<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Atheist civil rights group today expressed concern that a proposed U.N. Resolution banning &#8220;defamation&#8221; of religion threatens civil liberties and gives religious groups &#8220;special rights&#8221; at the expense of free speech and intellectual inquiry.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk/2009/11/03/atheist-civil-rights-group-today-expressed-concern-proposed-resolution-banning-defamation-religion-threatens-civil-liberties-religious-groups-special-rights-expense-free-speech-intellectual-inquiry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk/2009/11/03/atheist-civil-rights-group-today-expressed-concern-proposed-resolution-banning-defamation-religion-threatens-civil-liberties-religious-groups-special-rights-expense-free-speech-intellectual-inquiry/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: makarios</title>
		<link>http://blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk/2009/11/03/atheist-civil-rights-group-today-expressed-concern-proposed-resolution-banning-defamation-religion-threatens-civil-liberties-religious-groups-special-rights-expense-free-speech-intellectual-inquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-8456</link>
		<dc:creator>makarios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.echurchwebsites.org.uk/?p=8028#comment-8456</guid>
		<description>The line &quot;anyone should be free to defame a religion if they so choose&quot; seems geared to protect the peurile at heart. On the other hand this is a terrible law. Should it pass it would be used by Islamic purists for destructive purposes - no doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The line &#8220;anyone should be free to defame a religion if they so choose&#8221; seems geared to protect the peurile at heart. On the other hand this is a terrible law. Should it pass it would be used by Islamic purists for destructive purposes &#8211; no doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
