Archive for May, 2009

UK Christians risk rejection and discrimination for their faith

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

mmm, article from the Telegraph this morning:-

Christians are facing discrimination at work, and ridicule and rejection at home, according to new research.

The first poll of Britain’s churchgoers, carried out for The Sunday Telegraph, found that thousands of them believe they are being turned down for promotion because of their faith.

One in five said that they had faced opposition at work because of their beliefs.

More than half of them revealed that they had suffered some form of persecution for being a Christian.

The findings suggest a growing hostility towards religion in this country, which has been highlighted by a series of clashes between churchgoers and their employers.

Church leaders, including the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, have urged Christians to “wake up” and defend their beliefs after the suspension of Caroline Petrie, a community nurse, for offering to pray for a patient.

Churchgoers are likely to be further concerned by new guidelines that warn that employees face dismissal if they share their faith with colleagues at work.

Employers have been given new advice in a campaign, funded by the Government’s equality watchdog, that says people who evangelise in the workplace are “highly likely” to be accused of harassment.

The guidelines have been drawn up by the British Humanist Association (BHA), an atheist group, with the help of a £35,000 grant from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), a taxpayer-funded body.

Andrew Copson, director of education at the BHA, claimed that attempts to convert colleagues could amount to harassment under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003.

He said: “The law specifically protects people from being intimidated or confronted with a hostile environment in the workplace.

“Systematically undermining someone’s beliefs or persistently attempting to convert someone would lead to the creation of a hostile environment.”

However, legal experts have attacked the guidelines as “nonsense” and Christian groups have condemned them as “propaganda”.

Churchgoers interviewed in the ComRes poll said that they are already facing discrimination at work and one in 10 churchgoers said they have been rejected by family members because of their religious beliefs.

As many as 44 per cent said they had been mocked by friends, neighbours or colleagues for being a Christian, and 19 per cent said they had been ignored or excluded for the same reason.

They also claimed that they are being discriminated against at work, with five per cent saying they had been turned down for promotion due to their faith. The same number said they had been reprimanded or cautioned at work for sharing their faith.

There has been a series of cases over recent months featuring Christians who have been suspended after expressing their religious views, including a teacher who complained that a staff training day was used to promote gay rights.

Churchgoers believe that these incidents reflect growing intolerance towards Christianity in Britain.

Nearly three out of four of those questioned said that there is less religious freedom in the UK now than 20 years ago, and one in five said persecution of Christians is worse in this country compared to other European nations.

Although the EHRC declined to comment on the content of the BHA guidelines, a spokesman said: “The commission’s funding programme supports a wide range of organisations, both faith and non-faith groups, in keeping with its aim of promoting good relations and a better understanding between those from different religions and beliefs.

“This is one of many such projects to that end. This isn’t about supporting a particular belief or lack of belief over another, but encouraging debate.”

ComRes asked 512 worshippers between April 21 and May 1. The respondents were selected through different Christian media, from liberal publications through to evangelical websites.

The results are weighted to the exact denomination and churchmanship profile as defined by the 2005 Church Census.

  • Share/Bookmark

Christian Pastors Hear Gods Word Twitter Later

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Below article from The Christian Post made me laugh:-

Many pastors and church leaders have nothing against Twittering and see it as a useful tool for Christians. But when it comes to weekend worship services, some are telling churchgoers to keep their thumbs still.

“When you are in corporate worship, Worship!” says John Piper, a prominent evangelical pastor and author. “There is a difference between communion with God and commenting on communion with God.”

Since its launch in 2006, Twitter has grown to 32 million users, including an active following of pastors and churchgoers. The microblogging service is touted as the fastest growing social networking site. Just a year ago, Twitter traffic was at 2 million.

Considering the popularity, especially among young adults and youths, some churches have embraced the technological and cultural phenomenon and incorporated it into their worship services.

An earlier Time magazine article cited, among other churches, Westwinds Community Church in Jackson, Mich., where worshippers’ Tweets during worship are flashed on large video screens.

But reports of Twittering in church have sparked a debate among pastors and Christians on whether it is appropriate.

“While I personally enjoy Twitter and find it to be a useful tool for sharing and receiving information, I’m not excited about encouraging people to use Twitter during the Sunday meeting,” Josh Harris, senior pastor of Covenant Life Church in Gaithersburg, Md., wrote in his blog.

One of the reasons why Harris won’t be encouraging his congregation to Twitter during worship is that it will likely be distracting. Twitterers may be tempted to check their e-mail or read their Twitter feed during a sermon. Their mind may also focus on what to Tweet rather than on worship. Moreover, the minutes they take to Tweet would be minutes in which they weren’t actively listening to the sermon.

“The most important thing I can do while I’m sitting under the preaching of God’s word is to listen to what God is saying to me,” Harris, who is also on the council of The Gospel Coalition, noted. “I need to actively engage my heart and mind to receive.”

“When God is speaking again through his word, we should all be silent – and so should our Twitter feeds,” he stressed.

He’s not a Twitter hater, he wrote. He even encourages congregants to Tweet about the sermon or worship experience after church and sees it as a potential witnessing tool to friends who follow them on Twitter.

“But it’s also a good witness for them to see that something so important, so essential, so holy happens on Sunday morning when God’s church gathers that Twitter takes a back seat,” the Gaithersburg pastor stated.

Backing Harris’ points, evangelical pastor Piper of Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis, Minn., says churchgoers should focus only on hearing and engaging the Word of God.

“Don’t tweet while having sex. Don’t tweet while praying with the dying. Don’t tweet when your wife is telling you about the kids. There’s a season for everything,” Piper pointed out. “Multitasking only makes sense when none of the tasks requires heart-engaged, loving attention.”

And even though Twitter may be incredibly popular in the culture, that doesn’t give reason to accommodate it in worship, the pastors say.

“Lost people in this world don’t need to see that we’re current with the latest trend, they need to hear God’s unchanging truth,” Harris said on his blog. “They need to understand that God’s word makes a demand on their life.

“And they should see from us a reverence and holy awe in the presence of God and his word that points them to the fact that what happens in a Christian church is completely different than anything happening in the world.”

If you or your ministry or church need any kind of Christian internet website development, don’t hesitate to get in contact for a chat.

Blessings
  • Share/Bookmark

Christian Mental Health Website Development

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

I am currently developing the following christian mental health website, which is coming along nicely:-

I am really enjoying developing this website. It had to have a calm feel and I think that has been achieved.

I have included the facility to make donations on this website, which is a nice feature for charitable work.

This website also includes a forum discussion area for members and also has a newsletter sign up form.

I have also configured a lovely ‘Prayer Request‘ component, which allows website visitors to submit their prayer needs and also to view prayers submitted and subscribe to the prayer chain.

Have a look see and see what you think and always remember that should you or your ministry or church need any kind of Christian internet website development, don’t hesitate to get in contact for a chat.

Blessings

  • Share/Bookmark

SPURGEON THE HOPE OF FUTURE BLISS

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

As for me, I will behold thy face in righteousness; I shall be satisfied, when I awake, with thy likeness” Psalm 17:15

IT would be difficult to say to which the gospel owes most, to its friends or
to its enemies. It is true, that by the help of God, its friends have done
much for it; they have preached it in foreign lands, they have dared death,
they have laughed to scorn the terrors of the grave, they have ventured all
things for Christ, and so have glorified the doctrine they believed; but the
enemies of Christ, unwittingly, have done no little, for when they have
persecuted Christ’s servants, they have scattered them abroad, so that they
have gone everywhere preaching the Word; yea, when they have trampled
upon the gospel, like a certain herb we read of in medicine, it hath grown
all the faster: and if we refer to the pages of sacred writ how very many
precious portions of it do we owe, under God, to the enemies of the cross
of Christ! Jesus Christ would never have preached many of his discourses
had not his foes compelled him to answer them; had they not brought
objections, we should not have heard the sweet sentences in which he
replied. So with the book of Psalms: had not David been sorely tried by
enemies, had not the foemen shot their arrows at him, had they not
attempted to malign and blast his character, had they not deeply distressed
him, and made him cry out in misery, we should have missed many of those
precious experimental utterances we here find, much of that holy song
which he penned after his deliverance, and very much of that glorious
statement of his trust in the infallible God. We should have lost all this, had
it not been wrung from him by the iron hand of anguish. Had it not been
for David’s enemies, he would not have penned his Psalms; but when
hunted like a partridge on the mountains, when driven like the timid roe
before the hunter’s dogs, he waited for awhile, bathed his sides in the
brooks of Siloa, and panting on the hill-top a little, he breathed the air of
heaven and stood and rested his weary limbs.

Then was it that he gave
honor to God, then he shouted aloud to that mighty Jehovah, who for him
had gotten the victory. This sentence follows a description of the great
troubles which the wicked bring upon the righteous, wherein he consoles
himself with the hope of future bliss.; As for me,” says the patriarch,
casting his eyes aloft; As for me,” said the hunted chieftain of the caves of
Engedi — “As for me,” says the once shepherd boy, who was soon to wear
a royal diadem — “As for me, I will behold thy face in righteousness, I
shall be satisfied, when I awake with thy likeness.”

In looking at this passage tonight, we shall notice first of all, the spirit of
it secondly, the matter of it; and then, thirdly, we shall close by speaking of
the contrast which is implied in it.

I. First, then, the SPIRIT OF THIS UTTERANCE, for I always love to look at
the spirit in which a man writes, or the spirit in which he preaches; in fact,
there is vastly more in that than in the words he uses.

Now, what should you think is the spirit of these words? “As for me, I will
behold thy face in righteousness: I shall be satisfied, when I awake, with
thy likeness.” First, they breathe the spirit of a man entirely free from envy. Notice, that the Psalmist has been speaking of the wicked. “They are inclosed in their own fat: with their mouth they speak proudly.” “They are full of children, and leave the rest of their substance to their babes.” But David envies them not. “Go,” says he, “rich man, in all thy riches – go, proud man, in all thy pride – go, thou happy man, with thine abundance of children; I envy thee not; as for me, my lot is different: I can look on you without desiring to have your possessions. I can well keep that commandment, ‘Thou shalt not covet,’ for in your possessions there is nothing worth my love; I set no value upon your earthly treasures; I envy you not your heaps of glittering dust; for my Redeemer is mine.” The man is above envy, because he thinks that the joy would be no joy to him – that the portion would not suit his disposition. Therefore, he turns his eye heavenward, and says, “As for me I shall behold thy face in righteousness.”

Oh! beloved, it is a happy thing to
be free from envy. Envy is a curse which blighteth creation; and even
Eden’s garden itself would have become defaced, and no longer fair, if the
wind of envy could have blown on it, envy tarnisheth the gold; envy
dimmeth the silver; should envy breathe on the hot sun, it would quench it;
should she cast her evil eye on the moon, it would be turned into blood,
and the stars would fly astonished at her. Envy is accursed of heaven; yea,
it is Satan’s first-born-the vilest of vices. Give a man riches, but let him
have envy, and there is the worm at the root of the fair tree; give him
happiness, and if he envies another’s lot, what would have been happiness
becomes his misery, because it is not so great as that of some one else. But
give me freedom from envy; let me be content with what God has given
me, let me say, “Ye may have yours, I will not envy you  -I am satisfied with
mine,” yea, give me such a love to my fellow creatures that I can rejoice in
their joy, and the more they have the more glad I am of it. My candle will
burn no less brightly because theirs outshines it. I can rejoice in their
prosperity. Then am I happy, for all around tends to make me blissful,
when I can rejoice in the joys of others, and make their gladness my own.

Envy! oh! may God deliver us from it! But how, in truth, can we get rid of
it so well as by believing that ye have something that is not on earth, but in
heaven? If we can look upon all the things in the world and say, “As for
me, I will behold thy face in righteousness; I shall be satisfied by-and-bye!”
then we cannot envy other men, because their lot would not be adapted to
our peculiar taste. Doth the ox envy the lion! Nay, for it cannot feed upon
the carcase. Doth the dove grieve because the raven can gloat itself on
carrion? Nay, for it lives on other food. Will the eagle envy the wren his
tiny nest? Oh, no! So the Christian will mount aloft as the eagle, spreading
his broad wings, he will fly up to his eyrie amongst the stars, where God
hath made him his nest, saying, “As for me, I will dwell here; I look upon
the low places of this earth with contempt. I envy not your greatness, ye
mighty emperors; I desire not your fame, ye mighty warriors; I ask not for
wealth, O Croesus; I beg not for thy power, O Caesar; as for me, I have
something else, my portion is the Lord.” The text breathes the spirit of a
man free from envy. May God give that to us!

Then, secondly, you can see that there is about it the air of a man who is
looking into the future. Read the passage thoroughly, and you will see that
it all has relation to the future, because it says, “As for me, I shall.” It has
nothing to do with the present: it does not say, “As for me I do, or I am,
so-and-so,” but “As for me, I will behold thy face in righteousness; I shall
be satisfied, when I awake.” The Psalmist looks beyond the grave into
another world; he overlooks the narrow death-bed where he has to sleep,
and he says, “When I awake.” How happy is that man who has an eye to
the future; even in worldly things we esteem that man who looks beyond
the present day, he who spends all his money as it comes in will soon bring
himself to rags. He who lives on the present is a fool; but wise men are
content to look after future things.

When Milton penned his book he might
know, perhaps, that he should have little fame in his lifetime; but he said, “I
shall be honored when my head shall sleep in the grave.” Thus have other
worthies been content to tarry until time has broken the earthen pitcher,
and suffered the lamp to blaze; as for honor, they said, “We will leave that
to the future, for that fame which comes late is often most enduring,” and
they lived upon the “shall “and fed upon the future. “I shall be satisfied”
by-and-bye. So says the Christian. I ask no royal pomp or fame now; I am
prepared to wait, I have an interest in reversion; I want not a pitiful estate
here I will tarry till I get my domains in heaven, those broad and beautiful
domains that God has provided for them that love him. Well content will I
be to fold my arms and sit me down in the cottage, for I shall have a
mansion of God, “a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.”

Do any of you know what it is to live on the future – to live on expectation to
live on what you are to have in the next world – to feast yourselves with
some of the droppings of the tree of life that fall from heaven – to live upon
the manna of expectation which falls in the wilderness, and to drink that
stream of nectar which gushes from the throne of God? Have you ever
gone to the great Niagara of hope, and drank the spray with ravishing
delight; for the very spray of heaven is glory to one’s soul! Have you ever
lived on the future, and said, “As for me I shall have somewhat, by-and-bye?”

Why, this is the highest motive that can actuate a man. I suppose this
was what made Luther so bold, when he stood before his great audience of
kings and lords, and said, “I stand by the truth that I have written, and will
so stand by it till I die; so help me God!” Me thinks he must have said, “I
shall be satisfied by-and-bye. I am not satisfied now, but I shall be soon.”
For this the missionary ventures the stormy sea; for this he treads the
barbarous shore; for this he goes into inhospitable climes, and risks his life,
because he knows there is a payment to come by-and-bye. I sometimes
laughingly tell my friends when I receive a favor from them, that I cannot
return it, but set it up to my Master in heaven, for they shall be satisfied
when they awake in his likeness. There are many things that we may never
hope to be rewarded for here, but that shall be remembered before the
throne hereafter, not of debt, but of grace. Like a poor minister I heard of,
who, walking to a rustic chapel to preach, was met by a clergyman who
had a far richer berth. He asked the poor man what he expected to have for
his preaching. “Well,” he said, “I expect to have a crown.” “Ah!” said the
clergyman, “I have not been in the habit of preaching for less than a guinea,
anyhow.” “Oh!” said the other, “I am obliged to be content with a crown,
and what is more, I do not have my crown now, but I have to wait for that
in the future.” The clergyman little thought that he meant the “crown of life
that fadeth not away!” Christian! live on the future; seek nothing here, but
expect that thou shalt shine when thou shalt come in the likeness of Jesus,
with him to be admired, and to kneel before his face adoringly.

The Psalmist had an eye to the future.
And again, upon this point, you can see that David, at the time he wrote
this, was full of faith. The text is fragrant with confidence. “As for me,”
says David, no perhaps about it. “I will behold thy face in righteousness; I
shall be satisfied when I awake up in thy likeness.” If some men should say
so now, they would be called fanatics, and it would be considered
presumption for any man to say, “I will behold thy face, I shall be
satisfied;” and I think there are many now in this world who think it is quite
impossible for a man to say to a certainty, “I know, I am sure, I am
certain.” But, beloved, there are not one or two, but there are thousands
and thousands of God’s people alive in this world who can say with an
assured confidence, no more doubting of it than of their very existence, “I
will behold thy face in righteousness. I shall be satisfied, when I awake in
thy likeness.” It is possible, though perhaps not very easy, to attain to that
high and eminent position wherein we can say no longer do I hope, but I
know; no longer do I trust, but I am persuaded; I have a happy confidence;
I am sure of it; I an certain; for God has so manifested himself to me that
now it is no longer “if” and “perhaps” but it is positive, eternal, “shall.” “I
shall be satisfied when I awake in thy likeness.” How many are there here
of that sort? Oh! if ye are talking like that, ye must expect to have trouble,
for God never gives strong faith without fiery trial; he will never give a
man the power to say that “shall” without trying him; he will not build a
strong ship without subjecting it to very mighty storms; he will not make
you a mighty warrior, if he does not intend to try your skill in battle. God’s
swords must be used; the old Toledo blades of heaven must be smitten
against the armor of the evil one, and yet they shall not break, for they are
of true Jerusalem metal, which shall never snap.

Oh! what a happy thing to
have that faith to say “I shall.” Some of you think it quite impossible, I
know; but it “is the gift of God,” and whosoever asks it shall obtain it: and
the very chief of sinners now present in this place may yet be able to say
long before he comes to die, “I shall behold thy face in righteousness.”
Methinks I see the aged Christian. He has been very poor. He is in a garret
where the stars look between the tiles. There is his bed. His clothes ragged
and torn. There are a few sticks on the hearth: they are the last he has. He
is sitting up in his chair; his paralytic hand quivers and shakes, and he is
evidently near his end. His last meal was eaten yester-noon; and as you
stand and look at him, poor, weak, and feeble, who would desire his lot?
But ask him, “Old man, wouldst thou change thy garret for Caesar’s
palace? Aged Christian, wouldst thou give up these rags for wealth, and
cease to love thy God?” See how indignation burns in his eyes at once! He
replies,” ‘As for me, I shall,’ within a few more days, ‘behold his face in
righteousness; I shall be satisfied soon; here I never shall be. Trouble has
been my lot, and trial has been my portion, but I have ‘a house not made
with hands, eternal in the heavens.’” Bid high; bid him fair; offer him your
hands full of gold; lay all down for him to give up his Christ. “Give up
Christ?” he will say, “no, never!”

“While my faith can keep her hold,
I envy not the miser’s gold.”

Oh! what a glorious thing to be full of faith, and to have the confidence of
assurance, so as to say, “I will behold thy face; I shall be satisfied when I
awake with thy likeness.” Thus much concerning the spirit of David. It is one very much to be copied and eminently to be desired.

II. But now, secondly, THE MATTER OF THIS PASSAGE. And here we will
dive into the very depths of it, God helping us; for without the Spirit of
God I feel I am utterly unable to speak to you. I have not those gifts and
talents which qualify men to speak; I need an afflatus from no high,
otherwise I stand like other men and have nought to say. May that be given
me; for without it I am dumb. As for the matter of this verse, methinks it
contains a double blessing. The first is a beholding — “I will behold thy
face in righteousness,” and the next is a satisfaction — “I shall be satisfied
when I awake with thy likeness.”

Let us begin with the first, then. David expected that he should behold
God’s face. What a vision will that be, my brethren! Have you ever seen
God’s hand? I have seen it, when sometimes he places it across the sky,
and darkens it with clouds. I have seen God’s hand sometimes, when the
ears of night drag along the shades of darkness. I have seen his hand when,
launching the thunder-bolt, his lightning splits the clouds and rends the
heavens. Perhaps ye have seen it in a gentler fashion, when it pours out the
water and sends it rippling along in rills, and then rolls into rivers. Ye have
seen it in the stormy ocean – in the sky decked with stars, in the earth
gemmed with flowers; and there is not a man living who can know all the
wonders of God’s hand. His creation is so wondrous that it would take
more than a lifetime to understand it. Go into the depths of it, let its
minute parts engage your attention; next take the telescope, and try to see
remote worlds, and can I see all God’s handiwork – behold all his hand? No,
not so much as one millionth part of the fabric. That mighty hand wherein
the callow comets are brooded by the sun, in which the planets roll in
majestic orbits; that mighty hand which holds all space, and grasps all
beings – that mighty hand, who can behold it? but if such be his hand, what
must his face be?

Ye have heard God’s voice sometimes, and ye have
trembled; I, myself, have listened awestruck, and yet with a marvellous
joy, when I have heard God’s voice, like the noise of many waters, in the
great thunderings. Have you never stood and listened, while the earth
shook and trembled, and the very spheres stopped their music, while God
spoke with his wondrous deep bass voice? Yes, ye have heard that voice,
and there is a joy marvellously instinct with love which enters into my soul,
whenever I hear the thunder. It is my Father speaking, and my heart leaps
to hear him. But you never heard God’s loudest voice. It was but the
whisper when the thunder rolled. But if such be the voice, what must it be
to behold his face? David said, “I will behold thy face.” It is said of the
temple of Diana, that it was so splendidly decorated with gold, and so
bright and shining, that a porter at the door always said to every one that
entered, “Take heed to your eyes, take heed to your eyes; you will be
struck with blindness unless you take heed to your eyes.” But oh! that view
of glory! That great appearance. The vision of God! to see him face to
face, to enter into heaven, and to see the righteous shining bright as stars in
the firmament; but best of all, to catch a glimpse of the eternal throne! Ah!
there he sits! ‘Twere almost blasphemy for me to attempt to describe him.
How infinitely far my poor words fall below the mighty subject! But to
behold God’s face. I will not speak of the lustre of those eyes, or the
majesty of those lips, that shall speak words of love and affection; but to
behold his face’ Ye who have dived into the Godhead’s deepest sea, and
have been lost in its immensity, ye can tell a little of it! Ye naughty “ones,
who have lived in heaven these thousand years perhaps ye know, but ye
cannot tell, What it is to see his face. We must each of us go there we must
be clad with immortality. We must go above the blue sky, and bathe in the
river of life: we must outsoar the lightning, and rise above the stars to
know what it is to see God’s face. Words cannot set it forth. So there I
leave it.

The hope the Psalmist had was, that he might see God’s face.
But there was a peculiar sweetness mixed with this joy, because he knew
that he should behold God’s face in righteousness. “I shall behold thy face
in righteousness.” Have I not seen my Father’s face here below? Yes, I
have, “through a glass darkly,” But has not the Christian sometimes beheld
him, when in his heavenly moments earth is gone, and the mind is stripped
of matter? There are some seasons when the gross materialism dies away,
and when the ethereal fire within blazes up so high that it almost touches
the fire of heaven. There are seasons, when in some retired spot, calm and
free from all earthly thought, we have put our shoes from off our feet
because the place whereon we stood was holy ground; and we have talked
with God! even as Enoch talked with him so has the Christian held intimate
communion with his Father. He has heard his love whispers, he has told
out his heart, poured out his sorrows and his groans before him. But after
all he has felt that he has not beheld his face in righteousness. There was so
much sin to darken the eyes, so much folly, so much frailty, that we could
not get a clear prospect of our Jesus. But here the Psalmist says, “I will
behold thy face in righteousness.” When that illustrious day shall arise, and
I shall see my Savior face to face, I shall see him “in righteousness.” The
Christian in heaven will not have so much as a speck upon his garment; he
will be pure and white; yea, on the earth he is

“Pure through Jesus’ blood, and white as angels are.”

But in heaven that whiteness shall be more apparent. Now, it is sometimes
smoked by earth, and covered with the dust of this poor carnal world; but
in heaven he will have brushed himself, and washed his wings and made
them clean; and then will he see God’s face in righteousness. My God; I
believe I shall stand before thy face as pure as thou art thyself, for I shall
have the righteousness of Jesus Christ there shall be upon me the
righteousness of a God. “I shall behold thy face in righteousness.” O
Christian, canst thou enjoy this? Though I cannot speak about it, dost thy
heart meditate upon it? To behold his face for ever; to bask in that vision!
True, thou canst not understand it; but thou mayest guess the meaning. To
behold his face in righteousness!

The second blessing, upon which I will be brief, is satisfaction. He will be
satisfied, the Psalmist says, when he wakes up in God’s likeness.
Satisfaction! this is another joy for the Christian when he shall enter
heaven. Here we are never thoroughly satisfied. True, the Christian is
satisfied from himself; he has that within which is a wet-spring of comfort,
and he can enjoy solid satisfaction. But heaven is the home of true and real
satisfaction. When the believer enters heaven I believe his imagination will
be thoroughly satisfied. All he has ever thought of he will there see; every
holy idea will be solidified; every mighty conception will become a reality,
every glorious imagination will become a tangible thing that he can see. His
imagination will not be able to think of anything better than heaven; and
should he sit down through eternity, he would not be able to conceive of
anything that should outshine the lustre of that glorious city. His
imagination will be satisfied. Then his intellect will be satisfied.

“Then shall I see, and hear, and know,
All I desired, or wished, below.”

Who is satisfied with his knowledge here? Are there not secrets we want to
know, depths in the arcana of nature that we have not entered? But in that
glorious state we shall know as much as we want to know. The memory
will be satisfied. We shall look back upon the vista of past years, and we
shall be content with whatever we endured, or did, or suffered on earth.

“There, on a green and flowery mound,
My wearied soul shall sit,
And with transporting joys recount
The labors of my feet.”

Hope will be satisfied, if there be such a thing in heaven. We shall hope for
a future eternity, and believe in it. But we shall be satisfied as to our hopes
continually: and the whole man will be so content that there will not remain
a single thing in all God’s dealings, that he would wish to have altered; yea,
perhaps I say a thing at which some of you will demur – but the righteous in
heaven will be quite satisfied with the damnation of the lost. I used to think
that if I could see the lost in hell, surely I must weep for them. Could I hear
their horrid wailings, and see the dreadful contortions of their anguish,
surely I must pity them. But there is no such sentiment as that known in
heaven. The believer shall be there so satisfied with all God’s will, that he
will quite forget the lost in the idea that God has done it for the best, that
even their loss has been their own fault, and that he is infinitely just in it. If
my parents could see me in hell they would not have a tear to shed for me,
though they were in heaven, for they would say, “It is justice, thou great
God; and thy justice must be magnified, as well as thy mercy;” and
moreover, they would feel that God was so much above his creatures that
they would be satisfied to see those creatures crushed if it might increase
God’s glory.

Oh! in heaven I believe we shall think rightly of men. Here
men seem great things to us; but in heaven they will seem no more than a
few creeping insects that are swept away in ploughing a field for harvest;
they will appear no more than a tiny handful of dust, or like some nest of
wasps that ought to be exterminated for the injury they have done. They
will appear such little things when we sit on high with God, and look down
on the nations of the earth as grasshoppers, and “count the isles as very
little things.” We shall be satisfied with everything; there will not be a
single thing to complain of. “I shall be satisfied.”

But when? “I shall be satisfied when I awake with thy likeness.” But not till
then. No, not till then. Now here a difficulty occurs. You know there are
some in heaven who have not yet waked up in God’s likeness. In fact, none
of those in heaven have done so. They never did sleep as respects their
souls; the waking refers to their bodies, and they are not awake yet – but are
still slumbering. O earth! thou art the bedchamber of the mighty dead!
What a vast sleeping-house this world is! It is one vast cemetery. The
righteous still sleep; and they are to be satisfied on the resurrection morn,
when they awake. “But,” say you, “are they not satisfied now? They are in
heaven: is it possible that they can be distressed?” No, they are not; there is
only one dissatisfaction that can enter heaven – the dissatisfaction of the
blest that their bodies are not there. Allow me to use a simile which will
somewhat explain what I mean. When a Roman conqueror had been at
war, and won great victories, he would very likely come back with his
soldiers enter into his house, and enjoy himself till the next day, when he
would go out of the city and then come in again in triumph. Now, the
saints, as it were, if I might use such a phrase, steal into heaven without
their bodies; but on the last day, when their bodies wake up, they will enter
in their triumphal chariots. And methinks I see that grand procession, when
Jesus Christ, first of all, with man; crowns on his head, with his bright,
glorious body, shall lead the way. I see my Savior entering first. Behind
him come the saints, all of them clapping their hands all of them touching
their golden harps, and entering in triumph. And when they come to
heaven’s gates, and the doors are opened wide to let the king of glory in,
now will the angels crowd at the windows, and on the house-tops, like the
inhabitants in the Roman triumphs, to watch them as they pass through the
streets, and scatter heaven’s roses and cities upon them, crying, crying,
“Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! the Lord God Omnipotent reigneth!” “I
shall be satisfied” in that glorious day, when all his angels shall come to see
the triumph, and when his people shall be victorious with him.

One thought here ought not to be forgotten; and that is, the Psalmist says
we are to wake up in the likeness of God. This may refer to the soul; for
the spirit of the righteous will be in the likeness of God as to its happiness
holiness, purity, infallability, eternity, and freedom from pain; but specially,
I think, it relates to the body because it speaks of the awaking. The body is
to be in the likeness of Christ. What a thought! It is – and alas! I have had
too many such tonight – a thought too heavy for words. I am to awake up
in Christ’s likeness. I do not know what Christ is like, and can scarcely
imagine. I love sometimes to sit and look at him in his crucifixion. I care
not what men say – I know that sometimes I have derived benefit from a
picture of my dying crucified Savior; and I look at him with his crown of
thorns, his pierced side, his bleeding hands and feet, and all those drops of
gore hanging from him; but I cannot picture him in heaven, he is so bright,
so glorious; the God so shines through the man; his eyes are like lamps of
fire; his tongue like a two-edged sword; his head covered with hair as
white as snow, for he is the Ancient of days, he binds the clouds round
about him for a girdle; and when he speaks, it is like the sound of many
waters! I read the accounts given in the book of Revelation, but I cannot
tell what he is; they are Scripture phrases, and I cannot understand their
meaning; but whatever they mean, I know that I shall wake up in Christ’s
likeness. Oh; what a change it will be, when some of us get to heaven!

There is a man who fell in battle with the word of salvation on his lips, his
legs had been shot away, and his body had been scarred by sabre thrusts;
he wakes in heaven, and finds that he has not a broken body, maimed and
cut about, and hacked and injured, but that he is in Christ’s likeness. There
is an old matron, who has tottered on her staff for years along her weary
way; time has ploughed furrows on her brow; haggard and lame, her body
is laid in the grave. But oh! aged woman, thou shalt arise in youth and
beauty. Another has been deformed in his lifetime, but when he wakes, he
wakes in the likeness of Christ. Whatever may have been the form of our
countenance, whatever the contour, the beautiful shall be no more beautiful
in heaven than those who were deformed. Those who shone on earth,
peerless, among the fairest, who ravished men with looks from their eyes,
they shall be no brighter in heaven than those who are now passed by and
neglected: for they shall all be like Christ.

III. But now to close up, HERE IS A VERY SAD CONTRAST IMPLIED. We
shall all slumber A few more years and where will this company be? Xerxes
wept, because in a little while his whole army would be gone; how might I
stand here and weep, because within a few more years others shall stand in
this place, and shall say, “The fathers, where are they?” Good God! and is
it true? Is it not a reality? Is it all to be swept away? Is it one great
dissolving view? Ah! it is. This sight shall vanish soon, and you and I shall
vanish with it. We are but a show. This life is but “a stage whereon men
act;” and then we pass behind the curtain, and we there unmask ourselves,
and talk with God. The moment we begin to live we begin to die. The tree
has long been growing that shall be sawn to make you a coffin. The sod is
ready for you all. But this scene is to appear again soon. One short dream,
one hurried nap, and all this sight shall come o’er again. We shall all
awake, and as we stand here now, we shall stand together, perhaps, even
more thickly pressed. But we shall stand on the level then – the rich and
poor, the preacher and hearer. There will be but one distinction – righteous
and wicked. At first we shall stand together.

Methinks I see the scene. The
sea is boiling; the heavens are rent in twain, the clouds are fashioned into a
chariot, and Jesus riding on it, with wings of fire, comes riding through the
sky. His throne is set. He seats himself upon it. With a nod he hushes all
the world. He lifts his fingers, opens the great books of destiny, and the
book of our probation, wherein are written the acts of time. With his
fingers he beckons to the hosts above. “Divide,” said he, “divide the
universe.” Swifter than thought all the earth shall part in sunder. Where
shall I be found when the dividing comes? Methinks I see them all divided,
and the righteous are on the right. Turning to them, with a voice sweeter
than music, he says, “Come! Ye have been coming – keep on your progress!
Come! it has been the work of your life to come, so continue. Come and
take the last step. ‘Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom
prepared for you from before the foundation of the world.’” And now the
wicked are left alone; and turning to them, he says, “Depart! Ye have been
departing all your life long; it was your business to depart from me; ye said,
‘Depart from me, I love not thy ways.’ You have been departing, keep on,
take the last step!’” They dare not move. They stand still. The Savior
becomes the avenger. The hands that once held out mercy, now grasp the
sword of justice; the lips that spoke loving kindness, now utter thunder; and
with a deadly aim; he lifts up the sword, and sweeps amongst them. They
fly like deer before the lion, and enter the jaws of the bottomless pit.

But never, I hope, shall I cease preaching, without telling you what to do
to be saved. This morning I preached to the ungodly, to the worst of
sinners, and many wept – I hope many hearts melted – while I spoke of the
great mercy of God. I have not spoken of that tonight. We must take a
different line sometimes; led, I trust, by God’s Spirit. But oh! ye that are
thirsty, and heavy laden, and lost and ruined, mercy speaks yet once again
to you! Here is the way of salvation. “He that believeth and is baptized
shall be saved.” “And what is it to believe?” says one; “is it to say I know
Christ died for me?” No, that is not to believe, it is part of it, but it is not
all. Every Arminian believes that; and every man in the world believes it
who holds that doctrine, since he conceives that Christ died for every man.
Consequently that is not faith. But faith is this: to cast yourself on Christ.
As the negro said, most curiously, when asked what he did to be saved;
“Massa,” said he, “I fling myself down on Jesus, and dere I lay; I fling
myself flat on de promise, and dere I lay.” And to every penitent sinner
Jesus says, “I am able to save to the uttermost;” throw thyself flat on the
promise, and say, “Then, Lord, thou art able to save me.” God says,
“Come now, let us reason together, though your sins be as scarlet they
shall be white as snow, and though they be red like crimson they shall be as
wool.” Cast thyself on him, and thou shalt be saved.

“Ah!” says one, “I am
afraid I am not one of God’s people; I cannot read my name in the book of
life.” A very good thing you can’t, for if the Bible had every body’s name
in it, it would be a pretty large book; and if your name is John Smith and
you saw that name in the Bible, if you do not believe God’s promise now,
you would be sure to believe that it was some other John Smith. Suppose
the Emperor of Russia should issue a decree to all the Polish refugees to
return to their own country; you see a Polish refugee looking at the great
placards hanging on the wall he looks with pleasure, and says, “Well, I
shall go back to my country.” But some one says to him, “It does not say
Walewski.” “Yes, “he would reply, “but it says Polish refugees: Polish is
my Christian name, and refugee my surname, and that is me.” And so,
though it does not say your name in the Scriptures, it says lost sinner.
Sinner is your Christian name, and lost is your surname; therefore, why not
come? It says, “lost sinner;” – is not that enough? “This is a faithful saying,
and worthy of all acceptation, that Jesus Christ came into the world to save
sinners of whom I am chief.” “Yes, but,” another one says, “I am afraid I
am not elect.’ Oh! dear souls, do not trouble yourselves about that. If you
believe in Christ you are elect. Whoever puts himself on the mercy of Jesus
is elect; for he would never do it if he had not been elect. Whoever comes
to Christ, and looks for mercy through his blood, is elect, and he shall see
that he is elect afterwards; but do not expect to read election till you have
read repentance. Election is a college to which you little ones will not go
till you have been to the school of repentance. Do not begin to read your
book backwards, and say Amen before you have said your paternoster.
Begin with “Our Father,” and then you will go on to “thine is the kingdom
the power and the glory;” but begin with “the kingdom,” and you will have
hard work to go back to “Our Father.” We must begin with faith. We must
begin with:-

“Nothing in my hands I bring.”

As God made the world out of nothing, he always makes his Christians out
of nothing; and he who has nothing at all to-night, shall find grace and
mercy, if he will come for it.

Let me close up by telling you what I have heard of some poor woman,
who was converted and brought to life, just by passing down a street, and
hearing a child, sitting at a door, singing-

“I am nothing at all
But Jesus Christ is all in all.”

That is a blessed song; go home and sing it; and he who can rightly
apprehend those little words, who can feel himself vanity without Jesus,
but that he has all things in Christ, is not only far from the kingdom of
heaven, but he is there in faith, and shall be there in fruition, when be shall
wake up in God’s likeness.

  • Share/Bookmark

World Horizons Christian Ministry

Friday, May 29th, 2009

I was invited to spend the day with a Christian Ministry called ‘World Horizons‘ yesterday, who are based in Llanelli in Wales, which is the town of the famous 1904 Welsh Revival headed up by Evan Roberts – www.welshrevival.com.

I think that it is no coincidence that this town was the epicentre of a powerful move of God a century ago, and now has the headquarters of the Global ministry World Horizons

The focus of World Horizons is simply to proclaim the gospel and make disciples all over the world, especially focusing on those unreached people groups.

World Horizons describe themselves as a ‘Prayer based, pioneering, prophetic, pastoral, mission movement’…AND THEY ARE, AND MORE!

I had a wonderful day and was blown away by this ministry and the folks involved, I am almost speechless (which is most unlike me) and can only describe them as the ‘real deal’. They are fulfilling the ‘great commission’ based purely on faith and with no regard to themselves and their own comfort in this life, consequently they have the real Joy.

I have blogged about World Horizons in the past, as I was so impressed by them, when they came to our church to tell us about their work:-

World Horizons Previous Blog

I will be blogging some more about World Horizons that’s for sure. In the meantime the ‘Global Journeys‘ ministry within World Horizons, who specialise in short ministry trips (Headed up by the amazing Michael Kelly – and believe me a trip with him would be seriously good fun and cool :) ) are looking for folks to join them on their month long ‘overland extreme’ journey 19th June – 17th July. If you can go, then make sure you do, because I guarantee, it will change your life for the better forever!

Click here for the PDF details of the Overland Extreme Journey Morocco

More info on this ministry to come soon!

  • Share/Bookmark

UK Surveillance Society

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Interesting article from the Jubilee Centre this morning:-

Guy Brandon

Last week the BBC reported that a national network of cameras and computers to log car number plates would be up and running within months. The technology is not new; automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) has been used for years. The new development is that the thousands of cameras will now be linked centrally by one computer, enabling police to record and store details of every journey we make.

This has clear potential to reduce and detect crime and improve road safety. But the system also has its critics, who are concerned about the extent of police surveillance and its implications for personal freedom. Add to the ANPR network the national DNA database, which holds data on millions of people (many innocent), proposed national ID cards and existing measures (including but not limited to CCTV cameras, RFID tags, mobile phone records, Oyster cards, credit card transactions, and internet cookies†) and suddenly you start to realise just how much you are being, or can be watched.  Evoking images from Steven Spielberg’s futuristic thriller Minority Report, another TV programme this week, The Gadget Show, even demonstrated new iris-recognition technology that means a CCTV camera will soon be able to recognise you from your eye pattern from a distance of 1.5 to 2.5 metres as you walk along the street.

Campaigners against the ‘surveillance society’ usually state their case in terms of the risk to their civil liberties – a concept alien to the Bible, which tends to focus more on responsibilities than personal rights and freedoms. Although many of us feel uncomfortable about the degree to which we can be tracked and the amount of data about us that is recorded and kept, justifying those anxieties with biblical principles is not straightforward.

One shared theme between the modern-day campaigners and the biblical worldview is the cynicism about absolute, centralised power. When Israel first asks for a king in 1 Samuel 8, God warns them through the prophet Samuel that forsaking him as king and choosing a human ruler will actually result in reduced freedom, including higher taxes and forced labour. The rule of the king in Deuteronomy 17 was intended to limit the amount of power held by the king, who was not to be above the law and was not to accumulate wealth or possessions. Solomon’s excesses and the split between the northern and southern kingdoms after his death were among the consequences of disregarding this law.

Throughout the Bible, from the story of the tower of Babel to the allegories of Revelation, imperialism is viewed with scepticism. The implication is not just that such centralised power might lead to evil, but that it inevitably will; as Lord Acton famously remarked, ‘power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.’ Handing so much power over to a non-divine authority is asking for trouble. Although the current authorities might be benign, there is always the risk of future ones being less so, and the near-certainty of missing or stolen data being misused at some point.

Much has been made of the ‘mark of the beast’ (666) in Revelation 13, and the warning that no one would be able to buy and sell without such a mark on their forehead or hand. In applying this prophesy to today’s society, some have gone so far as to suggest that the ‘mark’ will be an implanted chip or tattooed bar code – perhaps not such a stretch of the imagination given the rise of RFID tags. However, it is likely that the original number referred to the emperor Nero, the letters of whose name total 666 when written in Hebrew/Aramaic characters (each of which is ascribed a numeric value); the restrictions in buying and selling may allude to coinage bearing his image, or contracts prefaced with a declaration of allegiance to the Roman gods (including the emperor).

The warning is that the concentration of power with one individual or government results in reduced personal freedom and a rival for our loyalty. There is also a misplaced trust in technology, which risks being given an almost messianic status: “If we could just spend enough on the new resources, if we could gather enough information, if we could only track and record every individual movement and every transaction, we would be safe.”

None of this provides an answer to the problems of crime or an alternative to ANPR and other surveillance methods. But it does raise some objections and caution against placing too much trust in the centralisation of power inherent in the surveillance society.
† For a description of each of these, see BBC: How we are being watched

For more on the ethics surrounding RFID technology, also see: IEEE Spectrum: RFID inside: The murky ethics of implanted chips

  • Share/Bookmark

U.K. lawyer: Attacks on religious freedom a symptom of wider attacks

Friday, May 29th, 2009

The following article is from The Catholic News Service this morning:-

By Simon Caldwell

LONDON (CNS) — Attacks on freedom of religion and conscience are attacks on freedom itself, said a leading Catholic lawyer.

Neil Addison, a criminal lawyer and a nationally recognized expert in discrimination law, said in a lecture at the London Oratory that England was becoming an increasingly intolerant and authoritarian country.

He highlighted a number of cases in which Christians had been penalized for their religious convictions and warned, “Attacks on religious freedom are symptomatic of wider attacks on freedom.”

“If we want to defend freedom of religion, then we have to defend the idea of freedom itself,” said Addison, the author of the legal textbook “Religious Discrimination and Hatred Law.”

“We are in a society which is increasingly intolerant, repressive, regulated and untrusting and, in consequence, we have officials who are dictatorial, interfering and untrustworthy,” he said.

Britain has entered an “era of increasing government interference and regulation of what used to be regarded as private life and an increasing intolerance of those who disagree,” he said.

“What we have today is a governmental system which does not acknowledge the right of religion to have its own sphere, nor does it respect the right of religious organizations to defend their own identity and to preserve their own integrity,” he said.

The church is always the first victim of authoritarianism because the church exists “as an organization that is, or should be, independent of the state and which has a basis for its motivation and thinking which is independent of the state,” Addison said.

He said the Equality Bill currently before the British Parliament attacked freedom of association by denying churches the right to choose their employees, with the exception of priests and religious teachers.

“We need to defend the principle of civil society in which associations and organizations as well as individuals have rights and are allowed the freedom to preserve their distinctive nature and contribution to society as a whole,” Addison said.

“It is no coincidence that the first thing any totalitarian state does is to regulate and control association, organizations and churches,” he added. “We need to be alert to this danger, and we need to defend the rights of churches and other organizations, not simply in order to defend religious freedom but in order preserve freedom itself.”

His speech, “Religious Freedom in England Today,” was delivered May 20; the text was released to journalists May 27.

Addison told Catholic News Service May 20 that he first appreciated the gravity of the threat to religious freedom when the European Parliament vetoed the proposed appointment of Italian Christian Democrat Rocco Buttiglione as a justice commissioner after he said, in answer to a question, that he thought gay sex was sinful.

In 2007 Addison co-founded the Thomas More Legal Centre in Warrington, England, in response to rising demand for legal advice among Christians clashing with either their employers or with government authorities.

In his lecture, Addison said he had advised doctors, nurses and pharmacists with conscientious objections to involvement in abortion and distribution of the morning-after pill.

“Their right to moral conscientious objection is simply being dismissed as ‘imposing your morality on others,’ which ignores the fact that to make somebody do or participate in something they consider to be immoral is in itself is the imposition of a view of morality,” he said.

The refusal to recognize the legitimacy of conscience and morality has consequences beyond the issues of abortion or homosexuality themselves, he said.

“Politicians are infantilizing us as a society by removing our ability to think in moral terms,” he said.

Addison said freedom of speech was also under attack and there were cases involving people who had been fired or suspended from their jobs after expressing opinions — in private conversations — that were not politically correct.

“If you read the history of Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union or the East German Stasi, one point is very clear and consistent: Totalitarian states do not recognize or respect the distinction between private and public life,” he said. “In a totalitarian state there is no such thing as a private conversation.”

He said the noble vision of England as a nation of free people was being allowed to die and “we need to fight to defend it again because it is an England that is worth fighting for.”

“We as Christians cannot separate ourselves from the society in which we live, nor should we want to do so; similarly, we cannot separate the defense of our religious freedom from the defense of freedom itself,” he said.

  • Share/Bookmark

Public Sector Prejudice Against Christians

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

Following article is from The Christian Institute:-

Harman snubs ‘prejudice against Christians’ plea

The Minister for Equality, Harriet Harman, has ignored an MP’s call for a House of Commons debate on prejudice against Christians in the public sector.

The appeal came from Conservative MP Julian Brazier during House of Commons Business Questions on Thursday.

Miss Harman played down his concerns and ignored the call for a debate. She said she would refer his point to the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

Addressing Miss Harman in her capacity as Leader of the House of Commons, Mr Brazier asked: “May I appeal for a debate during the forthcoming term on prejudice against Christians in a growing proportion of the public services?”

He cited “a string of incidents involving health service and local authority workers being penalised for offering to pray for people, for saying “God bless” to them and so on”.

He added that “the worst case of all” is that of the experienced Christian foster mother who was caring for a sixteen-year-old girl from a Muslim background.

When the girl chose to convert to Christianity, the local authority banned the mother from fostering and took the girl back into care. The loss of income has since caused the foster carer to lose her home.

Mr Brazier completed his remarks by urging the Leader of the House, Miss Harman, “to consider this a worthy subject for a debate in the House”.

Miss Harman, who is also Minister for Women and Equality, said: “I shall refer the honourable Gentleman’s point to the relevant Minister in the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

“This is really just a matter of basic good practice and common sense. There is nothing in any law or guidance that requires people to act daft.”

Mr Brazier has previously raised similar concerns in his blog for the Conservative Cornerstone Group.

In February he wrote: “In our bid to prove a religiously tolerant country I believe we are going too far the other way.

“Recently we have seen a succession of pernicious attacks on Christianity by aggressive secularism.”

He mentioned Caroline Petrie, the nurse suspended for offering to pray for a patient, pointing out that “The fact that Mrs. Petrie showed obvious compassion for her patient’s wellbeing seems to have been irrelevant to this health trust”.

He also referred to the foster carer again, and to Jennie Cain, the school receptionist whose five-year-old daughter was scolded by a teacher for talking to a classmate about Christianity.

“Are we really saying that as a society we no longer have a place for compassionate Christians who serve the public good?” he asked.

  • Share/Bookmark

eChurchWebsites Blog Shortlisted For Best Christian Blog 2009 Award

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

I am really chuffed to say that this blog has been nominated on the shortlist for the 2009 Christian Blog of the year.

This competition is run by the website Surefish (owned by Christian Aid) in association with the Church Times. Make sure you check them out and get your vote in!

I’m not expecting to win because there are so many good quality Christian blogs out there on the Internet, and in truth, I am really pleased to be able to say that :)

Please remember that if you want a Christian website or blog, for you, your ministry, or church, get in contact with me for a chat.

Blessings

Webmaster

  • Share/Bookmark

SPURGEON THOUGHTS ON THE LAST BATTLE

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

The sting of death is sin, and the strength of sin is the law. But
thanks to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ
” 1 Corinthians 15:56, 57

WHILE the Bible is one of the most poetical of books, though its language
is unutterably sublime, yet we must remark how constantly it is true to
nature. There is no straining of a fact, no glossing over a truth. However
dark may be the subject, while it lights it up with brilliance, yet it does not
deny the gloom connected with it. If you will read this chapter of Paul’s
epistle, so justly celebrated as a master-piece of language you will find him
speaking of that which is to come after death with such exaltation and
glory, that you feel, “If this be to die, then it were well to depart at once.”
Who has not rejoiced, and whose heart has not been lifted up, or filled with
a holy fire, while he has read such sentences as these: “In a moment, in the
twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the
dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this
corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on
immortality.

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and
this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the
saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. O Death, where is
thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?” Yet with all that majestic
language, with all that bold flight of eloquence, he does not deny that death
is a gloomy thing. Even his very figures imply it. He does not laugh at it, he
does not say, “Oh, it is nothing todie;” he describes death as a monster, he
speaks of it as having a sting, he tells us wherein the strength of that sting
lies and even in the exclamation of triumph he imputes that victory not to
unaided flesh, but he says, “Thanks be to God which giveth us the victory
through our Lord Jesus Christ.”

When I select such a text as this, I feel that I cannot preach from it. The
thought overmasters me, my words do stagger: there are no utterances that
are great enough to convey the mighty meaning of this wondrous text. If I
had the eloquence of all men united in one, if I could speak as never man
spake, (with the exception of that one godlike man of Nazareth) I could
not compass so vast a subject as this. I will not therefore pretend to do so,
but offer you such thoughts as my mind is capable of producing.
To night we shall speak of three things: first, the sting of death; secondly,
the strength of sin; and thirdly, the victory of faith.

I. First, THE STING OF DEATH. The apostle pictures death as a terrible
dragon or monster, which, coming upon all men, must be fought with by
each one for himself. He gives us no hopes whatever that any of us can
avoid it. He tells us of no bridge across the river Death; he does not give us
the faintest hope that it is possible to emerge from this state of existence
into another without dying: he describes the monster as being exactly in
our path, and with it we must fight, each man personally, separately, and
alone; each man must die; we all must cross the black stream; each one of
us must go through the iron gate. There is no passage from this world into
another without death. Having told us, then, that there is no hope of our
escape, he braces up our nerves for the combat; but he gives us no hope
that we shall be able to slay the monster; he does not tell us that we can
strike our sword into his heart, and so overturn and overwhelm death; but
pointing to the dragon, he seemed to say. “Thou canst not slay it, man,
there is no hope that thou shouldst ever put thy foot upon its neck and
crush its head; but one thing can be done – it has a sting which thou mayest
extract; thou canst not crush death under foot, but thou mayest pull out the
sting which is deadly, and then thou needst not fear the monster, for
monster it shall be no longer, but rather it shall be a swift winged angel to
waft thee aloft to heaven.”

Where, then, is the sting of this dragon? Where
must I strike? What is the sting? The apostle tells us that “The sting of
death is sin.” Once let me cut off that, and then, though death may be
dreary and solemn, I shall not dread it; but holding up the monster’s sting, I
shall exclaim, “O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?”
Let us now dwell upon the fact, that “the sting of death is sin.”

I. First, sin puts a sting into death from the fact that sin brought death into
the world. Men could be more content to die if they did not know it was a
punishment. I suppose if we had never sinned there would have been some
means for us to go from this world to another. It cannot be supposed that
so huge a population would have existed that all the myriads who have
lived from Adam down till now could ever have inhabited so small a globe
as this, there would not have been space enough for them. But there might
have been provided some means for taking us off when the proper time
should come, and bearing us safely to heaven. God might have furnished
horses and chariots of fire for each of his Elijahs; or as it was said of
Enoch, so it might have been declared of each of us, “He is not, for God
hath taken him.” Thus to die, if we may call it death, to depart from this
body and to be with God, would have been no disgrace; in fact it would
have been the highest honor: fitting the loftiest aspiration of the soul, to
live quickly its little time in this world, then to mount and be with its God;
and in the prayers of the most pious and devout man, one of his sublimest
petitions would be, “O God, hasten the time of my departure, when I shall
be with thee.” When such sinless beings thought of their departure they
would not tremble, for the gate would be of ivory and pearl – not as now, of
iron – the stream would be as nectar, far different from the present
“bitterness of death.”

But alas! how different! Death is now the punishment
of sin. “In the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” “In Adam all
die.” By his sin every one of us become subject to the penalty of death, and
thus, being a punishment, death has its sting. To the best man, the holiest
Christian, the most sanctified intellect, the soul that has the nearest and
dearest intercourse with God, death must appear to have a sting, because
sin was its mother. O fatal offspring of sin, I only dread thee because of thy
parentage! If thou didst come to me AS an honor, I could wade through
Jordan even now, and when its chilling billows were around me I would
smile amidst its surges; and in the swellings of Jordan my song should swell
to, and the liquid music of my voice should join with the liquid swellings of
the floods, “Hallelujah! It is blessed to cross to the land of the glorified.”
This is one reason why the sting of death is sin.

2. But I must take it in another sense. “The sting of death is sin:” – that is to
say, that which shall make death most terrible to man will be sin, if it is
not forgiven. If that be not the exact meaning of the apostle, still it is a
great truth, and I may find it here. If sin lay heavy on me and were not
forgiven  -if my transgressions were unpardoned – if such were the fact
(though I rejoice to know it is not so) it would be the very sting of death to
me. Let us consider a man dying and looking back on his past life: he will
find in death a sting, and that sting will be his past sin. Imagine a
conqueror’s death-bed. He has been a man of blood from his youth up.
Bred in the camp, his lips were early set to the bugle, and his hand, even in
infancy, struck the drum. He had a martial spirit; he delighted in the fame
and applause of men, he loved the dust of battle and the garment rolled in
blood. He has lived a life of what men call glory. He has stormed cities,
conquered countries, ravaged continents, overrun the world. See his
burners hanging in the hall, and the marks of glory on his escutcheon. He is
one of earth’s proudest warriors. But now he comes to die; and when he
lies down to expire what shall invest his death with horror? It shall be his
sin.

Methinks I see the monarch dying; he lies in state; around him are his
nobles and his counsellors; but there is someone else there. Hard by his
side there stands a spirit from Hades; it is the soul of a departed woman.
She looks on him and says, “Monster! my husband was slain in battle
through thy ambition: I was made a widow, and my helpless orphan and
myself were starved.” And she passes by. Her husband comes, and opening
wide his bloody wounds, he cries, “Once I called thee monarch; but by thy
vile covetousness, thou didst provoke an unjust war. See here these
wounds – I gained them in the siege. For thy sake I mounted first the sealing
ladder; this foot stood upon the top of the wall, and I waved my sword in
triumph, but in hell I lifted up my eyes in torment. Base wretch, thine
ambition hurried me thither!” Turning his horrid eyes upon him, he passes
by. Then up comes another, and another, and another yet: waking from
their tombs, they stalk around his bed and haunt him; the dreary procession
still marches on, looking at the dying tyrant. He shuts his eyes, but he feels
the cold and bony hand upon his forehead; he quivers for the sting of death
is in his heart. “O Death!” says he, “to leave this large estate, this mighty
realm, this pomp and power – this were somewhat, but to meet those men,
those women, and shoes orphan children, face to face, to hear them saying,
‘Art thou become like one of us?’ while kings whom I have dethroned, and
monarchs whom I have cast down shall rattle their chains in my ears, and
say, “Thou wast our destroyer, but how art thou fallen from heaven, O
Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou brought down as in a moment
from thy glory and thy pride!’” There you see the sting of death would be
the man’s sin. It would not sting him that he had to die but that he had
sinned, that he had been a bloody man, that his hands were red with
wholesale murder – this would plague him indeed, for “the sting of death is
sin.”

Or suppose another character  -a minister. He has stood before the world,
proclaiming something which he called the gospel. He has been a noted
preacher: the multitude have been hanging on his lips, they have listened to
his words, before his eloquence a nation stood amazed, and thousands
trembled at his voice. But his preaching is over; the time when he can
mount the pulpit is gone; another standing place awaits him, another
congregation, and he must hear another and a better preacher than himself.
There he lies. He has been unfaithful to his charge. He preached philosophy
to charm his people, instead of preaching truth and aiming at their hearts.
And as he pants upon his bed, that worst and most accursed of men – for
sure none can be worse than he – there comes up one, a soul from the pit,
and looking him in the face, says, “I came to thee once trembling on
account of sin, I asked thee the road to heaven, and thou didst say, ‘Do
such-and-such good works,’ and I did them, and am damned. Thou didst
tell me an untruth; thou didst not declare plainly the word of God.” He
vanishes only to be followed by another, he has been an irreligious
character, and as he sees the minister upon his death-bed, he says, “Ah! and
art thou here? Once I strolled into thy house of prayer, but thou hadst such
a sermon that I could not understand. I listened; I wanted to hear
something from thy lips, some truth that might burn my soul and make me
repent; but I knew not what thou saidst, and here I am.” The ghost stamps
his foot, and the man quivers like an aspen leaf, because he knows it is all
true. Then the whole congregation arise before him as he lies upon his bed,
he looks upon the motley group; he beholds the snowy heads of the old,
and the glittering eyes of the young; and lying there upon his pillow, he
pictures all the sins of his past life, and he hears it said, “Go thou!
unfaithful to thy charge: thou didst not divest thyself of thy love of pomp
and dignity; thou didst not speak

“As though thou ne’er might’st speak again,
A dying man to dying men.”

Oh! it may be something for that minister to leave his charge, somewhat
for him to die; but worst of all, the sting of death will be his sin, to hear his
parish come howling after him to hell, to see his congregation following
behind him in one mingled herd, he having led them astray, having been a
false prophet instead of a true one, speaking peace, peace, where there was
no peace, deluding them with lies, charming them with music, when he
ought rather to have told them in rough and rugged accents the word of
God. Verily it is true, it is true, the sting of death to such a man shall be his
great, his enormous, his heinous sin of having deluded others.

Thus, then, having painted two full-length pictures, I might give each one
of you miniatures of yourselves. I might picture, O drunkard, when thy
cups are drained, and when thy liquor shall no longer be sweet to thy taste,
when worse than gall shall be the danties that thou drinkest, when within
an hour the worms shall make a carnival upon thy flesh; I might picture
thee as thou lookest back upon thy misspent life. And thou, O swearer,
methinks I see thee there with thine oaths echoed back by memory to thine
own dismay. And thou man of lust and wickedness thou who hast
debauched and seduced others, I see thee there and the sting of death to
thee, how horrible, how dreadful! It shall not be that thou art groaning with
pain, it shall not be that thou art racked with agony, it shall not be that thy
heart and flesh faileth; but the sting, the sting shall be thy sin. How many in
this place can spell that word “remorse?” I pray you may never know its
awful meaning. Remorse, remorse! You know its derivation: it signifies to
bite. Ah! now we dance with our sins – it is a merry life with us – we take
their hands, and sporting in the noontide sun, we dance, we dance, and live
in joy. But then those sins shall bite us. The young lions we have stroked
and played with shall bite; the young adder, the serpent whose azure hues
have well delighted us, shall bite, shall sting when remorse shall occupy our
souls. I might, but I will not tell you, a few stories of the awful power of
remorse: it is the first pang of hell, it is the ante-chamber of the pit. To
have remorse is to feel the sparks that blaze upwards from the fire of the
bottomless Gehenna; to feel remorse is to have eternal torment commenced
within the soul. The sting of death shall be, unforgiven, unrepented sin.

3. But if sin in the retrospect be the sting of death, what must sin in the
prospect be? My friends, we do not often enough look at what sin is to be.
We see what it is: first the seed, then the blade, then the ear, and then the
full corn in the ear. It is the wish, the imagination, the desire, the sight, the
taste, the deed; but what is sin in its next development? We have observed
sin as it grows, we have seen it at first a very little thing but expanding
itself until it has swelled into a mountain. We have seen it like; “a little
cloud, the size of a man’s hand,” but we have beheld it gather until it
covered the skies with blackness and sent down drops of bitter rain. But
what is sin to be in the next state? We have gone so far, but sin is a thing
that cannot stop. We have seen whereunto it has grown, but whereunto
will it grow? for it is not ripe when we die; it has to go on still; it is set
going, but it has to unfold itself for ever. The moment we die the voice of
justice cries “Seal up the fountain of blood, stop the stream of forgiveness;
he that is holy let him be holy still” he that is filthy let him be filthy still.”
And after that the man goes on growing filthier and filthier still; his lust
develops itself; his vice increases; all those evil passions blaze with ten-fold
more fury, and, amidst the companionship of others like himself, without
the restraints of grace, without the preached word the man becomes worse
and worse; and who can tell whereunto his sin may grow?

I have
sometimes likened the hour of our death to that celebrated picture which I
think you have seen in the National Gallery, of Perseus holding up the head
of Medusa. That head turned all persons into stone who looked upon it.
There is a warrior there with a dart in his hand: he stands stiffened, turned
into stone, with the javelin even in his fist. There is another with a poignard
beneath his robe about to stab he is now the statue of an assassin,
motionless and cold. Another is creeping along stealthily, like a man in
ambuscade, and there he stands a consolidated rock, he has looked only
upon that head, and he is frozen into stone. Well, such is death. What I am
when death is held before me, that I must be for ever. When my spirit goes,
if God finds me hymning his praise, I shall hymn it in heaven; doth he find
me breathing out oaths, I shall follow up those oaths in hell. Where death
leaves me, judgment finds me. As I die, so shall I live eternally.

“There are no acts of pardon passed
In the cold grave to which we haste.”

It is for ever for ever, for ever! Ah! there are a set of heretics in these days
who talk of short punishment, and preach about God’s transporting souls
for a term of years and then letting them die. Where did such men learn
their doctrine, I wonder? I read in God’s word that the angel shall plant
one foot upon the earth, and the other upon the sea, and shall swear by him
that liveth and was dead, that time shall be no longer; But if a soul could
die in a thousand years it would die in time; if a million of years could
elapse, and then the soul could be extinguished, there would be such a
thing as time, for talk to me of years, and there is time. But, sirs, when that
angel has spoken the word, “Time shall be no longer,” things will then be
eternal; the spirit shall proceed in its ceaseless revolution of weal or woe,
never to be stayed, for there is no time to stop it; the fact of its stopping
would imply time, but everything shall be eternal, for time shall cease to be.

It well becomes you then to consider where ye are and what ye are. Oh!
stand and tremble on the narrow neck of land ‘twixt the two unbounded
seas, for God in heaven alone can tell how soon thou mayest be launched
upon the eternal future. May God grant that when that last hour may come,
we may be prepared for it! Like the thief, unheard, unseen, it steals through
night’s dark shade. Perhaps, as here I stand, and rudely speak of these dark
hidden things, soon may the hand be stretched, and dumb the mouth that
lisps the faltering strain. Oh! thou that dwellest in heaven, thou power
supreme, thou everlasting King, let not that hour intrude upon me in an
illspent season, but may it find me wrapt in meditation high, hymning my
great Creator. So in the last moment of my life I will hasten beyond the
azure, to bathe the wings of this my spirit in their native element, and then
to dwell with thee for ever -

“Far from a world of grief and sin,
With God eternally shut in.”

II. “THE STRENGTH OF SIN is the law.”
I have attempted to show how to fight this monster – it is by extracting and
destroying its sting. I prepare myself for the battle. It is true I have sin led,
and therefore I have put a sting into death but I will endeavor to take it
away. I attempt it, but the monster laughs me in the face, and cries, “The
strength of sin is the law. Before thou canst destroy sin thou must in some
way satisfy the law. Sin cannot be removed by thy tears or by thy deeds,
for the law is its strength, and until thou hast satisfied the vengeance of the
law, until thou hast paid the uttermost farthing of its demands, my sting
cannot be taken away for the very strength of sin is the law.” Now, I must
try and explain this doctrine, that the strength of sin is the law. Most men
think that sin has no strength at all “Oh!” say many, “we may have sinned very much, but we will repent, and we will be better for the rest of our lives, no doubt God is merciful, and he will forgive us.” And we hear many divines often speak of sin as if it were a very venial thing. Inquire of them what is a man to do? There is no deep repentance required, no real inward workings of divine grace, no casting himself upon the blood of Christ. They never tell us about a complete atonement having been made. They have, indeed, some shadowy idea of atonement, that Christ died just as a matter of form to satisfy justice, but as to any liberal taking away of our sins, and suffering the actual penalty for us, they do not consider that God’s law requires any such thing. I suppose they do not, for I never hear them assert the positive satisfaction and substitution of our Lord Jesus Christ. But, without that, how can we take away the strength of sin?

I. The strength of sin is in the law, first, in this respect, that the law being
spiritual it is quite impossible for us to live without sin. If the law were
merely carnal and referred to the flesh, if it simply related to open and
overt actions, I question even then, whether we could live without sin but
when I turn over the ten commandments and read, “Thou shalt not covet,”
I know it refers even to the wish of my heart. It is said, “Thou shalt not
commit adultery;” but it is said, also, that whosoever looketh on a woman
to lust after her hath already committed that sin. So that it is not merely the
act, it is the thought; it is not the deed simply, it is the very imagination,
that is a sin. Oh, now, sinner, how canst thou get rid of sin? Thy very
thoughts; the inward workings of thy mind, these are crimes – this is guilt
and desperate wickedness. Is there not, now, strength in sin? Hath not the
law put a potency in it? Has it not nerved sin with such a power that all thy
strength cannot hope to wipe away the black enormity of thy
transgression?

2. Then, again, the law puts strength into sin in this respect – that it will not
abate one tittle of its stern demands. It says to every man who breaks it, “I
will not forgive you.” You hear persons talk about God’s mercy. Now, if
they do not believe in the Gospel they must be under the law, but where in
the law do we read of mercy? If you will read the commandments through,
there is a curse after them, but there is no provision made for pardon. The
law itself speaks not of that; it thunders out, without the slightest
mitigation “the soul that sinneth it shall die.” If any of you desire to be
saved by works remember, one sin will spoil your righteousness; one speck
of this earth’s dross will spoil the beauty of that perfect righteousness
which God requires at your hands. If ye would be saved by works, men and
brethren, ye must be as holy as the angels, ye must be as pure and as
immaculate as Jesus; for the law requires perfection, and nothing short of
it; and God with unflinching vengeance, will smite every man low who
cannot bring him a perfect obedience. If I cannot, when I come before his
throne, plead a perfect righteousness as being mine, God will say, “You
have not fulfilled the demands of my law; depart, accursed one! You have
sinned, and you must die.” “Ah,” says one, “can we ever have a perfect
righteousness, then?” Yes, I will tell you of that in the third point; thanks
be unto Christ, who giveth us the victory through his blood and through his
righteousness, who adorns us as a bride in her jewels, as a husband arrays
his with ornaments.

3. Yet again, the law gives strength to sin from the fact that for every
transgression it will exact a punishment. The law never remits a farthing of
debt: it says, “Sin-punishment.” They are linked together with adamantine
chains; they are tied, and cannot be severed. The law speaks not of sin and
mercy; mercy comes in the gospel. The law says, “Sin-die; transgress-be
chastised; sin-hell.” Thus are they linked together. Once let me sin, and I
may go to the foot of stern justice, and, as with blind eyes, she holds the
scales, I may say, “Oh, Justice, remember, I was holy once, remember that
on such and such an occasion I did keep the law.” “Yes,” saith Justice, “all
I owe thee thou shalt have; I will not punish thee for what thou hast not
done; but remember you this crime, O sinner?” and she puts in the heavy
weight. The sinner trembles, and he cries, “But canst thou not forget that?
Wilt thou not cast it away?”; Nay,” saith Justice, and she puts in another
weighs. “Sinner, dost thou recollect this crime?” “Oh,” says the sinner,
“wilt thou not for mercy’s sake?” “I will not have mercy,” says Justice;
“Mercy has its own palace, but I have nought to do with forgiveness here;
mercy belongs to Christ. If you will be saved by justice you shall have your
full of it. If you come to me for salvation, I will not have mercy brought in
to help me, she is not my vicegerent, I stand here alone without her.” And
again, as she holds the scales, she puts in another iniquity, another crime,
another enormous transgression; and each time the man begs and prays that
he may have that passed by. Says Justice, “Nay, I must exact the penalty; I
have sworn I will, and I will. Canst thou find a substitute for thyself? If
thou canst, there is the only room I have for mercy. I will exact it of that
substitute, but even at his hands I will have the utmost jot and little; I will
abate nothing, I am God’s justice stern and unflinching, I will not alter I
will not mitigate the penalty.” She still holds the scales. The plea is in vain.
“Neverwill I change!’’ She cries; “bring me the blood, bring me the price to
its utmost; count it down, or else, sinner, thou shalt die.”

Now, my friends, I ask you, if ye consider the spirituality of the law, the
perfection it requires, and its unflinching severity, are you prepared to take
away the sting of death in your own persons? Can you hope to overcome
sin yourselves? Can you trust that by some righteous works you may yet
cancel your guilt? If you think so, go, foolish one, go! O madman, go!
work out thine own salvation with fear and trembling, without the God that
worketh in thee, go, twist thy rope of sand, go, build a pyramid of air, go,
prepare a house with bubbles, and think it is to last for ever, but know, it
will be a dream with an awful awakening, for as a dream when one
awaketh will he despise alike your image and your righteousness. “The
strength of sin is the law.”

III. But now, in the last place, we have before us THE VICTORY OF FAITH.
The Christian is the only champion who can smite the dragon of death, and
even he cannot do it of himself, but when he has done it, he shall cry,
“Thanks be to God who giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus
Christ.” One moment, and I will show you how the Christian can look
upon death with complacency through the merits of Jesus Christ.

First, Christ has taken away the strength of sin in this respect, that he has
removed the law. We are not under bondage, but under grace. Law is not
our directing principle, grace is. Do not misunderstand me. The principle
that I must do a thing – that is to say, the principle of law, “do, or be
punished; do, or be rewarded,” is not the motive of the Christian’s life; his
principle is grace. “God has done so much for me, what ought I to do for
him?” We are not under the law in that sense but under grace.
Then Christ has removed the law in this sense, that he has completely
satisfied it.

The law demands a perfect righteousness; “Christ says, “Law, thou hast it;
find fault with me. I am the sinner’s substitute, have I not kept thy
commandments? Wherein have I violated thy statutes?” “Come here, my
beloved,” he says, and then he cries to Justice, “Find a fault in this man I
have put my robe upon him; I have washed him in my blood. I have
cleansed him; from his sin. All the past is gone; as for the future, I have
secured it by sanctification; as for the penalty, I have borne it myself; at
one tremendous draught of love, I have drunk that man’s destruction dry. I
have borne what he should have suffered. I have endured the agonies he
ought to have endured. Justice, have I not satisfied thee? Did I not say
upon the tree, and didst thou not coincide with it, ‘It is finished! it is
finished!’ Have I not made so complete an atonement that there is now no
need for that man to die and expiate his guilt? Did I not complete the
perfect righteousness of this poor once condemned but now, justified
spirit?” “Yes,” saith Justice, “I am well satisfied, and even more content, if
possible, than if the sinner had brought a spotless righteousness of his own.

And now what saith the Christian after this? Boldly he comes to the realms
of death, and entering the gates there, he cries, “Who shall lay anything to
the charge of God’s elect!” And when he has said it, the dragon drops his
sting, he descends into the grave; he passes by the place where fiends lie
down in fetters of iron; he sees their chains, and looks into the dungeon
where they dwell, and as he passes by the prison door, he shouts, “Who
shall lay anything to the charge of God’s elect!” They growl, and bite their
iron bonds, and hiss in secret, but they cannot lay aught to his charge. Now
see him mount aloft. He approaches God’s heaven, he comes against the
gates, and faith still triumphantly shouts, “Who shall lay anything to the
charge of God’s elect?” And a voice comes from within: “Not Christ, for
he hath died; not God, for he hath justified.” Received by Jesus, faith enters
heaven, and again she cries, “Who,” even here among the spotless and
ransomed, “shall lay anything to the charge of God’s elect?” Now the law
is satisfied; sin is gone; and now surely we need not fear the sting of the
dragon, but we may say as Paul did, when he rose into the majesty of
poetry – such beautiful poetry, that Pope himself borrowed his words, only
transposing the sentences – ”O grave, where is thy victory? O death, where
is thy sting?”

If it were necessary tonight, I might speak to you concerning the
resurrection, and I might tell you how much that takes away the sting of
death, but I will confine myself to the simple fact, that “the sting of death is
sin,” that “the strength of sin is the law,” and that Christ gives us the
victory, by taking the sting away, and removing the strength of sin by his
perfect obedience.

And now, sirs, how many are there here who have any hope that for them
Christ Jesus died; Am I coming too close home, when most solemnly I put
the question to each one of you, as I stand in God’s presence this night, to
free my head of your blood; as I stand and appeal with all the earnestness
this heart is capable of. Are you prepared to die? Is sin pardoned? Is the
law satisfied? Can you view the flowing

“Of Christ’s soul-redeeming blood
With divine assurance knowing
That he made your peace with God?”

Oh, can ye now put one hand upon your heart, and the other upon the
Bible, and say, “God’s word and I agree; the witness of the Spirit here and
the witness there are one. I have renounced my sins, I have given up my
evil practices; I have abhorred my own righteousness; I trust in nought but
Jesu’s doings; simply do I depend on him.

‘Nothing in my hands I bring
Simply to thy cross I cling.’”

If so, should you die where you are -s udden death were sudden glory.
But, my hearers, shall I be faithful with you? or shall I belie my soul?
Which shall it be? Are there not many here who, each time the bell tolls the
departure of a soul might well ask the question, “Am I prepared?” and they
must say, “No.” I shall not turn prophet tonight, but were it right for me to
say so, I fear not one half of you are prepared to die. Is that true? Yea, let
the speaker ask himself the question, “Am I prepared to meet my Maker
face to face?’ Oh, sit in your seats and catechise your souls with that
solemn question. Let each one ask himself, “Am I prepared, should I be
call to die?” Methinks I hear one say with confidence, “I know that my
Redeemer liveth.” “Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.”

I hear another say with trembling accents
A guilty, weak, and helpless worm,
On Christ’s kind arms I fall;
He is my strength and righteousness,
My Jesus and my all

Yes, sweet words! I would rather have written that one verse than Milton’s
“Paradise Lost.” It is such a matchless picture of the true condition of the
believing soul. But I hear another say, “I shall not answer such a question
as that. I am not going to be dull today. It may be gloomy weather outside
today, but I do not want to be made melancholy.” Young man, young
man, go thy way. Let thine heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth; but
for all this the Lord shall bring thee to judgment. What wilt thou do,
careless spirit, when thy friends have forsaken thee, when thou art alone
with God? Thou dost not like to be alone young man, now, dost thou? A
falling leaf will startle thee. To be alone an hour will bring on an
insufferable feeling of melancholy. But thou wilt be alone – and a dreary
alone it will be – with God an enemy! How wilt thou do in the swellings of
Jordan? What wilt thou do when he taketh thee by the hand at eventide,
and asketh thee for an account; when he says, “What didst thou do in the
beginning of thy days? How didst thou spend thy life?” When he asks thee,
“Where are are the years of thy manhood?” When he questions thee about
thy wasted Sabbaths, and inquires how thy latter years were spent? What
wilt thou say then? Speechless, without an answer thou wilt stand. Oh, I
beseech you, as ye love yourselves, take care! Even now begin to weigh
the solemn matters of eternal life. Oh! say not, “Why so earnest? why in
such haste?” Sirs, if I saw you lying in your bed and your house was on
fire, the fire might be at the bottom of the house and you might slumber
safely for the next five minutes, but with all my might I would pull you
from your bed, or I would shout, “Awake! awake! the flame is under thee.”

So with some of you who are sleeping over hell’s mouth, slumbering over
the pit of perdition, may I not awake you? May I not depart a little from
clerical rules, and speak to you as one speaketh to his fellow whom he
loves? Ah! if I loved you not I need not be here. It is because I wish to win
your souls, and if it be possible, to win for my Master some honor, that I
would thus pour out my heart before you. As the Lord liveth, sinner, thou
standest on a single plank over the mouth of hell and that plank is rotten.
Thou hangest over the pit by a solitary rope, and the strands of that rope
are breaking. Thou art like that man of old, whom Dionysius placed at the
head of the table: before him was a dainty feast, but the man ate not, for
directly over his head was a sword suspended by a hair. So art thou, sinner.

Let thy cup be full, let thy pleasures be high, let thy soul be elevated. Seest
thou that sword? The next time thou sittest in the theater, look up and see
that sword the next time thou art in a tavern, look at that sword; when next
in thy business thou scornest the rules of God’s gospel, look at that sword.
Though thou seest it not, it is there. Even now ye may hear God saying to
Gabriel,-”Gabriel, that man is sitting in his seat in the hall, he is hearing,
but as though he heard not, unsheath thy blade. Let the glittering sword cut
through that hair, let the weapon fall upon him and divide his soul and
body.” Stop! thou Gabriel, stop! Save the man a little while. Give him yet
an hour, that he may repent. Oh, let him not die. True, he has been here
these ten or a dozen nights, and he has listened without a tear; but stop,
peradventure he may repent yet. Jesus backs up my entreaty, and he cries,
“Spare him yet another year, till I dig about him, and dung him, and though
he now cumbers the ground, he may yet bring forth fruit, that he may not
be hewn down and cast into the fire.” I thank thee, O God, thou wilt not
Cut him down tonight; but tomorrow may be his last day, Ye may never
see the sun rise, though you have seen it set.

Take heed. Hear the word of
God’s gospel, and depart with God’s blessing. “Whosoever believeth on
the name of the Lord Jesus Christ shall be saved.” “He that believeth and is
baptized shall be saved.” “He is able to save to the uttermost all that come
unto him.” Whosoever cometh unto him he will in no wise cast out.” Let
every one that heareth, say come; whosoever is athirst, let him come, and
take of.

  • Share/Bookmark

Christian candidates launch election campaign

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Article this morning from Christian Today

Campaigners for the Christian Party and Christian Peoples Alliance have taken clean brooms to Westminster to underline their commitment to sweeping reforms to the political system.

Launching their campaign bus at the weekend which will tour the London European electoral region, the two party leaders urged Christians and all people of goodwill to cast a vote for Christian integrity and truthfulness at the European elections on June 4.

For the first time ever in a UK election, there are candidates running on a Christian ticket across the United Kingdom.

Speaking at the launch, Christian Party Leader, Rev George Hargreaves, who is top of the London Region EU List, said: “Christianity has been at the heart of our national life for centuries.

“Our Christian religion promoted the public values of modesty, self-restraint, integrity, honesty and service that made the ‘Mother of Parliaments’ a democratic model for the world.

“Our campaign is about bringing those values back into the heart of politics, in Europe and then next year in Westminster.”

Councillor Alan Craig is Leader of the Christian Peoples Alliance, which is part of the wider family of Christian Democracy in Europe.

He said this election is an opportunity for the country to recognise the essential role that Christianity plays in shaping the national moral and political discourse.

“Half a century of corrosive and aggressive secularisation has created a selfish, superficial and materialistic culture amongst decision-makers and opinion-formers that is appropriately reflected in those we have elected to Parliament.

“We can have a criminal investigation and a reform of the expenses system, we can replace the speaker and even call a General Election, but none of these will get to the core of the problem.

“Rather we need to recognise that the active marginalisation of Christianity has led directly to the current moral malaise and that it is only the renewal and reassertion of those values that offers any hope for the moral authority of our Parliament and the long term future of our democratic institutions.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Christian Misrepresentation in the Media

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

I thought the below media article by George Pitcher (from the Telegraph) was quite interesting and revealing:-

MPs’ expenses: Things the Archbishops never told us

Dr Williams was making a good point about self-respect when he was misquoted, says George Pitcher.

I had lunch with George Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, on Friday, at an annual event hosted by a church newspaper of which he is a trustee. I’d like to tell you all he had to say, but the lunch was off the record. But I’m not breaking any confidences when I say that as we left lunch he made a point of saying that the Telegraph’s investigation of MPs’ expenses was “terrific”. Later, he emailed me to say: “The Telegraph has done us all a service. The public expects the highest standards from its elected representatives.”

Always nice to have a corporate pat on the back from someone as eminent as Lord Carey. But the exchange held extra significance because, unbeknown to either of us, as we were talking a column by his successor to the See of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, was being put to bed by The Times, along with the headline: “Archbishop appeals for end to MPs’ humiliation”.

When I relayed the headline to Lord Carey later, he said he was “surprised that Rowan is taking this approach”. So, presumably, was Dr Williams. Because actually he had said nothing of the sort. After writing that the expenses scandal was “as grave as could be for our parliamentary democracy” and calling for “urgent action” to “restore trust”, he said: “Many will be wondering if the point has not been adequately made; the continuing systematic humiliation of politicians itself threatens to carry a heavy price in terms of our ability to salvage some confidence in our democracy.” He then embarked on a thoughtful analysis of the role of self-respect in public morality. Message clear: it is MPs who have to recover our trust.

But the BBC dutifully followed the enough-humiliation line – which was as misrepresentative of what Dr Williams had to say as if I had written that Lord Carey had “slammed” him in a “furious row” after that lunch.

There is an obvious media psychology to note. The headline could as easily have read: “Humiliation of other media must stop”, as rival news organisations have flailed about in the wake of the Telegraph’s revelations. And, it should be said, an archbishop being misrepresented in a news story would itself hardly be newsworthy, causing nothing so much as rolled eyes of resignation in deaneries across the land, were it not for a far more serious misrepresentation a couple of days earlier.

Vincent Nichols, the new Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, greeted the Ryan Report into systematic abuse of children in Irish religious institutions over 70 years in an interview thus: “I think of those in religious orders and some of the clergy in Dublin who have to face these facts from their past which instinctively and quite naturally they’d rather not look at. That takes courage.”

This was widely reported in tones of faux outrage as the Archbishop saying that the abusers of children (many of whom are presumably now dead anyway) had been courageous in confessing their crimes. Some media outlets went so far as to suggest that Archbishop Nichols had “praised” the abusers for their courage and had even sought to “exonerate” them. Yet he had simply noted that it took courage for those in religious orders to face the abominations of their forebears.

Interestingly, there was a passage in Archbishop Nichols’s homily at his enthronement at Westminster last week that went almost completely overlooked, as he had a little pop at the media. He said: “Respectful dialogue is crucial… In this the media have such an important part to play, not by accentuating difference and conflict, but by enhancing creative conversation. Let us be a society in which we genuinely listen to each other… in which reasoned principles are not construed as prejudice and in which we are prepared to attribute to each other the best and not the worst of motives.”

It would be glib to suggest, as some politicians do at the moment over the expenses scandal, that it’s all the media’s fault. Or even that the media’s principal role should be “enhancing creative conversation”; that’s the sort of liberal salon talk that enrages Archbishop Nichols’s traditionalist critics. And it would be plain daft to contend that bishops don’t say stupid things.

As it happens, I think the Church of England’s current preoccupation with stopping people voting for the BNP is pretty dumb. For goodness sake, it even passed a motion at its General Synod to stop its clergy being members of the BNP, when none of them currently is. Talk about chasing the wrong issue.

And yet it remains a fact that bishops and church leaders aren’t always the only stupid interpreters of current affairs. When it comes to what they have to say, collectively we all have a responsibility to separate the wheat from the chaff.

They say silly enough things already without us having to make them look worse than they do when they have something sensible to say. So let’s be robust critics, but there are times when we should give them a break.

  • Share/Bookmark

Equality Bill is About Ideological Coercion

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Another article from Lifesitenews this morning:-

Critics Charge U.K. Equality Bill is About “Ideological Coercion” and Will “Reintroduce Discrimination into the Workplace”

By Hilary White

LONDON, May 25, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) – As the Labour government’s Equality act works its way through Parliament, critics are becoming increasingly vocal about the bill’s potential to stifle religious expression. A coalition of clergy, including sitting members of the House of Lords, some Labour MPs and leading opposition Conservative MPs have said that the bill is a direct threat to Britain’s ancient heritage of civil liberties and freedoms.

The government’s proposed Equality bill is not about protecting the rights of minorities, but about “ideological coercion,” said Charles Moore, a columnist with the Daily Telegraph. Moore compared the bill to the legislative structure which underpinned the South African apartheid regime.

The Equality act proposes to replace and amalgamate current law, to create a single Equalities Commission to cover all aspects of discrimination law and to outlaw all discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation in goods and services in both Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It also contains a provision relating to the creation of a public duty to promote equality on the ground of “gender.”

Moore warned that the agenda behind the Bill is “a gigantic, bureaucratic organisation of ideological coercion, promoting grievance, imposing cost and attacking businesses, charities, schools.”

Just as the architects of apartheid created “a vast edifice of legislation” to segregate South African society, “the ideologues of ‘Equality’ have sought to spin a single web to bind the entire structure of [British] society.”

The way the bill is structured, he said, requires adherence to an entire unified ideology. “Each ‘equality’ relates to every other,” he wrote earlier this month. “If you are in favour of, say, maternity leave, you must also support the legal recognition of trans-sexuals. You want better wheelchair access? Then you must be in favour of gay marriage.”

Tory MP Philip Davies slammed the bill, saying it had “nothing to do with equality,” and called it “incredibly misleadingly titled.”

“One of its central planks is not to enshrine equality in law but to reintroduce discrimination into the workplace.”

Andrea Williams, director of Christian Concern For Our Nation, which is helping co-ordinate opposition to the bill said, “No reasonable person supports the stirring up of hatred of any kind.”

“However, in 21st-century Britain we must find a way of being able to live peaceably alongside one another allowing for free and robust debate around every aspect of life, including reasonable criticism and discussion of all forms of sexual behaviour.”

Under the rubric of “anti-discrimination,” the Labour government continues its attempts to outlaw all criticism of the homosexual lifestyle in other bills. Last year, the proposed Criminal Justice and Immigration Act was introduced, which would have created the criminal offence of “incitement to hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation.”

The measure was defeated by a group of peers, led by the Tory Lord Waddington, who forced the government to accept an amendment that allowed “the discussion or criticism of sexual conduct or practices or the urging of persons to refrain from or modify such conduct or practices.” But a new clause being considered for the Coroners and Justice Bill would overturn this exemption.

Some Anglican bishops are opposing what they identify as an attempt to restrict freedom of expression for those who disagree with the homosexualist political doctrines. The Anglican bishop of Southwell and Nottingham told parliament last week “Our concern is with the potential application of the law to restrict legitimate discussion and expression of opinion about sexual ethics and sexual behaviour.”

Andrea Williams said that such legislation as the Equality Act and its relatives and antecedents are purely the work of the homosexualist political lobby who do not want their practices questioned.

Williams continued, “We are seeing case after case of Christians being discriminated against because of their biblical views on sexual conduct. It is time to take action before our laws silence any objection to homosexual practice.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Tony Blair is not someone worthy of trust on religious matters

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Article from Lifestenews this morning:-

Tony Blair “Not a Good Guide to the Teachings of the Catholic Church”: New Archbishop of Westminster

By Hilary White

LONDON, May 25, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The newly installed Archbishop of the Catholic diocese of Westminster, recently told Times columnist Dominic Lawson in an interview that former Prime Minister Tony Blair is not someone worthy of trust on religious matters. Archbishop Vincent Nichols called it “extraordinary” that Blair should have presumed to “lecture” the Pope on moral issues in an interview last month.

In April Blair gave an interview to a homosexualist magazine in which he attacked Pope Benedict XIV and the Catholic teaching on homosexuality. Nichols, however, said that Blair’s strong “political instincts,” are “not a good guide to the teachings of the Catholic Church.”

He continued, saying that “a bit more reflection is needed as to the relationship between political instinct in general – and certainly his – and the nature of the truth that the Church tries to put forward.

“Maybe he lacks a bit of experience in Catholic life.”

Nichols, usually described as a “conservative” by the British press, is widely credited with having helped spearhead the fight against the Blair government’s legislation that caused many of the British Catholic adoption agencies either to close or secularise in the face of new requirements that they allow adoption by homosexual partners.

At his May 21st installation Mass at Westminster Cathedral in London, Nichols urged Catholics to express themselves confidently in the public square. “Faith is never a solitary activity, nor can it be simply private,” he said. “Faith in Christ always draws us into a community and has a public dimension.”

In the Times, Lawson described Nichols, the former archbishop of Birmingham, as “still seething” over the adoption agency issue and describes him as never having “been afraid of taking the battle to the politicians when he feels his church is under attack.”

He quotes the Nichols saying, “We have been pushed out unnecessarily … It was a disproportionate response [by the government] and the victims are the children, not the church.”

Nichols said that all government adoption agencies except for the 11 Catholic ones accepted homosexual partners for consideration for adoptions, and therefore the Catholic agencies should have been allowed to opt out of the law.

However, critics of the archbishop’s reasoning point out that by the archbishop’s own admission, his own Birmingham Catholic adoption agency had “for years” been accepting single homosexuals as potential adopters against the teachings of the Church. In 2007, at the height of the adoption agency controversy, Nichols told the BBC in an interview that his agency was happy to adopt children out to single homosexuals but that the objection was only to those in legally recognised domestic arrangements.

The Birmingham diocesan agency would also allow single non-homosexuals and unmarried but cohabiting heterosexual couples to be considered.  However, the teaching of the Catholic Church says that to allow children to be adopted into irregular domestic situations, including with homosexual partners, unmarried single people or unmarried “common-law” partners, constitutes an act of “violence” to their natural development. Children, the Church teaches, have the right to be raised in the context of the natural family, with a mother and a father.

Critics have also pointed out that as head of the archdiocese of Birmingham, Nichols, with the rest of the Catholic bishops of England and Wales, had been fully briefed by an expert on Britain’s discrimination laws that it was unnecessary for any Catholic adoption agency either to close or secularise. “Regulation 18″ in the law allows them to operate according to their religious beliefs said Neil Addison, a barrister and the author of a textbook, “Religious Discrimination and Hatred Law.”

Addison told LifeSiteNews.com that there was no need under the law for any Catholic adoption agency in the UK to close or secularize, if they had been acting in accordance with Catholic teaching, or willing to change their practices to do so. Addison claims that the bishops were complicit in the closure or secularisation of the adoption agencies due to their unwillingness to fight for the religious nature of the agencies.

Addison told LSN that, with the exception of Bishop Patrick O’Donohue of Lancaster, the bishops of the Catholic Church of England and Wales simply ignored the existence of Regulation 18, claiming in the media that the government was forcing their adoption agencies to close.

  • Share/Bookmark

Nurse Sacked For Suggesting Church

Monday, May 25th, 2009

The following article is from our friend Andrea Minichiello Williams at the Christian Legal Centre

NURSE WITH 40 YEARS EXPERIENCE SACKED FOR SUGGESTING A PATIENT ‘GO TO CHURCH’ TO RELIEVE STRESS IN A TRAINING COURSE

A NHS Nurse with over 40-years experience has been sacked after he suggested two “patients” might go to Church to relieve stress during a role play session on a training course.

Committed Christian, Anand Rao, aged 71, was taking part in simulated situations as part of an exercise in palliative care. He had elected to go on the training session and found his own grant funding to do so. The Christian, a bank staff nurse in hospitals run by the Leicester NHS Trust, advised two persons playing the roles of husband and wife patients they might like to try going to church to relieve stress. He has recently instructed the Christian Legal Centre to advise him and is considering taking legal action for religious discrimination against his former employer.

Anand Rao says that he, and thousands of his former patients, will be staggered that someone who has given four decades to caring for people can be treated in the way he has.  He feels the action by his employers is “heavy handed and disproportionate”.

In the simulated exercise Mr Rao was involved in he was asked to advise the wife with a serious heart condition.  In the exercise the trainers were looking to elicit how a nurse would deal with advising a patient about reducing stress through the patient’s sexual intimacy with her husband. Mr Rao said: “Mrs. Jones [a made-up name] told me that her doctor had informed her that she would not live long and this had created stress. I advised her going to church might ease her anxiety and stress.” It is understood the woman “patient” in the role play situation felt she did not receive sympathetic, suitable advice.

The course directors raised this concern with Rao and told him that they do not want him to talk about God. Subsequently, the course organiser, Leicestershire and Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering (LOROS), sent a report to his employer raising concerns over his performance.

Mr Rao, who worked for the Leicester NHS Trust since May 2005, was initially suspended by his employer on the grounds that “concerns have been raised about your professional conduct by the course directors at LOROS.”  The care worker did not attend a disciplinary hearing on 23 January 2009 when the allegations against him were being examined as he had not been given, despite several requests, a copy of the questions and answers from his training meeting.  Mr Rao had his contract terminated in a letter from his employers which addressed concerns about his behavior at the training course.

Andrea Minichiello Williams, Director of CLC commented: “How is it possible that a nurse who has served the public for 40 years should find himself dismissed because in a training exercise he advised someone to go to Church?  To seek to censor and suppress this kind of language and belief is the first fruits of a closed society”.

  • Share/Bookmark

SPURGEON FORGIVENESS

Monday, May 25th, 2009

I, even I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins” Isaiah 43:25

THERE are some passages of sacred writ which have been more abundantly
blessed to the conversion of souls than others. They may be called
salvation texts. We may not be able to discover how it is, or why it is, but
certainly it is the fact, that some chosen verses have been more used of
God to bring men to the cross of Christ than any others in his Word.

Certainly they are not more inspired, but I suppose they are more
noticeable from their position, from their peculiar phraseology more
adapted to catch the eye of the reader, and more suitable to a prevailing
spiritual condition. All the stars in the heavens shine very brightly, but only
a few attract the eye of the mariner, and direct his course; the reason is
this, that those few stars from their peculiar grouping are more readily
distinguished, and the eye easily fixes upon them. So I suppose it is with
those passages of God’s Word which especially attract attention, and direct
the sinner to the cross of Christ. It so happens that this text is one of the
chief of them. I have found it, in my experience, to be a most useful one;
for out of the hundreds of persons who have come to me to narrate their
conversion and experience, I have found a very large proportion who have
traced the divine change which has been wrought in their hearts to the
hearing of this precious declaration of sovereign mercy read, and the
application of it with power to their souls: “I, even I, am he that blotteth
out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins.”

Hence I feel this morning somewhat pleased to have such a text, because I
anticipate that my Master will give me souls; and I feel likewise somewhat
afraid lest I should spoil the passage by my own imperfect handling thereof
I will, therefore, cast myself implicitly on the help of the Spirit, so that
whatever I speak, may be suggested by him, and whatever he saith that
may I speak, to the exclusion of my own thoughts as much as possible.

We shall notice first, this morning, the recipients of mercy – the persons of
whom the Lord is here speaking; secondly, the deed of mercy, — “I, even
I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions;” thirdly, the reasons for
mercy – ”for mine own sake;” and fourthly, the promise of mercy – ”I will not
remember thy sins.”

I. We are about to see who are THE RECIPIENTS OF MERCY; and I would
have you all listen, peradventure there be some strayed in here who are the
very chief of sinners – some who have sinned against light and knowledge,
who have gone the full length of their powers for sin, so that they come
here self-condemned, and fearing that for them there is neither mercy nor
pardon. I am about to talk to you of the lovingkindness of our glorious
Jehovah, and may some of you be led to read your own condition in those
characters which I shall describe to you.

If you will turn to your Bibles, you will find who are the persons here
spoken of. Look for example at the 22nd verse of the chapter from which
our text is taken, and you will see, first, that they were prayerless people:
“Thou hast not called upon me, O Jacob.” And are there not some
prayerless ones sitting or standing here this morning? Might I not walk
along these benches, and point my finger to one and another, and say,
“Thou art not a praying one?” Or might I not reach out my hand to one
and another upon this platform, and say, “Thou hast not been with God in
secret, and held heart converse with him?” These prayerless ones may have
repeated many a form of prayer, but the breathing desire, the living words,
have not come from their lips. Thou hast lived, sinner, up to this time
without sincere prayer, and if an ejaculation has bee forced from thy lips
from a fear that took hold of thee; if a cry has gone forth from thee when in
the sufferings of a sick bed, because the pains of death get hold upon thee;
if it has not been thy habit to pray, the impressions of that trying period
have soon been forgotten. Is prayer your constant practice, my hearers?
How many of you now before me, ay, and behind me too, must confess
that you have not prayed, that it is not your habit to hold communion with
God. Prayerless souls are Christless souls; for you can have no real
fellowship with Christ, no communion with the Father, unless you
approach his mercy-seat, and be often there; and yet if you are condemning
yourselves, and lamenting that this has been your condition, you need not
despair, for this mercy is for you: “Thou hast not called upon me, O
Jacob;” yet, “I, even I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine
own sake.”

Next, these persons were despisers of religion, for observe the language of
the same verse:- ”Thou hast been weary of me, O Israel.” And may I not
say to some here-thou despisest religion, thou hatest God; thou art weary
of him, and lovest not his services. As for the Sabbath-day, do not too
many of you find it the most tiresome day in the week, and do you not, in
fact, look over your ledger on the Sabbath afternoon? If you were
compelled to attend a place of worship twice on the Sabbath day, would
you not think it the greatest and most terrible hardship that could be
inflicted upon you? You have to find some worldly amusement to make the
hours of the Sabbath-day pass away with any comfort at all. So far from
wishing that “congregations might never break up” and the Sabbath last for
eternity, is it not to some of you the most tedious day of the week? You
feel it to be a weariness, and are glad when it is gone. You do not
understand the sentiment expressed by the poet:

“Sweet is the work, my God, my King,
To praise thy name, give thanks and sing.

You know nothing of the pain of banishment from the courts of Zion,
whither the sacred tribes repair; and when there you do not hold
communion with God, rejoicing that the hallowed place has become a
Bethel – the house of God – the very gate of heaven. You can never say-

“My willing soul would stay
In such a frame as this
And sit and sing herself away
To everlasting bliss.”

Ah, no! not only is religion unlovely to you, but it is a weariness. But if you
are now convinced of this sin, and are repenting of it, and desire to be
delivered from its power, then God speaks to you this morning, and says,
“I, even I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake return unto me, with unfeigned repentance, and I will have mercy upon
you.”

Note, again, the character. They have been thankless persons: “Thou hast
not brought me the small cattle of thy burnt offerings.” They have been
unthankful. They had their cattle and their flocks all multiplied and
increased many fold, but they did not bring even one of the small cattle to
him in return. Thou never gavest him a kid for a burnt offering, but hast
been like the swine, regardless of the oak which strews food upon the
ground for thee; thou hast been a carnal worldly character, receiving a gift,
but never thanking the Almighty who caused it to be bestowed; while the
little chicken, after it has drunk of the stream, lifteth its head, as if to thank
God who provided the water. Thou hast been fed, day by day, by an
Almighty power, and yet thou hast never given in return even one of the
small cattle of thy flock for a burnt offering. This is true of some who
attend our houses of prayer; they very rarely give to any collection for the
cause of God; they are like the man in America, of whom some one has
told us, who boasted that religion had been to him a very cheap thing,
costing him only a few cents a year, of whom a good man said, “The Lord
nave mercy on your little stingy soul.” If a man has no more religion than
that, if he has not a religion that will make him generous, he has no religion
at all.

I thought of that passage last Thursday night, while I was preaching:
“Thou hast bought me no sweet cane with money.” God needeth nothing at
your hands, but he likes little presents, he loves now and then to receive of
your substance; for you know that little as it is in his eyes, comparatively
speaking it is great, because it comes from a friend. But some of you have
never bought him a sweet cane with your money – never sang a hymn to his
praise; you have attributed everything to your good luck, and have boasted
that you have obtained everything you have got by the labor of your own
hands, and that you can say, I have need to thank nobody for what I have.
That has been thy spirit; thou hast given no thanks to God, – the God of
heaven and earth; thou hast not glorified him, but thyself, and yet the Most
High is willing to pardon thy sin in this thing, if thou art but unfeignedly
penitent, and dost sue for forgiveness, for he saith also to you, “I, even I,
am he that blotteth out thy transgressions.”

Yet, again, these people were a useless people. “Neither hast thou filled me
with the fat of thy sacrifices; but thou hast made me to serve with thy sins.”
It is well said, the chief end of man is to glorify God. For that purpose God
made the sun, moon, and stars, and all his works, that they might honor
him. And yet how many are there, even, perhaps among my hearers this
morning, who have never honored God in their lives. Ask yourselves what
have you done? If you were to write your own history, it would be little
better than that of Belzon’s toad, which existed in the rock for three
thousand years; you may have lived like it, but you have done nothing.
What souls have you ever won to the Savior? How has his name been
magnified by you? Have you ever served him? How have you ever worked
for him? What have you done for God? Have you not been cumberers of
the ground; taking the nourishment of the earth where some better tree
might have grown, and bearing no fruit to the great husbandman, or at
least, only a few sorry crabs, that were not worth his acceptance. For all
you have done, the world might as well have never known you. You have
not been even so much use as the glowworm, which, at least, serves to
light the steps of the traveler. The world may possibly be glad to get rid of
some of you, and rejoice when you are gone. Perhaps you have assisted in
destroying the souls of those with whom you have been connected in life.
You can recollect the time when you led that young man first into the ale
house. You can remember the hour when you swore a most horrible oath;
your child was within hearing, and learned to be profane also. You may
look upon some souls who are going even now to damnation through your
example; and in hell you may see spirits starting up from their iron beds,
and hear them shrieking in their woe: “Who is it that led me here, and
caused my soul to be destroyed? – thou art the author of my damnation.” Is
the indictment true? Will you not be compelled to plead guilty to the
charge? Do you not even now repent of your great transgressions? Even if
it be so, my Master authorises me to say again, “This saith the Lord, I,
even I, am he that blotteth out my transgressions, and will not remember
thy sins.”

Again, there are some who may be termed sanctuary sinners – sinners in
Zion – and these are the worst of sinners. I can usually tell whether inquirers
have been the children of pious parents or no, if after a confession of great
guilt they feel unable to proceed at the remembrance of what they once
were groaning, and sobbing, and tears running down their cheeks, are the
silent language of their woe. When I see this, I always know that the
language that succeeds will be: “I have been the child of pious parents; and
I feel that I am one of the worst of sinners, because I was brought up to
religion; and yet I disregarded it, and turned aside from it.” O yes, the
worst of sinners are sinners in Zion, because they sin against light and
knowledge; they force their way to hell, as John Bunyan says, over the
Cross of Christ; and the worst way to hell is to go by the cross to it. Many
of you now before me were consecrated to God by a beloved mother, and
your father taught you to read and love the Scriptures of truth. You were
brought up like Timothy; you well understand the theory of the way of
salvation, and yet you come here, young men, some of you enemies to God
and without Christ, and despisers of his word; some of you are even
scoffers, or if not actually scoffers, you say religion is nought to you, and
by your actions, if not by your words, declare it is nothing to you that Jesus
should die. Ah! when I speak to you, I would not forget myself. Should it
ever be my lot to wake up in hell, I should be amongst the most horribly
damned there, for I had a most pious training, and should be forced to take
my place with the sanctuary sinners. And you that are such, whom I am
addressing now, are you not afraid? Ask yourselves now, “Who among us
shall dwell with devouring fire?” Do you tremble and shake for fear, and
with a penitent heart desire forgiveness? If so, then I say again, in my
Master’s name – who spake nothing but love and mercy to penitent sinners,
who said, “Neither do I condemn thee” – Jehovah now declares “I, even I,
am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not
remember thy sins.”

Yet, once more, we have here men who had wearied God: “Thou hast
made me to serve with thy sins, thou hast wearied me with thine iniquities.”
You see the man who has been a professor of religion, and can look back
twenty years ago, when he was a member of a Christian church; he was
apparently walking in the fear of the Lord, and All men thought he had
received the grace of God in truth; but he has turned aside into the paths of
sin; sometimes his lips have been defiled with oaths, and his soul the
bondslave of sin; but even now he is often found in God’s house;
sometimes he is affected to tears, and says within himself, “Surely I will
return unto the Lord, for then was it better with me than now.” Self condemned, he stands and weeps in the bitterness of his heart; and mark
you, it may be this morning he has stepped into this vast assembly, and that
his knees are knocking one against the other, yet it may be that his
goodness shall prove like the morning cloud and the early dew, that
passeth away; or it may be that the turning point is now come; “Now or
never,” as Baxter used to say; now God or Satan, now accepted or
condemned. Poor backslider return unto the Lord, and he will have mercy
upon thee; he will blot out all thy sins; and so blot them out that he will not
remember them against thee any more for ever.

These, then, are the characters who receive mercy. Some of you may say,
“You seem to think us a bad lot “ – and so I do. Others exclaim, “How can
you talk to us in this way? We are a honest, moral, and upright people.” If
so, then I have no gospel to preach to you. You may go elsewhere if you
will, for you may get moral sermons in scores of chapels if you want them;
but I am come in my Master’s name to preach to sinners, and so I will not
say a word to you Pharisees except this – By so much as you think yourself
righteous and holy, by so much shall ye be cast out of God’s presence at
last. Your sentence will be eternal banishment from the presence of him
who hath said to every repenting sinner, “I, even I, am he that blotteth out
thy transgressions, and will not remember thy sins.”

II. The second point is, THE DEED OF MERCY. We have found out the
persons to whom God will give mercy; now what is mercy’s deed? It is a
deed of forgiveness, and in speaking of it, I shall speak first of its being a
divine forgiveness — “I, even I, am he.” Divine pardon is the only
forgiveness possible; for no one can remit sin but God only, and it matters
not whether a Roman Catholic Priest, or any other priest shall say in the
name of God, “I absolve thee from thy transgressions,” it is abominable
blasphemy. If a man has offended me I can forgive him, but if he has
offended God I cannot forgive him. The only discharge possible is pardon
by God; but then it is the only pardon necessary. Suppose I have so sinned
that the king or the queen will not pardon me, that my brethren will not
forgive me, and that I cannot pardon myself; if God absolves me, that is all
the acquittal that will be necessary for my salvation. Perhaps I stand
condemned by the lay of my country: I am a murderer and must suffer on
the scaffold; the queen refuses to pardon, and perhaps she does right in
such a refusal; but I do not want her forgiveness in order to enter heaven; if
God acquits me, that will be enough. Were I such a reprobate that all men
hissed at me and wished me gone from existence, if I knew that they would
never forgive my crime – though I ought to desire my fellow-creatures
forgiveness – it would not be necessary that I should have it to enter heaven.

If God says, I forgive thee, that is enough. It is only God that can forgive
satisfactorily; because no human pardon can ease the troubled conscience.
The self-righteous Pharisee may be content to give himself into the hands
of a priest to be rocked to sleep in the cradle of delusion, but the poor
convinced sinner wants something more than the arrogant dictum of a
priest – ten thousand of them, with all their enchantments, he feels to be all
in vain, unless Jehovah himself shall say, “I have blotted out thy sins for
mine own sake”

Again, it is surprising forgiveness; for the text speaks as if God himself
were surprised that such sins should be remitted: “I, even, I;” it is so
surprising that it is repeated in this way, lest any of us should doubt it. And
it is amazing to the poor sinner when first awakened to his sin and danger.
It seems to be too good too be true, and he “wonders to feel his own
hardness depart,” the mercy offered is so overwhelming. It is said that
Alexander, whenever he attacked a city, put a light before the gate of it;
and if the inhabitants surrendered before the light was burnt out, he spared
them; but if the light went out first, he put them all to death. But our
Master is more merciful than this; for if he had manifested grace only while
a small light would burn, where should we have been? There be some here
seventy or eighty years of age, and God has mercy on you still; but there is
a light you know which when once quenched, extinguishes all hope of
pardon – the light of life. See then, gray-headed man, thy candle is burnt
almost to the socket – it has but the snuff left. Seventy years thou hast been
here living in sin, and yet mercy waits on thee; but thou shalt soon depart,
and mark me, there is no hope for thee then. But surprising grace, mercy’s
message is still proclaiming-

For while the lamp holds out to burn,
The vilest sinner may return.”

Inutterable mercy! There is no sinner out of hell so black but that God can
wash him white. There is not out of the pit one so guilty that God is not
able and willing to forgive him; for he declares the wondrous fact – ”I, even
I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions.”

Notice once more, that it is a present forgiveness. It does not say I am he
that will blot out thy transgressions, but that blotteth them out now. There
are some who believe, or at least seem to imagine, that it is not possible to
know whether our sins are forgiven in this life. We may have hope, it is
thought, that at last there will be a balance to strike on our side. But this
will not satisfy the poor soul who is really seeking pardon, and is anxious
to find it; and God has therefore blessedly told us, that he blotteth out our
sin now; that he will do it at any moment the sinner believes. As soon as he
trusts in his crucified God, all his sins are forgiven, whether past, present,
or to come. Even supposing that he is yet to commit them, they are all
pardoned. If I live eighty years after I receive pardon, doubtless I shall fall
into many errors, but the one pardon will avail for them as well as for the
past.

Jesus Christ bore our punishment, and God will never require at my
hands the fulfillment of that law which Christ has honored in my stead; for
then would there be injustice in heaven: and that be far from God. It is no
more possible for a pardoned man to be lost than for Christ to be lost,
because Christ is the sinner’s surety. Jehovah will never require my debt to
be paid twice. Let none impute injustice to the God of the whole earth: let
none suppose that he will twice exact the penalty of one sin. If you have
been the chief of sinners, you may have the chief of sinner’s forgiveness,
and God can bestow it now.

I cannot help noticing the completeness of this forgiveness. Suppose you
call on your creditor, and say to him, “I have nothing to pay with.” “Well,”
says he, “I can issue a distress against you, and place you in prison and
keep you there.” You still reply that you have nothing and he must do what
he can. Suppose he should then say, “I will forgive all.” You now stand
amazed and say, “Can it be possible that you will give me that great debt of
a thousand pounds?” He replies, “Yes, I will.” “But how am I to know it?”
There is a bond: he takes it and crosses it all out and hands it back to you,
and says, “There is a full discharge, I have blotted it all out.” So does the
Lord deal with penitents. He has a book in which all your debts are written;
but with the blood of Christ he crosses out the handwriting of ordinances
which is there written against you. The bond is destroyed, and he will not
demand payment for it again. The devil will sometimes insinuate to the
contrary, as he did to Martin Luther. “Bring me the catalogue of my sins,”
said Luther; and he brought a scroll black and long. “Is that all?” said
Luther. “No,” said the devil; and he brought yet another. “And now,” said
the heroic saint of God, “write at the foot of the scroll: “The blood of Jesus
Christ his Son cleanseth from all sin.” That is a full discharge.”

III. Now, very briefly, the third thing – THE REASON FOR MERCY. Say
some poor sinner, “Why should God forgive me? I am sure there is no
reason why he should, for I have never done anything to deserve his
mercy.” Hear what God says, “I am not about to forgive you for your own
sake, but for my own sake.” “But, Lord, I shall not be thankful enough.” “I
am not about to pardon you because of your gratitude, but for my name’s
sake.” “But, Lord, if I am taken into thy church I can do very little for thy
cause in future years, for I have spent my best days in the devil’s service,
surely the impure dregs of my life cannot be sweet to thee, O God.” “I will
not engage to forgive you for your sake, but for my own. I do not want
you, says God, “I can do as well without you as with you; the cattle upon a
thousand hills are mine; and if I pleased I could create a whole race of men
for my service, who should be as renowned as the greatest monarchs, or
the most eloquent preacher, but I can do as well without them, as with
them; and I forgive you therefore for my own sake.” Is there not hope for a
guilty sinner here? It cannot be pleaded by any one that his sins are too
great to be pardoned, for the amount of guilt is hereby put entirely out of
consideration, seeing that God forgives not on account of the sinner, but
for his own sake. Did you never hear of a physician visiting a man upon a
sick bed, when the poor man said, “I have nothing to give you for your
attention to me.” “But,” says the doctor, “I did not ask for anything; I attend you from pure benevolence; and moreover to prove my skill. It will make no difference to me how long you live, I love to try my skill, and let the world know that I have power to heal diseases. I want to get myself a name.” And so God says, I desire to have a name for mercy, so that the worse you are, the more God is honored in your salvation. Go then to Christ, poor sinner, naked, filthy, poor, wretched, vile, lost, dead, come as thou art, for there is
nothing required in thee, except the need of him:

“This he gives you,
Tis his Spirit’s rising beam.”
“for mine own sake,” says God, “I will forgive.”

IV. Now to conclude – THE PROMISE OF MERCY. “And will not remember
thy sins.” There are some things which even God cannot do. Though it is
true he is Omnipotent, yet there are some things he cannot do. God cannot
lie – he cannot forsake his people – he cannot disown his covenant; and this is
one of the things it might be thought he could not do – that is, forget. Is it
impossible for God to forget? We finite creatures suffer many things to
skip, but can the Almighty ever do so? That God who counteth the stars
and calleth them all by their names – who knoweth how many animalculae
there are in the mighty ocean – who notices every grain of dust that floats in
the summer air, and is acquainted with every leaf of the forest, can he cease
to remember? Perhaps we may answer “No.” Not as to the absolute fact of
the committal of the deed; but there are senses in which the expression is
entirely accurate. In what sense are we to understand God’s forgetfulness
of our sins?

First of all, he will not exact punishment for them when we can come
before his judgment bar at last. The Christian will have many accusers.
The devil will come and say “that man is a great sinner” “I don’t remember
it,” says God. “That man rebelled against thee, and cursed thee,” says the
accuser. “I do not remember it,” says God, “for I have said I will not
remember his sins.” Conscience says, “Ah! but Lord, it is true, I did sin
against thee, and that most grievously.” “I do not remember it,” says God -
”I said, I will not remember his sins.” Let all the demons of the pit clamor
in God’s ear, and let them vehemently shout out a list of our sins, we may
stand boldly forth at that great day, and sing, “Who shall lay anything to
the charge of God’s elect?” for God does not even remember their sin. The
Judge does not remember it, and who then shall punish? Unrighteous as we
were; wicked as we have been; yet he has forgotten it all. Who then can
bring to remembrance what God has forgotten? He says, “I will cast thy
sins into the depths of the sea,” not into the shallows where they might be
fished up again, but into the depths of the sea, where Satan himself cannot
find them. There are no such things as sins recorded against God’s people.
Christ has so taken them away, that sin becomes a nonentity to Christians it
is all gone, and through Jesu’s blood they are clean.

The second meaning of this is, I will not remember thy sins to suspect thee.
There is a father, and he has a wayward son who went away that he might
live a life of looseness and profligacy, but after a while he comes home
again in a state of penitence. The father says, “I will forgive thee.” But he
says next day to his younger son, “There is business to be done at a distant
town tomorrow, and here is the money for you to do it with.” He does not
trust the returned prodigal with it. “I have trusted him before with money,”
says the father to himself, “and he robbed me, and it makes me afraid to
trust him again.” But our heavenly Father says, “I will not remember thy
sins.” He not only forgives the past, but trusts his people with precious
talents. He never suspects them. He has never one suspicious thought. He
loves them just as much as if they had never gone astray. He will employ
them to preach his gospel; he will put them into the Sunday school, and
make them servants of his Son: for he says, “I will not remember thy sins.”
Again: he will not remember in his distribution of the recompense of the
reward. The earthly parent will kindly pass over the faults of the prodigal;
but you know when that father comes to die, and is about to make his will,
the lawyer sitting by his side, he says, “I shall give so much to William,
who always behaved well, and my other son shall have so-and-so, and my
daughter, she shall have so much; but there is that prodigal, I have spent a
large sum upon him when he was young, but he wasted what he received,
and though I have taken him again into favor, and for the present he is
going on well; still I think I must make a little difference between him and
the others. I think it would not be fair – though I have forgiven him – to treat
him precisely as the rest;” and so the lawyer puts him down for a few
hundred pounds, while the others, perhaps, get their thousands. But God
will not remember your sins like that; he gives all an inheritance. He will
give heaven to the chief of sinners as well as to the chief of saints. When he
divides the portion to his children it may be he will put Mary Magdalene as
high as he does Peter, and the thief as high as he does John; yea, the
malefactor who died on the cross is as much in the sight of God as the
most moral person that ever lived.

Here is a blessed forgetfulness. What
sayest thou, poor sinner? Is thy heart drawn by a mysterious inspiration to
the foot of the cross? Then I thank my Master; for I trust the one object of
my life is to win souls for Christ, and if I may be blessed in that, my life
shall be happy. Still do you say, “My sins are too great to be forgiven.”
Nay, but O man, as high as the heaven is above the earth, so great is his
mercy above thy sins, and so far does his grace exceed thy thoughts. Oh,
but sayest thou, “He will not accept me.” What then is the meaning of this
text — “He is able to save unto the uttermost;” or this – ”Whosoever
cometh unto me I will in no wise cast out;” and again — “Whosoever will,
let him come and take of the water of life freely.” Do you still say, “This
does not include me.” Oh be not so faithless, but rather believe. Oh! had I
the power, God knows I would weep myself away in order to win your
souls.

But feeble our compassion proves
And can but weep where most it loves.

I can do nothing but preach God’s gospel; but since the moment Christ
forgave me, I cannot help speaking of his love. I turned away from his
gospel, and would have none of his reproofs. I cared not for his voice or
his Word. That blessed Bible lay unread; these knees refused to bend in
prayer, and my eyes looked on vanity. Has he not pardoned? Has he not
forgiven? Yes. Then sooner may this tongue cleave to the roof of my
mouth, than cease to proclaim free-grace in all its mighty displays of
electing, redeeming, pardoning, and saving mercy. Oh! how loud ought I to
sing, seeing I am out of hell, and delivered from condemnation. And if I am
out of hell, why should not you be? Why should I be saved and not
another? It was for sinners, remember, that Jesus came. Mary Magdalene,
Saul of Tarsus – the very chief of sinners, were accepted, and why do you
foolishly conclude that you are cast out? Oh, poor penitent if you perish,
you will be the FIRST penitent who ever did so. God give you his blessing,
my dear friends, for Christ’s sake. Amen.

  • Share/Bookmark

Bishops fight for right to criticise gay lifestyle

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Article from the Guardian this morning:-

Cross-party peers cite free speech defence to block changes to bill

Church of England bishops are on a collision course with the government over its plans to amend the incitement to hatred laws, claiming they will stifle what they believe is legitimate criticism of homosexual lifestyles.

In what is being portrayed in some parliamentary quarters as a battle for free speech, a coalition of Anglican bishops, Conservative peers, Labour malcontents and leading crossbenchers have united to block the proposals.

“No reasonable person supports the stirring up of hatred of any kind,” said Andrea Williams, director of Christian Concern For Our Nation, which is helping co-ordinate opposition to the plan. “However, in 21st-century Britain we must find a way of being able to live peaceably alongside one another allowing for free and robust debate around every aspect of life, including reasonable criticism and discussion of all forms of sexual behaviour.”

Last year’s Criminal Justice and Immigration Act created the criminal offence of “incitement to hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation”. But a group of peers, led by the Tory Lord Waddington, forced the government to accept an amendment stipulating that people should not be taken to court for stating that homosexual sex is wrong or for trying to persuade gay people to remain celibate. The clause read: “The discussion or criticism of sexual conduct or practices or the urging of persons to refrain from or modify such conduct or practices shall not be taken of itself to be threatening or intended to stir up hatred.”

Now a new clause inserted in the Coroners and Justice Bill would see this defence dropped. The majority of the Church of England’s bishops are believed to oppose dropping the defence, although there have been dissenters. “Our view is, if it isn’t broke don’t mend it,” a church spokesman said. “This is about freedom of speech and avoiding unnecessary police investigations.”

The Lord Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham, the Right Rev George Cassidy, told parliament last week “that people should be protected from inflammatory and intimidating behaviour towards them on the basis of their sexual orientation”. However, he added: “Our concern is with the potential application of the law to restrict legitimate discussion and expression of opinion about sexual ethics and sexual behaviour.”

Christian groups complain the current laws have already resulted in people being investigated for criticising homosexual lifestyles and claim more will be prosecuted if the amendment becomes law. They point to cases such as that of Kwabena Peat, a north London history teacher, who was dismissed for complaining that a staff away day was used to promote homosexual lifestyles.

In January 2006, Sir Iqbal Sacranie, then secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, was investigated by police for saying on radio that homosexual practice was unacceptable in terms of health and moral issues.

“The government seeks to remove this commonsense provision at the behest of the homosexual lobby who do not want to have their sexual practices questioned,” Williams said. “We are seeing case after case of Christians being discriminated against because of their biblical views on sexual conduct. It is time to take action before our laws silence any objection to homosexual practice.”

“There is, in our view, a very real danger of a chilling effect caused by this kind of legislation,” legal advice sought by Christian Concern from Simon Draycott QC concludes. “The harm is often done on the ground, when the police are pressed to intervene to stop a perfectly lawful speech or debate on the grounds that one of the speakers is stirring up hatred.”

But gay rights groups say the threshold for prosecution under incitement to hatred laws is set so high there is no danger that people who criticise homosexuality will be subject to police investigations if the clause in the Criminal Justice Act is dropped. “People must be free to express their views in temperate terms,” said Derek Munn, director of public affairs at Stonewall, the gay rights group. “We do not accept that people should be able to incite violence or hatred. This risks offering a defence to those who incite hatred.”

Given the opposition in the Lords, and pressures on the legislative timetable, the government may be forced to drop the proposal to get the bill passed.

  • Share/Bookmark

Nurse sacked over church advice

Monday, May 25th, 2009

The following article is from the BBC this morning:-

A nurse who says he was sacked for suggesting patients could become less stressed if they went to church could take action against the NHS trust.

Anand Rao said he made the comments to a woman in a training exercise and was suspended by University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust after a complaint.

He was dismissed after a disciplinary hearing. The Christian Legal Centre said it is considering legal action.

A trust spokesman said Mr Rao, 71, had “continuously” breached guidelines.

Mr Rao said that in the training exercise the woman had been playing the part of a patient with a life-threatening heart condition.

He said he told her she should go to church to alleviate stress.

Christian Legal Centre (CLC) director Andrea Minichiello Williams said the centre was now representing Mr Rao and was considering legal action against his former employer.

She said: “How is it possible that a nurse who has served the public for 40 years should find himself dismissed because in a training exercise he advised someone to go to church?

“To seek to censor and suppress this kind of language and belief is the fruits of a closed society.”

Kate Bradley, from the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, said Mr Rao’s contract was formally terminated in February after he failed to attend two disciplinary hearings.

She said: “Caring at its best is our motto, and it is important that every member of our staff, permanent or otherwise, deliver the best care possible to all of our patients regardless of their personal beliefs or lifestyle choices.

“The incident which led to the launch of the investigation was unfortunately not the first. Since joining us in 2005 Mr Rao had continuously shown a disregard for the Nursing and Midwifery’s code of conduct, which he had breached on more than one occasion.

“Mr Rao was given every opportunity to assure us that this would not happen again, but he was unable to do so and showed little regard for the standards of care and professionalism that is expected of him as a nurse.”

She added that Mr Rao was “welcome” to follow the trust’s formal appeals process.

  • Share/Bookmark

SPURGEON THE TWO EFFECTS OF THE GOSPEL

Saturday, May 23rd, 2009

For we are unto God a sweet savor of Christ, in them that are
saved, and in them that parish; to the one we are the savor of death unto death; and to the other the savor or life unto life. And Who is sufficient for these things?
” 2 Corinthians 2:15, 16

THESE are the words of Paul, speaking on the behalf of himself and his
brethren the Apostles, and they are true concerning all those who by the
Spirit are chosen, qualified, and thrust into the vineyard to preach God’s
gospel. I have often admired the 15th verse of this chapter, especially when
I have remembered from whose lips the words fell, “Now thanks be unto
God, which always causeth us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest
the savor of his knowledge by us in every place.” Picture Paul, the aged,
the man who had been beaten five times with “forty stripes save one,” who
had been dragged forth for dead, the man of great sufferings, who had
passed through whole seas of persecution – only think of him saying, at the
close of his ministerial career, “Now thanks be unto God, which always
causeth us to triumph in Christ!” to triumph when shipwrecked, to triumph
when scourged, to triumph in the stocks, to triumph under the stones, to
triumph amidst the hiss of the world, to triumph when he was driven from
the city and shook of I the dust from his feet, to triumph at all times in
Christ Jesus! Now, if some ministers of modern times should talk thus, we
would think little of it, for they enjoy the world’s applause. They can
always go to their place in ease and peace; they have an admiring people,
and no open foes; against them not a dog doth move his tongue; everything
is safe and pleasant. For them to say, “Now thanks be unto God, which
always causeth us to triumph “is a very little thing; but for one like Paul, so
trampled on, so tried, so distressed, to say it-then, we say, outspoke a
hero; here is a man who had true faith in God and in the divinity of his
mission.

And, my brethren, how sweet is that consolation which Paul applied to his
own heart amid all his troubles. “Notwithstanding all,” he says, “God
makes known the savor of his knowledge by us in every place.” Ah! with
this thought a minister may lay his head upon his pillow: “God makes
manifest the savor of his knowledge.” With this he may shut his eyes when
his career is over, and with this he may open them in heaven: “God hath
made known by me the savor of his knowledge in every place.” Then
follow the words of my text, of which I shall speak, dividing it into three
particulars. Our first remark shall be, that although the gospel is “a sweet
savor” in every place, yet it produces different effects in different persons;
“to one it is the savor of death unto death; and to the other the savor of life
unto life.” Our second observation shall be, that ministers of the gospel are
not responsible for their success, for it is said, “We are unto God a sweet
savor of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish.” And
thirdly, yet the gospel minister’s place is by no means a light one: his duty
is very weighty; for the Apostle himself said, “Who is sufficient for these
things?”

I. Our first remark is, that THE GOSPEL PRODUCES DIFFERENT EFFECTS. It
must seem a strange thing, but it is strangely true, that there is scarcely
ever a good thing in the world of which some little evil is not the
consequence. Let the sun shine in brilliance – it shall moisten the wax, it shall harden clay; let it pour down floods of light on the tropics – it will cause
vegetation to be extremely luxuriant, the richest and choicest fruits shall
ripen, and the fairest of all flowers shall bloom, but who does not know,
that there the worst of reptiles and the most venomous snakes are also
brought forth? So it is with the gospel. Although it is the very sun of
righteousness to the world, although it is God’s best gift, although nothing
can be in the least comparable to the vast amount of benefit which it
bestows upon the human race, yet even of that we must confess, that
sometimes it is the “savor of death unto death.” But then we are not to
blame the gospel for this; it is not the fault of God’s truth; it is the fault of
those who do not receive it. It is the “savor of life unto life” to every one
that listens to its sound with a heart that is open to its reception. It is only
“death unto death” to the man who hates the truth, despises it, scoffs at it,
and tries to oppose its progress. It is of that character we must speak first.

1. The gospel is to some men “a savor of death unto death.” Now, this
depends very much upon what the gospel is; because there are some things
called gospel that are “a savor of death unto death” to everybody that hears
them. John Berridge says he preached morality till there was not a moral
man left in the village; and there is no way of injuring morality like legal
preaching. The preaching of good works, and the exhorting men to
holiness, as the means of salvation, is very much admired in theory; but
when brought into practice, it is found not only ineffectual, but more than
that – it becomes even “a savor of death unto death.” So it has been found;
and I think even the great Chalmers himself confessed, that for years and
years before he knew the Lord, he preached nothing but morality and
precepts, but he never found a drunkard reclaimed by strewing him merely
the evils of drunkenness; nor did he find a swearer stop his swearing
because he told him the heinousness of the sin; it was not until he began to
preach the love of Jesus, in his great heart of mercy – it was not until he
preached the gospel as it was in Christ, in some of its clearness, fullness,
and power, and the doctrine, that “by grace ye are saved, through faith,
and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God” that he ever met with
success. But when he did preach salvation by faith, by shoals the drunkards
came from their cups, and swearers refrained their lips from evil speaking;
thieves became honest men, and unrighteous and ungodly persons bowed
to the scepter of Jesus. But ye must confess, as I said before, that though
the gospel does in the main produce the best effect upon almost all who
hear it either by restraining them from sin, or constraining them to Christ;
yet it is a great fact, and a solemn one, upon which I hardly know how to
speak this morning, that to some men the preaching of Christ’s gospel is
“death unto death,” and produces evil instead of good.

i. And the first sense is this. Many men are hardened in their sins by
hearing the gospel. Oh! ‘tis terribly and solemnly true, that of all sinners
some sanctuary sinners are the worst. Those who can dive deepest into sin,
and have the most quiet consciences and hardest hearts, are some who are
to be found in God’s own house. I know that a faithful ministry will often
prick them, and the stern denunciations of a Boanerges will frequently
make them shake. I am aware that the Word of God will sometimes make
their blood curdle within them; but I know (for I have seen the men) that
there are many who turn the grace of God into licentiousness, make even
God’s truth a stalking-horse for the devil, and abuse God’s grace to pallate
their sin. Such men have I found amongst those who hear the doctrines of
grace in their fullness. They will say, “I am elect, therefore I may swear; I
am one of those who were chosen of God before the foundation of the
world, and therefore I may live as I list.” I have seen the man who stood
upon the table of a public house, and grasping the glass in his hand, said,
“Mates! I can say more than any of you; I am one of those who are
redeemed with Jesus’ precious blood:” and then he drank his tumbler of ale
and danced again before them, and sang vile and blasphemous songs. Now,
that is a man to whom the gospel is “a savor of death unto death.” He
hears the truth, but he perverts it; he takes what is intended by God for his
good, and what does he do, he commits suicide therewith. That knife
which was given him to open the secrets of the gospel he drives into his
own heart. That which is the purest of all truth and the highest of all
morality, he turns into the panderer of his vice, and makes it a scaffold to
aid in building up his wickedness and sin. Are there any of you here like
that man – who love to hear the gospel, as ye all it, and yet live impurely?
who can sit down and say you are the children of God, and still behave like
liege servants of the devil? Be it known unto you, that ye are liars and
hypocrites, for the truth is not in you at all. “If any man is born of God, he
cannot sin.” God’s elect will not be suffered to fall into continual sin; they
will never “turn the grace of God into licentiousness;” but it will be their
endeavor, as much as in them lies, to keep near to Jesus. Rest assured of
this: “By their fruits ye shall know them.” “A good tree cannot bring forth
corrupt fruit; neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit.” Such men,
however, are continually turning the gospel into evil. They sin with a high
hand, from the very fact that they have heard what they consider excuses
their vice. There is nothing under heaven, I conceive, more liable to lead
men astray than a perverted gospel. A truth perverted is generally worse
than a doctrine which all know to be false. As fire, one of the most useful
of the elements, can also cause the fiercest of conflagrations, so the gospel,
the best thing we have, can be turned to the vilest account. This is one
sense in which it is “a savor of death unto death.”

ii. But another. It is a fact that the gospel of Jesus Christ will increase
some men’s damnation at the last great day. Again, I startle at myself
when I have said it; for it seems too horrible a thought for us to venture to
utter – that the gospel of Christ will make hell hotter to some men than it
otherwise would have been. Men would all have sunk to hell had it not
been for the gospel. The grace of God reclaims “a multitude that no man
can number;” it secures a countless army who shall be saved in the Lord
with an everlasting salvation;” but, at the same time, it does to those who
reject it, make their damnation even more dreadful. And let me tell you
why.

First, because men sin against greater light; and the light we have is an
excellent measure of our guilt. What a Hottentot might do without a crime,
would be the greatest sin to me, because I am taught better; and what some
even in London might do with impunity – set down, as it might be, as a sin
by God, but not so exceeding sinful – would be to me the very height of
transgression, because I have from my youth up been tutored to piety. The
gospel comes upon men like the light from heaven. What a wanderer must
he be who strays in the light! If he who is blind falls into the ditch we can
pity him, but if a man, with the light on his eyeballs dashes himself from the
precipice and loses his own soul, is not pity out of the question?

“How they deserve the deepest hell,
That slight the joys above!
What chains of vengeance must they feel,
Who laugh at sov’reign love!”

It will increase your condemnation, I tell you all, unless you find Jesus
Christ to be your Savior, for to have had the light and not to walk by it,
shall be the condemnation, the very essence of it. This shall be the virus of
the guilt – that the “light came into the world, and the darkness
comprehended it not;” for “men love darkness rather than light, because
their deeds are evil.”

Again: it must increase your condemnation if you oppose the gospel. If
God devises a scheme of mercy, and man rises up against it, how great
must be his sin? Who shall tell the great guilt incurred by such men as
Pilate, Herod, and the Jews? Oh! who shall picture out, or even faintly
sketch, the doom of those who cried “Crucify him! Crucify him!” And who
shall tell what place in hell shall be hot enough for the man who slanders
God’s minister, who speaks against his people, who hates his truth, who
would, if he could, utterly cut off the godly from the land? Ah! God help
the infidel! God help the blasphemer! God save his soul: for of all men least
would I choose to be that man. Think you, sirs, that God will not take
account of what men have said? One man has cursed Christ; he has called
him a charlatan Another has declared, (knowing that he spoke a lie) that
the gospel was else. A third has proclaimed his licentious maxims, and then
has pointed to God’s Word, and said, “There are worse things there!” A
fourth has abused God’s ministers and held up their imperfections to
ridicule. Think you God shall forget all this at the last day? When his
enemies come before him, shall he take them by the hand and say, “The
other day thou didst call my servant a dog, and spit on him, and for this I
will give thee heaven!” Rather, if the sin has not been cancelled by the
blood of Christ, will he not say, “Depart, cursed one, into the hell which
thou didst scoff at; leave that heaven which thou didst despise; and learn
that though thou saidst there was no God, this right arm shall teach thee
eternally the lesson that there is one; for he who discovers it not by my
works of benevolence shall learn it by my deeds of vengeance: therefore
depart, again, I say!” It shall increase men’s hell that they have opposed
God’s truth. Now, is not this a very solemn view of the gospel, that it is
indeed to many “a savor of death unto death?”

iii. Yet, once more. I believe the gospel makes some men in this world
more miserable than they would be. The drunkard could drink, and could
revel in his intoxication with greater joy, if he did not hear it said, “All
drunkards shall have their portion in the lake that burneth with fire and
brimstone.” How jovially the Sabbath breaker would riot through his
Sabbaths, if the Bible did not say, “Remember the Sabbath day to keep it
holy!” And how happily could the libertine and licentious man drive on his
mad career, if he were not told, “The wages of sin is death, and after death
the judgment!” But the truth puts the bitter in his cup; the warnings of God
freeze the current of his soul. The gospel is like the skeleton at the
Egyptian feast. Though by day he laughed at it, by night he will quiver as
the aspen leaf, and when the shades of evening gather around him, he will
shake at a whisper. At the thought of a future state his joy is spoiled, and
immortality, instead of being a boon to him, is in its very contemplation the
misery of his existence. The sweet wooings of mercy are to him no more
harmonious than peals of thunder, because he knows he despises them.
Yea I have known some who have been in such misery under the gospel,
because they would not give up their sins, that they have been reedy to
take their own lives. Oh! terrible thought! The gospel is “a savor of death
unto death.” Unto how many here is it so? Who are now hearing God’s
Word to be damned by it? Who shall retire hence to be hardened by the
sound of the truth? Why, every man who does not believe it, for unto those
that receive it, it is “a savor of life unto life,” but to unbelievers it is a
curse, and “a savor of death unto death.”

2. But, blessed be God, the gospel has a second power. Besides being
“death unto death,” it is “a savor of life unto life.” Ah! my brethren, some
of us could speak, if we were allowed this morning, of the gospel as being
“a savor of life” to us. We can look back to that hour when we were “dead
in trespasses and sins.” In vain all Sinai’s thunders, in vain the rousing of
the watchmen; we slept on in the death-sleep of our transgressions; nor
could an angel have aroused us. But we look back with joy to that hour
when first we stepped within the walls of a sanctuary, and savingly heard
the voice of mercy. With some of you it is but a few weeks. I know where
ye are and who ye are. But a few weeks or months ago ye too were far
from God, but; now ye are brought to love him. Canst thou look back my
brother Christian, to that very moment when the gospel was “a savor of
life” to thee – when thou didst cast, away thy sins, renounce the lusts, and
turning to God’s Word, received it with full purpose of heart? Ah! that
hour – of all hours the sweetest! Nothing can be compared there with. I
knew a person who for forty or fifty years had been completely deaf.
Sitting one morning at her cottage door as some vehicle was passing; she
thought she heard melodious music. It was not music, it was but the sound
of the vehicle. Her ear had suddenly opened, and that rough sound seemed
to her like the music of heaven, because it was the first she had heard for
so many years. Even so, the first time our ears were opened to hear the
words of love – the assurance of our pardon – we never heard the word so
well as we did then; it never seemed so sweet; and perhaps, even now, we
look back and say,

“What peaceful hours I then enjoyed!
How sweet their memory still!”
When first it was “a savor of life” unto our souls.

Then, beloved, if it ever has been “a savor of life,” it will always be a savor
of life,” because it says it is not a savor of life unto death, but “a savor of
life unto life.” Now I must aim another blow at my antagonists the
Arminians; I cannot help it. They will have it that sometimes the gospel is a
savor of life unto death. They tell us that a man may receive spiritual life,
and yet may die eternally. That is to say, a man may be forgiven, and yet be
punished afterwards, he may be justified from all sin, and yet after that, his
transgressions can be laid on his shoulders again. A man may be born of
God, and yet die; a man may be loved of God, and yet God may hate him
tomorrow. Oh! I cannot bear to speak of such doctrines of lies; let those
believe them that like. As for me, I so deeply believe in the immutable love
of Jesus that I suppose that if one believer were to be in hell, Christ himself
would not long stay in heaven, but would soon cry, “To the rescue! to the
rescue!” Oh! if Jesus Christ were in glory with one of the gems wanting in
his crown, and Satan had that gem in hell, he would say, “Aha! prince of
light and glory, I have one of thy jewels!” and he would hold it up, and
then he would say, Aha! thou didst die for this man, but thou hadst not
strength enough to save him; thou didst love him once – where is thy love? It
is not worth having, for thou didst hate him afterwards!” And how would
he chuckle over that heir of heaven, and hold him up, and say, “This man
was redeemed. Jesus Christ purchased him with his blood:” and plunging
him in the waves of hell, he would say, “There purchased one! see how I
can rob the Son of God!” And then again he would say, “This man was
forgiven; behold the justice of a God! He is to be punished after he is
forgiven. Christ suffered for this man’s sins, and yet,” says Satan with a
malignant joy, “I have him afterwards, for God exacted the punishment
twice!” Shall that e’er be said? Ah! no. It is “a savor of life unto life,” and
not of life unto death. Go, with your vile gospel; preach it where you
please; but my Master said, “I give unto my sheep eternal life.” You give to
your sheep temporary life, and they lose it; but, says Jesus, “I give unto my
sheep ETERNAL life, and they shall never perish, neither shall any man
pluck them out of my hands.”

I generally wax warm when I get to this
subject because I think few doctrines more vital than that of the
perseverance of the saints for if ever one child of God did perish, or if I
knew it were possible that one could I should conclude at once that I must,
and I suppose each of you would do the same; and then where is the joy
and happiness of the gospel? Again I tell you the Arminian gospel is the
shell without the kernel; it is the husk without the fruit, and those who love
it may take it to themselves. We will not quarrel with them. Let them go
and preach it. Let them go and tell poor sinners that if they believe in Jesus
they will be damned after all, that Jesus Christ will forgive them, and yet
the Father send them to hell. Go and preach your gospel, and who will
listen to it? And if they do listen, is it worth their hearing? I say no; for if I
am to stand after conversion on the same footing as I did before
conversion, then it is of no use for me to have been converted at all. But
whom he loves he loves to the end.

“Once in Christ, in Christ for ever:
Nothing from his love can sever.”

It is “a savor of life unto life.” And not only “life unto life” in this world,
but; of life unto life” eternal. Every one who has this life shall receive the
next life; for “the Lord will give grace and glory, and no good thing will he
withhold from them that walk uprightly.”

I am obliged to leave this point; but if my Master will but take it up and
make his word; a savor of life unto life” this morning, I shall rejoice in
what I have said.

II. But our second remark was, that THE MINISTER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE
FOR HIS SUCCESS. He is responsible for what he preaches; he is
accountable for his life and actions; but he is not responsible for other
people. If I do but preach God’s word, if there never were a soul saved,
the King would say, “Well done, good and faithful servant!” If I do but tell
my message, if none should listen to it, he would say, “Thou hast fought
the good fight: receive thy crown.” You hear the words of the text: “We
are unto God a sweet savor of Christ, as well in them that perish, as in
them that are saved.” This will appear, if I just tell you what a gospel
minister is called in the Bible. Sometimes he is called an ambassador. Now,
for what is an ambassador responsible? He goes to a country as a
plenipotentiary; he carries terms of peace to the conference: he uses all his
talents for his master; he tries to show that the war is inimical to the
prosperity of the different countries; he endeavors to bring about peace;
but the other kings haughtily refuse it. When he comes home does his
master say, “Why did not you make peace?” “Why, my Lord,” he would
say, “I told them the terms; but they said nothing.” “Well, then,” he will say
“thou hast done thy duty; I am not to condemn thee if the war continues.”

Again: the minister of the gospel is called a fisherman. Now a fisherman is
not responsible for the quantity of fish he catches, but for the way he
fishes. That is a mercy for some ministers, I am sure, for they have neither
caught fish, nor even attracted any round their nets. They have been
spending all their life fishing with most elegant silk lines, and gold and
silver hooks; they always use nicely polished phrases; but the fish will not
bite for all that, whereas we of a rougher order have put the hook into the
jaws of hundreds. However, if we cast the gospel net in the right place,
even if we catch none, the Master will find no fault with us. He will say,
“Fisherman! didst thou labor? Didst thou throw the net into the sea in the
time of storms?” “Yes, my Lord, I did.” “What hast thou caught?” “Only
one or two.” “Well, I could have sent thee a shoal, if it so pleased me; it is
not thy fault. I give in my sovereignty where I please, or withhold when I:
choose; but as for thee, thou hast well labored, therefore there is thy
reward.”

Sometimes the minister is called a sower. Now, no farmer expects
a sower to be responsible for the harvest; all he is responsible for is, does
he sow the seed? and does he sow the right seed? If he scatters it on good
soil, then he is happy; but if it falls by the way-side, and the fowls of the air
devour it, who shall blame the sower? Could he help it? Nay, he did his
duty; he scattered the seed broad-cast, and there he left it. Who is to
blame? Certainly not the sower. So, beloved, if a minister comes to heaven
with but one sheaf on his shoulder, his Master will say “O reaper! once a
sower! where didst thou gather thy sheaf?” “My Lord, I sowed upon the
rock, and it would not grow, only one seed on a chance Sabbath-morning
was blown a little awry by the wind, and it fell on a prepared heart; and this
is my one sheaf.” “Hallelujah!” the angelic choirs resound, “one sheaf from
a rock is more honor to God than a thousand sheaves from a good soil;
therefore let him take his seat as near the throne as yon man, who, stooping
beneath his many sheaves, comes from some fertile land, bringing his
sheaves with him.”

I believe that if there are degrees in glory, they will not
be in proportion to success, but in proportion to the earnestness of our
endeavors. If we mean right, and if with all our heart we strive to do the
right thing as ministers if we never see any effect, still shall we receive the
crown. But how much more happy is the man who shall have it in heaven
said to him, “He shines for ever, because he was wise, and won many souls
unto righteousness.” It is always my greatest joy to believe that if I should
enter heaven, I shall in future days see heaven’s gates open, and in shall fly
a cherub, who, looking me in the face, will smilingly pass along to God’s
throne, and there bow down before him; and when he has paid his homage
and his adoration, he may fly to me, and though unknown, shall clasp my
hand; and if there were tears in heaven surely I should weep, and he would
say, “Brother, from thy lips I heard the word; thy voice first admonished
me of my sin, here I am, and thou the instrument of my salvation.” And as
the gates open one after another, still will they come in, souls ransomed,
souls ransomed; and for each one of these a star – for each one of these
another gem in the diadem of glory – for each one of them another honor,
and another note in the song of praise. Blessed be that man that shall die in
the Lord, and his works shall follow him; for thus saith the Spirit.

What will become of some good Christians now in Exeter Hall, if crowns
in heaven are measured in value by the souls that are saved? Some of you
will have a crown in heaven without a single star in it. I read a little while
ago, a piece upon the starless crown in heaven – a man in heaven with a
crown without a star! Not one saved by him! He will sit in heaven as happy
as he can be, for sovereign mercy saved him; but oh! to be in heaven
without a single star! Mother! what sayest thou to be in heaven without
one of thy children to deck thy brow with a star? Minister! what wouldst
thou say to be a polished preacher, and yet have no star? Writer! will it
well become thee to have written even as gloriously as Milton, if thou
shouldst be found in heaven without a star? I am afraid we pay too little
regard to this. Men will sit down and write huge folios and tomes, that they
may have them put in libraries for ever, and have their names handed down
by fame! but how few are looking to win stars for ever in heaven! Toil on,
child of God, toil on; for if thou wishest to serve God, thy bread cast upon
the waters shall he found after many days. If thou sendest in the feet of the
ox or the ass, thou shalt reap a glorious harvest in that day when he comes
to gather in his elect. The minister is not responsible for his success.

III. But yet, in the last place, TO PREACH THE GOSPEL IS HIGH AND
SOLEMN WORK. The ministry has been very often degraded into a trade. In
these days men are taken and made into ministers who would have made
good captains at sea, who could have waited well at the counter, but who
were never intended for the pulpit. They are selected by man, they are
crammed with literature, they are educated up to a certain point, they are
turned out ready dressed; and persons call them ministers. I wish them all
God-speed, every one of them, for as good Joseph Irons used to say, “God
be with many of them if it be only to make them hold their tongues.”

Man made ministers are of no use in this world, and the sooner we get rid of
them the better. Their way is this: they prepare their manuscripts very
carefully, then read it on the Sunday most sweetly in sotto voce, and so the
people go away pleased. But that is not God’s way of preaching. If so, I
am sufficient to preach forever, I can buy manuscript sermons for a shilling,
that is to say, provided they have been preached fifty times before, but if I
use them for the first time the price is a guinea, or more. But that is not the
way. Preaching God’s word is not what some seem to think, mere child’s
play – a mere business or trade to be taken up by any one. A man ought to
feel first that he has a solemn call to it, next, he ought to know that be
really possesses the Spirit of God, and that when he speaks there is an
influence Upon him that enables him to speak as God would have him,
otherwise out of the pulpit he should go directly; he has no right to be
there, even if the living is his own property. He has not been called to
preach God’s truth, and unto him God says, “What hast thou to do, to
declare my statutes?”

But you say “What is there difficult about preaching God’s gospel?” Well it
must be somewhat hard, for Paul said, “Who is sufficient for these things?”
And first I will tell you, it is difficult because it is so hard as not to be
warped by your own prejudices in preaching the word. You want to say a
stern thing, and your heart says, “Master! in so doing thou wilt condemn
thyself;” then the temptation is not to say it. Another trial is, you are afraid
of displeasing the rich in your congregations. Your think, “If I say such-and-such a thing, so-and-so will be offended; such an one does not approve of that doctrine; I had better leave it out.” Or perhaps you will happen to win the applause of the multitude, and you must not say anything that will displease them, for if they cry, “Hosanna “to day, they will cry, “Crucify, crucify,” tomorrow.

All these things work on a minister’s heart. He is a
man like yourselves; and he feels it. Then comes again the sharp knife of
criticism, and the arrows of those who hate him and hate his Lord; and he
cannot help feeling it sometimes. He may put on his armor, and cry, “I care
not for your malice,” but there were seasons when the archers sorely
grieved even Joseph. Then be stands in another danger, lest he should
come out and defend himself; for he is a great fool whoever tries to do it.
He who lets his detractors alone, and like the eagle cares not for the
chattering of the sparrows, or like the lion will not turn aside to rend the
snarling jacka – he is the man, and he shall be honored. But the danger is,
we want to set ourselves right. And oh! who is sufficient to steer clear
from these rocks of danger? “Who is sufficient,” my brethren, “for these
things?” – To stand up, and to proclaim, Sabbath after Sabbath, and weekday
after week day, “the unsearchable riches of Christ.”

Having said thus much, I may draw the inference – to close up – which is: if
the gospel is “a savor of life unto life,” and if the minister’s work be solemn
work, how well it becomes all lovers of the truth to plead for all those who
preach it, that they may be “sufficient for these things.” To lose my Prayerbook, as I have often told you, is the worst thing that can happen to me. To have no one to pray for me would place me in a dreadful condition.
“Perhaps,” says a good poet, “the day when the world shall perish, will be
the day unwhitened by a prayer;” and, perhaps, the day when a minister
turned aside from truth, was the day when his people left off to pray for
him, and when there was not a single voice supplicating grace on his
behalf. I am sure it must be so with me. Give me the numerous hosts of
men whom it has been my pride and glory to see in my place before I came
to this hall; give me those praying people, who on the Monday evening met
in such a multitude to pray to God for a blessing, and we will overcome
hell itself, in spite of all that may oppose us. All our perils are nothing, so
long as we have prayer. But increase my congregation; give me the polite
and the noble, – give me influence and understanding,- and I should fail to do
anything without a praying church. My people! shall I ever lose your
prayers? Will ye ever cease your supplications? Our toils are nearly ended
in this great place, and happy shall we be to return to our much-loved
sanctuary. Will ye then ever cease to pray? I fear ye have not uttered so
many prayers this morning as ye should have done; I fear there has not
been so much earnest devotion as might have been poured forth. For my
own part, I have not felt the wondrous power I sometimes experience. I
will not lay it at your doors; but never let it be said, “Those people, once so
fervent, have become cold!” Let not Laodiecanism get into Southwark; let
us leave it here in the West-end, if it is to be anywhere; let us not carry it
with us. Let us “strive together for the faith once delivered unto the
saints:” and knowing in what a sad position the standard bearer stands, I
beseech you rally round him; for it will be ill with the army,

“If the standard bearer fall, as fall full well he may.
For never saw I promise yet, of such a deadly fray.”

Stand up my friends; grasp the banner yourselves, and maintain it erect
until the day shall come, when standing on the last conquered castle of
hell’s domains, we shall raise the shout, “Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!
The Lord God Omnipotent reigneth!” Till that time, fight on.

  • Share/Bookmark

Candi Staton You Got The Love

Saturday, May 23rd, 2009

I love this tune, most folks don’t realise that this is a song about Jesus!

  • Share/Bookmark