if you’re under 75; the Evangelicals have many working-class members, while very, very few

The Evangelicals also aggressively court people of other faiths, including Muslims – while the Catholics would rather meet other religious leaders at (preferably tax-payer funded) interfaith meetings where they can spout platitudes about faith communities, as if religious identity is fixed, not a choice.

And in three decades of living in London I have also never seen so many people of different racial backgrounds united in a feeling of brotherhood – Londoners generally tolerate each other, and muddle on, but whether it’s the NHS surgery or the Notting Hill Carnival, the theme is begrudging tolerance, not affection. A small church can do far more for race relations than all the state-subsidised quangos and anti-racism campaigners in Christendom.

Many Catholic and Anglican churches are packed on Sunday mornings with young parents trying to get their kids into the best schools, and it shows – the air is thick with hypocrisy. In contrast the Evangelicals, whether anyone likes it or not, believe, and it shows. Doubt and scepticism are fine things but a religious community that does not believe in its own message will wither and die, and be replaced by others. I’m not remotely surprised Evangelical Christianity is on the march in England.

Celebrating Dutch Diversity (Christianity Not Included) – Hooray it’s not just Britain. Doh!

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

Gates of Vienna Blog

The aggressive secularization of Western cultures continues apace, and overt expressions of Christian belief are the primary targets of PC governmental restrictions. The Netherlands is no exception to this, and the multicultural brigades of Dutch diversity are busy beavering away at the last vestiges of Christianity in Holland.

Our Flemish correspondent VH has translated a couple of articles on the topic.

Read More

The Copenhagen climate summit has brought with it an outpouring of opinions and a planetary law imposing China’s one-child policy on all nations is what is needed, according Diane Francis

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

These comments by Diane Francis in a national Canadian newspaper have sure ticked some folk off. Perhaps we should all consider sacrificing ourselves for Gaia, rather than just our babies, that should help emissions.

This is just one article on these comments from the Christian world:-

ROME (Zenit.org) – The Copenhagen climate summit has brought with it an outpouring of opinions on environmental issues. Among these is a disturbing return to the Malthusian position of seeing population control as the solution to the world’s problems.

A planetary law imposing China’s one-child policy on all nations is what is needed, according to an opinion article by Diane Francis, published Dec. 8 in the Canadian newspaper, the National Post.

Francis predicted this would reduce the current world population of 6.5 billion down to 3.43 billion by 2075. While more extreme than most, Francis is hardly alone in advocating population control.

Just prior to the Copenhagen summit, Britain’s Optimum Population Trust launched a carbon offset scheme, reported the Guardian newspaper on Dec. 3.

As explained by John Vidal, the paper’s environment editor, this allows rich consumers to offset their jet-set lifestyle by paying for contraception in poorer countries.

According to Vidal, the trust’s calculations show that the 10 metric tons of carbon emitted by a return flight from London to Sydney could be offset by preventing the birth of one child in a country such as Kenya.

It seems neo-colonialism is still alive in the attitudes of some environmental activists who don’t see any problem in urging developing nations to curb their population so that the carbon emissions of richer countries can be offset.

The launch of the scheme followed a report published in August by the trust titled: “Fewer Emitters, Lower Emissions, Less Cost: Reducing Future Carbon Emissions by Investing in Family Planning.”

The conclusions of the study stated: “The cost/ benefit analysis found that family planning is considerably cheaper than many low carbon technologies.”

“Based on the study’s findings, it is proposed that family planning methods should be a primary tool in the optimum strategy for reducing carbon emissions,” the report advocated.

Disaster predictions

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) joined the Malthusian chorus with the publication of its State of World Population 2009 Report.

Greater access to “reproductive health” was constantly urged by the report. This U.N. term is understood to include access to condoms, contraceptives and abortion.

“We have now reached a point where humanity is approaching the brink of disaster,” stated Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, UNFPA’s executive director at the London launch of the report Nov. 18.

The report was greeted in the press with titles such as “UN: Fight Climate Change With Free Condoms,” (The Associated Press, Nov. 18).

“Birth Control: The Most Effective Way of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” trumpeted the Nov. 19 headline in the London Times newspaper in its coverage of the report.

Confusingly, alongside the call for reproductive health in developing nations were other statements that contradicted the thesis that less people in poorer countries would bring the world back from the precipice of environmental disaster.

“The dominant responsibility for the current build-up of greenhouse gases lies with developed countries,” the report admitted.

“The linkages between population and climate change are in most cases complex and indirect,” it also conceded.

A better guide to the issue of population and the environment came in a special report published by The Economist magazine in its Oct. 31 issue.

In the editorial that accompanied the report the magazine pointed out that the trend to lower fertility in developing countries is already advanced. “Today’s fall in fertility is both very large and very fast,” it said.

We can limit the human impact on the environment in three ways the editorial maintained: population policy, technology and governance. Regarding population there is not much more to be done the magazine argued. Only “Chinese-style coercion” could bring about a speedier reduction in fertility.

Notably, for a publication that in no way espouses religion, the editorial also added that: “Forcing poor people to have fewer children than they want because the rich consume too many of the world’s resources would be immoral.”

The report itself proposed that the way to deal with carbon emissions and environmental concerns is not to try and reduce fertility but to alter economic growth so that it is less polluting and to make it less resource-intensive.

British sociologist Fran Furedi explored the return of Malthusianism in a piece written for the Web site Spiked. His Dec. 7 commentary harshly attacked the proposals of the Optimum Population Trust for being “a zombie-like Malthusian organization devoted to the cause of human depletion.”

“Throughout most of history, human life has been valued in and of itself; it has been seen as possessing a special quality that could not be reduced to quantities to be measured by misanthropic accountants,” he observed.

Furedi based his comments on a humanist perspective and not on a religious foundation. There is a unique quality to human life he argued. He also wondered why other humanists were not interested in defending human life and standing up for ideals developed in the Renaissance and the Enlightenment.
Losing faith

“A world that can place an equal sign between a baby and carbon is one that has lost its faith in humanity,” Furedi lamented.

Another interesting commentary was published on Dec. 9 by the Australian Web site, On Line Opinion. It was written by Farida Akhter from Bangladesh. According to the article, she is the executive director of an organization that works with communities in Bangladesh and she also runs a feminist publishing house.

Akhter reflected on the UNFPA’s State of World Population report and argued that it is a simplistic approach to consider that women can solve environmental problems simply by reducing their fertility.

Targeting the developing nations simply doesn’t make sense, she affirmed. Citing data from the UNFPA report she stated that the world’s richest half-billion people are responsible for 50% of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions.

So, she continued, even if we reduce population growth in the poorest countries their contribution to the reduction of carbon emissions or consumption of resources will be not be significant.

“Let’s not make women the target for contraceptives in the name of solving climate change,” she concluded. A sentiment shared by Jennie Bristow, editor of the British publication, the Abortion Review. She also wrote an article for Spiked on the topic of population and ecology, on Oct. 6.

Bristow defended abortion and contraception, but also pointed out that history is full of examples where these practices have been imposed upon women by authorities who wanted to decide how many children should be born.

Her essay was critical of the pro-life position, yet she also argued that: “Serious questions have to be asked about how genuine the commitment to free choice is among those who ultimately would like women to choose not to have children, or more than a certain number of children.”

We do indeed have a responsibility towards the environment pointed out Benedict XVI in his June 29 encyclical “Caritas in Veritate.”

What is at stake, however, is something more than just ecological issues, the Pope added. Respect for nature also includes a respect for human life. “Our duties towards the environment are linked to our duties towards the human person, considered in himself and in relation to others,” the encyclical argued (No. 51).

If the two become opposed, then “herein lies a grave contradiction in our mentality and practice today,” the Pontiff continued. A contradiction being proposed by not a few voices in the debate over how to approach environmental issues today.

Here is some more from LifeSiteNews, which also helpfully collates responses to Diane Francis.

In addition to strong criticisms from Laura Ingraham on the Fox Network and Canadian MP Maurice Vellacott, there is increasing outrage to the blunt, sincerely meant comments by National Post editor-at-large Diane Francis advocating worldwide adoption of the Chinese one-child policy as a solution to climate change.

Francis’s column is only the latest in a growing number of calls for de-population as a principal solution to climate change. The Chinese delegation to Copenhagen has been urging international adoption of a population policy similar to their forced one-child program.

A report by Britain’s Optimum Trust suggests that the 10 metric tons of carbon emitted by a single return flight from London to Sydney could be “offset” by “enabling the avoidance of one unwanted birth in a country such as Kenya.” In a Dec. 10 column in the London Telegraph, writer Charlie Brooks states, The real “elephant at the summit”, however, is population growth. In spite of it being the core cause of climate change” he says, “everyone is running a mile from having a serious, frank discussion on how it can be halted.”

The UN Population Fund is leading the push for drastic de-population measures as what it claims is a necessary tactic to combat climate change. However, long before climate change or global warming became a major issue, the UN has been strongly advocating world de-population even to the point of today ignoring the fact that most nations are already at well below replacement birth levels. Many experts warn that nations will soon and inevitably experience traumatic social and economic upheavals because of the huge demographic imbalance between the aged and the young.

Listed below are additional responses to the Francis article and arguments given to counter her points: Continue Reading

Oral Roberts hospitalized. Should we assume this is the result of a lack of faith?

Monday, December 14th, 2009

Sorry it just made me laugh, from the Epistolizer Blog:-

If a faith healer can’t heal himself, he better keep his mits off of me.

Two-thirds of US Protestant pastors believe Islam is a dangerous religion, according to survey results just released by LifeWay Research.

Monday, December 14th, 2009

Christian Post

While opinions vary widely based on factors such as denominational affiliation and political ideology, the survey of more than 1,000 Protestant pastors found 45 percent strongly agree with the statement “I believe Islam is a dangerous religion,” and 21 percent agree somewhat.

Ed Stetzer, president of LifeWay Research, said American Protestant pastors’ agreement that Islam is dangerous could speak to various issues, however, “in one sense, Protestant pastors are a competing religion, so we should not be completely surprised by their concerns about Islam.”

Scott McConnell, associate director of LifeWay Research, said LifeWay Research decided to ask this question after European headlines used the phrase “dangerous religion” to describe results drawn from a 2008 study across 21 European countries that found an “overwhelming majority” of people believe immigration from predominantly Muslim countries poses a threat to Europeans’ traditional way of life.

“It appears that Protestant pastors in America are overwhelmingly willing to use that phrase and cite Islam as ‘a dangerous religion,’” McConnell said.

Additionally, a study by the Pew Research Center found that 38 percent of all Americans say Islam is more likely to encourage violence than other religions. However, studies also indicate a need for interaction. For example, data from the Gallup Muslim-West Dialogue Index shows that when given the option of labeling greater interaction between Muslim and Western worlds a threat or a benefit, 70 percent of Americans call it a benefit.

“It’s important to note,” Stetzer pointed out, “our survey asked whether pastors viewed Islam as ‘dangerous,’ but that does not necessarily mean ‘violent.’ ‘Dangerous’ can be defined in a variety of ways, including from the perspective of spiritual influence. Regardless of the definition, the numbers tell us that Protestant pastors are concerned.”

Read More

The Anti-Defamation League on Monday condemned the “despicable” removal of a Hannukiah in Moldova, apparently led by Christian Orthodox priest Fr. Anatoliy Chirbik

Monday, December 14th, 2009

This report from the Jerusalem Post regarding the removal of a Jewish Hannukiah from a public place in Moldova, to be replaced with a cross is despicable, disturbing and disgraceful. I can only hope that Moldova’s Orthodox Church, which is part of the Russian Orthodox Church, will be swift in their public condemnation of this appalling act of anti-Semitism.

Jerusalem Post

The Anti-Defamation League on Monday condemned the “despicable” removal of a Hannukiah in Moldova, apparently led by an Orthodox priest. Video footage of the event, uploaded to YouTube, shows a group of dozens of people looking on as the menorah is pulled down down with hammers and iron bars and replaced with a cross.

Officials in the Moldovan capital of Chisinau said that the 1.5 meter-tall ceremonial candelabrum was retrieved, reinstalled and is now under police guard.

The video shows an Orthodox priest, identified by Moldovan media as Fr. Anatoliy Chirbik, leading the Sunday demonstration at Stefan the Great Square and saying, “We are an Orthodox country. Stephan the Great defended our country from all kinds of kikes, and now they come and put their menorah here. This is anarchy.”

Police said they were investigating, and that there was no official reaction from Moldova’s Orthodox Church, which is part of the Russian Orthodox Church and counts 70 percent of Moldovans as members.

The national government said in a statement that “hatred, intolerance and xenophobia” are unacceptable.

Jewish leader Alexandr Bilinkis called on the Orthodox Church to take a position over the priest’s actions.

In a statement released Monday, the ADL urged both the Moldovan government and the Orthodox Church to bring those responsible to justice.

“The Moldovan government and the Orthodox Church must punish the perpetrators of this despicable anti-Semitic crime and send a clear signal to Moldovan society and to the Jewish community that the government and the church will not tolerate anti-Semitism,” ADL National Director Abraham H. Foxman said in the statement.

The Jewish community in Moldova was thriving before World War II but there are now estimated to be just 12,000 Jews in the former Soviet Republic. Twenty years ago there were 66,000 Jews. Many emigrated to Israel.

The Christian Institute Report Marginalising Christians – Instances of Christians being sidelined in modern Britain

Monday, December 14th, 2009

The Christian Institute have just released a new report which can be found on this link in a PDF format:-

The Christian Institute Report Marginalising Christians – Instances of Christians being sidelined in modern Britain

This is how the Christian Institute introduce the report themselves:-

New report: Christians are sidelined by equality laws

Christians are being marginalised by a raft of equality and diversity laws which leave them the first to be punished and the last to be protected, a new Christian Institute report says.

The report, published today, follows comments from the Archbishop of Canterbury at the weekend that the Government treats Christians as eccentric oddities.

The report, called “Marginalising Christians”, catalogues numerous cases of Christians being sidelined by public bodies, popular media, employers and barriers to public funding.

It also charts a worrying number of cases where Christians have been violently attacked in ‘faith hate’ assaults.

The publication of the report comes just days after two Christian hoteliers in Liverpool faced a criminal prosecution for criticising Islam during a debate with a Muslim guest.

And tomorrow the Court of Appeal will deliver a ruling on whether Islington Council discriminated against a Christian registrar, Lillian Ladelle, who asked for her religious beliefs to be accommodated when it came to same-sex civil partnerships.

Parliament is currently considering an Equality Bill which faith groups fear will further erode their liberty.

The Government is using the Bill to drastically shrink the freedom of churches to insist that their staff’s sexual conduct is in keeping with the Bible.

The Christian Institute’s Mike Judge said: “Many Christians feel marginalised in modern Britain.

“Whether it’s a Christian nurse being suspended for offering to pray for a patient’s recovery, or whether it’s a Christian couple being prosecuted for a crime because they criticised Islam, believers feel targeted by the ‘equality police’.

“A stream of equality and diversity laws have failed to reasonably accommodate the rights of religious believers. Christians in particular feel like they have been pushed to the back of the queue.

“When it comes to applying equality and diversity laws, Christians seem to be the first to be punished and the last to be protected.”

None of this will come as any big surprise to observant Christians, but it is good that the Christian Institute has collated and detailed all of recent Christian persecution in the UK. This also meshes nicely with Melanie Phillips article from earlier today.

Inhumane Humanism – Atheist Propaganda Thinly Disguised, part 1

Monday, December 14th, 2009

This is a Cross-post from Mariano, over at the Atheism is Dead Blog:-

Let us consider further arguments that have broken out about atheist attempts to proselytize children and otherwise express anti-Christian prejudice in the guise of humanism and concern and free thinking freedom of choice.

Here is one such example:

Critics say the ideas behind the campaign are seriously flawed, especially the notion that it is possible to bring children up in a neutral environment. Fr Stephen Wang says “the call to liberate children is superficially appealing but fundamentally naive . . . If you really want your children to be free, you need to tell them why their freedom matters, and help them appreciate some of the values they might pursue. And to do that, you need to use at least a few labels.”

Brian McClinton, of the Northern Ireland Humanist Association, is frustrated at what he calls the “wilful misunderstanding” of the campaign. “We’re not devil-worshippers,” he says wearily.

“In a society full of labels, this is simply a plea for freedom of thought. All the billboard is doing is asking parents to be aware that children are not their possessions, that they have rights too . . . Why brainwash them with fantastical nonsense about floods and original sins, heavens and hells, resurrections, deaths and apocalypses?”[1]

Can we agree on this much; neither am I or my wife devil-worshippers but we might as well be as we are referred to as “child abusers” who “brainwash” our children. Thank you Brian McClinton for proving that this is not, as you claimed that “All the billboard is doing is asking parents to be aware that children are not their possessions, that they have rights too” and ending by expressing your anti-“religion” zealotry—that is, indeed, what this is about. Note that Brian McClinton did not state that parents brainwash their children by telling them that it is wrong to be greedy and hit others. He did not refer to brainwashing when parents feed their children meat before the children can choose to be vegetarians—or when parents raise them vegetarian before they can choose to eat meat.

Also, Brian McClinton did not refer to brainwashing parents who tell their children that there is no God (as my previous pastor’s wife’s father did as he tucked her into bed at night), or who tell children that the universe and everything in it is an accident, that they are glorified animals, that death will bring annihilation, etc.

I encountered an article that struck me as misconceived which was written by “The [atheist] Chaplain” from An Apostate’s Chapel and includes a quotation from Daniel Dennett:

I am delighted with the American Humanist Association’s campaign. It articulates a simple truth that should not even be considered controversial. OF COURSE you can be good without a belief in God….

We can all be good for goodness’ sake, and not because an imaginary God ‘commands’ it (who believes, literally, in such an anthropomorphic commander anyway?) or because we fear eternal torture if we don’t (what a vicious idea!), or because we crave the goodies in an afterlife (what an ignoble, childish myth!). Once we set aside, as beneath respect, those traditional themes of obedience to a supernatural monarch, fear of punishment, and covetousness of reward, religion turns out to have nothing to offer to morality except some inspiring examples of good and courageous behavior that can be appreciated by believers and non-believers alike. [ellipses in original]

It is sad to see the deleterious effects that becoming an atheist activist have had on this professor of philosophy.

I have detailed the reasons why “OF COURSE you can be good without a belief in God” at this link. OF COURSE they can since they borrow Judeo-Christian morality—even while cutting their own feet from under themselves by throwing away its ethos—God.As to “who believes, literally, in such an anthropomorphic commander anyway?” Well, the overwhelming majority of the entire planet’s population, why do you ask?

Are we to be good (whatever “good” may mean in an atheistic universe) “because we fear eternal torture if we don’t”? This surely is a “vicious idea!” and it is Daniel Dennett’s vicious idea. At least speaking from Judeo-Christian theology, there is no such concept of “torture” known to the Bible.

And to assert that this is why Judeo-Christians do good is an attempt at mind reading and viciously narrow minded as is his assertion to craving “goodies in an afterlife.”

I considered the claim to ulteriorly motivated good doing in both Christians and atheists in the essay: The Red Light of Punishment. For now, note that in assuming to speak for theism he misses the point, which is his point, lest he be left without a point to make. The main point of Judeo-Christian theology is to love God and love humans. Love God who created humans in His image, love the humans that God loves and you will see that you have no right to violate anyone and reason enough to love everyone. Indeed, set aside, as beneath respect, those traditional themes of obedience to a supernatural monarch, fear of punishment, and covetousness of reward and do good for the main reason laid out in the Bible—love:

A lawyer, asked Him [Jesus] a question, testing Him, and saying, “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?”Jesus said to him, “‘You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the first and great commandment.

And the second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets” (Matthew 22:35-40).

Interestingly enough, The Chaplain commented that they are “troubled” by Dennett’s statement, “inspiring examples of good and courageous behavior.” But why this, why not his narrow-minded arrogance? It is because:

“As I think about those exemplars and their deeds, I’m struck by how often these people fail(ed) to live up to their moral ideals:

Jacob cheated his brother
Abraham lied about his relationship with Sarah
Jesus cursed a fig tree that didn’t bear fruit out of season
Inquisitors tortured people they deemed as heretics and infidels
Protestants and Catholics bled Europe dry during religious wars
The Catholic Church still refuses to take full responsibility for pedophilia
Muslims stone women for being unchaperoned when in the presence of males to whom they are not related”

Note that while the reference was to “inspiring examples of good and courageous behavior,” the response is to essentially ignore the statement and merely be contrarian by offering examples of bad and un-courageous behavior. One does not defeat the fact of “inspiring examples of good and courageous behavior” by noting the opposite since the former is a fact and was not claimed to be an absolute. What we see is a desperate attempt to grasp at straws in attempting to deny the facts of history.

As for Jacob and Abraham; failing to live up to our own, or God’s, moral ideals is part attempting to live up to our own, or God’s, moral ideals. The Bible constantly points out the moral failings of its heroes and villains alike. The issue of Jesus cursing the tree is obviously a parabolic action which I exposited here.

I will not attempt to tackle an issue as misunderstood and talking-pointitive as the Inquisition in brevity but will note that the accused would request to be held as prisoners by the religious authorities as the secular authorities as the secular were merciless. Note that:

Historians estimate that the Spanish Inquisition killed approximately 5,000-6,000 people over its 350-year history. That’s fewer than 18 a year. One a year is too many, but the number hardly sustains the monstrous narratives we often hear.[2]

In fact, the Inquisition was premised upon political intrigues. As The Jewish Encyclopedia notes (1906 ed. Vol. XI, p. 485), “It remains a fact that the Jews, either directly or through their correligionists in Africa, encouraged the Mohammedans to conquer Spain.”Indeed, directly prior to the commencement of the Inquisition, Turks attacked Otranto where the choice was offered to convert to Islam or, as was done to the 800 Christians who refused, beheading on The Hill of the Martyrs. Overall, 20,000 were slaughtered along with the archbishop and a bishop. Thereafter, the Turks attacked Vieste, Lecce, Taranto and Brindisi.

Also, note that there is plenty of this to go around as in atheistic Communism Russia:

Prisoners would have their skulls squeezed within iron rings…human being would be lowered into an acid bath…they would be trussed up naked to be bitten by ants and bedbugs…a ramrod heated over a primus stove would be thrust up their anal canal (the “secret brand”)…a man’s genitals would be slowly crushed beneath the toe of a jackboot…[3]
Some had their heads repeatedly plunged into a bucket of urine and fecal matter while the guards intoned a parody of the baptismal rite…[4]

And this merely scratches the surface.

We will conclude considering The Chaplain’s article in the next segment.

[1] Fionola Meredith “Hey, preacher – leave those kids alone,” Irish Times, Nov 28, 2009
[2] Dr. John Dickson, “‘Religious violence’ a small part of the story,” ABC.net.au, May 20, 2009
[3] Daniel J. Flynn providing an example from the book: The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression
[4] Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, Thomas P. Whitney, trans., The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956 – An Experiment in Literary Investigation (New York: Harper & Row, 1973), pp. 93-94

“I have seen performances where the central character has not been Jesus. Instead he is replaced by an angel or a sheep, and I think that’s a shame,” said Rev Roger Widdecombe, vicar of St Paul’s in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire.

Monday, December 14th, 2009

Oh no, here we again!

Telegraph

A growing number of schools have scrapped the traditional Mary and Joseph performances in favour of secular alternatives such as Snow White or Scrooge.

Others have removed explicitly religious messages from their re-enactments of the birth of Christ for fear of upsetting pupils of other faiths.

Now vicars have spoken out against this watering down of the nativity, complaining that children are not being taught the spiritual message of Christmas.

Read More

They embraced the religion of their invaders to escape the caste system that had condemned them to a miserable existence. But Karlos Zurutuza reports on how, centuries later, Christians in the Taliban stronghold of Quetta are once again becoming ‘untouchables.’

Monday, December 14th, 2009

An excellent article, kindly emailed to me by Tokyo-based editor of The Diplomat (www.the-diplomat.com), an online current affairs magazine focusing on the Asia Pacific region. Written by Karlos Zurutuza and reproduced here with kind permission:-

They embraced the religion of their invaders to escape the caste system that had condemned them to a miserable existence. But Karlos Zurutuza reports on how, centuries later, Christians in the Taliban stronghold of Quetta are once again becoming ‘untouchables.’

Dubbed ‘Little London’ when still under British rule, Quetta, in Pakistan’s Balochistan Province, was levelled to the ground by an earthquake in 1935. Yet, although the physical evidence of the city’s colonial heritage was lost in the temblor, reminders remain of the British legacy–locals still add milk to their tea, for example, and when they take to the roads they drive (nominally at least) on the left.

But look closely at the motifs that adorn locals’ rickshaws and motorised tricycle taxis and a very different image emerges–one of an ethnically mixed subcontinent city. For while the colourful flags of the Pashtun and Baloch political parties most frequently embellish these small vehicles, there’s no shortage of black Shiite banners, or the Jamiat Ulama´e Islam’s black and white horizontal stripes (which also serve as reminders that many in Quetta demand the strict enforcement of traditional Islamic law).

Against the backdrop of noisy rickshaws meandering around pedestrians, cars and trucks, rumours frequently circulate quietly around the bazaar. ‘A truck full of explosives has entered the city,’ went one whisper I heard, prompting the ever-versatile tricycles to change their routes in response to this latest rumour. Avenue Noordar, the city’s main artery, which is lined with government offices, is sealed off by concrete roadblocks, forcing the tricycles to fan out along alternative routes.

The only distinguishing mark on Rehan’s vehicle is a small image of the Virgin Mary, visible only when he lowers the sun visor. This unexpected apparition is a privilege reserved for members of Quetta’s Christian community and the few Westerners who visit Quetta. The discretion of this skinny, raven-haired man is understandable in this border city, where ethnic tensions often explode into targeted killings and random bombings.

Quetta is just a one-hour drive from the Afghan border, and two from Kandahar. Yet although this is the capital of the part of Balochistan controlled by Pakistan, even here Balochs are a minority–outnumbered by the tens of thousands of refugees arriving from Afghanistan. Most of these incomers survive through smuggling Iranian underwear, Afghan opium or Russian weapons.

The influx of refugees adds to the remarkable variety of ethnicities here–women hidden under blue burkhas, Tajiks with their distinctive aquiline noses, beardless Uzbeks and almond-eyed Shia Hazaras. Locals also ‘know’ that Afghan Taliban leader Mullah Omar lives here, protected by his personal Baloch guards and, according to many, by the Pakistani Army. It’s no surprise that Quetta means ‘fortress’ in Pashto, the language of the Pashtuns.

Educating tomorrow’s Talibans

Much like Russian dolls, the great fortress of Quetta has a plethora of redoubts tucked away inside it. There are the houses of the different religious or tribal leaders, the secure government buildings and even a few Christian colleges. The St. Francis Grammar School is one of them.

‘It’s probably the best in Quetta,’ says Younis B, the school’s manager who says the school was originally meant for the British stationed here, but that when they withdrew in 1947 it was left in locals’ hands. Today, St Francis Grammar School’s admissions policy does not discriminate between faiths. It has 2000 students and, surprisingly, even children of Taliban mullahs share desks with the about 300 Christians here.

‘Their parents will never acknowledge it in public, but they all know that Pakistani public education leaves much to be desired,’ Younis says.

Yet it’s almost impossible to find any Christian symbols around the building–they are reserved for the school manager´s office and the chapel. And despite the apparently secular atmosphere, a teacher from the school was forced to flee Quetta after being pilloried for hanging a calendar of a famous brand of cars on a wall. The cars were not the problem. What riled some was the date–2009–a Christian rendering not favoured in Quetta. ‘A pupil told his father, a mullah, that our teacher was indoctrinating his class in Christianity,’ Younis says. ‘Of course, the teacher flatly denied the allegation. Unfortunately, though, the constant threats from the fundamentalists eventually meant our teacher had to leave Quetta.’

Many more might soon be forced to flee the region. Rumours abound about an upcoming major military operation in the area, similar to those in the Swat valley and Waziristan. Such rumours increase the pervading sense of insecurity, especially among the members of the Christian community. ‘Where will we go if they force us to leave our house? Afghanistan? Iran?’ asks Younis. Neither would be a promising option for a Punjabi Christian.

The sister school of St. Francis Grammar School is the St Joseph’s Girls’ School, just 200 metres away, and governed by Sister Magdalene. ‘Quetta has a very conservative mentality. No woman goes out except to the market or to the temple,’ explains the Dominican nun between sips of green tea.

Sister Magdalene says that the complete lack of independence for women applies to virtually the entire female population of Quetta, with the Roma perhaps the only exception.

The Roma here stand out–Roma women do not cover their hair and, barefoot and with pierced noses decorated with rings, they beg along Jinnah Road, appearing oblivious to the inquisitive stares of passers-by. The stares are, in effect, punishment for the Roma’s ‘lack of respect’ for local rules of decorum. Many Roma are murdered after being abducted and raped. Small wonder, since they are easy prey and, moreover, a loss that few outside the Roma community will cause a fuss over.

‘Religion isn’t a major handicap for local women,’ explains Sister Magdalene. ‘Being a woman is just as difficult for all of us.’

‘Convert or die!’

The majority of Christians in Quetta live in a district close to the Kandahari bazaar, a vibrant commercial hub where the Taliban’s black and white turbans often resemble a moving chess board. On August 1, eight Christians were burned to death after a mob set fire to their neighbourhood in the town of Gojra, Punjab Province. A few days later, eight more Christians were executed at the hands of fundamentalists in Quetta. It is said several families had received letters in which they were given ten days to convert to Islam. Those who chose to stay, and remain Christian, paid for their ‘offence’ with their lives.

‘Many fled after the letters arrived, and even more when the Taliban carried out their promises,’ recalls Farqalit, a local Christian. ‘Their goal is to make us disappear, one way or another,’ he says adding he feels ‘too old’ to move to Karachi, a booming megacity of over 20 million people that seems to be the last chance of survival for many of Farqalit’s neighbours.

‘We all try to hide the high number of suicides among our people,’ says Rufin, Farqalit’s nephew. He wears a baseball cap, an earring in his left ear and a cross on his necklace; a brave declaration of principles in such a hostile environment.

The recent fundamentalist threat has exacerbated already difficult living conditions. But suicides among the Christian community in Pakistan are far from new. ‘Life here is hard for everyone: Punjabies, Pashtuns, Baluchs, Hazaras… but suicides are more common among us Christians than among the Muslim community,’ says this young Catholic with an expression that reflects anger and shame in equal measure.

The ‘bunker’ of faith

The Holy Rosary Church is the main one for Christians in the Balochistan region. It’s an austere concrete building, a place more defensive than spiritual, and an uninspiring modern imitation of the solid Romanesque European churches of the Middle Ages. The entrance is a metal door in a backstreet heavily guarded by Pakistani police and private staff–just another of those little fortresses hidden away in Quetta.

But once inside, the atmosphere is more relaxed. Men and women remove their shoes at the entrance of the church before splitting along the sides of the hallway: women dressed in their colourful garments to the right, and men in white or light blue baggy clothes at the left. The sound of drums and songs being sung by the choir in Punjabi help bring some colour to the austere Roman litany.

Among the attendees is Victor Ganapragasam, a Tamil priest who arrived from his native Sri Lanka 35 years ago. Today he oversees the Apostolic Prefecture of Quetta. He has had hardly any sleep after a three-day journey visiting three Christian families in the middle of the Baloch desert. ‘We’re around 35,000 in Quetta and hardly 80,000 in the whole Balochistan province,’ he says. ‘Our people are very scared, so every little effort matters when it comes to preventing them from fleeing the region.’

‘The threats to our community members began with the invasion of Afghanistan, eight years ago,’ Ganapragasam says. ‘The Taliban gathered in front of our churches accusing us Christians of destroying their people. Can you believe it? Us!’ he says indignantly as he exchanges greetings with those now leaving the church. ‘Unfortunately for them, the Taliban worldview is as black and white as their turbans. They see Christians as infidels and believe we must be punished as such.’

‘We were happy as Hindu, why did you Europeans have to convert us?’ Ganapragasam jokes.

The mountain of shoes at the entrance of the chapel has vanished. The men shake hands and say goodbye until next Sunday, and the women thoroughly cover their hair before crossing the threshold of the Holy Rosary Church of Quetta, the metal gate of which now separates the ‘heaven’ promised by the colonial settlers of yesteryear from the hell of today’s ‘war on terror.’

Switch to our mobile site