Archive for November, 2009

Jesus Christ’s words are eternal amidst a creation ‘destined to end,’ Pope Benedict says

Monday, November 16th, 2009

(CNA).- With thousands of faithful gathered in St. Peter’s Square for the Sunday Angelus, Pope Benedict XVI focused his address on Sunday’s Mass reading from the Gospel of St. Mark. While creation is “destined to end,” he said, Jesus’ words are “eternal.”

On the second-to-last Sunday of the liturgical year, Pope Benedict expressed his thanks to God for another year in “the great family of the Church” almost complete: “It is an inestimable gift, which permits us to live in history the mystery of Christ, welcoming in the paths of our personal and communal existence the seed of the Word of God, an eternal seed that from the inside transforms this world and opens it to the Kingdom of Heaven.”

St. Mark, he added, today presents us a part of the discourse of Jesus on the end times: “In this discourse, there is a sentence that is striking for its clear synthesis: ‘Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.’”

The expression “Heaven and earth,” Benedict XVI explained, appears frequently in the Bible to indicate all the universe, the entire cosmos. “Jesus,” he added, “declares that all that is destined to pass away, not only earth, but Heaven, which is included here in the cosmic sense, not as synonymous of God.”

“Sacred Scripture is unambiguous. All creation is destined to end, including elements divinized by ancient mythology. There is no confusion between creation and the Creator, but a clear difference.”

“With such clear distinction, Jesus affirms his words ‘will not pass away,’ which stand by the part of God and accordingly, are eternal,” the Pope expounded. “Pronounced with the concreteness of his early existence, these are prophetic words par excellence, as Jesus affirms (in the Gospel of St. John) when he turns to the heavenly Father: ‘the words you gave to me I have given to them, and they accepted them and truly understood that I came from you, and they have believed that you sent me.’”

In a well-known parable in the Gospel of St. Matthew, Jesus compares himself to a sower and explains that the seed is the Word. “The ones who hear the word and accept it and bear fruit” are part of the Kingdom of God, the Holy Father said.

“That is, they live under his rule, remaining in the world, but no longer part of the world. They bear in themselves…a principle of transformation that already now manifests itself in a good life, animated by love, and in the end, will produce the resurrection of the body. Behold the power of the Word of God.”

The Pontiff concluded by explaining that the Blessed Virgin Mary is the living sign of this truth: “Her heart was “good earth” that welcomed with complete openness the Word of God, such that all her existence, transformed according to the image of the Son, was introduced to eternity, soul and body, anticipating the eternal vocation of each human being.”

“Now, in prayer, let us make our own her response to the Angel ‘may it be done to me according to your word,’ so that following Christ along the way of the cross, we too can reach the glory of the resurrection.”

Joel Osteen and the Glory Story: A Case Study

Monday, November 16th, 2009

Excellent article from Virtue Online

by Michael S. Horton, Ph.D.  – Westminster Seminary California

“Name it, claim it”; the “health-and-wealth” or “prosperity gospel” : these are nicknames for a heresy that in many respects is only an extreme version of perhaps the most typical focus of American Christianity today more generally. Basically, God is there for you and your happiness. He has some rules and principles for getting what you want out of life and if you follow them, you can have what you want. Just “declare it” and prosperity will come to you. (1) God as Personal Shopper.

Although explicit proponents of the so-called “prosperity gospel” may be fewer than their influence suggests, its big names and best-selling authors (T. D. Jakes, Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, and Joyce Meyer) are purveyors of a pagan worldview with a peculiarly American flavor. It’s basically what the sixteenth century German monk turned church reformer Martin Luther called the “theology of glory”: How can I climb the ladder and attain the glory here and now that God has actually promised for us after a life of suffering? The contrast is the “theology of the cross”: the story of God’s merciful descent to us, at great personal cost, a message that the Apostle Paul acknowledged was offensive and “foolish to Greeks.”

Joel Osteen: Another Verse of a Really Long Song The attraction of Americans to this version of the “glory story” is evident in the astonishing success of Joel Osteen’s runaway best-seller, Your Best Life Now: Seven Steps to Living at Your Full Potential. Beyond his charming personality and folksy style, Osteen’s phenomenal attraction is no doubt related to his simple and soothing sampler of the American gospel: a blend of Christian and cultural elements that he picked up not through any formal training, but as the son of a Baptist-turned-prosperity evangelist who was a favorite on the Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN). However, gone are the eccentric caricatures of “prosperity” televangelism, with its flamboyant style and over-the-top rhetoric.

In the Wal-Mart era of religion and spirituality, every particular creed and any denominational distinctives get watered down. We don’t hear (at least explicitly) about our being “little gods,” “part and parcel of God,” or the blood of Christ as a talisman for healing and prosperity. The strange teachings of his father’s generation, still regularly heard on TBN, are not explored in any depth. In fact, nothing is explored in any depth. Osteen still uses the telltale lingo of the health-and-wealth evangelists: “Declare it,” “speak it,” “claim it,” and so forth, but there are no dramatic, made-for-TV healing lines. The pastor of Lakewood Church in Houston, TX, which now owns the Compaq Center, does not come across as a flashy evangelist with jets and yachts, but as a charming next-door-neighbor who always has something nice to say.

Although remarkably gifted at the social psychology of television, Joel Osteen is hardly unique. In fact, his explicit drumbeat of prosperity (word-faith) teaching is communicated in the terms and the ambiance that might be difficult to distinguish from most megachurches. Joel Osteen is the next generation of the health-and-wealth gospel. This time, it’s mainstream.

As community philosopher Karl Marx said of a consumer-driven culture, “All that is solid melts into the air.” Religion, too, becomes a commodity-a product or therapy that we can buy and use for our personal well-being. Exemplifying the moralistic and therapeutic approach to religion, Osteen’s message is also a good example of the inability of Boomers to mourn in the face of God’s judgment or dance under the liberating news of God’s saving mercy. In other words, all gravity is lost-both the gravity of our problem and of God’s amazing grace. According to this message, we are not helpless sinners-the ungodly-who need a one-sided divine rescue. (Americans, but especially we Boomers, don’t take bad news well.) Rather, we are good people who just need a little instruction and motivation.

“Law-Lite”: Salvation From Unhappiness By Doing Your Best There is no condemnation in Osteen’s message for failing to fulfill God’s righteous law. On the other hand, there is no justification. Instead of either message, there is an upbeat moralism that is somewhere in the middle: Do your best, follow the instructions I give you, and God will make your life successful. “Don’t sit back passively,” he warns, but with a gentle pleading suggests that the only reason we need to follow his advice is because it’s useful for getting what we want. God is a buddy or partner who exists primarily to make sure we are happy. “You do your part, and God will do his part.” (2) “Sure we have our faults,” he says, but “the good news is, God loves us anyway.” (3) Instead of accepting God’s just verdict on our own righteousness and fleeing to Christ for justification, Osteen counsels readers simply to reject guilt and condemnation.(4) Yet it is hard to do that successfully when God’s favor and blessing on my life depend entirely on how well I can put his commands to work. “If you will simply obey his commands, He will change things in your favor.”(5) That’s all: “…simply obey his commands.”

Everything depends on us, but it’s easy. One wonders if he has ever had a crisis of doubt or moral failure that stripped him naked in God’s presence. Osteen seems to think that we are basically good people and God has a very easy way for us to save ourselves-not from his judgment, but from our lack of success in life-with his help. “God is keeping a record of every good deed you’ve ever done,” he says-as if this is good news. “In your time of need, because of your generosity, God will move heaven and earth to make sure you are taken care of.” (6)

It may be “Law Lite,” but make no mistake about it: behind a smiling Boomer Evangelicalism that eschews any talk of God’s wrath, there is a determination to assimilate the gospel to law, an announcement of victory to a call to be victorious, indicatives to imperatives, good news to good advice. The bad news may not be as bad as it used to be, but the good news is just a softer version of the bad news: Do more. But this time, it’s easy. And if you fail, don’t worry. God just wants you to do your best. He’ll take care of the rest.

So who needs Christ? At least, who needs Christ as “the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (Jn 1:29)? The sting of the law may be taken out of the message, but that only means that the gospel has become a less demanding, more encouraging law whose exhortations are only meant to make us happy, not to measure us against God’s holiness.

So while many supporters offer testimonials to his kinder, gentler version of Christianity than the legalistic scolding of their youth, the only real difference is that God’s rules or principles are easier and it’s all about happiness here and now, not being reconciled to a holy God who saves us from ourselves. In its therapeutic milieu, sin is failing to live up to our potential, not falling short of God’s glory. We need to believe in ourselves and the wages of such “sins” is missing out on our best life now. But it’s still a constant stream of exhortation, demands, and burdens: follow my steps and I guarantee your life will be blessed.

A TIME story in 2006 observed that Osteen’s success has reached even more traditional Protestant circles, citing the example of a Lutheran church that followed Your Best Life Now during Lent, of all times, “when,” as the writer notes, “Jesus was having his worst life then.” Even churches formally steeped in a theology of the cross succumb to theologies of glory in the environment of popular American spirituality. We are swimming in a sea of narcissistic moralism: an “easy-listening” version of salvation by self-help.

This is what we might call the false gospel of “God-Loves-You-Anyway.” There’s no need for Christ as our mediator, since God is never quite as holy and we are never quite as morally perverse as to require nothing short of Christ’s death in our place. God is our buddy. He just wants us to be happy, and the Bible gives us the roadmap.

I have no reason to doubt the sincere motivation to reach non-Christians with a relevant message. My concern, however, is that the way this message comes out actually trivializes the faith at its best and contradicts it at its worst. In a way, it sounds like atheism: Imagine there is no heaven above us or hell below us, no necessary expectation that Christ “will come again with glory to judge the living and the dead” and establish perfect peace in the world. In fact, one would be hard-pressed to find anything in this message that would be offensive to a Unitarian, Buddhist, or cultural Christians who are used to a diet of gospel-as-American-Dream. Disney’s Jiminy Cricket expresses this sentiment: “If you wish upon a star, all your dreams will come true.”

To be clear, I’m not saying that it is atheism, but that it sounds oddly like it in this sense: that it is so bound to a this-worldly focus that we really do not hear anything about God himself-his character and works in creation, redemption, or the resurrection of the body and the age to come. Nothing in the past (namely, Christ’s work) nor in the future (namely, Christ’s return in judgment, raising our bodies in everlasting life) really matters. Maybe I haven’t heard enough of his talks on TV, but I have never heard anything that approached a proclamation of any article mentioned in the Apostles’ Creed. Despite the cut-aways of an enthralled audience with Bibles opened, I have yet to hear a single biblical passage actually preached. Is it possible to have evangelism without the evangel? Christian outreach without a Christian message?

If God matters, it is for the most trivial concerns-or at least those quite secondary to the real crisis that the gospel addresses. One could easily come away from this type of message concluding that we are not saved by Christ’s objective work for us, but by our subjective “personal relationship with Jesus” through a series of works that we perform to secure his favor and blessing. God has set up all of these laws and now it’s up to us to follow them so that we can be blessed. I can think of no better illustration of what sociologist Christian Smith has identified as “moralistic, therapeutic deism”: the gospel of American Religion.

As the New Testament repeatedly affirms, those who want to be saved by their own obedience need to know that God doesn’t grade on a curve. His record-keeping is bad news, not good news, unless Christ’s obedient record has been credited to us through faith alone. God’s law says, “If you want to be saved by your own effort, here are the terms: Do all these things and you’ll go to heaven; fail to do them and you’ll go to hell.” The revivalists of yesteryear came up with their own list, but it was basically the same threat: “Do or die.” The kinder, gentler version is, “Try harder and you’ll be happier; fail to do them and you’ll lose out on God’s best for your life here and now.” No heaven, no hell; no condemnation or salvation; no perfect obedience of Christ credited to us: Just do your best. Remember, God is keeping score. Christ becomes totally unnecessary in this message.

Osteen reflects the broader assumption among evangelicals that we are saved by making a decision to have a personal relationship with God. If one’s greatest problem is loneliness, the good news is that Jesus is a reliable friend. If the big problem is anxiety, Jesus will calm us down. Jesus is the glue that holds our marriages and families together, gives us purpose for us to strive toward, wisdom for daily life. And there are half-truths in all of these pleas, but they never really bring hearers face to face with their real problem: that they stand naked and ashamed before a holy God and can only be acceptably clothed in his presence by being clothed, head to toe, in Christ’s righteousness.

This gospel of “submission,” “commitment,” “decision,” and “having a personal relationship with God” fails to realize, first of all, that everyone has a personal relationship with God already: either as a condemned criminal standing before a righteous judge or as a justified co-heir with Christ and adopted child of the Father. “How can I be right with God?” is no longer a question when my happiness rather than God’s holiness is the main issue. My concern is that Joel Osteen is simply the latest in a long line of self-help evangelists who appeal to the native American obsession with pulling ourselves up by our own bootstraps. Salvation is not a matter of divine rescue from the judgment that is coming on the world, but a matter of self-improvement in order to have your best life now.

Footnotes

1 This position is extensively documented in Michael Horton, ed., The Agony of Deceit (Chicago: Moody Press, 1990) [back to text]

2 Joel Osteen, Your Best Life Now: Seven Steps to Living at Your Full Potential (NY: Warner Books, 2004),41-42 [back to text]

3 Ibid., 57 [back to text]

4 Ibid., 66 [back to text]

5 Ibid., 119 [back to text]

6 Ibid., 262 [back to text]

Opinion: Called to Courage. Faint of Heart Need Not Apply – ‘There will be no easy paths through these dark days, and no way around it. Our mission is clear: We must be the light in the darkness’

Monday, November 16th, 2009

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

By Jennifer Hartline

Our society is made of bendy, cowardly stuff these days. The travesty at Fort Hood last week is only the latest proof. We’re in desperate need of a vaccination, alright, but not for the swine flu. We need a massive shot in the arm of courage to help strengthen us against this rampant virus of godless political correctness.

After this terrible, heartbreaking week, I think if I hear one more person extolling the virtues of diversity I’m going to throw up. Diversity simply for the sake of appearances, for the sake of balanced-looking statistics leads to trouble. What happened at Fort Hood leaves no doubt. Battle-tested men with bars and stars on their chests were reluctant to speak the truth because the pressure of political-correctness was stronger than the threat of violence. 14 people are dead not because there wasn’t tight enough security at the front gate, but because a terrorist wearing an Army uniform was protected by a climate of fear.

Even now, that climate of fear is working overtime to squelch the truth and put a palatable spin on the fact that we’ve been suckered like cowards into pooh-poohing the danger any fool can plainly see because we fear being branded as prejudiced or intolerant. So we cover our eyes and pretend not to see the truth staring us in the face, and deadly things happen.

Pitifully, this is the standard modus operandi now in our society. We’re not much interested in the truth anymore; only in making sure we appear to be tolerant, diverse, and “equal” in all things. Here’s a newsflash folks: all things are not “equal”, and some choices are always wrong.

To those who salute the flag of godless political correctness, sometimes the words equality, tolerance and choice are actually “code-speak” that disguises a nefarious meaning. Those terms are now used as weapons against anyone who dares to say that something is immoral and wrong. They are thrown like bombs at anyone who won’t compromise what they know in their hearts to be right and true.

To the well-meaning yet weak-willed, otherwise commendable concepts like diversity, equality and choice have an attractive glow and they sound good and right, and it’s easy to be fooled. But when the death of one person is being sold as the “choice” of another, when the immoral sexual activity engaged in between two men or two women is proclaimed to be “equality”, when appropriate questioning and good judgment are silenced for the sake of a false notion of “diversity”, it’s time to wise up and see the wolf beneath the lamb’s wool.

The goal of this godless agenda is simple: get people to sidestep the truth in favor of “diversity.” Bully people into ignoring the objective truth in deference to “equality.” Seduce people into abandoning the notion of truth altogether in service to their own personally constructed “rights” and “choices.”

Convince people to accept something they instinctively know is wrong by appealing to their vanity and self-interest, and soon they’ll voluntarily adjust their own moral compass and rally behind the wrong they once rejected.

Guilt people into walking lock-step in line behind the new and “enlightened” way of thinking about spirituality, sexuality, human relationships, or whatever, by shaming them, branding them as prejudiced, racist, hateful, judgmental, or fearful.

This is the state of the world we live in, and it makes me so angry. It seems more and more lately like morality is slowly drowning, barely keeping its head above water as it gasps for air. Each day it feels like the water rises higher and higher and going under is inevitable. That, my friends, is called despair and lately I have felt the weight of it.

The national news is sometimes too much to bear, and when I dare to look into the prospective future, the future my children are inheriting, it seems utterly dark, oppressive, and without a shred of virtue. It’s a culture that has elevated all things sexual to the level of a new idol, determined to steal away innocence and modesty and purity under the warped dictates of a counterfeit notion of personal freedom and equal rights. It’s a culture that silences the truth for fear of “offending” anyone. People of faith who dare to fight against this dictatorship of relativism are hissingly marked with the scarlet letter “I” for intolerance.

Is there any hope of putting the brakes on this downhill slide? The weight of despair says no. Despair is what sucks the life out of the good fight. Despair convinces the beaten-up, weary soldiers that it’s hopeless; there’s no way to win, so stop fighting. Defeat is certain, so just give up. Despair is a weapon crafted in the misery of hell; it is powerful, persuasive, and highly deceptive.

What are we to do? Run. Run as fast as we can to the Author of Truth and hear what He has to say. Cling to the truth with a courageous heart and both hands.

“Be on your guard; stand firm in the faith; be men of courage; be strong.” (1 Cor 16:13)

“Christ is faithful as a son over God’s house. And we are his house, if we hold on to our courage and the hope of which we boast.” (Hebrews 3:6)

“But you, man of God, flee from all this, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and gentleness. Fight the good fight of faith. Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called…” (1 Timothy 6:11-12)

“In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.” (John 16:33)

“If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:31-32)

“We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed.” (2 Cor 4:8-9)

There will be no easy paths through these dark days, and no way around it. Our mission is clear: We must be the light in the darkness. We must set our light high upon the hill and expose the evil that wants to remain hidden. We must tell the world the truth that will set them free. It is Jesus, the Way, the Truth, and the Life; Jesus, the Light of the world.

Sadly, the forces of godless political correctness have denied the truth at Fort Hood again by refusing to count Pfc. Velez’s unborn baby among those murdered. To them, the child in the womb doesn’t count. The truth says otherwise. We must say otherwise. Our godless age says that sexual immorality of every kind is normal, good, and a matter of personal freedom. The truth says otherwise. So must we. The leaders of our godless age are corrupt and self-serving, and they say God has no place in government. The truth says otherwise. Will we?

The fight is intense and we’re going to take some hits, but the victory is already won. We cannot give in to discouragement and despair. We must take courage and remain steadfast. Honestly, I don’t know whether many of the battles we face will be won. But I intend to find out.

—–

Jennifer Hartline is a Catholic Army wife and stay-at-home mother of three precious kids who writes frequently on topics of Catholic faith and daily living. She is a contributing writer for Catholic Online.

What an amazing array of glorious acts of love God shows toward us in 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14. I pray that God will make my thoughts this dense with magnificent truth.

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

John Piper

What an amazing array of glorious acts of love God shows toward us in 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14. I pray that God will make my thoughts this dense with magnificent truth.

  • Loved
  • Chosen
  • Saved
  • Sanctified
  • Believing
  • Called
  • Obtaining glory

2 Thessalonians 2:13-14:

But we ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers beloved by the Lord, because God chose you as the firstfruits to be saved , through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth . To this he called you through our gospel, so that you may obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ

Politicians are ‘doing God’ today. David Cameron appears on the BBC’s Songs of Praise and John Denham upsets the National Secular Society

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

It seems to be a day of politicians ‘doing God’.

Firstly we have John Denham, the communities secretary, recognising religious values contributing positively to society, which has deeply upset the secularists (which is remarkable as he is an avowed secular humanist), and frankly is too little too late from Labour:-

Telegraph:-

Faith groups to be key policy advisers – Faith groups are to be given a central role in shaping government policies, a senior minister has vowed.

John Denham, the communities secretary, said the values of Christians, Muslims and other religions were essential in building a “progressive society”.

He attacked secularists who have called for religion to be kept out of public life.

Mr Denham revealed that a new panel of religious experts has been set up to advise the Government on making public policy decisions.

The move has been criticised by secularists who warned that it represented a worrying development.

However, Mr Denham argued that Christians and Muslims can contribute significant insights on key issues, such as the economy, parenting and tackling climate change.

In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, he admitted that the Government had failed to listen to these voices in the past, but is now determined to include them in the decision-making process.

“Anyone wanting to build a more progressive society would ignore the powerful role of faith at their peril,” he said.

“We should continually seek ways of encouraging and enhancing the contribution faith communities make on the central issues of our time.

“Faith is a strong and powerful source of honesty, solidarity, generosity – the very values which are essential to politics, to our economy and our society.”

The minister said that the Government needed to be educated by faith groups on “how to inform the rest of society about these issues”.

Read Entire Article

And then we have David Cameron, appearing on Songs of Praise:-

BBC

David Cameron has said he is a Christian who believes in God and goes to church, although “not as regularly as I should”.

The Conservative leader said Sunday School was one of his earliest memories, but said he did not “drop to my knees” and ask for help in a crisis.

However Mr Cameron added his Christian faith was a “part of who I am”.

His comments on the BBC’s Songs of Praise diverge from other party leaders who have not discussed their beliefs.

Mr Cameron was brought up in an old rectory and told BBC One’s Songs of Praise, which was filmed in his Oxfordshire constituency of Witney, that his family were “relatively regular churchgoers”.

He said: “I believe in God and I’m a Christian and I worship – not as regularly as I should – but I go to church.

“Do I drop to my knees and ask for guidance whenever an issue comes up? No, I don’t. But it’s part of who I am.

“For me, and I suspect for lots of other people too, bad things actually sometimes make you think more about faith and the fact that you’re not facing these things on your own.”

Read Entire Article

This is the second time that David Cameron has ‘done God’:-

Cameron: I’m a questioning Christian – Teachings of Jesus are a ‘good guide’ to life, says Cameron

And he has also used Biblical allusions in a speech before:-

Cameron’s speech draws on biblical allusions

Being as I have a rather cynical nature, I’m undecided as to if this is all good news or not, however, Cranmer does offer a rather upbeat analysis of David Cameron ‘doing God’:-

David Cameron does Songs of Praise

Palestinian Christians Suffer Persecution Under the Palestinian Authority

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

by Joseph PuderPajamas Media Blog

Rev. Bill Harter is a charismatic and well-respected Presbyterian Church (USA) pastor who has taken forty church missions to Israel and the Palestinian Authority territories. On various occasions at meetings with State Department officials, Rev. Harter revealed to them that Christian Palestinians say one thing in public and the opposite in private.

He requested that the State Department appoint a human rights officer and station him at the U.S. Consulate in Jerusalem in order to monitor, record, and redress the abuses that Christian Palestinians are undergoing at the hands of the Palestinian Authority and Hamas-sponsored gangs.

Rev. Harter was told in whispers, in the privacy of Christian Palestinian families’ homes, about the fears they have of remaining in their towns and living there under the control of a Palestinian state. During his earlier trips, members of the Arab Christian community had expressed great fear for their safety as Israel withdrew from the Bethlehem area and handed it over to Arafat and the Palestinian Authority (PA). According to Harter, Christians under PA control are intimidated into speaking out against Israel and are abused if they seem to accuse the PA of any wrongdoing.

Palestinian Christians, according to researcher Justus Reid Weiner of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, have faced uninterrupted persecution since the Oslo Accords were implemented and Israel handed over the territories to the PA. Weiner asserts that the “very existence of the 2000 year-old Christian community” is in doubt. As a minority in a society governed by strict adherence to Islamic religious law, their leadership has also been intimidated and has abandoned them — choosing to curry favor with the PA leadership rather than acknowledge and speak out against the ever-increasing suffering of Christians under the Palestinian Authority and the more militant Muslim-led Hamas in Gaza.

Christian Palestinians have also been abandoned by the international community — by NGOs and human rights organizations. On their own, this educated Christian community has had to endure anarchy and lawlessness, widespread corruption in the PA security and police forces, and a xenophobic and intolerant Muslim majority.

Lacking protection and subjected to continued abuse including murder, robbery, rape, and physical assault, Christians have begun to emigrate from the Palestinian territories on a massive scale. Back in the 1990s, when this writer asked the late mayor of Bethlehem, Elias Freij, where the Christians of his city are, he pointed west and said, “You can see them in Santiago de Chile.”  Former U.S. Congressman J.C. Watts attributed the departure of the Palestinian Christians to having been “driven out by the steady persecution of the PA and the realization that they will face worse treatment under a possible future Palestinian state.”

Article 5 of the draft constitution of the Palestinian Authority unequivocally declares: “In the State of Palestine Islam will be the official religion. … Sharia Islamic law will be the primary source of legislation.” Although that same article also “guarantees that monotheistic religions (Christianity and Judaism) will be respected and that the state will provide for freedom of worship,” the best that Christians (Jews do not live under PA control) can expect from the PA is dhimmitude — the discriminatory social and legal status “provided” to the Peoples of the Book.

As Palestinian Christians look at the current political map, they recognize the growing strength of Islamic fundamentalism in PA-controlled areas and in Gaza. With few economic opportunities, Palestinian Muslims are typically poor and lack the access to a practical education. They marry young, have large families, and in short order become the natural constituents of Hamas and other radical Islamic groups. Palestinian Anglican Bishop Riah Abu el-Assal has pointed out: “The Islamic movements seem to offer their adherents something to live for — at times even something to die for. … [T]his is a very dangerous development, and one which is difficult to contain.”

William Murray, chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, speaks of the PA school curriculum as deadly: “I have talked to Christian families about what is taught in the PA schools. From what they say, there is indeed a ‘culture of death’ that includes the glorification of suicide bombers and training to kill Jews and Americans.”

In his report “Human Rights of Christians in Palestinian Society,” Weiner interviewed Lina Atallah, a Christian receptionist from Bethlehem. She described to him the Muslim attitude toward Christians: “They spit on us, try to force us to wear headscarves, and in the Islamic fasting month of Ramadan, the Palestinian (Authority) police arrest us for smoking or eating on the streets. … The Muslims want to get rid of us or they want us to live like them.”

As a result of the economic boycott of Christian businesses by the Muslim community and extortion by gangs associated with the PA police and security forces, Christian businesses in Bethlehem have been rapidly disappearing. These gangs of Muslim thugs had an official license from Arafat and now one from Mahmud Abbas to extort money from Christian businesses. Failure to pay up results in Mafia-like actions. Businesses are torched or, even worse, the Christian owners or members of their families are murdered and their daughters are raped. Weiner reports: “Internationally recognized holy sites in the West Bank are being both vandalized and desecrated by the PA without consequence.”

According to Khaled Abu Toameh, an Arab Muslim reporter for the Jerusalem Post: “Not only do Christians not have the same recourse to institutional justice under a Muslim-dominated PA, but you can harm a member of a Christian family without facing 300 people attacking you. The vigilante justice in place to protect Muslim daughters does not exist for the Christian minority.”  Evangelical Pastor David Ortiz observes that by rendering Christian women unfit for marriage and childbearing with Christian men, Muslim rapists might think that it is an effective method of reducing the Christian population.

Attempts by both the George W. Bush and Obama administrations to prop up the Palestinian Authority in general and Mahmud Abbas in particular have resulted in greater human rights abuses which have been grossly overlooked purely for political reasons. The U.S. State Department’s annual report on International Religious Freedom regularly ignores the abuses by the PA for political expediency as well. All of this has contributed to the further endangerment of the future of the Christian community in the Palestinian territories.

Joseph Puder, a freelance journalist, is the founder and executive director of the Interfaith Taskforce for America and Israel (ITAI).

Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) Call to boycott Israeli goods at Morrison’s and Waitrose had no impact on trade

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

Excellent news!

Previous Posts:

For a week from the 7th of November, the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign (PSC) is targeting Waitrose and Morrisons as part of their supermarket boycott campaign.

Link to the excellent FairPlay website:

FairPlay

Jerusalem Post

‘Call to boycott Israeli goods had no impact on trade’

LONDON – Last week’s call by anti-Israel activists for people to boycott Israeli goods at two of the UK’s largest supermarkets appears to have passed with no major impact.

Radical fringe group Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) called for a week of boycott action and protests against Morrison’s and Waitrose supermarkets and said they would flood the supermarket’s help lines with nuisance calls throughout the day on Wednesday.

Morrison’s declined to comment but Waitrose declared there had been no impact at all on trade during the week.

“Our customer services department has responded to calls in their normal way,” a Waitrose spokesperson said.

Responding to the boycott call, the Board of Deputies of British Jews and Fair Play Campaign Group (FPCG) initiated a “BUYcott Israeli goods” campaign calling on friends of Israel to buy more Israeli goods.

On Sunday, “BUYcott” campaigners were at Waitrose in Brent Cross Shopping Center in northwest London urging people to buy Israeli products.

According to their mission statement, the “Who Profits” project says: “Israeli and international corporations are directly involved in the occupation: in the construction of Israeli colonies and infrastructure in the occupied territories, in the settlements’ economy, in building walls and checkpoints, in the supply of specific equipment used in the control and repression of the civilian population under occupation.”

“We have heard from people all over Britain who made an extra effort to buy Israeli goods this week. In the future, we hope that every anti-Israel boycott is answered with a BUYcott,” a FPCG spokesman said.

Posting on the FPCG Web site, people commented on their shopping successes with a number of reports that Israeli produce had sold out.

One post said: “I am a part of a group of Christians who love and support Israel from Wirral and Chester, we were made aware of this boycott and in response I managed to purchase 8 different kinds of Israeli produce from Morrison’s in Chester, some were almost sold out! So well done to Morrison’s and I pray this boycott will be turned around.”

Reporting that Israeli wine had sold out in one store, a contributor said: “Just to let you know that Waitrose in Finchley Road have these Israeli fresh products: mangoes, pomegranates, red grapefruit, organic dates and cherry tomatoes, fresh basil and tarragon plus all the Yarden products and various chocolates and cakes. There is no Israeli wine left, I bought 4 bottles last week. I have in fact decided to buy a substantial amount of Israeli products and am handing them out to friends and family. Thanks for alerting us to this campaign.”

Another said: “Just to let you know that today I bought lots of delicious Israeli Sharon fruit and really good quality mixed Israeli peppers from Waitrose at the SpiresShopping Center in Barnet. Well done, Waitrose.”

Next week, PSC is co-hosting a meeting with the humanitarian charity Oxfam, which is set to uncover companies and corporate organizations “who trade and profit from Israel’s occupation of Palestine.”

One of the main speakers at Thursday’s public event at the London School of Economics’ Student Union, titled “Israel’s Occupation of Palestine: who profits and who doesn’t?” is Dr. Dalit Baum from Haifa University, who coordinates the “Who Profits from the Occupation” project as part of the Jaffa-based Coalition of Women for Peace.

Described in the promotional material as “a feminist anti-occupation activist”, Baum is set to discuss the project at the event as well as “present its mapping of corporate involvement in the occupation and tell the story of specific discoveries and challenges in ongoing campaigns.”

CHARLES SPURGEON THE GOOD MAN’S LIFE AND DEATH

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

“For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain.” Philippians 1:21

How ominously these words follow each other in the text — “live,” “die.”
There is but a comma between them, and surely as it is in the words so is it
in reality. How brief the distance between life and death! In fact there is
none. Life is but death’s vestibule, and our pilgrimage on earth is but a
journey to the grave. The pulse that preserves our being beats our death
march, and the blood which circulates our life is floating it onward to the
deeps of death. To-day we see our friends in health, to-morrow we hear of
their decease. We clasped the hand of the strong man but yesterday, and
to-day we close his eyes. We rode in the chariot of comfort but an hour
ago, and in a few more hours the last black chariot must convey us to the
home of all living. Oh, how closely allied is death to life! The lamb teat
sporteth in the field must soon feel the knife. The ox that loweth in the
pasture is fattening for the slaughter. Trees do but grow that they may be
felled. Yea, and greater things than these feel death. Empires rise and
flourish, they flourish but to decay, they rise to fall. How often do we take
up the volume of history, and read of the rise and fall of empires. We hear
of the coronation and the death of kings. Death is the black servant who
rides behind the chariot of life. See life! and death is close behind it. Death
reacheth far throughout this world, and hath stamped all terrestrial things
with the broad arrow of the grave. Stars die mayhap; it is said that
conflagrations have been seen far off in the distant ether, and astronomers
have marked the funerals of worlds, the decay of those mighty orbs that we
had imagined set for ever in sockets of silver to glisten as the lamps of
eternity. But blessed be God, there is one place where death is not life’s
brother, where life reigns alone; “to live,” is not the first syllable which is
to be followed by the next, “to die.” There is a land where deathknells are
never tolled, where winding-sheets are never woven, where graves are
never digged. Blest land beyond the skies! To reach it we must die. But if
after death we obtain a glorious immortality, our text is indeed true: “To
die is gain.”

If you would get a fair estimate of the happiness of any man you must
judge him in these two closely connected things, his life and his death. The
heathen Solon said, “Call no man happy until he is dead; for you know not
what changes may pass upon him in life.” We add to that — Call no man
happy until he is dead; because the life that is to come, if that be miserable,
shall far outweigh the highest life of happiness that hath been enjoyed on
earth. To estimate a man’s condition we must take it in all its length. We
must not measure that one thread which reacheth from the cradle to the
coffin. We must go further; we must go from the coffin to the resurrection,
and from the resurrection on throughout eternity. To know whether acts
are profitable, I must not estimate their effects on me for the hour in which
I live, but for the eternity in which I am to exist. I must not weigh matters
in the scales of time; I must not calculate by the hours, minutes and
seconds of the clock, but I must count and value things by the ages of
eternity.

Come, then, beloved; we have before us the picture of a man, the two sides
of whose existence will both of them bear inspection; we have hi life, we
have his death: we have it said of his life, “to live is Christ,” of his death,
“to die is gain;” and if the same shall be said of any of you, oh! ye may
rejoice! Ye are amongst that thrice happy number whom the Lord hath
loved, and whom he delighteth to honor.

We shall now divide our text very simply into these two points, the good
man’s life, and the good man’s death.

I. As to HIS LIFE, we have that briefly described thus: “For me to live is
Christ.” The believer did not always live to Christ. When he was first born
into this world he was a slave of sin, and an heir of wrath, even as others.
Though he may have afterwards become the greatest of saints, yet until
divine grace hath entered his heart, he is “in the gall of bitterness and in the
bonds of iniquity.” He only begins to live to Christ when God the Holy
Spirit convinceth him of his sin, and of his desperate evil nature, and when
by grace he is brought to see the dying Savior making a propitiation for his
guilt. From that moment when by faith he sees the slaughtered victim of
Calvary, and casts his whole life on him, to be saved, to be redeemed, to be
preserved, and to be blest by the virtue of his atonement and the greatness
of his grace, from that moment the man begins to live to Christ.

And now shall we tell you as briefly as we can what living to Christ means.
It means, first, that the life of a Christian derives its parentage from
Christ. “For me to live is Christ.” The righteous man has two lives. He has
one which he inherited from his parents; he looks back to an ancestral race
of which he is the branch, and he traces his life to the parent stock; but he
has a second life, a life spiritual, a life which is as much above mere mental
life, as mental life is above the life of the animal or the plant; and for the
source of this spiritual life he looks not to father or mother, nor to priest
nor man, nor to himself, but he looks to Christ. He says, “O Lord Jesus,
the everlasting Father, the Prince of peace, thou art my spiritual parent;
unless thy Spirit had breathed into my nostrils the breath of a new, holy and
spiritual life, I had been to this day “dead in trespasses and sins.” I owe my
third principle, my spirit, to the implantation of thy grace. I had a body and
a soul by my parents, I have received the third principle, the spirit from
thee, and in thee I live, and move, and have my being. My new, my best,
my highest my most heavenly life, is wholly derived from thee. To thee I
ascribe it. My life is hid with Christ in God. It is no longer I that live, but
Christ that liveth in me.” And so the Christian says, “For me to live is
Christ,” because for me to live is to live a life whose parentage is not of
human origin, but of divine, even of Christ himself. Again he intended to
say, that Christ was the sustenance of his life, the food his newborn spirit
fed upon. The believer hath three parts to be sustained. The body, which
must have its proper nutriment; the soul, which must have knowledge and
thought to supply it; and the spirit which must feed on Christ. Without
bread I become attenuated to a skeleton, and at last I die; without thought
my mind becomes dwarfed, and, and dwindles itself until I become the
idiot, with a soul that hath just life, but little more. And without Christ my
newborn spirit must become a vague shadowy emptiness. It cannot live
unless it feeds on that heavenly manna which came down from heaven.

Now the Christian can say, “The life that I live is Christ,” because Christ is
the food on which he feeds and the sustenance of his new-born Spirit.
The apostle also meant, that the fashion of his life was Christ. I suppose
that every man living has a model by which he endeavors to shape his life.
When we start in life, we generally select some person, or persons, whose
combined virtues shall be to us the mirror of perfection. “Now,” says Paul,
“if you ask me after what fashion I mould my life, and what is the model by
which I would sculpture my being, I tell you, it is Christ. I have no fashion,
no form, no model by which to shape my being, except the Lord Jesus
Christ. Now, the true Christian, if he be an upright man, can say the same.
Understand, however what I mean by the word “upright.” An upright man
mean” a straightt up man — a man that does not cringe and bow, and fawn
to other men’s feet; a man that does not lean for help on other men, but
just stands with his head heavenward, in all the dignity of his independence,
leaning nowhere except on the arm of the Omnipotent. Such a man will
take Christ alone to be his model and pattern. This is the very age of
conventionalities. People dare not now do a thing unless everybody else
does the same. You do not often say, “Is a thing right?” The most you say
is, “Does so-and-so do it?” You have some great personage or other in
your family connection, who is looked upon as being the very standard of
all propriety; and if he do it, then you think you may safely do it. And oh!
what an outcry there is against a man who dares to be singular, who just
believes that some of your conventionalities are trammels and chains, and
kicks them all to pieces and says, “I am free!” The world is at him in a
minute; all the ban-dogs of malice and slander are at him, because he says,
“I will not follow your model! I will vindicate the honor of my Master, and
not take your great masters to be for ever my pattern.” Oh! I would to God
that every statesman, that every minister, that every Christian were free to
hold that his only form, and his only fashion for imitation, must be the
character of Christ. I would that we could scorn all superstitious
attachments to the ancient errors of our ancestors; and whilst some would
be for ever looking upon age and upon hoary antiquity with veneration, I
would we had the courage to look upon a thing, not according to its age,
but according to its rightness, and so weigh everything, not by its novelty,
or by its antiquity, but by its conformity to Christ Jesus and his holy
Gospel; rejecting that which is not, though it be hoary with years, and
believing that which is, even though it be but the creature of the day, and
saying with earnestness, “For me to live is not to imitate this man or the
other, but ‘for me to live is Christ.’”

I think, however, that the very center of Paul’s idea would be this: The end
of his life is Christ. You think you see Paul land upon the shores of
Philippi. There, by the river-side, were ships gathered and many merchant
men. There you would see the merchant busy with his ledger, and
overlooking his cargo, and he paused and put his hand upon his brow, and
said as he griped his money-bag, “For me to live is gold.” And there you
see his humbler clerk, employed in some plainer work, toiling for his
master, and he, perspiring with work mutters between his teeth, “For me to
live is to gain a bare subsistence.” And there stands for a moment to listen
to him, one with a studious face and a sallow countenance, and with a roll
full of the mysterious characters of wisdom. “Young man,” he says, “for
me to live is learning.” “Aha! aha!;” says another, who stands by, clothed
in mail, with a helmet on his head, “I scorn your modes of life, for me to
live is glory.” But there walks one, a humble tent-maker, called Paul; you
see the lineaments of the Jew upon his face, and he steps into the middle of
them all and says, “For me to live is Christ.” Oh! how they smile with
contempt upon him, and how they scoff at him, for having chosen such an
object! “For me to live is Christ.” And what did he mean! The learned man
stopped, and said, “Christ! who is he? Is he that foolish, mad fellow, of
whom I have heard, who was executed upon Calvary for sedition?” The
meek reply is, “It is he who died, Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.”
“What?” says the Roman soldier, “and do you live for a man who died a
slave’s death? What glory will you get by fighting his battles?” What profit
is there in your preaching, chimes in the trader. Ah! and even the
merchant’s clerk thought Paul mad; for he said, “How can he feed his
family? how will he supply his wants if all he liveth for is to honor Christ?”
Ay, but Paul knew what he was at. He was the wiser man of them all. He
knew which way was right for heaven, and which would end the best. But,
right or wrong, his soul was wholly possessed with the idea — “For me to
live is Christ.”

Brethren and sisters, can you say, as professing Christians, that you live up
to the idea of the apostle Paul? Can you honestly say that for you to live is
Christ? I will tell you my opinion of many of you. You join our churches
you are highly respectable men; you are accepted among us as true and real
Christians; but in all honesty and truth I do not believe that for you to live
is Christ. I see many of you whose whore thoughts are engrossed with the
things of earth; the mere getting of money; the amassing of wealth, seems
to be your only object. I do not deny that you are liberal, I will not dare to
say that you are not generous, and that your cheque-book does not often
bear the mark of some subscription for holy purposes, but I dare to say,
after all, that you cannot in honesty say that you live wholly for Christ.
You know that when you go to your shop or your warehouse, you do not
think, in doing business, that you are doing it for Christ; you dare not be
such a hypocrite as to say so. You must say that you do it for selfaggrandisement,
and for family advantage. “Well!” says one, “and is that a
mean reason?” By no means; not for you, if you are mean enough to ask
that question, but for the Christian it is. He professes to live for Christ;
then how IS it he dares to profess to live for his Master, and yet does not
do so, but lives for mere worldly gain? Let me speak to many a lady here.
You would be shocked if I should deny your Christianity. You move in the
highest circles of life, and you would be astonished if I should presume to
touch your piety, after your many generous donations to religious objects;
but I dare to do so. You — what do you do? You rise late enough in the
day: you have your carriage out, and call to see your friends, or leave your
card by way of proxy. You go to a party in the evening; you talk nonsense,
and come home and go to bed. And that is your life from the beginning of
the year to the end. It is just one regular round. There comes the dinner or
the ball, and the conclusion of the day; and then Amen, so be it, for ever.
Now you don’t live for Christ. I know you go to church regularly, or
attend at some dissenting chapel; all well and good. I shall not deny your
piety, according to the common usage of the term, but I deny that you have
got to anything like the place where Paul stood when he said, “For me to
live is Christ.” I, my brethren, know that with much earnest seeking I have
failed to realize the fullness of entire devotion to the Lord Jesus. Every
minister must sometimes chasten himself and say, “Am I not sometimes a
little warped in my utterances? Did I not in some sermon aim to bring out a
grand thought instead of stating a home truth? Have I not kept back some
warning that I ought to have uttered, because I feared the face of man?”
Have we not all good need to chasten ourselves, because we must say that
we have not lived for Christ as we should have done? And yet there are, I
trust, a noble few, the elite of God’s elect, a few chosen men and women
on whose heads there is the crown and diadem of dedication, who can truly
say, “I have nothing in this world I cannot give to Christ — I have said it,
and mean what I have said —

‘Take my soul and body’s powers,
All my goods and all my hours,
All I have, and all I am.’

Take me, Lord, and take me for ever.” These are the men who make our
missionaries; these are the women to make our nurses for the sick, these
are they that would dare death for Christ; these are they who would give of
their substance to his cause; these are they who would spend and be spent,
who would bear ignominy, and scorn, and shame if they could but advance
their Master’s interest. How many of this sort have I here this morning?
Might I not count many of these benches before I could find a score? Many
there are who do in a measure carry out this principle; but who among us is
there (I am sure he standeth not here in this pulpit) that can dare to say he
hath lived wholly for Christ, as the apostle did? And yet, till there be more
Pauls, and more men dedicated to Christ, we shall never see God’s
kingdom come, nor shall we hope to see his will done on earth, even as it is
in heaven.

Now, this is the true life of a Christian, its source, its sustenance, its
fashion, and its end, all gathered up in one word, Christ Jesus; and, I must
add, its happiness, and its glory, is all in Christ. But I must detain you no
longer.

II. I must go to the second point, THE DEATH OF THE CHRISTIAN. Alas,
alas, that the good should die; alas, that the righteous should fall! Death,
why dost thou not hew the deadly upas? Why dost thou not mow the
hemlock? Why dost thou touch the tree beneath whose spreading branches
weariness hath rest? Why dost thou touch the flower whose perfume hath
made glad the earth? Death, why dost thou snatch away the excellent of
the earth, in whom is all our delight? If thou wouldest use thine axe, use it
upon the cumber-grounds, the trees that draw nourishment, but afford no
fruit; thou mightest be thanked then. But why wilt thou cut down the
cedars, why wilt thou fell the goodly trees of Lebanon? O Death, why dost
thou not spare the church? Why must the pulpit be hung in black; why
must the missionary station be filled with weeping? Why must the pious
family lose its priest, and the house its head? O Death, what art thou at?
touch not earth’s holy things; thy hands are not fit to pollute the Israel of
God. Why dost thou put thine hand upon the hearts of the elect? Oh stay
thou, stay thou; spare the righteous, Death, and take the bad! But no, it
must not be; death comes and smites the goodliest of us all; the most
generous, the most prayerful, the most holy, the most devoted must die.
Weep, weep, weep, O church, for thou hast lost thy martyrs; weep, O
church, for thou hast lost thy confessors, thy holy men are fallen. Howl, fir
tree, for the cedar hath fallen, the godly fail, and the righteous are cut off.
But stay awhile; I hear another voice. Say ye thus unto the daughter of
Judah, spare thy weeping. Say ye thus unto the Lord’s flock, Cease, cease
thy sorrow thy martyrs are dead, but they are glorified; thy ministers are
gone, but they have ascended up to thy Father, and to their Father, thy
brethren are buried in the grave, but the archangel’s trumpet shall awake
them, and their spirits are ever now with God.

Hear ye the words of the text, by way of consolation, “To die is gain.” Not
such gain as thou wishest for, thou son of the miser, not such gain as thou
art hunting for, thou man of covetousness and self-love; a higher and a
better gain is that which death brings to a Christian.

My dear friends, when I discoursed upon the former part of the verse, it
was all plain. No proof was needed; ye believed it, for you saw it clearly.
“To live is Christ,” hath no paradox in it. But “To die is gain,” is one of the
Gospel riddles which only the Christian can truly understand. To die is not
gain if I look upon the merely visible, to die is loss, it is not gain. Hath not
the dead man lost his wealth? though he had piles of riches, can he take
anything with him? Hath it not been said, “Naked came I out of my
mother’s womb, and naked shall I return thither.” “Dust thou art, and unto
dust shalt thou return.” And which of all thy goods, canst thou take with
thee? The man had a fair estate and a goodly mansion; he hath lost that. He
can no more tread those painted halls, nor walk those verdant lawns. He
had abundance of fame and honor; he hath lost that, so far as his own sense
of it is concerned, though still the harp string trembles at his name. He has
lost his wealth, and buried though he may be in a costly tomb, yet is he as
poor as the beggar who looked upon him in the street in envy. That is not
gain, it is loss and he hath lost his friends: he hath left behind him a
sorrowing wife and children, fatherless, without his guardian care; he hath
lost the friend of his bosom, the companion of his youth. Friends are there
to weep over him, but they cannot cross the river with him; they drop a
few tears into his tomb, but with him they must not and cannot go. And
hath he not lost all his learning, though he hath toiled ever so much to fill
his brain with knowledge? What is he now above the servile slave, though
he hath acquired all knowledge of earthly things? Is it not said,

“Their memory and their love are lost
Alike unknowing and unknown?”

Surely death is loss. Hath he not lost the songs of the sanctuary and the
prayers of the righteous? Hath he not lost the solemn assembly, and the
great gathering of the people? No more shall the promise enchant his ear,
no more shall the glad tidings of the gospel wake his soul to melody. He
sleeps in the dust, the Sabbath-bell tolls not for him, the sacramental
emblems are spread upon the table, but not for him. He hath gone to his
grave, he knoweth not that which shall be after him. There is neither work
nor device in the grave, whither we all are hastening. Surely death is loss.
When I look upon thee, thou clay-cold corpse, and see thee just preparing
to be the palace of corruption and the carnival for worms, I cannot think
that thou hast gained. When I see that thine eye hath lost light, and thy lip
hath lost its speech, and thine ears have lost hearing, and thy feet have lost
motion, and thy heart hath lost its joy, and they that look out of the
windows are darkened, the grinders have failed, and no sounds of tabret
and of harp wake up thy joys, O clay-cold corpse, than hast lost, lost
immeasurably. And yet my text tells me it is not so. It says, “To die is
gain.” It looks as if it could not be thus, and certainly it is not, so far as I
can see. But put to your eye the telescope of faith, take that magic glass
which pierces through the veil that parts us from the unseen. Anoint your
eyes with eyesalve, and make them so bright that they can pierce the ether
and see the unknown worlds. Come, bathe yourself in this sea of light, and
live in holy revelation and belief, and then look, and oh how changed the
scene! Here is the corpse, but there the spirit; here is the clay, but there the
soul, here is the carcase, but there the seraph. He is supremely blest; his
death is gain. Come now, what did he lose? I will show that in everything
he lost, he gained far more. He lost his friends, did he? His wife, and his
children, his brethren in church fellowship, are all lea to weep his loss. Yes,
he lost them, but, my brethren what did he gain? He gained more friends
than e’er he lost. He had lost many in his lifetime, but he meets them all
again. Parents, brethren and sisters who had died in youth or age, and
passed the stream before him, all salute him on the further brink. There the
mother meets her infant, there the father meets his children, there the
venerable patriarch greets his family to the third and fourth generation,
there brother clasps brother to his arms, and husband meets with wife, no
more to be married or given in marriage, but to live together, like the
angels of God. Some of us have more friends in heaven than in earth. We
have more dear relations in glory, than we have here. It is not so with all of
us, but with some it is so; more have crossed the stream than are left
behind. But if it be not so, yet what friends we have to meet us there! Oh, I
reckon on the day of death if it were for the mere hope of seeing the bright
spirits that are now before the throne; to clasp the hand of Abraham, and
Isaac, and Jacob, to look into the face of Paul the apostle, and grasp the
hand of Peter; to sit in flowery fields with Moses and David, to bask in the
sunlight of bliss with John and Magdalene. Oh how blest! The company of
poor imperfect saints on earth is good; but how much better the society of
the redeemed. Death is no loss to us by way of friends. We leave a few, a
little band below, and say to them, “Fear not little flock,” and we ascend
and meet the armies of the living God, the hosts of his redeemed. “To die is
gain.” Poor corpse! thou hast lost thy friends on earth; nay, bright spirit,
thou hast received a hundred fold in heaven.

What else did we say he lost? We said he lost all his estate, all his
substance and his wealth. Ay, but he has gained infinitely more. Though he
were rich as CrÏsus, yet he might well give up his wealth for that which he
hath attained. Were his fingers bright with pearls, and hath he lost their
brilliancy? The pearly gases of heaven glisten brighter far. Had he gold in
his storehouse? Mark ye, the streets of heaven are paved with gold, and he
is richer far. The mansions of the redeemed are far brighter dwelling places
than the mansions of the richest here below. But it is not so with many of
you. You are not rich, you are poor. What can you lose by death? You are
poor here, you shall be rich there. Here you suffer toil, there you shall rest
for ever. Here you earn your bread by the sweat of your brow but there, no
toil Here wearily you cast yourself upon your bed at the week’s end, and
sigh for the Sabbath, but there Sabbaths have no end. Here you go to the
house of God, but you are distracted with worldly cares and thoughts of
suffering; but there, there are no groans to mingle with the songs that
warble from immortal tongues, Death will be gain to you in point of riches
and substance.

And as for the means of grace which we leave behind, what are they when
compared with what we shall have hereafter? Oh, might I die at this hour, I
think I would say something like this, “Farewell Sabbaths, — I am going to
the eternal Sabbath of the redeemed. Farewell minister; I shall need no
candle, neither light of the sun, when the Lord God shall give me light, and
be my life for ever and ever. Farewell ye songs and sonnets of the blessed;
farewell, I shall not need your melodious burst; I shall hear the eternal and
unceasing hallelujahs of the beatified. Farewell, ye prayers of God’s people;
my spirit shall hear for ever the intercessions of my Lord, and join with the
noble army of martyrs in crying, ‘O Lord, how long?’ Farewell, O Zion!
Farewell, house of my love, home of my life! Farewell, ye temples where
God’s people sing and pray; farewell, ye tents of Jacob, where they daily
burn their offering! -I am going to a better Zion than you, to a brighter
Jerusalem, to a temple that hath foundations, whose builder and maker is
God!” O my dear friends, in the thought of these things, do we not, some
of us, feel as if we could die!

“E’en now by faith we join our hands
With those that went before,
And greet the blood-besprinkled bands
Upon th’ eternal shore.
One army of the living God,
At his command we bow,
Part of the host have crossed the flood,
And part are crossing now.”

We have not come to the margin yet, but we shall be there soon: we soon
expect to die.

And again, one more thought. We said that when men died they lost their
knowledge, we correct ourselves. Oh, no, when the righteous die they
know infinitely more than they could have known on earth.

“There shall I see and hear and know
All I desired or wished below;
And every power find sweet employ,
In that eternal world of joy.”

“Here we see through a glass darkly, but there face to face.” There, what
“eye hath not seen nor ear heard” shall be fully manifest to us. There,
riddles shall be unravelled, mysteries made plain, dark texts enlightened,
hard providences made to appear wise. The meanest soul in heaven knows
more of God than the greatest saint on earth. The greatest saint on earth
may have it said of him, “Nevertheless he that is least in the kingdom of
heaven is greater than he.” Not our mightiest divines understand so much
of theology as the lambs of the flock of glory. Not the greatest masterminds
of earth understand the millionth part of the mighty meanings which
have been discovered by souls emancipated from clay. Yes, brethren, “To
die is gain.” Take away, take away that hearse, remove that shroud; come,
put white plumes upon the horse’s heads and let gilded trappings hang
around them. There, take away that fife, that shrill sounding music of the
death march. Lend me the trumpet and the drum. O hallelujah, hallelujah,
hallelujah; why weep we the saints to heaven; why need we lament? They
are not dead, they are gone before. Stop, stop that mourning, refrain thy
tears, clap your hands, clap your hands.

“They are supremely blest,
Have done with care and sin and woe;
And with their Savior rest.”

What! weep! weep! for heads that are crowned with coronals of heaven?
Weep, weep for hands that grasp the harps of gold? What, weep for eyes
that see the Redeemer? What, weep for hearts that are washed from sin,
and are throbbing with eternal bliss! What, weep for men that are in the
Saviour’s bosom? -No, weep for yourselves, that you are here. Weep that
the mandate has not come which bids you to die. Weep that you must
tarry. But weep not for them. I see them turning back on you with loving
wonder, and they exclaim, “Why weepest thou?” What, weep for poverty
that it is clothed in riches? What, weep for sickness, that it hath inherited
eternal health? What, weep for shame, that it is glorified; and weep for
sinful mortality, that it hath become immaculate? Oh, weep not, but rejoice.
“If ye knew what it was that I have said unto you, and whither I have gone,
ye would rejoice with a joy that no man should take from you.” “To die is
gain.” Ah, this makes the Christian long to die — makes him say,

“Oh, that the word were given!
O Lord of Hosts, the wave divide,
And land us all in heaven!”

And now, friends, does this belong to you all? Can you claim an interest in
it? Are you living to Christ? Does Christ live in you? For if not, your death
will not be gain. Are you a believer in the Savior? Has your heart been
renewed, and your conscience washed in the blood of Jesus? If not, my
bearer, I weep for thee. I will save my tears for lost friends; there, with this
handkerchief I’d staunch mine eyes for ever for my best beloved that shall
die, if those tears could save you. O, when you die, what a day! If the
world were hung in sackcloth, it could not express the grief that you would
feel. You die. O death! O death! how hideous art thou to men that are not
in Christ! And yet, my hearer, thou shalt soon die. Save me thy bed of
shrieks, thy look of gall, thy words of bitterness! Oh that thou couldst be
saved the dread hereafter! Oh! the wrath to come! the wrath to come! the
wrath to come! who is he that can preach of it? Horrors strike the guilty
soul! It quivereth upon the verge of death; no, on the verge of hell. It
looketh over, clutching hard to life, and it heareth there the sullen groans,
the hollow moans, and shrieks of tortured ghosts, which come up from the
pit that is bottomless, and it clutcheth firmly to life, clasps the physician,
and bids him hold, lest he should fall into the pit that burneth. And the
spirit looketh down and seeth all the fiends of everlasting punishments, and
back it recoileth. But die it must. It would barter all it hath to coin an hour;
but no, the fiend hath got its grip, and down it must plunge. And who can
tell the hideous shriek of a lost soul? It cannot reach heaven; but if it could,
it might well be dreamed that it would suspend the melodies of angels,
might make even God’s redeemed weep, if they could hear the wailings of
a damned soul. Ah! you men and women, ye have wept; but if you die
unregenerate, there will be no weeping like that, there will be no shriek like
that, no wail like that. May God spare us from ever hearing it or uttering it
ourselves! Oh, how the grim caverns of Hades startle, and how the
darkness of night is frighted, when the wail of a lost soul comes up from
the ascending flames, whilst it is descending in the pit. “Turn ye, turn ye;
why will ye die, O house of Israel?” Christ is preached to you. “This is a
faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into
the world to save sinners.” Believe on him and live, ye guilty, vile,
perishing; believe and live. But this know — if ye reject my message, and
depise my Master, in that day when he shall judge the world in
righteousness by that man, Jesus Christ, I must be a swift witness against
you. I have told you — tat your soul’s peril reject it. Receive my message,
and you are saved; reject it — take the responsibility on your own head.
Behold, my skirts are clear of your blood. If ye be damned, it is not for
want of warning. Oh God grant, ye may not perish.

On Sunday November 15, Christians worldwide will join in remembering and praying for suffering believers through the International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Churches (IDOP)

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

2 Corinthians 4:8-9

We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed.

Hebrews 13:3

Remember those in prison as if you were their fellow prisoners and those who are mistreated as if you yourselves were suffering.

The following is taken from the International Day of Prayer website.

In the traditional church calendar, “All Saints Day” and “All Souls Day” stand out in the month of November, set apart to remember the saints of the church and the souls of those who departed this world. It is fitting that the modern church has set apart the month of November to remember and pray for the persecuted church, through the International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church (IDOP).

There are many countries in the world today where Christians are martyred for their faith. The world watched in horror the unbridled violence that was unleashed on Christians in Orissa state, India last year. There are other places in the world, such as North Korea, where acts of persecution take place, but we often don’t see or hear the full story. Brother Andrew of Open Doors once said, “Our heroes are not with us simply because they are in prison.”

The International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church is a time set apart for us to remember thousands of our Christian brothers and sisters around the world who suffer persecution, simply because they confess Jesus Christ as Lord.

To find out more about IDOP 2009 and to download a kit of special resources designed to help you get involved, please visit the IDOP international website at www.idop.org. This year’s kit includes posters, a prayer map, prayer requests, children’s materials, a four-minute video, and other resources that will help your church or group pray together with thousands of other Christians around the world for our persecuted brothers and sisters.

Doctors and lawyers raise concerns over Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Keir Starmer’s interim guidance on euthanasia (assisted suicide) law

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

It’s a relief to see these two media reports below, the first from the Christian Institute relating to doctors concerns over proposed assisted suicide laws, and the second from the Telegraph, relating to a group of leading lawyers, peers and former judges, warning that assisted suicide plans pose “serious dangers for public safety”.

Christian Institute

Doctors voice concerns over DPP’s assisted suicide policy

Leading doctors fear that fellow practitioners could help someone kill themselves but avoid prosecution under proposed guidance on prosecuting assisted suicide cases.

The British Medical Association (BMA) have asked Keir Starmer, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), for “further clarification” about the role of doctors under proposed guidelines, which are due to be finalised next year.

In September Mr Starmer issued interim guidance outlining the public interest factors he will consider before deciding to pursue assisted suicide cases.

View the DPP’s interim policy

The DPP made it clear that assisted suicide was still illegal.

He will finalise his guidelines next year after a public consultation is completed.

But the BMA are particularly concerned about one factor which suggests a prosecution would be less likely if someone helped a victim kill themselves “as a consequence of his or her usual lawful employment”.

In a consultation response to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) on the proposed changes, the BMA asked Mr Starmer to clarify exactly to whom the new guidance is referring.

Dr Tony Calland, chairman of the BMA’s ethics committee, said they wanted to make sure the new rules did not make it easier for doctors to help patients to die.

In the response, the BMA said: “Although the interim policy makes it absolutely clear that helping or encouraging another person to end his or her life remains a criminal offence, the BMA feels that some further clarification of (this) factor would be helpful.”

A CPS spokesman said the wording was intended to refer to taxi drivers or pilots who played a part in taking people to suicide facilities overseas.

Mr Starmer was ordered to issue a policy statement by the Law Lords who ruled in favour of a legal challenge by assisted suicide campaigner Debbie Purdy.

Miss Purdy, who suffers from multiple sclerosis, wants to know what would happen to her husband if he helped her travel overseas to commit suicide and said the current law is not clear.

Mr Starmer has said that his new guidance applies equally to suicides assisted in the UK and overseas.

Writing in the Daily Telegraph today, commentator George Pitcher said: “It will be doctors who kill off the nasty and sinister attempt of Law Lords to introduce euthanasia to the UK through Parliament’s back door”.

He said there is an overwhelming majority of doctors committed to the principles of their profession who oppose assisted suicide and any attempts by the legal profession to “move the goal posts”.

Mr Pitcher warned that the “euthanasia freaks are trying to give their death cult some clinical respectability”.

He pointed out that the “law under which British doctors practice is there, with proper vigilance in the future, to prevent another Harold Shipman going unnoticed”.

And:-

Telegraph

Elderly and disabled could be ‘forced to commit suicide’ under changes to rules – Increasing numbers of elderly and infirm people will be pressured into killing themselves under changes to assisted suicide rules, it has been claimed.

A group of leading lawyers, peers and former judges including Baroness Butler-Sloss, the former head of the family division of the High Court, are warning that the plans pose “serious dangers for public safety”.

In a significant intervention, they are warning the proposed changes go against the will of Parliament and risk reducing the Director of Public Prosecutions from an enforcer of the law, to an arbitrator.

Baroness Butler-Sloss, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, a former Lord Chancellor, and Lord Carlile of Berriew, the Government’s terrorism legislation adviser, are among those have come together in an unprecdented coalition to express concern about the impact of the changes proposed by Keir Starmer, the DPP.

In September, he published a list of factors to help lawyers to decide whether to prosecute people for assisting suicide. The rules have been interpreted by some campaigners as a way of “legalising” assisted suicide.

The DPP has now launched a consultion on the guidance which says that families who help terminally ill loved ones to end their lives are unlikely to face prosecution as long as they do not encourage them and assist only a clear and settled intention to die.

But the group – which also includes Lord Walton of Detchant, Professor Sheila Hollins, a former President of the Royal College of Psychiatrists and Baroness Campbell of Surbiton – says the new guidance is “not fit for purpose”.

The group has signed up to a hard-hitting response to the proposals from campaign group Care Not Killing, in which it warns that changes to the law could mean that the lives of stroke-sufferers, disabled people and those with arthritis, could be at risk.

It says: “Among the factors proposed as tending against prosecution are that the deceased was seriously ill or incurably disabled or had a history of suicide attempts. In Care Not Killing’s view these proposals are discriminatory as well as dangerous.”

The proposal that serious illness or disability might be a mitigating factor in whether to prosecute someone for assisting a suicide “flies in the face of the declared will of Parliament”, which has twice in the past four years rejected legalisation of assisted suicide in such cases.

Peter Saunders, the director of Care Not Killing, said: “The current law acts as a powerful deterrent against abuse and exploitation of vulnerable people and has been firmly upheld by Parliament.

“Removing these safeguards could lead to increase in vulnerable and disabled people being pressured into ending their lives.”

Read Entire Article

Previous recent posts:-

DPP could cause ‘constitutional crisis’ on assisted suicide

An elderly, but healthy British couple (Dennis & Flora Milner of Newbury, Berkshire, aged 83 and 81) who are thought to have committed suicide together, sent a letter to the BBC just before their deaths complaining about the law prohibiting assisted suicide.

Switch to our mobile site