Archive for November, 2009

MULTI-CULTURAL CHRISTIAN NATIONS CELEBRATE CHRIST-NOT X-MAS

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

Guest post by Richard Symonds:-

England, my England, is a multi-cultural Christian nation – and I am proud to be part of it.

I am not racist, xenophobic or a religious nut, but I am a patriot. I’m sure many Scots, Welsh & Irish feel the same way about their country – as do many of those from India, Pakistan, France. Germany, United States, and so on.

We are a Christian country.

That does not mean everyone subscribes, or should subscribe, to a certain kind of Christian dogma – most people in this country do not. But I do believe most would instinctively accept we live in a Christian country – as opposed, say, to a Muslim one.

What I mean here is that there are certain moral values which shape our culture and heritage; derived partly from ancient Greece and Rome, partly from the French & American Revolutions; partly from Judaism & other ancient religions – but principally from Christianity.

Christmas (Christ’s Birth) and Easter (Christ’s Death & Resurrection) mark the two most foundational Christian events on our calendar.

Moral Philosopher, CEM Joad (1891-1953), expresses this idea with far more clarity & precision than I can ever muster (“Recovery of Belief – A Restatement of Christian Philosophy” – Faber&Faber 1952) :

“These values are so deeply inter-woven into our nature…that we have grown up as unconscious of their existence as we are unconscious of the air we breathe…

“A nation, most people would say, especially if it has a long tradition behind it, is more than the sum total of the individuals who at any given moment may happen to be living and constituting the nation.

“The conception of the nation includes such subsidiary ideas as a continuing tradition, a way of life and belief, a scale of values, all of which, when taken together, constitute a mould or formula within which each successive generation of individuals grows and develops.

“The members of a nation have become what they are because of the influence of the mould upon; it stamps them with its impress.

“The national ethos and culture, as we say, make them what they are. In this sense, the ethos and culture of the nation are IMMANENT in the citizens. Because of this immanence, the members of a national community constitute a whole , and because of their relation to the whole – and to one another – they are different from what they would have been as isolated individuals.

“Nevertheless, the tradition, the way of life, the scale of values, are not exhausted by any particular generation that happens to exemplify and live in acordance with them.

They persist, most people would say, from generation to generation.

“The nation, then, in this sense, TRANSCENDS its members.

“Whether…it would exist apart from the particular individuals who happen to embody it, is a controversial question. I should say that it would not”.

What are these “moral values which shape our culture and heritage” – the values which shape who we are and what we become ?

That question can be tackled after Christmas – may I wish you all a very happy one.

Richard W. Symonds is a member of the International Society For Philosophers ( www.isfp.co.uk) and author of “Mega Theory & The Moral Instinct”. He can be contacted by email : richardsy5@aol.com or at his website: Gatwick City of Ideas

Live sheep wheeled into Bexleyheath Asda shop in a shopping trolley

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

I am sorry but I have a deviant sense of humour and this one from the BBC made me laugh my socks off:-

The RSPCA has hit out at pranksters who put a live sheep in a shopping trolley and wheeled it into a supermarket in south-east London.

Two youths were recorded on CCTV carrying out the prank in Bexleyheath just after 0300 GMT on Friday.

Staff at the Asda store have named the animal Rob. It is thought to have been rustled from a farm near Gravesend in Kent.

The RSPCA said it was a “stupid, irresponsible stunt”.

Joe Lock, manager of the store, said: “We were shocked to discover that a poor sheep had been wheeled into our store.”

RSPCA inspector Andrew Kirby, who is investigating the incident, said: “We have tracked down the sheep’s owner but we can’t return it to its flock for six days because of restrictions on the movement of livestock.

“This stupid, irresponsible stunt would have terrified this poor sheep and caused it great stress by removing it from its flock.”

The sheep was not physically harmed.

The maximum sentence for the crime of causing an animal unnecessary suffering is six months in prison and a £5,000 fine.

Oh the RSPCA should get a life, no harm done really, it’s just a bloomin’ prank.

Modern art is paganised and increasingly reflects a culture of death, Archbishop Mario Conti of Glasgow has said. He was speaking a day after the Pope met more than 250 artists at the Sistine Chapel in Rome, urging them to embark on a “quest for beauty”.

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

Although on the face of it Archbishop Conti’s comments seem a little harsh, the fact that he is Archbishop of Glasgow does give us some indication of why he may feel this way. Glasgow has been the epicentre of some very controversial ‘art’ recently.

Firstly there was the tax payer funded art exhibition that allowed visitors to write comments on a copy of the Bible, at the Gallery of Modern Art (Goma) in Glasgow. Secondly there was the play “Queen of Heaven” which portrayed Jesus as transsexual woman at Glasgow’s Tron Theatre.

Having Libertarian tendencies, I say, let the world have whatever ‘art’ it wants and in exchange give us the freedom of speech to proclaim the full counsel of God everywhere and anywhere, without fear of legal reprisals.

The Catholic Herald By Mark Greaves

Modern art is paganised and increasingly reflects a culture of death, Archbishop Mario Conti of Glasgow has said.

He was speaking a day after the Pope met more than 250 artists at the Sistine Chapel in Rome, urging them to embark on a “quest for beauty”.

Archbishop Conti said in his homily at a Mass for artists in Glasgow that a lot of modern art was “incoherent and dispiriting”.

He said: “If we can legitimately speak of a culture of death, much art reflects it: the body is defaced; the marital act prostituted; gender dissembled.”

In particular he cited a play portraying Jesus as a transsexual, called Jesus, Queen of Heaven, and an exhibition displaying a Bible with abuse written on it. He has said it was “disgraceful” that both events received public funding.

He compared the offence they caused to Christians to the apparent offence given to a Finnish woman by the display of crucifixes in Italian classrooms – a complaint upheld by the European Court of Human Rights.

Archbishop Conti said the image of the crucified Christ was deemed offensive because it had become a challenge to secular society.

He quoted an editorial in L’Osservatore Romano which predicted a time when public places were stripped of religious symbols “for fear of offending others’ sensibilities”.

In Europe, he said, “the very foundations of our Christian civilisation are being disturbed”, and modern art, as an expression of culture, reflected that.

The archbishop concluded his homily by urging Christian artists to use their work to bear witness to Christ, “and so countering all that obscures his beauty”.

His appeal closely echoed that of Pope Benedict XVI in his meeting with 262 leading arts figures in the Sistine Chapel on Saturday.

Guests, who included artist Anish Kapoor, composer Ennio Morricone and Gomorra director Matteo Garrone – though not U2 singer Bono, who was invited but could not attend – sat underneath Michelangelo’s Last Judgment and heard a choir sing music by Palestrina.

Pope Benedict told them that they had a “great responsibility to communicate beauty”.

True beauty, he said, forced people to encounter reality and pointed them to the mystery of existence and, ultimately, to God.

The Pope appropriated the language of modern art criticism, saying beauty “gives man a healthy ‘shock’, it draws him out of himself, wrenches him away from resignation and from being content with the humdrum”. He said it may even make the onlooker suffer, “piercing him like a dart”.

He then distinguished between superficial beauty, which “rekindles desire, the will to power, to possess”, and true beauty, which “unlocks the yearning of the human heart, the profound desire to know, to love, to go towards the other, to reach for the beyond”. He said: “If we acknowledge that beauty touches us intimately, that it wounds us, that it opens our eyes, then we rediscover the joy of seeing, of being able to grasp the profound meaning of our existence, the mystery of which we are part.”

The Pope said that beauty, whether in nature or in art, by pointing beyond ourselves, and “bringing us face to face with the abyss of infinity, can become a path towards the transcendent, towards the ultimate mystery, towards God”.

The Pope urged artists to “enter into dialogue with believers”. He said that faith “takes nothing from your genius or your art. On the contrary, it exalts them and nourishes them”.

Zaha Hadid, an Iraqi-born architect, said afterwards that the audience “was quite an emotional experience”. The American architect Daniel Libeskind described it as an “amazing step”. Bill Viola, an American video artist, told the New York Times that artists had struggled for centuries “walking that fine line between creative freedom, between bending the rules” and breaking them. But he said the audience had “real potential for something interesting”.

Archbishop Gianfranco Ravasi, director of the Pontifical Council for Culture, organised the event. He has suggested that the Vatican should have its own pavilion at the next Venice Biennale art exhibition in 2011 as well as at the Frankfurt Book Fair.

If we discover aliens, then we will need theologians – The Church must not ignore the possibility of extraterrestrial life, says Andrew McKie

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

…but….but…surely the church should be the first to say that this world is already infested with non-carbon, intelligent, extraterrestrial, alien life, in the form of spiritual beings?

Click here for previous post

The Catholic Herald

The Vatican’s conference on astrobiology earlier this month tended to prompt two reactions from commentators, though they had in common an air of dismissiveness. The first was the usual pooh-poohing of those who think any interest in the possibility of extraterrestrial life is the preserve of the tinfoil-hat brigade. The second was from those who accept that it may be worthwhile to examine the question, but couldn’t see why the Church would have any interest, or for that matter business, in doing so.

Both these responses seem to me extremely strange. Surely the question of whether life exists on other planets must rank among the most important inquiries that human beings could undertake. When, some years ago, it was suggested that there might be some evidence for microbial life on Mars, the Independent rather prematurely ran the story as “Life found on Mars” – at the bottom of a page. There are only two sane reactions to such a claim, though: either it is not true or it is just about the most astounding news in the history of humanity.

The preposterous aspects of science fiction – giant killer crabs from outer space, little green men, computers which become self-aware, parallel universes and so on – shouldn’t disguise the fact that its central themes are those which preoccupy philosophy and theology: what is the nature of reality, the underlying structure of time, the universe, rationality; what constitutes consciousness, identity, existence?

The question of whether life is confined to Earth, or exists elsewhere in the universe, seems to me to be indisputably a non-trivial question of the same sort, no matter how facetiously it is presented. And the answer would also tell us a great deal about our place in the universe.

As the late Douglas Adams reminded us: “Space is big. Really big … you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist’s, but that’s just peanuts to space.” It may be, as some scientists have suggested, that intelligent and self-conscious life is remarkably unlikely, and that the reason it has happened at all is precisely because the universe is so big – indeed, that it needs to be as large as it is for intelligent life to develop on any one planet. If human beings were confirmed as the only creatures that possessed rationality and conscience – as we seem to be on Earth – anywhere in the universe, it ought to concentrate our minds on the responsibilities which follow from our unique position, and also, perhaps, to meditate on what is meant by the declaration that we are made in God’s image.

Admittedly, that is probably the assumption that most of us make. But the very size of Creation, the variety and abundance of life on Earth, and the fact that our planet seems to be – in astronomical terms – a fairly unremarkable one, makes it conceivable that there are numerous other species on other planets. And, if we were to discover any evidence that any other forms of life existed, or had existed, within our own solar system, it would make it likely that the rest of the universe is positively teeming with other forms of life.

As the organiser of the conference and director of the Vatican Observatory, Fr José Gabriel Funes, put it last year in an interview with L’Osservatore Romano: “Just as there is a multiplicity of creatures over the Earth, so there could be other beings, even intelligent, created by God. This is not in contradiction with our faith, because we cannot establish limits to God’s creative freedom.”

Fr Funes cites here one of the central reasons why the Church should and, indeed, always has, engaged with science. Some reports of this conference seemed to be surprised to discover that the Vatican should maintain an observatory (there are two, really, since its research group is based at the University of Arizona). It is, in fact, one of the world’s oldest astronomical institutions.

To hear militantly atheistic figures such as Richard Dawkins, one would imagine that the Church has long been engaged in preventing the spread of rationality and exploration of knowledge. Such claims are not just piffle, they are the exact opposite of the historical facts.

Western civilisation, understanding and scholarship are in large measure due to the Church. What knowledge we have of the ancient world is almost entirely due to its preservation in monastic libraries. But the Church was responsible not just for the conservation, but also the expansion of knowledge. It founded the majority of Europe’s ancient universities; it was the principal patron of the architects, engineers and artists who were also the technicians and scientists of their day.

The trial of Galileo, routinely held up as an instance of religion barring the way to science, has acquired a kind of mythic status (thanks in part to Brecht) which persists even after the Church’s apology. It obscures the fact that Galileo was a devout Catholic who received great support from the Church for much of his career. In fact, the theories he advocated had been the work of Copernicus, who was a priest, and they met with no objection from the Pope (though they were condemned by Luther and Calvin). There is no doubt that the identification of life beyond Earth would be a scientific discovery of Copernican proportions. But the new questions, and perhaps solutions, which it might bring to biology, chemistry and physics are not the only intellectual challenges. If we ever encounter intelligent extraterrestrial life, it is the philosophers and theologians who have the most to gain, by learning what other creatures make of their purpose in the universe.

A good many people writing about the conference claim that it creates problems for the Church’s claims of universality; of the Incarnation as a single and unique event. Fr Funes has raised a different possibility (similar to the one suggested by C S Lewis in Out of the Silent Planet, which outraged the scientist J B S Haldane) which cuts that argument out altogether. “We could think that in this universe there can be 100 sheep, equivalent to different kinds of creatures. We, belonging to humankind, could be precisely the lost sheep… assuming that there would be other intelligent beings, we could not say that they needed redemption. They could have remained in full friendship with the Creator.”

A conference of this sort may not be preparation for proselytising, as some scientific commentators have sniffily suggested, but preparation for learning something of what it is to live in perpetual grace.

Of course, there may be nothing out there, but there’s a lot of there out there. A universal Church needs to understand universal laws, just as physicists and cosmologists search for them. And the Church needs to ask why, and not just, how, things are as they are.

The Church of England is facing the loss of as many as one in ten paid clergy in the next five years and internal documents seen by The Times admit that the traditional model of a vicar in every parish is over.

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

As I have said before, where in the New Testament is the model of retirement for ministers of the Gospel? Ministering the Gospel is not a job, or even a vocation, it is a lifelong dedication and labour of love.

Increased life expectancy, combined with greater regulation and the credit crunch, has left the Church’s pension scheme with liabilities of £813 million, almost double the £461 million market value of its assets.

All of this money to serve pensions. There should never be a provision for retirement for ministers of the Gospel in my opinion and if you can’t live with that, then you are not worthy of the position frankly. The Church of England is in financial crises for something that has absolutely no precedence in the New Testament. The Church of England has modelled and followed the world and now we begin to see the consequences and it is bloomin’ heartbreaking!

One diocese that is particularly struggling is Winchester, where a meeting of the diocesan synod this morning will discuss proposals to cut clergy posts to save £1 million.

I read about this yesterday and the upshot is huge budget cuts for 2010, which would include cutting their university chaplains, Diocesan newspaper, Comms Officer, Canon Missioner, a Schools Advisor, the number of clergy, and much more besides. There has been a strong reaction from students at the University of Southampton to the news that they could be losing their chaplain, details include a website petition, facebook group, and protest at Winchester Cathedral.

TimesOnline

The Church of England is facing the loss of as many as one in ten paid clergy in the next five years and internal documents seen by The Times admit that the traditional model of a vicar in every parish is over.

The credit crunch and a pension funding crisis have left dioceses facing massive restructuring programmes. Church statistics show that between 2000 and 2013 stipendiary or paid clergy numbers will have fallen by nearly a quarter.

According to figures on the Church of England website, there will be an 8.3 per cent decrease in paid clergy in the next four years, from 8,400 this year to 7,700 in to 2013. This represents a 22.5 per cent decrease since 2000. If this trend continues in just over 50 years there will be no full-time paid clergy left in Britain’s 13,000 parishes serving 16,000 churches.

Jobs will instead be filled by unpaid part-timers, giving rise to fears about the quality of parish ministry. Combined with a big reduction in churchgoing, the figures will add weight to the campaign for disestablishment.

Nine meetings with bishops, diocesan and cathedral staff were held in London this summer to discuss the crisis. A Church report on the meetings released yesterday to The Times describes the traditional model of a stipendiary vicar in every parish as “broken in much of the country”.

This week the Archbishops’ Council approved a plan to make Anglican clergy work until the age of 68 to help to save the Church from its multimillion-pound pensions shortfall.

Increased life expectancy, combined with greater regulation and the credit crunch, has left the Church’s pension scheme with liabilities of £813 million, almost double the £461 million market value of its assets.

The scheme, created in 1998 and partly funded by churchgoers who are being asked to put more in the collection pot than ever before, has been especially hard hit because all of its investments were placed in the stock market at the end of the 1990s.

One diocese that is particularly struggling is Winchester, where a meeting of the diocesan synod this morning will discuss proposals to cut clergy posts to save £1 million.

Read Entire Depressing Article

CHARLES SPURGEON THINGS THAT ACCOMPANY SALVATION

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

“Things that accompany Salvation.” Hebrews 6:9

I AM not quite certain that my text will warrant all I shall say upon it this
day if read and understood in its connection. But I have taken the words
rather by accommodation than otherwise, and shall make use of them as a
kind of heading to the discourse which I hope to be enabled to deliver. I sat
myself down, and I meditated on this subject — ”Things that accompany
Salvation.” And after some period of rumination, my thoughts assumed the
form of an allegory; in which I hope to present them to you this morning. I
compared Salvation to a rich and costly treasure, which God in his infinite
love and mercy had determined to send into the world, and I remembered
that our Lord Jesus was so much interested in the bringing of this Salvation
to this earth, that he did send all that he had, and came himself to attend
and to accompany this Salvation. I then pictured to myself a great march of
bright ones through this land, carrying in their midst the sacred jewel of
Salvation. I looked forward, and I saw a mighty van-guard, who already
had attained the shores of Eternity. I looked around Salvation, and I saw it
always in every case attended with divers graces and virtues which seemed
to be like troops and soldiers to guard it in the ran, about its flanks, and in
the rear.

Before we begin, however, let us just make this caution. When the Apostle
speaks of virtues and of graces, he calls them “things that accompany
Salvation,” not things which cause it. Our faith does not cause Salvation,
nor our hope, nor our love, nor our good works; they are things which
attend it as its guard of honor. The origin of Salvation lies alone in the
sovereign will of God the Father; in the infinite efficacy of the blood of
Jesus — God the Son, and in the divine influence of God the Holy Spirit.
There are, however, “things that accompany Salvation.” Picture then to
yourselves the march of some ancient monarch through his territory. We
read stories of eastern monarchs in the olden time, that seem more like
romance than reality; when they marched with thousands of flying banners
and with all kinds of riches borne with them. Now you are to take that as
the basis of my figure and suppose Salvation to be the sacred treasure
which is being carried through the world, with guards before and guards
behind, to accompany it on its journey.

We will begin, then, with the advance-guard that has accompanied
Salvation or rather gone before it. We shall then come to those who
immediately precede it, and then we shall notice those who accompany it
by its side, and conclude by noticing the rear guard attending upon this
Salvation of our God.

I. First, then, IN THE MARCHES OF TROOPS AND ARMIES, THERE ARE
SOME THAT ARE OUTRIDERS, AND GO FAR AHEAD OF THE OTHER
TROOPS. So in the march of Salvation,” which have far preceded it to clear
the way. I will tell you the names of these stupendous Titans who have
gone before. The first is Election, the second is Predestination, the third is
Redemption and the Covenant is the captain of them all. Before Salvation
came into this world, Election marched in the very forefront, and it had for
its work the billeting of Salvation. Election went through the world and
marked the houses to which Salvation should come and the hearts in which
the treasure should be deposited. Election looked through all the race man,
from Adam down to the last, and marked with sacred stamp those for
whom Salvation was designed. “He must needs go through Samaria,” said
Election; and Salvation must go there. Then came Predestination.
Predestination did not merely mark the house, but it mapped the road in
which Salvation should travel to that house, Predestination ordained every
step of the great army of Salvation, it ordained the time when the sinner
should be brought to Christ, the manner how he should be saved, the
means that should be employed; it marked the exact hour and moment,
when God the Spirit should quicken the dead in sin, and when peace and
pardon should be spoken through the blood of Jesus. Predestination
marked the way so completely, that Salvation doth never overstep the
bounds, and it is never at a loss for the road. In the everlasting decree of
the Sovereign God, the footsteps of Mercy were every one of them
ordained. As nothing in this world revolves by chance — as even the
foreknown station of a rush by the river is as fixed as the station of a king
— it was not meet that Salvation should be left to chance; and therefore
God has mapped the place where it should pitch its tent, the manner of its
footsteps to that tent, and the time when it should arrive there. Then came
Redemption. The way was rough; and though Election had marked the
house, and Predestination had mapped the road, the way was so impeded
that Salvation could not travel it until it had been cleared. Forth came
Redemption, it had but one weapon; that weapon was the all-victorious
cross of Christ. There stood the mountains of our sins; Redemption smote
them, and they split in halves and left a valley for the Lord’s redeemed to
march through. There was the great gulph of God’s offended wrath;
Redemption bridged it with the cross, and so left an everlasting passage by
which the armies of the Lord may cross. Redemption has tunnelled every
mountain; it has dried up every sea, cut down every forest; it has levelled
every high hill, and filled up the valleys, so that the road of Salvation is
now plain and simple. God can be just, and yet the justifier of the ungodly.
Now, this sacred advance-guard carry for their banner the Eternal
Covenant. Election, Predestination, and Redemption — the things that
have gone before, beyond the sight, are all rallied to the battle by this
standard — the Covenant, the Everlasting Covenant, ordered in all things
and sure. We know and believe that before the morning star startled the
shades of darkness, God had covenanted with his Son that he should die
and pay a ransom price, and that, on God the Father’s part, he would give
to Jesus “a number whom no man could number,” who should be
purchased by his blood, and through that blood should be most securely
saved. Now, when Election marches forward, it carries the Covenant.
These are chosen in the Covenant of grace. When Predestination marcheth,
and when it marketh out the way of Salvation, it proclaims the Covenant.
“He marked out the places of the people according to the tribes of Israel.”
And Redemption also, pointing to the precious blood of Christ, claims
Salvation for the blood-bought ones, because the Covenant hath decreed it
to be theirs.

Now, my dear hearers, this advance-guard is so far ahead that you and I
cannot see them. These are true doctrines, but very mysterious; they are
beyond our sight, and if we wish to see Salvation, we must not stop until
we see the van-guard, because they are so far off that only the eye of faith
can reach them. We must have that sacred glass, that divine telescope of
faith, or else we shall never have the evidence of things not seen. Let us
rest certain, however, that if we have Salvation we have Election. He that
believeth is elected whoever casts himself on Christ as a guilty sinner, is
certainly God’s chosen child. As sure as ever you believe on the Savior,
and go to him, you were predestinated to do so from all eternity, and your
faith is the great mark and evidence that you are chosen of God, and
precious in his esteem. Dost thou believe? Then Election is thine. Dost
thou believe? Then Predestination is as surely thine as thou art alive. Dost
thou trust alone in Jesus? Then fear not, Redemption was meant for thee.
So then, we will not be struck with terror at that grand advance-guard that
hath already gained the celestial hill, and have prepared the place where the
elect shall for ever repose upon the bosom of their God.

II. But mark, we are about to review THE ARMY THAT IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDES SALVATION; and first, in the forefront of these, there marches
one whose name we must pronounce with sacred awe. It is God, the Holy
Spirit. Before anything can be done in our salvation, there must come that
Third Person of the Sacred Trinity. Without him, faith, repentance,
humility, love, are things quite impossible. Even the blood of our Lord
Jesus Christ cannot save until it has been applied to the heart by God the
Holy Spirit. Before we notice the grand army, then, that immediately
precedes Salvation, let us be cautious that we do not forget Him who is the
leader of them all. The great King, Immortal, invisible, the Divine person,
called the Holy Ghost, the Holy Spirit: it is he that quickens the soul, or
else it would lie dead for ever; it is he that makes it tender, or else it would
never feel, it is he that imparts efficacy to the Word preached, or else it
could never reach further than the ear; it is he who breaks the heart, it is he
who makes it whole: he, from first to last, is the great worker of Salvation
in us just as Jesus Christ was the author of Salvation for us. O soul, by this
mayest thou know whether Salvation has come to thine house — art thou a
partaker of the Holy Spirit? Come now, answer thou this question — hath
he ever breathed on thee? Hath he ever breathed into thee? Canst thou say
that thou hast been the subject of his supernatural influence? For, if not,
remember except a man be born of the Spirit from above, he cannot see the
kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; only that which is
born of the Spirit is spirit. Thy best exertions will be all unavailing unless
the Holy Ghost shall work in thee, to will and to do of God’s good
pleasure. The highest efforts of the flesh can never reach higher than the
flesh, just as water of itself will never run higher than its source. You may
be moral, you may be strictly upright, you may be much that is
commendable, but unless you be partakers of the Holy Spirit, salvation is
as impossible to you as it is even to the lost. We must be born again, and
born again by that divine influence, or else it is all in vain. Remember, then,
that the Spirit of God always accompanies Salvation.

And now, close in the rear of the adorable Spirit follow the Thundering
Legion. No sooner does God the Holy Ghost come into the soul, than he
brings with him what I have called the Thundering Legion; and those of
you that have been saved will not be at a loss to understand what I mean.
This Thundering Legion are clad in mail, their helmets wave with horror;
their speech is rough like men that come from a far country; their faces are
terrible to look upon, for they are like unto lions, and do terribly affright
the timid. Some of the men in this Thundering Legion bear with them
swords; with these swords they are to slay the sinner. For before he can be
made whole, he must be spiritually killed, the sword must pierce him, and
must slay all his selfishness before he can be brought to the Lord Jesus.
Then another body of them carry with them axes, with which they cut
down the thick trees of our pride and abase the goodly cedars of our
righteousness. There are with them those that fill up the wells with stones,
and break up all the cisterns of our carnal sufficiency, until we are driven to
despair, having all our hopes despoiled. Then come those who, with brazen
trumpets, or with trumps of ram’s horns — like those who once razed
Jericho level with the ground — do blow a blast, so shrill and dread, that
the sinner thinks that even the yells of hell itself could not be more terrible.
Then come those who with lances pierce the spirit through and through;
and in the rear are the ten great guns, the artillery of the law, which,
perpetually fire upon the wounded spirit till it knows not what it is, nor
what it does. My friend, has this Thundering Legion ever come to your
house? Have they ever taken up their quarters in your heart? For, rest
assured, these are some of the “things that accompany Salvation.” What I
have said is no allegory to those who have been converted, but it may be a
mystery to those who know not the Lord. Understand, then, that the first
work of God the Spirit in the soul is a terrible work. Before a man can be
truly converted, he must suffer great agony of spirit; all our selfrighteousness
must be laid level with the ground, and trampled like the
miry streets. Our carnal hopes must, every one of them, be cut in pieces,
and our refuges of lies must be swept away with the hail of God’s anger.
The law of God will appear terrible to the sinner when he is first convinced
of sin. “What have I done?” he will say. Or rather, “What have I undone? I
have undone myself.” See him when God the Spirit has first convinced him
of sin; you would think him mad; he is thought to be mad by his worldly
companions. He weeps lay and night, tears become his meat and his drink;
he can scarcely sleep for the dreams of hell, and when he wakes he thinks
he feels it already.”Oh, the wrath to come, the wrath to come, the wrath to
come!” that seems to be ever pressing on his heart. He is like John
Bunyan’s pilgrim, he has a heavy burden on his back, and he knows not
how to get rid of it, he wrings his hands and cries “What shall I do? I am
undone. I have rebelled against God, and God is angry with me.” Ah, I tell
you this Thundering Legion is a terrible thing indeed. God be praised,
when once they go out of the heart there is some joy; but whilst they are
billited in the conscience of man, I defy him to eat or drink with any mirth
or joy. The poor town of Mansoul is hung with black all the time these
rough soldiers are there. Hideous threatenings and doleful forebodings are
the sinner’s only company in such a case. He seeks to find a little hope and
comfort in his own doings; down comes the hammer of the Law, and
breaks all his doings to pieces. He thinks, well he will rest on the couch of
Indifference and Sloth; forth comes the Law, ties him to the halberts, takes
its ten-thonged whip and begins to lay on to him with all his might till his
heart bleeds again. Then comes Conscience with its brine, and washes him
all over; and he is exceedingly tormented, for even his bed is become a bed
of spikes and thorns. This Thundering Legion always precedes Salvation.
More or less of terrors every man must feel before he is converted. Some
have less, some have more; but there must be some measure of this terrible
law work in the soul, or else Salvation is not come to a man’s house.
Oh, Thundering Legion, ye are gone; we hear their trumpets and the dying
echoes still appal us. We can remember, brethren, those terrible days when
they were in our house and in our heart. They are gone. What see we in the
rear of them? Close in the rear there follows a broken heart. Look at it; do
not despise it, God never despises it, do not thou. “A broken and a contrite
heart O God thou wilt not despise.” I see how this poor broken heart is
broken; it is rent to its very eye and center; it is bathed in tears; it is
overwhelmed with suffering. See its humility; it never talks about boasting
now. Mark its repentance, the sins it loved before it hates now; it speaks
not about self-salvation. Hear it, as the broken heart speaks out its broken
language. Hear it — “Lord have mercy upon me a sinner!” Do not fear to
come and look at this broken heart; how sweetly is it perfumed! The sacred
smell of a sacrifice which God approves rises from it. Hear it, as again it
speaks — “Lord, save, or I perish.” See this poor broken heart when it is in
the world and at its business; it interrupts its business with ejaculations like
these — “Oh that — Ah, ah — would that!” And when it can get alone, it
pours out its heart before God, and cries,
Unclean, unclean, and full of sin
From first to last, O Lord I’ve been;
Deceitful is my heart.’
Oh wash my soul in Jesus’ blood; forgive me all my guilt, and I will be thy
servant for ever and ever.

Dear hearers, has this broken heart ever come to your house? Rest assured
I am speaking God’s own truth, that admits of no dispute — unless this
broken heart has come within your bosom you cannot be made partakers of
Christ. The heart must first be pounded in the mortar of conviction, and
beaten in pieces with the pestle of the law, or else it never can receive the
grace of the Comforter in all its plenitude. Are you broken-hearted to-day?
Are you sorrowful at this very hour? Be of good cheer, Salvation is not far
behind. When there is once a broken heart there is mercy very near. The
broken heart is the prelude of healing. He that kills will make whole; he
that woundeth will bind up; he that smote will cure. God is looking on thee
with love, and will have mercy upon thee.

But who are those that follow in the rear? Another troop, another legion,
but these are far different from the rest. The silken legion follow, these are
not clad in steel; they have no helmets of war upon their head; they have
smiling looks and countenances that are full of joy. No weapons of war in
their hands; no thunders do they utter, but they speak kind words of pity,
and their hands are full of benedictions. Shall I tell you who this silken
legion are? There is a troop of them who take the poor wounded heart, and
wash it first in blood; they sprinkle on it the sacred blood of the
Atonement; and it is amazing how the poor broken heart, though faint and
sick, revives at the first drop of the precious blood of our Lord Jesus
Christ, and when well washed in blood, another of this legion steps
forward and takes it and washes it in water — for both water and blood
flowed from the Saviour’s heart.

“Let the water and the blood,
From thy wounded side which flow’d
Be of sin the double cure,
Cleanse me from its guilt and power”

And oh, what a washing it is! The heart that was once black as the coals of
hell, seems white as the snow of Lebanon. When it has once been bathed in
the bath of the Saviour’s blood and water, oh, how pure it becomes! He
who was black as the tents of Kedar becomes fair as the curtains of
Solomon. Then follow those who pour oil and wine into the wounds of this
poor broken heart, so that where it smarted before, the wounds begin to
sing. The sacred oil and wine of the precious promise is poured into every
wound; and then follow those who with downy fingers bind up the heart
with the sacred liniment of Promise till it seems no longer broken, but the
broken heart rejoices. The whole heart sings for gladness; for God hath
restored its strength and bound up all its wounds, according to his promise:
“He healeth the broken in heart, and bindeth up their wounds.” And then,
since the work is not quite done, there come those who carry the King’s
ward-robe; and with the things out of this rich storehouse they array the
soul from head to foot; they clothe it with everything that for lustre and for
glory could adorn it, and make it bright as the spirits before the throne.
And then the King’s jewellers come in and complete the whole: they array
the soul with ornaments, and bedeck it with precious stones. As the Father
said, “Briny forth the best robe and put it on him, and put a ring on his
hand and shoes on his feet,” even so do this Silken Legion wash and heal
and cleanse and glorify the once poor broken heart. Have these ever come
to your house? It is an allegory, but it is all plain to him that understandeth
it. Sinner, hast thou ever had the blood of Christ applied to thee?

“Couldst thou look and see the flowing
Of his soul’s redeeming blood,
With divine assurance knowing
He hath made thy peace with God?”

Dost thou this hour lay thine hand on the dear head of Christ; confess thy
sin, and believe that he was punished for thee? Thou canst? Then, verily
salvation is thine. And has thine heart been ever washed with water? Say,
dost thou hate sin? Is thy guilt all cleansed, and is the power of guilt cut
away, so that thou dost not love the ways of iniquity, nor seek to run in the
paths of transgressors. Then thou art an heir of heaven. And say, poor
sinner, hast thou ever been arrayed in the robe of Jesus’ righteousness?
Couldst thou ever fondly hope that thou wast accepted in the Beloved?
Methinks I see thee with the tear in thine eye, and hear thee saying, I have
sometimes sung with all my heart —

Jesus, thy blood and righteousness
My beauty are, my glorious dress;
‘Midst flaming worlds, in these array’d,
With joy shall I lift my head.
Bold shall I stand in that great day,
For who aught to my charge shall lay?
Fully absolved through Christ I am
From sin’s tremendous curse and shame.”

And now we have not yet come to a full conviction of Salvation. The
Silken Legion are gone; their banners are still flying in the gale, and their
trumpets of promise are still making the air glad with melody. What
cometh next? Now come those that are the actual attendants upon
Salvation — or rather, that march in the rank immediately before it. There
are four of these, called Repentance, Humility, Prayer and a tender
Conscience. Just before the full assurance of Salvation there marches
Humility. She is of a downcast look; she is not sad, but she hath no high
looks; she scarcely dares to lift her eye to the place where God’s honor
dwelleth. She is often looking downwards, remembering her past estate
thinking of all the bitterness and the guilt of her previous life. She never
boast; of what God has done for her, she looks to the hole of the pit and
the miry clay from whence she was digged. She knows she has been
washed in the blood of the Savior, but she remembers how black she was
before she was washed, and oh, she laments the past although she rejoices
in the present. She feels her own weakness, she dares not stand alone she
leans on the arm of her Beloved, for she knows that she should fall to the
ground unless he should constantly maintain her. Side by side with her, is
her sister called Repentance, watering the ground with tears to lay the dust
before the King. Wherever she goes she weeps and if you ask her why, she
will tell you she does not weep because of a fear of hell — that is all gone.
The Silken Legion yonder, she tells you, have wiped all her fears away; but
she weeps because she smote the Lord that loved her so well she beats her
breast, and cries —

“‘Twas you, my sins, my cruel sins,
His chief tormentors were;
Each of my crimes became a nail,
And unbelief the spear.”

The more you tell her of her Salvation, the more she weeps to think she
could have rebelled against such a Savior. She is confident that her sins are
blotted out; she knows her Master has forgiven her; but she never will
forgive herself. Then side by side with Repentance is one called Prayer. He
is a priest, and he waves in his hand a censer full of odoriferous incense,
that the way for the King may be prepared, that wherever he marches there
may be a sweet perfume. Prayer riseth by midnight to call upon God, its
waking eyes salute the rising sun, that it may lift up its heart to Jehovah,
and when the sun is setting, Prayer will not let his wheel be hidden beneath
the horizon, until in his chariot he hath carried supplication. Then in this
company is the fourth of those immediately attending upon Salvation, a
tender Conscience. This tender Conscience is afraid to put one foot before
the other, lest it should put its foot in the wrong place. Poor tender
Conscience; some despise him; but he is dear to the King’s heart. I would
to God, my brethren, you and I knew more about him. I used to know a
conscience so tender, that I would wish to feel it again. Then we
questioned the lawfulness of every act before we committed it, and then,
though it was lawful we would stop to see if it were expedient and if we
thought it expedient, even then we would not do it, except we felt it would
be abundantly honorable to the Lord our God. Every doctrine we used to
scruple at, lest we should believe a lie; every ordinance we examined, lest
we should commit idolatry; happy were the days when tender Conscience
went with us. And now, my hearers, do you know anything about these
four? Has Humility ever come to you? Has she ever abased your pride and
taught you to lie in the dust before God? Has Repentance ever watered the
floor of your hearts with tears? Have you ever been led to weep in secret
for your sins, and to bewail your iniquities? Has Prayer ever entered your
spirit? Remember, a prayerless soul is a Christless soul. Have you learned
to pray, not with the parrot’s cry, but with the heart’s ever fresh
expression. Have you ever learned to pray? And lastly are you tender of
Conscience, for unless your conscience is made tender, salvation has not
met you, for these are the immediate attendants upon it.

III. And now comes SALVATION IN ALL ITS FULLESS. The “things that
accompany Salvation” make a glorious march in the forefront of it — from
Election down to these precious opening buds of virtue in the sinner’s
heart. What a goodly array! Sure the angels do sometimes fly along in
admiration, and see this long array that heralds Salvation to the heart. And
now comes the precious casket set with gems and jewels. It is of God-like
workmanship; no hammer was ever lifted on it, it was smitten out and
fashioned upon the anvil of Eternal blight, and cast in the mould of
Everlasting Wisdom; but no human hand hath ever defiled it, and it is set
with jewels so unutterably precious, that if heaven and earth were sold they
could never buy another Salvation! And who are those that are close
around it? There are three sweet sisters that always have the custody of the
treasure — you know them, their names are common in Scripture — Faith,
Hope, and Love, the three divine sisters; these have Salvation in their
bowels and do carry it about with them in their loins. Faith, who layeth
hold on Christ, and trusteth all in him; that ventureth everything upon his
blood and sacrifice, and hath no other trust. Hope, that with beaming eye
looks up to Jesus Christ in glory, and expects him soon to come: looks
downward, and when she sees grim Death in her way, expecting that she
shall pass through with victory. And thou sweet Love, the sweetest of the
three, she whose words are music and whose eyes are stars; Love, also
looks to Christ and is enamoured of him; loves him in all his offices, adores
his presence, reverences his words, and is prepared to bind her body to the
stake and die for him, who bound his body to the cross to die for her.
Sweet Love, God hath well chosen to commit to thee the custody of the
sacred work. Faith, Hope, and Love — say sinner, hast thou these three?
Dost thou believe that Jesus is the Son of God? Dost thou hope that
through the efficacy of his merits thou shalt see thy Maker’s face with joy?
Dost thou love him? Say, couldst thou repeat after me,

“Jesus! I love thy charming name,
‘Tis music to my ear;
Fain would I sound it out so loud
That earth and heaven might hear.
Yes, thou art precious to my soul,
My transport and my trust;
Jewels to thee are gaudy toys,
And gold is sordid dust.”

Have you these three graces? If so, you have Salvation. Having that, you
ere rich to all intents of bliss; for God in the Covenant is yours. Cast your
eye forward; remember Election is yours, Predestination and Sovereign
Decree are both yours; remember, the terrors of the law are past; the
broken heart is mourning; the comforts of religion you have already
received; the spiritual graces are already in the bud, you are an heir of
immortality, and for you there is a glorious future. These are the “things
that accompany Salvation.”

IV. Now you must have patience with me for just a few more minutes; I
MUST BRING UP THE REAR GUARD. It is impossible that with such a van
guard, grace should be unattended from behind. Now see those that follow
Salvation. As there were fair bright cherubs that walked in front of it —
you remember still their names — Humility, Repentance, Prayer, and a
tender Conscience — there are four that follow it, and march in solemn
pomp into the sinner’s heart. The first of these is Gratitude — always
singing, “Bless the Lord O my soul, and all that is within me bless his holy
name.” And then Gratitude lays hold upon its son’s hand; the name of that
son is Obedience. “O my master, “saith the hears, “thou hast done so much
for me; I will obey thee” —

“Help me to run in thy commands,
‘Tis a delightful road;
Nor let my heart, nor hands, nor feet,
Offend against my God.”

In company with this fair grace is one called Consecration — a pure white
spirit that hath no earthliness; from its head to its foot it is all God’s, and
all gold. Hear it speak —

“All that I am and all I have
Shall be for ever thine;
What e’er my duty bids me give,
My cheerful hands resign.
And if I might make some reserve,
And duty did not call,
I love my God with zeal so great,
That I would give him all.”

Linked to this bright one, is one with a face Serene and solemn, called
Knowledge, “Then shall ye know when ye follow on to know the Lord.”
whose that are saved understand mysteries, they know the love of Christ;
they “know him, whom to know is life eternal.”

Now, have you these four? They are rather the successors of Salvation
than the heralds of it. “Oh yes,” the believer can say, “I trust I have
Gratitude. Obedience, Consecration, and Knowledge.” I will not weary
you, but there are three shining ones that follow after these four, and I
must not forget them, for they are the flower of them all. There is Zeal with
eyes of fire, and heart of flame a tongue that burneth, a hand that never
wearies and limbs that never tire. Zeal, that flies round the world with
wings swifter than the lightning’s flash, and finds even then he- wings too
tardy for her wish. Zeal, ever ready to obey, resigning up itself for Christ,
jealously affected always in a good thing. This Zeal always dwells near one
that is called Communion. This, sure, is the goodliest of all the train; an
angel spiritualised, an angel purified and made yet more angelic, is
Communion. Communion calls in secret on its God; its God in secret sees.
It is conformed to the image of Jesus; walks according to his footsteps, and
lays its head perpetually on his bosom. And as a necessary consequence, on
the other side of Communion — which with one hand lays hold of Zeal, is
Joy — joy in the Spirit. Joy, that hath an eye more flashing than the
world’s merriment ever gave to mortal beauty, with light foot trips over
hills of sorrow, singing in the roughest ways, of faithfulness and love. Joy,
like the nightingale, sings in the dark, and can praise God in the tempest
and shout his high praises in the storm. This is indeed a fitting cherub to be
in the rear of Salvation. Do not forget these other three; they are after
works of the Spirit, they are high attainments — Zeal, Communion, and
Joy.

Now I have almost done. Just in the rear is Perseverance, final, certain and
sure. Then there follows complete Sanctification, whereby the soul is
purged from every sin, and made as white and pure as God himself. Now
we have come to the very rear of the army; but remember as there was an
advance guard so far ahead that we could not see them, so there is a rear
guard so far behind that we cannot behold them now. Let us just try to see
them with the eye of faith. We have seen the army; we have traced it from
the Thundering Legion, guided by the Holy Spirit, till we have finished it
by complete Sanctification. Hark, I hear the silver trumpet sound; there is a
glorious array behind. A guard, far, far back are coming following the steps
of the conquering heroes, that have already swept our Sills away. Do you
not see in the fore part there is one, whom men paint a skeleton. Look at
him, he is not the King’s terrors. I know thee, Death, I know thee.

Miserably men have belied thee. Thou art no spectre, thine hand bears no
dart; thou art not gaunt and frightful. I know thee, thou bright cherub: thou
hast not in thy hand a dart, but a golden key that unlocks the gates of
Paradise. Thou art fair to look upon, thy wings are like the wings of doves,
covered with silver and like yellow gold. Behold this angel Death, and his
successor Resurrection. I see three bright things coming; one is called
Confidence, see it! it looks at Death; no fear is in its eye, no palor on its
brow. See holy Confidence marches with steady steps, the cold chill stream
of Death doth not freeze its blood. See behind it its brother Victory; hear
him, as he cries, “O Death, where is thy sting? O Grave where is thy
victory?” The last word, “victory,” is drowned amidst the shouts of angels.
These bring up the rear. Angels bear the spirits of the redeemed into the
bosom of the Saviour —

“Far from a world of grief and sin,
With God eternally shut in,
They are for ever blest.”

And now follow everlasting songs — “Praise him, praise him, King of
kings and Lord of lords; he hath gotten him the victory. Hallelujah,
hallelujah, hallelujah, world without end! Hallelujah, yet again!” Let the
echoes of eternity perpetually cry, “Hallelujah! for”

“THINGS THAT ACCOMPANY SALVATION.”

The BBC has withdrawn part of a ballet “In The Spirit Of Diaghilev” from its Christmas television schedule, after discovering part 4 by Javier de Frutos, entitled “Eternal Damnation To Sancho And Sanchez”, featured a deformed Pope who rapes nuns.

Friday, November 27th, 2009

I have seen coverage of this today from the Telegraph and elsewhere, but I simply can’t help myself, the very best article on this today comes from the MediaWatchWatch Blog:-

The BBC, increasingly jittery about causing offence to anyone, has shelved plans to show a ballet which features a hunchbacked pope with a penchant for raping nuns and eunuchs.

The tribute to Diaghilev is in four parts, and it is part 4 by Javier de Frutos, entitled Eternal Damnation To Sancho And Sanchez, which gave the beeb the heebie-jeebies. Apparently, they thought it might offend.

When we announced we were showing it, at the time we weren’t fully aware of the details of the ballet and had every intention of showing all four acts.

We’re not able to show it after before the watershed because the scenes in this work are particularly strong. Even in a post-watershed slot it would not be possible to show the work in its entirety. As is often the case with performance pieces the programme was commissioned before the final details of the work were established.

While it is plausible that the corporation feared an orchestrated Jerry Springer: The Opera style outrage campaign from angry Catholics, one should not rule out the possibility that they decided to cancel the show because it was crap.

:lol: let’s face it, it does sound rather crappy, perhaps using the ‘offense’ card was a good way out for the BBC :lol:

The French National Assembly has rejected an attempt to legalize euthanasia in a 326 to 202 vote.

Friday, November 27th, 2009

By Hilary White

PARIS, November 27, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The French National Assembly has rejected an attempt to legalize euthanasia in a 326 to 202 vote.

“Euthanasia is not a medical act. The right to die is not a medical act,” said Union for a Popular Movement party deputy Jean Leonetti, author of a 2005 law on dying that promotes the use of palliative care.

The Alliance for Human Life welcomed the vote, saying that the bill “played on the ambiguity of the word ‘dignity’” and “contributed to the confusion on a difficult topic.”

Xavier Mirabel, president of the Alliance said, “The French do not want aggressive treatment. When they understand that aggressive treatment does not include euthanasia, most of our citizens are reassured. We therefore ask that the Leonetti law be known and more fully implemented, which requires a more proactive promotion of palliative care.”

The Alliance for Life has launched an education campaign making clear that palliative care can negate any perceived need for euthanasia. They have distributed over 500,000 pamphlets on the theme, “Neither aggressive medical treatment nor euthanasia.”

In the bill, put forward by Manuel Valls a deputy for the Parti Socialiste (PS), euthanasia was described as “medical assistance to die with dignity.” The bill’s supporters argued that since euthanasia was currently being practiced “outside a legal framework,” it was necessary to have a law regulating it.

“Either we accept that euthanasia is often hypocritically practiced without rules or control, or be willing to open the choice of an end of life framed by precise rules, with protection for the patient and the doctor,” said Laurent Fabius, another deputy for the Socialists.

The text of the bill said euthanasia should be allowed for “all adults with advanced or terminal illnesses of a serious and incurable [nature]; those who suffer from physical or mental pain that can not be appeased [by medicine] and that [the patient] considers intolerable.”

Anti-euthanasia activists have strongly criticized such language which they say could lead to patients suffering from mental illnesses like depression being at risk of medically approved suicide.

President Obama’s brief proclamation of Thanksgiving Day on November 26 was unique among all recorded Thanksgiving proclamations by his predecessors: it is the first one that fails to directly acknowledge the existence of God.

Friday, November 27th, 2009

By Kathleen Gilbert

WASHINGTON, D.C., November 27, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) – President Obama’s brief proclamation of Thanksgiving Day on November 26 was unique among all recorded Thanksgiving proclamations by his predecessors: it is the first one that fails to directly acknowledge the existence of God.

The beneficence shown by God to America is a theme that traditionally defines the Thanksgiving holiday, and this theme is strongly emphasized in the original Thanksgiving Day proclamations and consistently acknowledged even by modern presidents.

Obama’s unprecedented proclamation, however, only makes indirect mention of God by quoting George Washington, stating: “Today, we recall President George Washington, who proclaimed our first national day of public thanksgiving to be observed ‘by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God.’”

The proclamation goes on to call Thanksgiving Day “a unique national tradition we all share” that unites people as “thankful for our common blessings.”

“This is a time for us to renew our bonds with one another, and we can fulfill that commitment by serving our communities and our Nation throughout the year,” it continues.

All other presidential Thanksgiving proclamations directly refer to “God,” “Providence,” or another appellation for the divine being.

But Obama’s historic decision to avoid directly mentioning God in the Thanksgiving proclamation doesn’t necessarily come as  a surprise. Earlier this year Obama similarly made history on Inaguration Day by explicitly referencing “non-believers” in his speech, which, according to USA Today, was the first time in history that a President had done so. Obama has also said on more than one occasion that the United States is “not a Christian nation.”

The second weakest reference to God in a Thanksgiving proclamation was issued in 1975 by Gerald Ford, who in his second year as President exhorted Americans to “reaffirm our belief in a dynamic spirit that will continue to nurture and guide us.”  But in his first address, Ford characterized Thanksgiving as a time “all Americans join in giving thanks to God for the blessings we share.”

In 1969, President Richard Nixon’s address referred to the “Source of all good” who “constantly bestows His blessings on mankind.”  In 1978, Jimmy Carter hailed the bounty provided by “Providence”; Ronald Reagan’s 1982 proclamation mentioned “a divine plan” that established America.

Even President Bill Clinton affirmed in his first such proclamation that, “From the beginnings of our Nation, we have sought to recognize the providence and mercy of God with words and acts of gratitude,” and called the spirit of Thanksgiving “acknowledging God’s graciousness.”

The Islamic Law of Apostasy – Barnabas Fund has been running a campaign for the abolition of the Islamic apostasy law, which imposes very serious penalties on Muslims who choose to leave their faith.

Friday, November 27th, 2009

From the Barnabas Fund – Hat tip: Anglican Mainstream

Throughout 2009 Barnabas Fund has been running a campaign for the abolition of the Islamic apostasy law, which imposes very serious penalties on Muslims who choose to leave their faith. All schools of Islamic law specify the death sentence for apostasy, and converts face a range of other punishments, including the loss of their families and property. The law also provokes powerful hostility to apostates among Muslims.

But change is possible. Some progressive Muslim scholars have argued that the apostasy law should be abandoned, so that people can leave Islam without fear of reprisals. And in a very encouraging development, just last month a group of mainstream Muslim leaders in Britain declared that no-one should be coerced into remaining a Muslim: “It is important to say quite simply that people have the freedom to enter the Islamic faith and the freedom to leave it” (Contextualising Islam in Britain, Cambridge: Centre of Islam ic Studies, 2009, p.75). These brave voices will be strengthened by non-Muslims also calling for repeal of the law.

Below you will find an important article by Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali, which explains how Christians should respond to the issue of apostasy (and blasphemy) in Islam. In response to this, we invite you to sign our petition against the apostasy law, and to encourage your church and Christian friends to sign it too. The more signatures we have, the more impact we can have.

Dr Patrick Sookhdeo
International Director, Barnabas Fund
Apostasy and Blasphemy in Islam: What should Christians Do?
From the Foreword to Freedom to Believe (McLean, VA: Isaac Publishing, 2009). Also published in Barnabas Aid November/December 2009.

The Rt Rev Dr Michael Nazir-Ali

The Qur’an is fierce in its condemnation of apostasy (ridda) and of the apostate (murtadd). Theirs, according to it, will be a dreadful penalty (‘adhbun ‘azmun). This sentiment, which occurs in Sura 16:106, is re-expressed in other ways in other suras (chapters of the Qur’an). The interesting point to note is that the various threats of judgement and of punishment seem to relate to the next world or to life after this earthly one, rather than to this world and to this life.

Against this, we have the unanimous position of the various schools of Islamic law (fiqh) that shari‘a lays down the death penalty for adult male Muslims in possession of their faculties who apostatise. Some schools also prescribe a similar punishment for women, whilst others hold that a woman apostate should be imprisoned until she recants and returns to Islam. In addition to this, should an apostate somehow escape the ultimate penalty, his property becomes fai’, i.e. it becomes the property of the Muslim community, which may hand it over to his heirs; his mar riage is automatically dissolved and he is denied Muslim burial.

How then did such a major difference arise between the prima face teaching of the Qur’an and the provisions of shari‘a as codified by the various schools of law? The answer is that the death penalty for apostasy is to be found in the hadith, the various collections of traditions about the Prophet of Islam’s sayings and doings, and it is also found in the sunna of Muhammad and of his closest companions, the reports about their practice.

Commentators on the Qur’an, both ancient and modern, sensing this tension, have attempted to find passages that could be interpreted as teaching the death penalty for apostates. Thus 2:217, which speaks of the barrenness of an apostate’s life and work, in both this world and the next, is interpreted as meaning that apostates will be punished both in this world and in the next. Similarly, passages such as 4:88-89 are taken as justification for inflicting capital punishment on apostates.

On the other hand, there are those who take as their point of departure the Qur’anic silence on penalties in this world for apostasy. They either minimise the force of the traditions that require it or reject them altogether. It is said, for example, that the traditions that speak of the death penalty for apostates are weakly attested or from an unreliable source. If they contradict the Qur’an they are to be rejected as an accurate account of what Muhammad may have said. They are also to be rejected if they do not cohere with other accounts of his behaviour or speech.

Others point to the supposed practice of the second Caliph ‘Umar, who disliked the extreme penalty for apostasy and was followed in this by some of the early fuqaha or lawyers. More recently, this view has gained currency in some circles close to Al-Azhar As-Sharif, the premier place for Sunni learning, located in Cairo, Egypt. According to these scholars, the traditional time given to an apostate to repent must be extended to the whole of his life.

Many scholars claim that the punishment for apostasy in the time of the Prophet and of his Companions arose because rejection of the Islamic faith was linked to rebellion against the nascent Islamic state. So the punishment was not so much for apostasy as for treason. The well-known scholar, Sheikh Qaradawi, whose opinions are widely studied and followed, relying on the medieval jurist and reformer Ibn Tamiyya, distinguishes between the greater and the lesser apostasy. The lesser apostate, whilst being subject to civil penalties, would not be put to death but those who proclaim their apostasy, thus destabilising Islam and the Muslim umma (or nation), would be. This may be a useful distinction to make but is hardly a manifesto for freedom of expression or of belief.

Although apostasy is punishable by death in only a few countries, such as Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Sudan (Iran seems to be drawing back from putting it on the statute book, at the time of writing), in fact jurists will sometimes directly invoke the authority of shari‘a to sentence apostates to death. This has happened in both Iran and in Afghanistan. In addition to judicial process, those accused of apostasy can be killed in prison, through torture or poisoning, or by mobs attacking their home or place of work, or even by relatives!

Whilst apostasy, and its penalty, are applicable to Muslims, the offence of Sabb, of insulting the Qur’an or the Prophet of Islam, can also be applied to non-Muslims. Blasphemy against the Prophet is punishable by death, though the method of execution varies from one authority to another. It is this that led the Federal Shari‘a Court in Pakistan to rule out any other penalty but death for blaspheming Muhammad. The so-called “Blasphemy Law” has caused considerable grief for Christians and other non -Muslim minorities since even the expression of their belief can be construed as insulting the Prophet. The Law has also become a way of settling personal scores by accusing one’s adversary of blasphemy. There have been numerous convictions in the lower courts, though fortunately the higher courts have invariably, so far, overturned these verdicts. In the meantime, the family is left destitute and the community from which the accused comes left vulnerable to harassment and intimidation.

The irony is that Muslims claim that their prophet forgave those who insulted him and there are a number of stories to this effect in the sira (life of Muhammad) and in the hadith (there are also other stories that describe how those who insulted him were punished). Which of these attitudes is to prevail in contemporary Muslim societies?

A number of administrative and judicial attempts have been made to ease the lot of those accused of blasphemy and to make it mor e difficult to file charges of blasphemy against someone. None of these has been wholly successful. The law returns again and again to haunt the political establishment and the judiciary. The only solution is for a government to have the courage to repeal it or to abolish or suspend the death penalty altogether, thus leaving other penalties for dealing with alleged cases of “insulting religion” or blasphemy, as indeed existed before the current law was promulgated. Some of the ‘ulama (Islamic scholars) are bound to object to such steps, if the government takes them, and there may well be “popular” movements to resist the repeal or amendment of the law. Such resistance needs to be faced down and genuine objections, such as the claim that Islamic law prescribes qisas or retaliation for murder and that therefore the relatives of the murdered person have the right to seek life for life, or alternatively compensation, will have to be met. It is already the case that qisas cannot be carried out by an individual or group but must be left to the state. If the death penalty were to be abolished or suspended for all serious crime, could not the state order and enable compensation to be paid instead of the death penalty as part of its judicial and executive responsibility? These issues need further exploration but it is clear that the present blasphemy law is neither just nor compassionate and needs to be dealt with while there is opportunity.

Most Muslim countries have subscribed to international treaties, such as the UN Declaration of Human Rights, but they subordinate such agreements to the provisions of the shari‘a, which, in many cases, negates the effect of these documents. In this connection, it is interesting to compare the UN Declaration with the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam. In the latter there is no equivalent to Article 18 (on freedom of thought, conscience and religion) of the former and all provisions are, ultimately, subject to shari‘a. This approach has resulted, again and again, in important rights under Article 18 of the UN Declaration being denied to people in Islamic countries on the grounds that they contravene the provisions of shari‘a. This situation has caused much frustration to human rights activists, constitutional lawyers and even progressive regimes as any provision in law can always be trumped by an appeal to shari‘a.

If the impasse created in this way is to be avoided, it is necessary for leading institutions in the Islamic world to undertake a major reform of shari‘a so that the principles of amelioration and of movement, which exist in at least some of the madhahib, or schools of law, are not only recognised but actually acted upon in both religious and other courts, as there is need. There is also, of course, the urgent task of ijtihad, i.e. a fundamental examination as to how the principles of law to be found in the Qur’an and other sources of Islamic law can be brought into a fruitful relationship with present-day conditions and requirements. This is the case, for example, in the areas of finance, family law, penal provisions, jihad and the treatment of non-Muslims in an Islamic state.

Christians, of course, in the context of dialogue with Muslims and with Islamic religious and political authorities, will encourage those who are struggling to maximise fundamental freedoms in Islamic contexts. They will also be active in advocacy for those who have fallen foul, both materially and spiritually, of traditional understandings of laws and customs regarding apostasy and blasphemy. It remains important to raise awareness of what is happening in so many parts of the world so that people can learn from, pray for and give to those who have become victims of these draconian laws and customs.

The Rt Revd Dr Nazir-Ali was until recently Bishop of Rochester.

“When I am visiting a country where Christians are under pressure, quite often a minister or a lay person will ask quietly whether I know about Barnabas Fund. When I say, ‘Yes,’ their eyes light up and they tell me how Barnabas has encouraged them with a church building, a school or medical assistance. It is this kind of ministry that needs to be supported by prayers and by generosity so that the situation of our brothers and sisters is eased a little by our love.”

Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali

International Website: www.barnabasfund.org | Follow Barnabas Fund:

Switch to our mobile site